CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[tbearhere]

Yesssssssssssss that's what I was working on crysx.

[chrysophylax]

Yesssssssssssss that's what I was working on crysx.

what hash do you normally get with them? ...

and what settings? ... im only using -X 15 parameter with them ... would that be the optimal on lyra2v2? ...

#crysx

[tbearhere]

Yesssssssssssss that's what I was working on crysx.

what hash do you normally get with them? ...

and what settings? ... im only using -X 15 parameter with them ... would that be the optimal on lyra2v2? ...

#crysx

I don't use any parameters. I just oc at 1345 mhz on ALL my nvidia cards.. no matter what type...... any higher and they become unstable.
I only have 2 980ti's...but I get about 4x what a 750ti gets.......it would be higher if we can get the mem clock up to 7 gig hz and then oc the mem
My guess  on quark ..a guess...... is 2mh/s more.

[chrysophylax]

Yesssssssssssss that's what I was working on crysx.

what hash do you normally get with them? ...

and what settings? ... im only using -X 15 parameter with them ... would that be the optimal on lyra2v2? ...

#crysx

I don't use any parameters. I just oc at 1345 mhz on ALL my nvidia cards.. no matter what type...... any higher and they become unstable.
I only have 2 980ti's...but I get about 4x what a 750ti gets.......it would be higher if we can get the mem clock up to 7 gig hz and then oc the mem
My guess  on quark ..a guess...... is 2mh/s more.

kool ...

so im pretty much on the mark then ... actually a little below as sp pointed out - but that isnt a great deal in the situation that im testing for ...

still - two of these cards are pretty damned good ... with these results - i cant wait to test the extreme ones ... there is two of those cards and they are supposed to perform better ... they are MUCH bigger cards than the gigabyte 980ti g1 cards ... and heavier too ... the heatsinks on the gigabyte 980ti extreme cards are massive ...

anyway - below are the lyra2v2 results im getting - using -X 15 commandline parameter as the only 'extra' parameter ...

-------

[2016-01-13 22:54:14] lyra2rev2.eu.nicehash.com:3347/ lyra2v2 block 548979
[2016-01-13 22:54:14] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11951 (T= 68C F= 53% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11942 (T= 67C F= 49% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:14] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11953 (T= 69C F= 52% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:14] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11968 (T= 70C F= 57% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:16] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11947 (T= 68C F= 53% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:16] accepted: 719/719 (100.00%), 47800 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 22:54:17] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11966 (T= 71C F= 57% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:18] accepted: 720/720 (100.00%), 47801 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 22:54:30] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11952 (T= 68C F= 52% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:31] accepted: 721/721 (100.00%), 47801 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 22:54:33] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11943 (T= 67C F= 49% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:33] accepted: 722/722 (100.00%), 47801 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 22:54:43] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11952 (T= 68C F= 52% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:44] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11942 (T= 67C F= 49% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:44] accepted: 723/723 (100.00%), 47802 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 22:54:44] accepted: 724/724 (100.00%), 47802 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 22:54:47] lyra2rev2.eu.nicehash.com:3347/ lyra2v2 block 548980
[2016-01-13 22:54:47] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11939 (T= 67C F= 49% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:47] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11968 (T= 71C F= 57% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:47] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11948 (T= 68C F= 52% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:47] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11952 (T= 69C F= 52% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:55:02] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11942 (T= 67C F= 49% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:55:02] accepted: 725/725 (100.00%), 47802 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 22:55:03] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11952 (T= 69C F= 53% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:55:03] accepted: 726/726 (100.00%), 47803 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 22:55:04] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11941 (T= 69C F= 53% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:55:04] accepted: 727/727 (100.00%), 47802 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 22:55:05] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11952 (T= 68C F= 52% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:55:05] accepted: 728/728 (100.00%), 47802 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 22:55:10] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11951 (T= 69C F= 53% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:55:10] accepted: 729/729 (100.00%), 47802 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 22:55:17] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11968 (T= 71C F= 57% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:55:20] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11942 (T= 67C F= 50% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:55:21] accepted: 730/730 (100.00%), 47803 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 22:55:24] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11942 (T= 67C F= 50% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:55:25] accepted: 731/731 (100.00%), 47803 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 22:55:28] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11951 (T= 68C F= 52% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:55:28] accepted: 732/732 (100.00%), 47803 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 22:55:31] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11967 (T= 71C F= 57% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:55:32] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11953 (T= 69C F= 53% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:55:32] accepted: 733/733 (100.00%), 47804 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 22:55:32] accepted: 734/734 (100.00%), 47804 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 22:55:38] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11942 (T= 67C F= 50% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:55:39] accepted: 735/735 (100.00%), 47804 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 22:55:39] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11953 (T= 68C F= 53% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:55:40] accepted: 736/736 (100.00%), 47804 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 22:55:42] lyra2rev2.eu.nicehash.com:3347/ lyra2v2 block 548981

-------

i now want to move ALL of the miners to these cards ... damn ...

