sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
January 26, 2016, 01:39:34 PM |
|
Last block was mined at 531.64 GH/s. Last 24h volume at Poloniex just passed 22000 BTC so $100000 ain't that much.
But $1 000 000 mined in 10 days is a bit much for a new coin don't you think? When some of the biggest miners starts to dump it, the coin will bleed.. The High turnover is caused by trading... The same coins are flipped back and forth. What makes this coin so special? And why do they want to go POS?
|
|
|
|
antantti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
|
 |
January 26, 2016, 02:33:40 PM |
|
Last block was mined at 531.64 GH/s. Last 24h volume at Poloniex just passed 22000 BTC so $100000 ain't that much.
But $1 000 000 mined in 10 days is a bit much for a new coin don't you think? When some of the biggest miners starts to dump it, the coin will bleed.. The High turnover is caused by trading... The same coins are flipped back and forth. What makes this coin so special? And why do they want to go POS? Only small portion of all ETH is mineable. Right now there are bids worth of 1740 BTC/ 275000 ETH above 0.006, bid book total 4000 BTC. It isn't coin as we miners know it. It's more like a fuel for a platform. Read it yourself, it's all there freely available.
|
|
|
|
lemp
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 26, 2016, 04:37:21 PM |
|
Genoil's ether miner gtx 970 g1 standard: 20MHASH = 0.0033 BTC/Day
Please give an example of the startup parameters miners? My Gtx970(+100) hashrate is 15Mh?
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
January 26, 2016, 04:48:52 PM |
|
You need windows 7 or linux. And elpida memory. Hynix is slower. What card are you using?
|
|
|
|
lemp
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 26, 2016, 04:59:56 PM |
|
You need windows 7 or linux. And elpida memory. Hynix is slower. What card are you using?
Windows 8.1 x64, card- GIGABYTE GV-N970WF3OC-4GD, samsung memory
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
January 26, 2016, 05:19:55 PM |
|
You need windows 7 or linux. And elpida memory. Hynix is slower. What card are you using?
Windows 8.1 x64, card- GIGABYTE GV-N970WF3OC-4GD, samsung memory I believe samsung is hynix based. hynix is in faster copyspeed. Elpida is faster in random acces.
|
|
|
|
antantti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
|
 |
January 26, 2016, 06:10:34 PM |
|
You need windows 7 or linux. And elpida memory. Hynix is slower. What card are you using?
Windows 8.1 x64, card- GIGABYTE GV-N970WF3OC-4GD, samsung memory I believe samsung is hynix based. hynix is in faster copyspeed. Elpida is faster in random acces. Samsung and Elpida give 20-22MH/s, hynix 17-19MH/s in windows 7. I am not sure about windows 8.1. You need to get your card to P0 state: 1) open cmd.exe with the admin privileges 2) cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI 3) nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 0 4) nvidia-smi -ac 350X,14XX -i 0 (where 350X is that very first number printed after supported clocks-memory and 14XX one of those numbers printed after graphics) 5) Overclock your memory, +500 generally works. Should give you memory speed of 4005MHz 6) Overclock your core, doesn't make big difference mining ETH. 7) If you wan't to save power, reduce your power limit. Even 60% works suprisingly well. Someone should open new topic for nvidia and ethereum... 
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
January 26, 2016, 09:26:42 PM |
|
Last block was mined at 531.64 GH/s. Last 24h volume at Poloniex just passed 22000 BTC so $100000 ain't that much.
But $1 000 000 mined in 10 days is a bit much for a new coin don't you think? When some of the biggest miners starts to dump it, the coin will bleed.. The High turnover is caused by trading... The same coins are flipped back and forth. What makes this coin so special? And why do they want to go POS? Only small portion of all ETH is mineable. Right now there are bids worth of 1740 BTC/ 275000 ETH above 0.006, bid book total 4000 BTC. It isn't coin as we miners know it. It's more like a fuel for a platform. Read it yourself, it's all there freely available. Interesting.. So the difficulty can be controlled by fiat... I think this is not something the creator of bitcoin and the clones would like.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
January 26, 2016, 09:46:04 PM |
|
Last block was mined at 531.64 GH/s. Last 24h volume at Poloniex just passed 22000 BTC so $100000 ain't that much.
