cdb000
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 11
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:38:04 PM |
|
Lag 25 minutes, price $107
|
|
|
|
dmiceman
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:38:35 PM |
|
Sure about that? I see very few trades. What other legitimate drain on resources can there be?
But gox is available. This would not be possible in case of plain old DDoS attack, preventing servers to communicate with world. And any kind of DoS attack by its definition covers anything that denies the host resources.
Well.. DoS mean Denial of Service, and this is may be a DoS in the terms of network worm like stuxnet. But that is unlikely. Programming or hardware or human error is much more likely. BTW, yes, I'm an expert, having some servers under my control, having some experience with fighting DDoS, and constantly fighting DoS caused by programming errors, my own sometimes :-)
|
|
|
|
creativex
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:39:54 PM |
|
Gox is crippling down probably "victim of their Success" aka DDOS by thousands of buyers.. More likely the retarded staff over at Mt. Joke is playing a game of battlefield on the trading server. It's an 80's era compaq and cannot handle much ya know.
|
|
|
|
stereotype
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:39:58 PM |
|
I'm pretty sure this is not a DDoS, something is wrong with the trading engine. No trades are getting through, it seems. The normal factors (0.01 bot spamming / large trades) are not here right now.
Ive been looking at loads of suspicious 0.04 orders?
|
|
|
|
cdb000
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 11
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:40:10 PM |
|
I am beginning to hate Gox more and more. I have fiat there, and could buy if the price is down, but I just can't trade with 25 minutes of lag. There is just no way to make sensible decisions.
|
|
|
|
dandirk
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:42:14 PM |
|
I think we are seeing MtGox's solution to market crashes... Just lag out and prevent trades... slow the roll. Though it doesn't seem to work thank goodness.. I only have cash in my accounts.
|
|
|
|
Kazu
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:43:59 PM |
|
How can people say that the lag is caused by selloffs now. There was NO selloff going on, BTC had been at almost exactly $110 for nearly 12 hours. Yet people are running around trolling about Gox trying to manipulate the price upward with lag.
|
|
|
|
coined
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:46:27 PM |
|
How can people say that the lag is caused by selloffs now. There was NO selloff going on, BTC had been at almost exactly $110 for nearly 12 hours. Yet people are running around trolling about Gox trying to manipulate the price upward with lag.
I was watching live, there was a decent sell off, and it broke the price triangle downwards, and that was the start of the lag.
|
|
|
|
stereotype
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:47:11 PM |
|
I am beginning to hate Gox more and more. I have fiat there, and could buy if the price is down, but I just can't trade with 25 minutes of lag. There is just no way to make sensible decisions.
Im done with Gox. Uncertainty and trading can never mix well.
|
|
|
|
Digikeys
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:47:39 PM |
|
How can people say that the lag is caused by selloffs now. There was NO selloff going on, BTC had been at almost exactly $110 for nearly 12 hours. Yet people are running around trolling about Gox trying to manipulate the price upward with lag.
I was watching live, there was a decent sell off, and it broke the price triangle downwards, and that was the start of the lag. But it was only a sell off from 114 to 110? Nothing that should induce too much panic?
|
|
|
|
NamelessOne
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:49:31 PM |
|
How can people say that the lag is caused by selloffs now. There was NO selloff going on, BTC had been at almost exactly $110 for nearly 12 hours. Yet people are running around trolling about Gox trying to manipulate the price upward with lag.
I was watching live, there was a decent sell off, and it broke the price triangle downwards, and that was the start of the lag. The triangle was done long ago. There was a 2000btc sell and then it rested at 110ish for a couple couple minutes while no one did anything. THEN the lag started. 2000 sell that causes a couple dollar drop isn't really a sell off.
|
|
|
|
seleme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:49:49 PM |
|
guess the current gox price is million dollars answer
|
|
|
|
coined
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:50:06 PM |
|
How can people say that the lag is caused by selloffs now. There was NO selloff going on, BTC had been at almost exactly $110 for nearly 12 hours. Yet people are running around trolling about Gox trying to manipulate the price upward with lag.