#crysx

[bensam1231]

Cryptsy just went under... FTC is now pointless to mine as that's where all the volume was. Unfortunately I lost about .4 BTC over there. Literally closed it right as I was figuring out a altcoin to withdraw it with.
So, Neo has basically been scrapped. I kinda doubt the FTC market will recover as that's a huge blow to a rather small and successful coin. As far as improvements go Ethereum and x11 is where it's currently at (as long as there is notable improvements in x11).
Just another day in Cryptos... off to Ethereum I go.

Feathercoin Markets
USD  Main Markets
#   Source   Pair   Volume (24h)   Price   Volume (%)   Updated
1   Bittrex   FTC/BTC   $ 542   $ 0.002995   80.15 %   Recently
2   BTER   FTC/BTC   $ 133   $ 0.003380   19.72 %   Recently
3   BTER   FTC/CNY   $ 1   $ 0.003041   0.13 %   Recently
4   Vircurex   FTC/BTC   $ 0   $ 0.003154   0.00 %   Recently
5   bitebi9   FTC/CNY   $ 0   $ 0.003566   0.00 %   Recently
6   Bittylicious   FTC/GBP   $ 0   $ 0.005348   0.00 %   Recently
7   Cryptonit   FTC/BTC   $ 0   $ 0.003368   0.00 %   339 hours ago
8   LiteBit.eu   FTC/EUR   $ 0   $ 0.002929   0.00 %   Recently

Yup, Coinmarket pulled Cryptsy this last weekend. There was about 10BTC worth of activity on Cryptsy. Things will probably level out over the next weekend. People already predumped BTC in preperation for a BTC crash. I kinda doubt BTC will crash, but it's probably going to end up back at about 420 when NA wakes up today.

[sp_]

sp.....I can't get r78 zip to open.





And here is a couple of beers.


Transaction ID: d3088e0d25037723d9d540fe4c8e7b94fe6813786c63258ac5e1fc7b69b7fb12-000

r78 was uploaded in win zip not 7 zip.

you need to open the file in the 7-zip file manager

[ldw-com]

Looking good over here at Nvidia.


Here are some X11 & Quark results over @ the AMD side


X11 (Fury X, Stock clock)

X11 Image


Quark (Fury X, Stock Clock)

Quark Image

[sp_]

anyway - below are the lyra2v2 results im getting - using -X 15 commandline parameter as the only 'extra' parameter ...

-------

[2016-01-13 22:54:14] lyra2rev2.eu.nicehash.com:3347/ lyra2v2 block 548979
[2016-01-13 22:54:14] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11951 (T= 68C F= 53% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11942 (T= 67C F= 49% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:14] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11953 (T= 69C F= 52% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:14] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11968 (T= 70C F= 57% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:16] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11947 (T= 68C F= 53% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:16] accepted: 719/719 (100.00%), 47800 kH/s yes!

something is wrong. I get 16MHASH + on the same card on windows. Run without the -X parameter.

[sp_]

Looking good over here at Nvidia.

Here are some X11 & Quark results over @ the AMD side

X11 (Fury X, Stock clock)




Quark (Fury X, Stock Clock)

But where is the sourcecode?

XI 1024 is not usable on my cards. They report lower at the pool with the kochur bins.. Use -X 640 instead..

[chrysophylax]

anyway - below are the lyra2v2 results im getting - using -X 15 commandline parameter as the only 'extra' parameter ...

-------

[2016-01-13 22:54:14] lyra2rev2.eu.nicehash.com:3347/ lyra2v2 block 548979
[2016-01-13 22:54:14] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11951 (T= 68C F= 53% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11942 (T= 67C F= 49% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:14] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11953 (T= 69C F= 52% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:14] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11968 (T= 70C F= 57% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:16] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11947 (T= 68C F= 53% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 22:54:16] accepted: 719/719 (100.00%), 47800 kH/s yes!

something is wrong. I get 16MHASH + on the same card on windows. Run without the -X parameter.

ok ...

testing without -X parameter ...

edit ... same results ...

dont forget sp - this is the opensource one - NOT - your private kernel thats running here ... ...