But $1 000 000 mined in 10 days is a bit much for a new coin don't you think? When some of the biggest miners starts to dump it, the coin will bleed.. The High turnover is caused by trading... The same coins are flipped back and forth. What makes this coin so special? And why do they want to go POS? Only small portion of all ETH is mineable. Right now there are bids worth of 1740 BTC/ 275000 ETH above 0.006, bid book total 4000 BTC. It isn't coin as we miners know it. It's more like a fuel for a platform. Read it yourself, it's all there freely available. Interesting.. So the difficulty can be controlled by fiat... I think this is not something the creator of bitcoin and the clones would like. We love the bubbles... Feed the shark
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1024
|
 |
January 26, 2016, 10:56:46 PM |
|
Splitting up the Dag file would help. "i think". Feel kind of bad for the nvidia guys out there but glad i don't own any.
If more miners are moving to mine Etherum, then the other algos will be more profitable. This depends entirely on who is moving. I've seen relatively no change in other algos profitability, this means people that are moving are using pub kernels (much like us) and profitability is much higher for Eth. If they aren't moving, that probably means profitability is higher for whatever they're mining (like x11 for instance), which means they're using custom kernels and rightfully so network difficulty doesn't change much as they control the majority of the market hashrate. I don't believe in miners that don't watch their profits. Usually everything adjusts in about 3~ days. Too Complicated: People are using custom kernels, they're still making more mining what they currently are. In other news, Eth is crashing, Lyra is making a comeback...
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
crsminer
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 1
|
 |
January 26, 2016, 11:03:45 PM |
|
Splitting up the Dag file would help. "i think". Feel kind of bad for the nvidia guys out there but glad i don't own any.
If more miners are moving to mine Etherum, then the other algos will be more profitable. This depends entirely on who is moving. I've seen relatively no change in other algos profitability, this means people that are moving are using pub kernels (much like us) and profitability is much higher for Eth. If they aren't moving, that probably means profitability is higher for whatever they're mining (like x11 for instance), which means they're using custom kernels and rightfully so network difficulty doesn't change much as they control the majority of the market hashrate. I don't believe in miners that don't watch their profits. Usually everything adjusts in about 3~ days. Too Complicated: People are using custom kernels, they're still making more mining what they currently are. In other news, Eth is crashing, Lyra is making a comeback... You are right. I always wondered why would anyone want to mine an unprofitable algo (based on sp's ccminer hashrates for example). The reason must be that whoever is mining those algos has access to private miners.
|
|
|
|
pokeytex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002
|
 |
January 26, 2016, 11:48:17 PM Last edit: January 27, 2016, 03:10:34 AM by pokeytex |
|
SP will you be incorporating the new vanilla blake algo into ccminer? If so, when?
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1024
|
 |
January 27, 2016, 12:39:03 AM |
|
Splitting up the Dag file would help. "i think". Feel kind of bad for the nvidia guys out there but glad i don't own any.
If more miners are moving to mine Etherum, then the other algos will be more profitable. This depends entirely on who is moving. I've seen relatively no change in other algos profitability, this means people that are moving are using pub kernels (much like us) and profitability is much higher for Eth. If they aren't moving, that probably means profitability is higher for whatever they're mining (like x11 for instance), which means they're using custom kernels and rightfully so network difficulty doesn't change much as they control the majority of the market hashrate. I don't believe in miners that don't watch their profits. Usually everything adjusts in about 3~ days. Too Complicated: People are using custom kernels, they're still making more mining what they currently are. In other news, Eth is crashing, Lyra is making a comeback... You are right. I always wondered why would anyone want to mine an unprofitable algo (based on sp's ccminer hashrates for example). The reason must be that whoever is mining those algos has access to private miners. Yup, in some cases it's botnets too. For instance Neoscrypt has a CPU miner that's still somewhat profitable as does Cryptonote, so they mine negative. I'm pretty sure we'll never see Monero profitable ever again. X11 is definitely full of private kernels.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
bathrobehero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
|
 |
January 27, 2016, 12:48:01 AM |
|
Let me guess, your 970 has Hynix memory?
Samsung. Gigabyte cards. Remember, it is a race for finding a block which starts again every 15 seconds. To win that race you need to get rid of every ms. To mine directly to exchange you need to mine in pool, pool = lots of ms and rejected shares.
From my experience with fast coins it's the other way around; you get more orphans not the pools, even with very low scantime. Pools tend to have better connection and their wallets usually have way more than 10-20 connections. yep I have the same issue ...
not a single share is submitted ...
