Bitcoin Forum
December 02, 2020, 04:06:13 AM *
News: Bitcointalk Community Awards
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 [77] 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 ... 138 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Vertcoin - 1 | ASIC - 0 | Lyra2RE | Decentralised | GPU Mineable | Open Source  (Read 415055 times)
masterross
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 26, 2015, 03:02:55 PM
 #1521

@geenius

Did you read my post above?
1606881973
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1606881973

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1606881973
Reply with quote  #2

1606881973
Report to moderator
1606881973
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1606881973

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1606881973
Reply with quote  #2

1606881973
Report to moderator
1606881973
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1606881973

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1606881973
Reply with quote  #2

1606881973
Report to moderator
According to NIST and ECRYPT II, the cryptographic algorithms used in Bitcoin are expected to be strong until at least 2030. (After that, it will not be too difficult to transition to different algorithms.)
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1606881973
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1606881973

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1606881973
Reply with quote  #2

1606881973
Report to moderator
1606881973
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1606881973

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1606881973
Reply with quote  #2

1606881973
Report to moderator
1606881973
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1606881973

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1606881973
Reply with quote  #2

1606881973
Report to moderator
geenius
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 26, 2015, 03:18:44 PM
 #1522

@geenius

Did you read my post above?

yes I did, i am downloading those 14.12-omega drivers. and that is all? just upgrade my catalyst 14.4. to omega 14.12?
Diavulu
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 26, 2015, 03:58:45 PM
 #1523

That's some interesting numbers there Wolf. Using your math, a 750ti should come out on the plus side still right?
usukan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1590
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 27, 2015, 06:42:31 AM
 #1524

When I first bought VTC it was USD 1.10 EACH - thats almost living memory time..........

haha - kept buying all the way down - that recent pump saved my ass - way ahead now.  And still got my old VTC nailed to the wall as a trophy.

This is a great coin - I want it to succeed.



This is the first coin I have mined and seeing its value drop by half lately is disappointing. I don't see anything wrong with asking about direction etc like usukan did though. That just shows he is interested in the coin and its future.

--


--
AikaPool
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 808
Merit: 500

AikaPool admin


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2015, 10:11:58 AM
 #1525

Hi, miners!

1) 322.91 + 78.78 + 1.34 + 362.71 = 765,74
2) 765,74 / 4 blocks = 191,435% (average percent)!
3) 191,435% / 2 = 95,7175%

https://pool.verters.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks

Attention! The average percent is reduced twice!

pool.verters.com


http://aikapool.com - pool for a good mining!
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1093


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
October 28, 2015, 10:26:09 AM
 #1526

You can't sum percent values like that.
Sum the shares and it's all correct.

AikaPool
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 808
Merit: 500

AikaPool admin


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2015, 10:28:42 AM
 #1527

You can't sum percent values like that.
Sum the shares and it's all correct.

LOL! No comments! Grin

Look on other pools!

http://aikapool.com - pool for a good mining!
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1093


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
October 28, 2015, 10:34:23 AM
 #1528

You can't sum percent values like that.
Sum the shares and it's all correct.

LOL! No comments! Grin

Look on other pools!

Maybe you should read some mathematics book :-)
Or google "adding percentages"

AikaPool
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 808
Merit: 500

AikaPool admin


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2015, 11:04:34 AM
Last edit: October 30, 2015, 02:36:34 PM by AikaPool
 #1529

Maybe you should read some mathematics book :-)
Or google "adding percentages"

Shares Est. - it is also doubled!
You have a calculator? Smiley

Shares Est. - valid value = 191174 !!!

365967 shares / 191174 est.shares * 100 = 191,43%

You shouldn't deceive miners!



http://aikapool.com - pool for a good mining!
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1093


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
October 28, 2015, 11:46:33 AM
 #1530

that's becoming increasingly laughable :-)

even if the pool (which is not mine, I've got nothing to do with them) declared a higher percentage of shares done vs expected, it would be at their disadvantage (less luck... if you believe in it).