-------

[2016-01-13 23:09:02] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11955 (T= 68C F= 49% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] Stratum difficulty set to 4
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11930 (T= 69C F= 50% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] accepted: 231/231 (100.00%), 47802 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] accepted: 232/232 (100.00%), 47802 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11969 (T= 67C F= 48% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:03] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11937 (T= 67C F= 48% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:03] accepted: 233/233 (100.00%), 47799 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 23:09:03] accepted: 234/234 (100.00%), 47799 kH/s yes!

-------

obviously this is just a quick test - so it will increase over time ( which is why i test for 25mins at a time ) but the hashrate is no where near what you are stating it can do ...

am i doing something wrong on my end? ...

#crysx

[ldw-com]

Looking good over here at Nvidia.

Here are some X11 & Quark results over @ the AMD side

X11 (Fury X, Stock clock)




Quark (Fury X, Stock Clock)

But where is the sourcecode?

XI 1024 is not usable on my cards. They report lower at the pool with the kochur bins.. Use -X 640 instead..

True, no sourcecode, but oh well, i don't care.

never tried 640 before. Will try that later (Ethereum is more profitable anyway)

[sp_]

True, no sourcecode, but oh well, i don't care.
never tried 640 before. Will try that later (Ethereum is more profitable anyway)

You should care because when the miner says 20MHASH and the pool say 15MHASH you need to lower the intensity or fix the sourcecode.

[sp_]

testing without -X parameter ...

edit ... same results ...

dont forget sp - this is the opensource one - NOT - your private kernel thats running here ... ...

-------

[2016-01-13 23:09:02] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11955 (T= 68C F= 49% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] Stratum difficulty set to 4
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11930 (T= 69C F= 50% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] accepted: 231/231 (100.00%), 47802 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] accepted: 232/232 (100.00%), 47802 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11969 (T= 67C F= 48% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:03] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11937 (T= 67C F= 48% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:03] accepted: 233/233 (100.00%), 47799 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 23:09:03] accepted: 234/234 (100.00%), 47799 kH/s yes!

-------

obviously this is just a quick test - so it will increase over time ( which is why i test for 25mins at a time ) but the hashrate is no where near what you are stating it can do ...

am i doing something wrong on my end? ...

#crysx

Here is the private on the gtx g1 970: (+100 on the core)

Could be a problem with the 64bit buids / linux?

in the scanhash_lyra2v2

if (strstr(props.name, "980 Ti"))
{
   intensity = 256 * 256 * 18;
   tpb = 10;
}

try to change find the optimal tpb by chinging to to 7,8,9,10, 11, 12, 13 ,14,15

Code:

extern "C" int scanhash_lyra2v2(int thr_id, uint32_t *pdata,
	const uint32_t *ptarget, uint32_t max_nonce,
	unsigned long *hashes_done)
{
	const uint32_t first_nonce = pdata[19];
	uint32_t intensity = 256 * 256 * 8;
	uint32_t tpb = 18;

	cudaDeviceProp props;
	cudaGetDeviceProperties(&props, device_map[thr_id]);

	if (strstr(props.name, "970"))
	{
		tpb = 10;
		intensity = 256 * 256 * 18;
	}
	else if (strstr(props.name, "980 Ti"))
	{
		intensity = 256 * 256 * 18;
		tpb = 10;
	}

[chrysophylax]

testing without -X parameter ...

edit ... same results ...

dont forget sp - this is the opensource one - NOT - your private kernel thats running here ... ...

-------

[2016-01-13 23:09:02] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11955 (T= 68C F= 49% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] Stratum difficulty set to 4
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11930 (T= 69C F= 50% C=1354/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] accepted: 231/231 (100.00%), 47802 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] accepted: 232/232 (100.00%), 47802 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 23:09:02] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11969 (T= 67C F= 48% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:03] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 11937 (T= 67C F= 48% C=1366/3304)
[2016-01-13 23:09:03] accepted: 233/233 (100.00%), 47799 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-13 23:09:03] accepted: 234/234 (100.00%), 47799 kH/s yes!

-------

obviously this is just a quick test - so it will increase over time ( which is why i test for 25mins at a time ) but the hashrate is no where near what you are stating it can do ...

am i doing something wrong on my end? ...