I was watching live, there was a decent sell off, and it broke the price triangle downwards, and that was the start of the lag. But it was only a sell off from 114 to 110? Nothing that should induce too much panic? the price was consolidating into a narrow range, a triangle, people were waiting on a break out to see what way we are going, it broke down, and lag started.
|
|
|
|
Kazu
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:51:37 PM |
|
How can people say that the lag is caused by selloffs now. There was NO selloff going on, BTC had been at almost exactly $110 for nearly 12 hours. Yet people are running around trolling about Gox trying to manipulate the price upward with lag.
I was watching live, there was a decent sell off, and it broke the price triangle downwards, and that was the start of the lag. I was watching too. The triangle formed around $110, there was a "break" upwards, turned out to only bring it to $120 then down to $115, where it stayed for a while, then there was a "break" downwards, turned out to only bring it down to $110 again, stayed there for a bit lag kicked in and now we are screwed.
|
|
|
|
coined
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:52:06 PM |
|
How can people say that the lag is caused by selloffs now. There was NO selloff going on, BTC had been at almost exactly $110 for nearly 12 hours. Yet people are running around trolling about Gox trying to manipulate the price upward with lag.
I was watching live, there was a decent sell off, and it broke the price triangle downwards, and that was the start of the lag. The triangle was done long ago. There was a 2000btc sell and then it rested at 110ish for a couple couple minutes while no one did anything. THEN the lag started. 2000 sell that causes a couple dollar drop isn't really a sell off. see that couple of minutes when nothing happened? it was lagged, just no message, as lag starts before it tells you, I placed asks instantly on the movedown, and nothing happened, then minutes later we saw the lag, but it was there right away.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinAshley
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:52:58 PM |
|
OMG, in this very thread, a few posts above, someone actually said they were going to stop using GOX!
This is a first.
Maybe people are learning!
It takes a long time to associate "incompetent programmers, failing infrastructure, constant lag, impossible to trade on" with "a service that I probably shouldn't voluntarily use."
|
|
|
|
Digikeys
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:53:18 PM |
|
How can people say that the lag is caused by selloffs now. There was NO selloff going on, BTC had been at almost exactly $110 for nearly 12 hours. Yet people are running around trolling about Gox trying to manipulate the price upward with lag.
I was watching live, there was a decent sell off, and it broke the price triangle downwards, and that was the start of the lag. But it was only a sell off from 114 to 110? Nothing that should induce too much panic? the price was consolidating into a narrow range, a triangle, people were waiting on a break out to see what way we are going, it broke down, and lag started. The same thing happened about four and a half hours ago, 114 to 111... no lag at all, buying resumed and bounced back to 116.. This doesnt seem like massive sell off lag to me
|
|
|
|
NamelessOne
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:54:42 PM |
|
How can people say that the lag is caused by selloffs now. There was NO selloff going on, BTC had been at almost exactly $110 for nearly 12 hours. Yet people are running around trolling about Gox trying to manipulate the price upward with lag.
I was watching live, there was a decent sell off, and it broke the price triangle downwards, and that was the start of the lag. I was watching too. The triangle formed around $110, there was a "break" upwards, turned out to only bring it to $120 then down to $115, where it stayed for a while, then there was a "break" downwards, turned out to only bring it down to $110 again, stayed there for a bit lag kicked in and now we are screwed. This, the triangle broke upwards many hours ago. In terms of lag, Coined, you experienced it first hand, I didn't. Whatever is happening right now is unacceptable. There is very little activity.
|
|
|
|
Kazu
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:55:30 PM |
|
It seems pretty damn obvious to me that lag -> sell offs, not the other way around. BTC will never become omnipresent until gox ceases to exist.
|
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
|
April 13, 2013, 06:56:25 PM |
|
How can people say that the lag is caused by selloffs now. There was NO selloff going on, BTC had been at almost exactly $110 for nearly 12 hours. Yet people are running around trolling about Gox trying to manipulate the price upward with lag.
I was watching live, there was a decent sell off, and it broke the price triangle downwards, and that was the start of the lag. I was watching too. The triangle formed around $110, there was a "break" upwards, turned out to only bring it to $120 then down to $115, where it stayed for a while, then there was a "break" downwards, turned out to only bring it down to $110 again, stayed there for a bit lag kicked in and now we are screwed. This, the triangle broke upwards many hours ago. In terms of lag, Coined, you experienced it first hand, I didn't. Whatever is happening right now is unacceptable. There is very little activity.
|
|
|
|
|