I just stepped in because it made me smile when you added the percentages like you did :-)

AikaPool
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 808
Merit: 500

AikaPool admin


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2015, 11:59:14 AM
 #1531

that's becoming increasingly laughable :-)

I am able to calculate. I am the owner of the pool, in which statistics is valid!

http://aikapool.com - pool for a good mining!
AikaPool
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 808
Merit: 500

AikaPool admin


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2015, 12:06:25 PM
 #1532

I just stepped in because it made me smile when you added the percentages like you did :-)

You ignoramus!!!  Wink

Calculate average:
5 + 10 + 3 + 4 = 22 / 4 = 5.5
8 + 9 + 4 + 12 = 33 / 4 = 8.25
7 + 4 + 14 + 3 + 2 = 30 / 5 = 6

http://aikapool.com - pool for a good mining!
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1093


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
October 28, 2015, 12:10:31 PM
 #1533

I just stepped in because it made me smile when you added the percentages like you did :-)

You ignoramus!!!  Wink

Calculate average:
5 + 10 + 3 + 4 = 22 / 4 = 5.5
8 + 9 + 4 + 12 = 33 / 4 = 8.25
7 + 4 + 14 + 3 + 2 = 30 / 5 = 6

I didn't insult you, I just said you shouldn't add percentages related to different quantities, like you did.
If you don't want people to correct your mistakes, then keep your observations for yourself.
I don't know what you mean by these numbers nor want to continue with this discussion, which is pretty OT anyway.

theotherme
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 28, 2015, 12:45:35 PM
 #1534

I just stepped in because it made me smile when you added the percentages like you did :-)

You ignoramus!!!  Wink

Calculate average:
5 + 10 + 3 + 4 = 22 / 4 = 5.5
8 + 9 + 4 + 12 = 33 / 4 = 8.25
7 + 4 + 14 + 3 + 2 = 30 / 5 = 6

I didn't insult you, I just said you shouldn't add percentages related to different quantities, like you did.
If you don't want people to correct your mistakes, then keep your observations for yourself.
I don't know what you mean by these numbers nor want to continue with this discussion, which is pretty OT anyway.
math is so over-rated  Grin
Diavulu
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 28, 2015, 09:07:45 PM
 #1535

Isn't math the thing we convinced ourselves in school we would never use in the real world?  Smiley
AikaPool
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 808
Merit: 500

AikaPool admin


View Profile WWW
October 30, 2015, 02:34:51 PM
 #1536

pool.verters.com

Don't deceive users! Return the correct calculation % of the block what was 3 months ago! The percent has to be twice more!
Really users of your pool aren't able to consider?



http://aikapool.com - pool for a good mining!
jwinterm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 1075



View Profile
October 30, 2015, 03:44:54 PM
 #1537

incoherent babbling
...

Can we all just agree that AikaPool is the only fair and legitimate pool for mining vtc? /s
fastlan
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 116
Merit: 10

https://twitter.com/_Crypto_Mike


View Profile
October 30, 2015, 04:48:45 PM
 #1538

incoherent babbling
...

Can we all just agree that AikaPool is the only fair and legitimate pool for mining vtc? /s
i mine on miningpoolhub.com...seems to be ok
DragonSlayer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 181
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 30, 2015, 08:57:41 PM
 #1539

pool.verters.com

Don't deceive users! Return the correct calculation % of the block what was 3 months ago! The percent has to be twice more!
Really users of your pool aren't able to consider?




LMAO, take Shares divide by Shares Est to get percentage at per block.  Sum(Shares) divide by Sum(Shares Est) to get Percentage over a period of time.  What so hard?  Do you also do average of averages?

chilly2k
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1007
Merit: 1000


View Profile
October 31, 2015, 02:50:45 AM
 #1540

pool.verters.com

Don't deceive users! Return the correct calculation % of the block what was 3 months ago! The percent has to be twice more!
Really users of your pool aren't able to consider?




LMAO, take Shares divide by Shares Est to get percentage at per block.  Sum(Shares) divide by Sum(Shares Est) to get Percentage over a period of time.  What so hard?  Do you also do average of averages?

   I think he's saying the expected shares of the last 4 blocks found was 191,174.  But the shares estimate on the general screen shows 382,348.  The actual numbers from both screen actually match with 365,967. 
 
   I don't know how to calculate the expected shares, so I have no idea which seems more likely.  I think he feels the individual block numbers are more valid. so instead of the main screen displaying 365,967/382,348 = 95.72%  it should really be 365,967/191,174 = 191.43% 

   Basically it would take the pool from better then expected (95.72%) to almost 2X worse then expected (191.43%)

I had to read this several times to understand what the problem was, and even then could only do it by actually doing the math to see what was wrong...       

Pages: « 1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 [77] 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 ... 138 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!