#crysx

Here is the private on the gtx g1 970:

Could be a problem with the 64bit buids?

hmmm ...

one thing i noticed when ccminer runs is that it no longer shows the verion number - just the gcc and cuda versions ... which is great - but the current version number would be nice too ...

apart from that - the build is exactly the same as it has always been ...

i havent changed anything in the compile ...

i cant say if its the x64 build or not that is doing it - but if these cards are supposed to run 16mh in lyra2v2 - then thats what they should be doing ...

i couldnt tell you any more than that sp ...

ill do another compile - but i doubt that will do anything ... in fact the compile is going through now ...

#crysx

[tbearhere]

crysx
The 2 980ti cards I have are the big ones with the back plate

[tbearhere]

sp.....I can't get r78 zip to open.





And here is a couple of beers.


Transaction ID: d3088e0d25037723d9d540fe4c8e7b94fe6813786c63258ac5e1fc7b69b7fb12-000

r78 was uploaded in win zip not 7 zip.

you need to open the file in the 7-zip file manager

Got it sp...something in the upload because I usually just click on the folder and drag the file onto my desktop.
But I have it now thx

[chrysophylax]

crysx
The 2 980ti cards I have are the big ones with the back plate

thats what all four of these are mate ...

the extreme ones are MUCH bigger and heavier cards ...

what hash are you getting on lyra2v2 tbearhere? ...

#crysx

[bathrobehero]

Here is the private on the gtx g1 970: (+100 on the core)

Could be a problem with the 64bit buids / linux?

in the scanhash_lyra2v2

if (strstr(props.name, "980 Ti"))
{
   intensity = 256 * 256 * 18;
   tpb = 10;
}

try to change find the optimal tpb by chinging to to 7,8,9,10, 11, 12, 13 ,14,15

Sp, can we get a command line switch that allows us to override the tpb without having to recompile?
Crowd sourcing finding the best settings for each card would probably also save you some time.

[pallas]

Here is the private on the gtx g1 970: (+100 on the core)

Could be a problem with the 64bit buids / linux?

in the scanhash_lyra2v2

if (strstr(props.name, "980 Ti"))
{
   intensity = 256 * 256 * 18;
   tpb = 10;
}

try to change find the optimal tpb by chinging to to 7,8,9,10, 11, 12, 13 ,14,15

Sp, can we get a command line switch that allows us to override the tpb without having to recompile?
Crowd sourcing finding the best settings for each card would probably also save you some time.

most algos have hardcoded tpb: some on a #define, some directly on the launch config... there is a good amount of clean up which should be done on all the algos.

[zTheWolfz]

It seems now we urgently need faster x15 miner.
Ready to donate 0.01 btc for my poor gtx750)))

Coincidentally I'm working on a faster CPU miner for X algos that nearly doubles the X15 performance
but noone wants to pay for a CPU miner. I'm not doing it to make money, I'm doing it because it's fun
and I'm learning something along the way. And if I ever get it finished I'll probably give it away.

If you need any help with hardware testing on this I have 3x EVGA SR2's dual CPU 24 cores boards, a 4x CPU AMD sever 32 cores & a 980X 12 core in service.
I'd also be willing to tip in some BTC to you if you need that.

I'll keep that in mind. Things are progressing well. I'm not sure which CPU miners you are familiar with but I'm working
with darkcoin cpu miner 1.3 (elmad), cp3u (palmd) & cpuminer-multi (tpruvot )and taking the best from each. I've even
managed to improve on the current best in each algo (all X, quark, qubit). The other algos are either unstable or too
difficult for the moment. If you know of any other interesting CPU miners point them out to me. I'll take a look and see
if I can make use of them. Also if you (or anyone else) knows of other contributors to these programs not yet credited
let me know.

It has been quite a challenge. I've never done any c++ development before and no development at all for 10 years. I had a
hell of a time messing with the Makefile sources and #includes. I'm trying to tweak each algo some more. Some work better
inlined, others not, simple stuff for now. Everything focussed on AES for now.

By my own ad-hoc versioning I'm at beta2 (that goal reached since the first post). Maybe one more beta before I'm comfortable
sharing it privately. Then I'll start work on support for CPUs limited to sse2, then...

Should this be moved to a new thread?

Probably should start your own topic on this subject. If you do just come back and post a link in one of your reply's here.
I've used at some point almost every CPU miner software out there or tested it at some point. darkcoin cpu, cpuminer-multi for sure.
Not at my main testing rig so I'll have to take a look at the others CPU miners once I'm in the shop. I'll PM you with some details later.
Can't wait to test these, thanks for posting.