SatoshiDICE.com - The World's Most Popular Bitcoin Game

[1982dre]

Great job fixing the graphs ... much work to do still, without 2fa I would never consider sending coins to a bitcoin  site.

It is required to temporarily unlock the account before withdrawing. When requesting an unlock, our system sends a confirmation link to the user's email address. Clicking this link will unlock the account for 3 minutes.

We are adding additional 2FA as soon as possible.

Email isn't good enough for 2fa. If your computer is compromised, both email and password are known to the attacker. The idea behind 2fa is that attacker needs to compromise 2 devices - computer and phone. SMS counts as 2fa, but it's not convenient for traveling people - can't receive SMS when you are traveling to another country. Authy or similar is preferable.

2fa is so easy to do, all sites do it. Find it hard to believe it is a huge problem..

It's indeed very easy to implement. Even scamsites uses it. 

[kidsuzudn]

any free faucet available ?

[klendor]

Looks good going to try this out

[RedGolpe]

who ever said 3,300 losses at 3% chance to win doesn't prove anything either is terrible at maths or genuinely retarded........

Who said that? You probably heard that a screenshot doesn't prove anything and made up the rest in your mind.

[enquirer]

site seems down

[adaseb]

site seems down

Yeah, big surprise .

Looks like its down again.

Basically like before, the site seems to be working because it loads your secret url but doesn't go any further. Wonder how much longer people are going to put up with all of these issues before moving on to more reliable websites that don't have any of these issues.

[Egjoshslim]

Just went on the shitty slots, 40 wilds, 0.50 mbit win. RIGGED. Just avoid the scamming cunts. Vermin. Hope the owners fail in life. They deserve fuck all.

Also site is at a crawl. Admins are incompetent.  I have been with you for ages. You have changed the odds. I only went on to see and it has indeed got worse.

[tarantoga]

Just went on the shitty slots, 40 wilds, 0.50 mbit win. RIGGED. Just avoid the scamming cunts. Vermin. Hope the owners fail in life. They deserve fuck all.

Also site is at a crawl. Admins are incompetent.  I have been with you for ages. You have changed the odds. I only went on to see and it has indeed got worse.

Why don't you just validate the hashes?
https://www.satoshidice.com/provably-fair/

[BTCevo]

Just went on the shitty slots, 40 wilds, 0.50 mbit win. RIGGED. Just avoid the scamming cunts. Vermin. Hope the owners fail in life. They deserve fuck all.

Also site is at a crawl. Admins are incompetent.  I have been with you for ages. You have changed the odds. I only went on to see and it has indeed got worse.

First of all why we should believe on what red trust people saying? Because there is no proof that they are scamming you unless you can give us some solid proof that correspond to your loss. And btw you can verify your bet result there so why dont you do that, instead of saying bad things about X sites better try to figure something out and give the solid proof to us

[adaseb]

Just went on the shitty slots, 40 wilds, 0.50 mbit win. RIGGED. Just avoid the scamming cunts. Vermin. Hope the owners fail in life. They deserve fuck all.

Also site is at a crawl. Admins are incompetent.  I have been with you for ages. You have changed the odds. I only went on to see and it has indeed got worse.

Well before you placed the bets they gave you a hashed seed,  you should of recorded that seed and then after you took bets. They give you the unhashed seed, so you can hash that seed and make sure its the same as your hashed seed as presented earlier. Then you can make a simple script and verify your bets to see if you were cheated.

I used to think many of used websites cheat also, but when you learn about provably fair you relise that most of the rolls are already predicted in advance and you can't change them in anyway. You don't need to even change your client seed because it won't make a difference.

Use this 3rd party site to compare your bets
https://dicesites.com/provably-fair

[andulolika]

Just went on the shitty slots, 40 wilds, 0.50 mbit win. RIGGED. Just avoid the scamming cunts. Vermin. Hope the owners fail in life. They deserve fuck all.

