Ytterbium
|
|
September 01, 2013, 04:08:54 AM |
|
Those that come to mind:
Coinbase Bitpay SatoshiDice
Public securities come with market maturity. EVERY Bitcoin company is currently a startup, so why would you expect them to be publicly traded?
SDICE was traded on exchanges, but the shares got pulled when MtGox bought them. Are bitpay and coinbase US Companies? If so, we're more likely to see them publicly traded on real exchanges then virtual ones. There's no reason bitcoin companies can't be listed on traditional, fiat exchanges in the future if they're mature enough and large enough.
|
|
|
|
sunnankar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1031
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 01, 2013, 05:50:08 AM |
|
Savers get wealthier every day by doing nothing.
...
The deflation is like and endless juggernaut, it never stops, and the base prices of everything priced in it must by definition drop and drop and drop. Market fluctuations and speculation can mask it for a time, but in the end it is relentless as gravity and it will reign supreme in the end.
Your assertions are totally incorrect. Perhaps you need to read more Mises and Rothbard. Savers, in a deflationary currency, do something extremely important which you incorrectly interpret as nothing. They are choosing to allocate capital into the currency instead of into some other venture which, in their subjective view, does not have as good a prospect of generating a decent return. This speaks to the demand for money which is rarely talked about outside of the Austrian school of economics. And as Bitcoin gets more developed with deeper capital pools and more sophisticated financial products then it will get a better pricing mechanism for the cost of money or Bitcoin's interest rate; just like gold has an interest rate. All a deflationary currency does, compared to our current system of fiat currency and fractional reserve banking, is reveal with greater accuracy and transparency the risk individuals are taking when allocating their capital to be used by others instead of just sitting safely in their Bitcoin wallet. The deflation juggernaut ends based on subjective value theory as applied to the interest rate, demand for money, counter-party risk assessment, expectation of profitable investments and several other factors. Sure, it does not 'speed up capital' like the current system that does which encourages destruction and dissipation of capital, like with bailouts, etc. by privatizing the gains and socializing the losses. But a deflationary system will be much more effective at helping individuals generate and accumulate savings. And those savings will provide a foundation of capital that will result in wealth creation and generation like never before seen in history. Thus, a deflationary currency will result in the vast bulk of humanity much better off than the current financial and monetary system.
|
|
|
|
Lohoris
|
|
September 01, 2013, 07:47:43 AM |
|
If a stock costs 1 btc and the value of btc doubles, all things being equal the stock price should move to 0.5 btc. Wrong; this is only true if that stock issues dividends also based on the BTCUSD rate. If that stock issues BTC dividends not affected by the BTCUSD rate, than its value should be unaffected too.
|
|
|
|
Vycid
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
♫ the AM bear who cares ♫
|
|
September 01, 2013, 08:10:10 AM |
|
If a stock costs 1 btc and the value of btc doubles, all things being equal the stock price should move to 0.5 btc. Wrong; this is only true if that stock issues dividends also based on the BTCUSD rate. If that stock issues BTC dividends not affected by the BTCUSD rate, than its value should be unaffected too. Right. The value embodied by a company is a distinct quantity, and is not bound to any particular currency. In a sense, shares of a company are their own currency, and the price of those shares is actually their exchange rate to other currencies. If the price of BTC doubles, AM shareprice is (theoretically) unaffected, since both their shares and their revenue streams are denominated in BTC. In the real world, we have factors such as relative USD expenditures decreasing (electricity, rent, boards, chips), market irrationality, and people cashing out on the higher BTC/USD rate that influence share price. Frankly, attempting to predict AM price movements based on the BTC/USD ratio is foolhardy - it is what I would call a technical movement. The only thing you have any hope of figuring out is the true value of the underlying company - everything else in the markets is white noise and, in my experience, trying to profit from technicals will get you burned. And, even then, regardless of the validity of your valuation, the market may take an indefinite amount of time to correct to fair value.
|
|
|
|
supert
|
|
September 01, 2013, 10:09:10 AM |
|
SDICE was traded on exchanges, but the shares got pulled when MtGox bought them.
Sorry, what? Gox bought SatoshiDice?!?
|
|
|
|
freedomno1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
|
|
September 01, 2013, 11:17:45 AM |
|
SDICE was traded on exchanges, but the shares got pulled when MtGox bought them.
Sorry, what? Gox bought SatoshiDice?!? The true buyer choose to remain anonymous (Although there are rumors on whodunit Mtgox was one EH seeing it as a cash cow and own buying etc.)
|
Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
September 01, 2013, 11:25:33 AM |
|
SDICE was traded on exchanges, but the shares got pulled when MtGox bought them.