Had the same issue, reverted to 0.9.4.1 (from cryptominingblog) which is a bit slower but submit shares. Regarding 750 Ti's, I get like 300khs every 5th or 6th lines amd the rest is just zeros.
|
Not your keys, not your coins!
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
January 27, 2016, 06:42:23 AM |
|
SP will you be incorporating the new vanilla blake algo into ccminer? If so, when?
Blake is already included. ccminer -a blake --benchmark or ccminer -a blakecoin --benchmark
|
|
|
|
antantti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
|
 |
January 27, 2016, 07:22:57 AM Last edit: January 27, 2016, 07:41:27 AM by antantti |
|
Remember, it is a race for finding a block which starts again every 15 seconds. To win that race you need to get rid of every ms. To mine directly to exchange you need to mine in pool, pool = lots of ms and rejected shares.
From my experience with fast coins it's the other way around; you get more orphans not the pools, even with very low scantime. Pools tend to have better connection and their wallets usually have way more than 10-20 connections. Yeah, forgot to say you need better than average network connection too. You just don't wan't to see pool stats like this (ETH): Blocks Coins Generated 13 65 5 25 Earnings 58.51884072
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
January 27, 2016, 07:55:52 AM |
|
Had the same issue, reverted to 0.9.4.1 (from cryptominingblog) which is a bit slower but submit shares. Regarding 750 Ti's, I get like 300khs every 5th or 6th lines amd the rest is just zeros.
Did you try the opencl version with adjustable blocksize? https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum/tree/opencl-chunks
|
|
|
|
Genoil
|
 |
January 27, 2016, 09:08:49 AM |
|
Had the same issue, reverted to 0.9.4.1 (from cryptominingblog) which is a bit slower but submit shares. Regarding 750 Ti's, I get like 300khs every 5th or 6th lines amd the rest is just zeros.
Did you try the opencl version with adjustable blocksize? https://github.com/Genoil/cpp-ethereum/tree/opencl-chunksChunks version does work on NVidia (not on AMD!), but AFAIK it doesn't do anything to avert TLB trashing. I wonder what's the difference between these versions. I also get reports from people using a build posted on cryptomining who can't submit shares. If I'm correct, there are actually two different builds posted on Cryptomining. I'll try them both. To rule out a problem with the algo, try running the miner for a while using the -S flag instead of -F. It simulates hashing at increasing difficulty until a block time of 15 seconds is reached. Using a GTX9x0, you should be able to get to a difficulty of about 30 (1 << 30) in a relatively short amount of time. If you get stuck at 20 or 25, the algo is most likely broken. Don't be fooled if it makes your 750ti tick hash faster on Win7/Linux than it does now as it uses the epoch 0 DAG.
|
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
 |
January 27, 2016, 09:19:59 AM Last edit: January 27, 2016, 09:36:16 AM by pallas |
|
SP will you be incorporating the new vanilla blake algo into ccminer? If so, when?
Blake is already included. ccminer -a blake --benchmark or ccminer -a blakecoin --benchmark I don't think it'll work. You should import a little patch which was submitted to tpruvot ccminer a couple days ago. EDIT: "Algo is the same Blake256 8-rounds. It's just different from Blakecoin who's using single sha256 for the merkle root generation. Vanilla will use standard double sha256."
|
|
|
|
lemp
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 27, 2016, 09:30:14 AM |
|
Samsung and Elpida give 20-22MH/s, hynix 17-19MH/s in windows 7. I am not sure about windows 8.1. You need to get your card to P0 state: 1) open cmd.exe with the admin privileges 2) cd C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI 3) nvidia-smi -q -d SUPPORTED_CLOCKS -i 0 4) nvidia-smi -ac 350X,14XX -i 0 (where 350X is that very first number printed after supported clocks-memory and 14XX one of those numbers printed after graphics) 5) Overclock your memory, +500 generally works. Should give you memory speed of 4005MHz 6) Overclock your core, doesn't make big difference mining ETH. 7) If you wan't to save power, reduce your power limit. Even 60% works suprisingly well. Someone should open new topic for nvidia and ethereum...  Thanks, now my gtx970 card gives ~21Mh Overclock: nvidia-smi -ac 3505,1505 Startup parametrs eth miner: ethminer --cuda-grid-size 8192 --cuda-block-size 128 --cuda-turbo
|
|
|
|
|