Also site is at a crawl. Admins are incompetent.  I have been with you for ages. You have changed the odds. I only went on to see and it has indeed got worse.

Well before you placed the bets they gave you a hashed seed,  you should of recorded that seed and then after you took bets. They give you the unhashed seed, so you can hash that seed and make sure its the same as your hashed seed as presented earlier. Then you can make a simple script and verify your bets to see if you were cheated.

I used to think many of used websites cheat also, but when you learn about provably fair you relise that most of the rolls are already predicted in advance and you can't change them in anyway. You don't need to even change your client seed because it won't make a difference.

Use this 3rd party site to compare your bets
https://dicesites.com/provably-fair

If you create streaks they can skip nounces, always be careful who you trust , there is a very small bunch of sites I trust and with the time you see why.

[adaseb]

Just went on the shitty slots, 40 wilds, 0.50 mbit win. RIGGED. Just avoid the scamming cunts. Vermin. Hope the owners fail in life. They deserve fuck all.

Also site is at a crawl. Admins are incompetent.  I have been with you for ages. You have changed the odds. I only went on to see and it has indeed got worse.

Well before you placed the bets they gave you a hashed seed,  you should of recorded that seed and then after you took bets. They give you the unhashed seed, so you can hash that seed and make sure its the same as your hashed seed as presented earlier. Then you can make a simple script and verify your bets to see if you were cheated.

I used to think many of used websites cheat also, but when you learn about provably fair you relise that most of the rolls are already predicted in advance and you can't change them in anyway. You don't need to even change your client seed because it won't make a difference.

Use this 3rd party site to compare your bets
https://dicesites.com/provably-fair

If you create streaks they can skip nounces, always be careful who you trust , there is a very small bunch of sites I trust and with the time you see why.

If they skip noonces then their would get caught very easily because it would be very easy to prove they are a scam site.

How do they know that the gambler isn't actually verifying the bets? They don't.

Most of the gambers aren't very technical people but I am sure there is a small percentage of betters who verify all their bets at the end of the session to make sure they weren't scammed.

[maidenvoyage]

hey Adaseb,

do you have prove that they "are a scam site"? Or is it just your way of speaking?

In my humble technical knowledge... I think really you have to trust the/any casino.
As an investor.. It is just too easy that they play "on their own". That means against the bankroll fixing the bets for a player which is themselves.
As a bettor.. you have to trust because even if the hashes work out of each single bet you cannot check the house edge. Is it only X%? Or is it much more?
A casino can easily have a much bigger house edge and siphon out the gains through dummy players that take the earnings out into their own pocket.
Thats why it is good to know that the owners are also invested in the bankroll.

Yours
Pierre

[andulolika]

hey Adaseb,

do you have prove that they "are a scam site"? Or is it just your way of speaking?

In my humble technical knowledge... I think really you have to trust the/any casino.
As an investor.. It is just too easy that they play "on their own". That means against the bankroll fixing the bets for a player which is themselves.
As a bettor.. you have to trust because even if the hashes work out of each single bet you cannot check the house edge. Is it only X%? Or is it much more?
A casino can easily have a much bigger house edge and siphon out the gains through dummy players that take the earnings out into their own pocket.
Thats why it is good to know that the owners are also invested in the bankroll.

Yours
Pierre

House edge is on the payout, 2x is 50% with 1% house edge you need 49.5% in order to earn 1%, so depending of what chance to play you should more or less easily see that something is not right.

[maidenvoyage]

[/quote]House edge is on the payout, 2x is 50% with 1% house edge you need 49.5% in order to earn 1%, so depending of what chance to play you should more or less easily see that something is not right.
[/quote]
Lol..... and..... in english perhaps??
 

[Taki]

Must be I'm not such big gambler as I imagined myself, because of I have never heard and tried this site. But if everybody say how good it is I will visit it of course.