Sorry, what? Gox bought SatoshiDice?!? Oh god why. Hopefully this isn't true.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
101111
|
|
September 01, 2013, 03:11:42 PM |
|
Bitfunder AM @ BTC1.8
|
|
|
|
twentyseventy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 01, 2013, 03:15:11 PM |
|
Bitfunder AM @ BTC1.8 That was a big sell. Back up to 2.0 now.
|
|
|
|
101111
|
|
September 01, 2013, 03:23:28 PM |
|
Bitfunder AM @ BTC1.8 That was a big sell. Back up to 2.0 now. Yep, and excellent buying at that price.
|
|
|
|
superduh
|
|
September 01, 2013, 05:14:46 PM |
|
Bitfunder AM @ BTC1.8 That was a big sell. Back up to 2.0 now. Yep, and excellent buying at that price. 1.8 is a steal - anyone offering direct shares at that price now?
|
ok
|
|
|
gramma
|
|
September 01, 2013, 05:16:16 PM |
|
Bitfunder AM @ BTC1.8 DAMMIT I hate missing stuff like that. Whatever the arguments about whether AM was ever worth 5 BTC, to my mind, it's clearly worth in excess of 1.8.
|
BTC: 1MrNRPo7p8DEyxn87c9BCGwrbatBQeCHc1
|
|
|
DeaDTerra
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 01, 2013, 05:30:48 PM |
|
Keep in mind BitFunder and whoever is managing the PT now has been very unresponsive, late on dividends, etc.
The price difference isn't such a random thing.
I am usually quite responsive The PT has now been handed over to Ukyo. Hopefully he will be able to offer faster dividends and better transfers in and out. //DeaDTerra
|
|
|
|
superduh
|
|
September 01, 2013, 05:48:04 PM |
|
Keep in mind BitFunder and whoever is managing the PT now has been very unresponsive, late on dividends, etc.
The price difference isn't such a random thing.
would still be worth it to buy at 1.8!! and transfer out to direct shares
|
ok
|
|
|
David Chen
Member
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
|
September 01, 2013, 06:13:25 PM |
|
Keep in mind BitFunder and whoever is managing the PT now has been very unresponsive, late on dividends, etc.
The price difference isn't such a random thing.
would still be worth it to buy at 1.8!! and transfer out to direct shares You can transfer out to direct shares only if you have at least 250 shares on the Bitfunder.
|
reputation is everything.
|
|
|
FNG
|
|
September 01, 2013, 06:20:50 PM |
|
Are we back or have we been getting lucky? 4 out of the last 8 blocks
|
|
|
|
JimiQ84
|
|
September 01, 2013, 06:28:30 PM |
|
Are we back or have we been getting lucky? 4 out of the last 8 blocks
probably just luck, it was shitty last 24 hours
|
|
|
|
Strange Vlad
|
|
September 01, 2013, 07:41:35 PM |
|
If you think the network will reach 1 Petahash before the end of the year, then you're too naive. The Petahash is quite likely to come even before October! And by the end of 2013 it will likely go far beyond 2 PH, maybe even approach 3 PH. Looks like I was too conservative! We are going to hit 1PH way before October... Like, within the next couple of weeks. And then if the daily growth is kept around 2.5%, then we'll see 2PH in October, 4PH in November, 8PH in December and, possibly... 10PH in the last days of 2013. Holy cat, I don't believe my own calculations! But then I didn't believe them in July either, and the growth just keeps accelerating...
|
Do not try and bend the spoon. That's impossible. Instead... only try to realize the truth. There is no spoon. Then you'll see, that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself. 1CdVTkA288cd3m1jkdqPjUfhQ5ebei8gVT
|
|
|
Vycid
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
♫ the AM bear who cares ♫
|
|
September 01, 2013, 07:46:17 PM |
|
If you think the network will reach 1 Petahash before the end of the year, then you're too naive. The Petahash is quite likely to come even before October! And by the end of 2013 it will likely go far beyond 2 PH, maybe even approach 3 PH. Looks like I was too conservative! We are going to hit 1PH way before October... Like, within the next couple of weeks. And then if the daily growth is kept around 2.5%, then we'll see 2PH in October, 4PH in November, 8PH in December and, possibly... 10PH in the last days of 2013. Holy cat, I don't believe my own calculations! But then I didn't believe them in July either, and the growth just keeps accelerating... For guys that believe in Bitcoin, you have surprisingly little faith in the free market.
|
|
|
|
Vycid
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
♫ the AM bear who cares ♫
|
|
September 01, 2013, 08:57:47 PM |
|
For guys that believe in Bitcoin, you have surprisingly little faith in the free market.
What? The capability of the competition to rapidly assemble and bring products to market has been a much-maligned topic in this thread in the past few months. The "everyone else is incompetent" mindset flies in the face of free market theories, which suggests that competent competition will arrive in any sector where there is profit to be made. Clearly the evidence of competent competition is here and the opinion has shifted. But your surprise remains - did you really think this opportunity for profit wasn't going to get exploited? That isn't a very free-market way of thinking.
|
|
|
|
|