[freemanjackal]

just call my attention that that winning chance is set to 50% when most site, at least those that i know set it to 49.50 winning chance, i will try it to see what happens and compare with some others like primedice...

[dooglus]

As a bettor.. you have to trust because even if the hashes work out of each single bet you cannot check the house edge. Is it only X%? Or is it much more?
A casino can easily have a much bigger house edge and siphon out the gains through dummy players that take the earnings out into their own pocket.

No, as Andu tried to explain you are wrong here.

As a bettor if you know the chance of winning and the payout multiplier you can easily determine the house edge:

Multiply the percentage chance of winning by the payout multiplier and subtract the result from 100.

So if the chance of winning is 49.5% and the payout multiplier is 2 you get a house edge of 100-(49.5*2) = 100-99 = 1%.

If doesn't matter (to the bettor) whether the house has dummy players siphoning profits from the investors. That matters to the investors, but the players shouldn't care.

Understand it now?

[freemanjackal]

As a bettor.. you have to trust because even if the hashes work out of each single bet you cannot check the house edge. Is it only X%? Or is it much more?
A casino can easily have a much bigger house edge and siphon out the gains through dummy players that take the earnings out into their own pocket.

No, as Andu tried to explain you are wrong here.

As a bettor if you know the chance of winning and the payout multiplier you can easily determine the house edge:

Multiply the percentage chance of winning by the payout multiplier and subtract the result from 100.

So if the chance of winning is 49.5% and the payout multiplier is 2 you get a house edge of 100-(49.5*2) = 100-99 = 1%.

If doesn't matter (to the bettor) whether the house has dummy players siphoning profits from the investors. That matters to the investors, but the players shouldn't care.

Understand it now?

thats a math that does not convince me, claiming that the house edge is just 1% form my point of view is a lie. house edge is more than 50 %, if the user has 49.50 win chance and the house 1%, who has the the rest 49.50%, obviously the house. if i can only win with 49.50% i have a chance to lose of 50,50%, bigger than the winning chance, and if i loose who keep the coins wagered, the house.
thats a very simple math, house has bigger chances to win, we are just blind dumbs...that want to bealieve that we can win...

[maidenvoyage]

As a bettor.. you have to trust because even if the hashes work out of each single bet you cannot check the house edge. Is it only X%? Or is it much more?
A casino can easily have a much bigger house edge and siphon out the gains through dummy players that take the earnings out into their own pocket.

No, as Andu tried to explain you are wrong here.

As a bettor if you know the chance of winning and the payout multiplier you can easily determine the house edge:

Multiply the percentage chance of winning by the payout multiplier and subtract the result from 100.

So if the chance of winning is 49.5% and the payout multiplier is 2 you get a house edge of 100-(49.5*2) = 100-99 = 1%.

If doesn't matter (to the bettor) whether the house has dummy players siphoning profits from the investors. That matters to the investors, but the players shouldn't care.

Understand it now?

Dooglus, yes... I understand what you are saying. But... I say... and I am not sure if I'm right. As a player, or bankroll, one cannot "check" the house edge. One does not know if the algorithm, if you would check large numbers really favors 1% for the bank. When you play the site might show 49.5% with a multiplyer of 2. But .. if you would play 10.000 times you would really only win 4.950 times on average... and not 4.300 times...or 4.200..or whatever..
So the provably fair thing is really only for the elementary bet... but the sites real winning chance, determined by the house edge.. is not visible unless you have the numbers.
Am I right or am I right? Haha... I know you run primedice and you might explain me...how anyone can check the statistics of an online casino...
thanks maiden

Sorry.. I slept over it and now I got it. IF the single bet is determined in its outcome before (controlable by getting the hash before you place your bet) then the casino must be fair since the outcome is boolean (true or false, win or loose) it is really only the payout rate which decides the house edge. If for a 2 times payout you only get 49,5% winning chance the house edge is 1%.
FAIR.. there are still other ways to cheat.. but not the single player... only the investors.