Bitcoin Forum
November 14, 2024, 09:03:47 AM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 [614] 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 ... 1348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It  (Read 3917035 times)
Ytterbium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
September 01, 2013, 04:08:54 AM
 #12261


Those that come to mind:

Coinbase
Bitpay
SatoshiDice

Public securities come with market maturity. EVERY Bitcoin company is currently a startup, so why would you expect them to be publicly traded?

SDICE was traded on exchanges, but the shares got pulled when MtGox bought them. Are bitpay and coinbase US Companies?  If so, we're more likely to see them publicly traded on real exchanges then virtual ones. There's no reason bitcoin companies can't be listed on traditional, fiat exchanges in the future if they're mature enough and large enough.

sunnankar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1031
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
September 01, 2013, 05:50:08 AM
 #12262

Savers get wealthier every day by doing nothing.

...

The deflation is like and endless juggernaut, it never stops, and the base prices of everything priced in it must by definition drop and drop and drop. Market fluctuations and speculation can mask it for a time, but in the end it is relentless as gravity and it will reign supreme in the end.

Your assertions are totally incorrect. Perhaps you need to read more Mises and Rothbard.

Savers, in a deflationary currency, do something extremely important which you incorrectly interpret as nothing. They are choosing to allocate capital into the currency instead of into some other venture which, in their subjective view, does not have as good a prospect of generating a decent return. This speaks to the demand for money which is rarely talked about outside of the Austrian school of economics. And as Bitcoin gets more developed with deeper capital pools and more sophisticated financial products then it will get a better pricing mechanism for the cost of money or Bitcoin's interest rate; just like gold has an interest rate.

All a deflationary currency does, compared to our current system of fiat currency and fractional reserve banking, is reveal with greater accuracy and transparency the risk individuals are taking when allocating their capital to be used by others instead of just sitting safely in their Bitcoin wallet.

The deflation juggernaut ends based on subjective value theory as applied to the interest rate, demand for money, counter-party risk assessment, expectation of profitable investments and several other factors. Sure, it does not 'speed up capital' like the current system that does which encourages destruction and dissipation of capital, like with bailouts, etc. by privatizing the gains and socializing the losses. But a deflationary system will be much more effective at helping individuals generate and accumulate savings. And those savings will provide a foundation of capital that will result in wealth creation and generation like never before seen in history.

Thus, a deflationary currency will result in the vast bulk of humanity much better off than the current financial and monetary system.

Lohoris
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


Bitgoblin


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 07:47:43 AM
 #12263

If a stock costs 1 btc and the value of btc doubles, all things being equal the stock price should move to 0.5 btc.
Wrong; this is only true if that stock issues dividends also based on the BTCUSD rate.
If that stock issues BTC dividends not affected by the BTCUSD rate, than its value should be unaffected too.

1LohorisJie8bGGG7X4dCS9MAVsTEbzrhu
DefaultTrust is very BAD.
Vycid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


♫ the AM bear who cares ♫


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 08:10:10 AM
 #12264

If a stock costs 1 btc and the value of btc doubles, all things being equal the stock price should move to 0.5 btc.
Wrong; this is only true if that stock issues dividends also based on the BTCUSD rate.
If that stock issues BTC dividends not affected by the BTCUSD rate, than its value should be unaffected too.


Right. The value embodied by a company is a distinct quantity, and is not bound to any particular currency. In a sense, shares of a company are their own currency, and the price of those shares is actually their exchange rate to other currencies.

If the price of BTC doubles, AM shareprice is (theoretically) unaffected, since both their shares and their revenue streams are denominated in BTC. In the real world, we have factors such as relative USD expenditures decreasing (electricity, rent, boards, chips), market irrationality, and people cashing out on the higher BTC/USD rate that influence share price.

Frankly, attempting to predict AM price movements based on the BTC/USD ratio is foolhardy - it is what I would call a technical movement. The only thing you have any hope of figuring out is the true value of the underlying company - everything else in the markets is white noise and, in my experience, trying to profit from technicals will get you burned. And, even then, regardless of the validity of your valuation, the market may take an indefinite amount of time to correct to fair value.

supert
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 01, 2013, 10:09:10 AM
 #12265

SDICE was traded on exchanges, but the shares got pulled when MtGox bought them.

Sorry, what? Gox bought SatoshiDice?!?
freedomno1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820
Merit: 1090


Learning the troll avoidance button :)


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 11:17:45 AM
 #12266

SDICE was traded on exchanges, but the shares got pulled when MtGox bought them.

Sorry, what? Gox bought SatoshiDice?!?

The true buyer choose to remain anonymous
(Although there are rumors on whodunit Mtgox was one EH seeing it as a cash cow and own buying etc.)

Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
September 01, 2013, 11:25:33 AM
 #12267

SDICE was traded on exchanges, but the shares got pulled when MtGox bought them.

Sorry, what? Gox bought SatoshiDice?!?
Oh god why. Hopefully this isn't true.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
101111
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 525
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 03:11:42 PM
 #12268

Bitfunder AM @ BTC1.8  Shocked
twentyseventy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 03:15:11 PM
 #12269

Bitfunder AM @ BTC1.8  Shocked

That was a big sell. Back up to 2.0 now.
101111
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 525
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 03:23:28 PM
 #12270

Bitfunder AM @ BTC1.8  Shocked

That was a big sell. Back up to 2.0 now.
Yep, and excellent buying at that price.
superduh
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 05:14:46 PM
 #12271

Bitfunder AM @ BTC1.8  Shocked

That was a big sell. Back up to 2.0 now.
Yep, and excellent buying at that price.

1.8 is a steal - anyone offering direct shares at that price now?

ok
gramma
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 194
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 01, 2013, 05:16:16 PM
 #12272

Bitfunder AM @ BTC1.8  Shocked

DAMMIT I hate missing stuff like that.  Whatever the arguments about whether AM was ever worth 5 BTC, to my mind, it's clearly worth in excess of 1.8.

BTC: 1MrNRPo7p8DEyxn87c9BCGwrbatBQeCHc1
DeaDTerra
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 01, 2013, 05:30:48 PM
 #12273

Keep in mind BitFunder and whoever is managing the PT now has been very unresponsive, late on dividends, etc.

The price difference isn't such a random thing.
I am usually quite responsive Smiley
The PT has now been handed over to Ukyo.
Hopefully he will be able to offer faster dividends and better transfers in and out.
//DeaDTerra
superduh
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 05:48:04 PM
 #12274

Keep in mind BitFunder and whoever is managing the PT now has been very unresponsive, late on dividends, etc.

The price difference isn't such a random thing.

would still be worth it to buy at 1.8!! and transfer out to direct shares

ok
David Chen
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91
Merit: 10



View Profile
September 01, 2013, 06:13:25 PM
 #12275

Keep in mind BitFunder and whoever is managing the PT now has been very unresponsive, late on dividends, etc.

The price difference isn't such a random thing.

would still be worth it to buy at 1.8!! and transfer out to direct shares

You can transfer out to direct shares only if you have at least 250 shares on the Bitfunder.

reputation is everything.
FNG
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 06:20:50 PM
 #12276

Are we back or have we been getting lucky?   4 out of the last 8 blocks
JimiQ84
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 06:28:30 PM
 #12277

Are we back or have we been getting lucky?   4 out of the last 8 blocks

probably just luck, it was shitty last 24 hours
Strange Vlad
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 01, 2013, 07:41:35 PM
 #12278

If you think the network will reach 1 Petahash before the end of the year, then you're too naive.  The Petahash is quite likely to come even before October!  And by the end of 2013 it will likely go far beyond 2 PH, maybe even approach 3 PH.

Looks like I was too conservative! Shocked
We are going to hit 1PH way before October...  Like, within the next couple of weeks.
And then if the daily growth is kept around 2.5%, then we'll see 2PH in October, 4PH in November, 8PH in December and, possibly... 10PH in the last days of 2013.
Holy cat, I don't believe my own calculations!  But then I didn't believe them in July either, and the growth just keeps accelerating...


Do not try and bend the spoon. That's impossible. Instead... only try to realize the truth. There is no spoon. Then you'll see, that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself.
1CdVTkA288cd3m1jkdqPjUfhQ5ebei8gVT
Vycid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


♫ the AM bear who cares ♫


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 07:46:17 PM
 #12279

If you think the network will reach 1 Petahash before the end of the year, then you're too naive.  The Petahash is quite likely to come even before October!  And by the end of 2013 it will likely go far beyond 2 PH, maybe even approach 3 PH.

Looks like I was too conservative! Shocked
We are going to hit 1PH way before October...  Like, within the next couple of weeks.
And then if the daily growth is kept around 2.5%, then we'll see 2PH in October, 4PH in November, 8PH in December and, possibly... 10PH in the last days of 2013.
Holy cat, I don't believe my own calculations!  But then I didn't believe them in July either, and the growth just keeps accelerating...



For guys that believe in Bitcoin, you have surprisingly little faith in the free market.

Vycid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


♫ the AM bear who cares ♫


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 08:57:47 PM
 #12280

For guys that believe in Bitcoin, you have surprisingly little faith in the free market.
What? Huh

The capability of the competition to rapidly assemble and bring products to market has been a much-maligned topic in this thread in the past few months. The "everyone else is incompetent" mindset flies in the face of free market theories, which suggests that competent competition will arrive in any sector where there is profit to be made.

Clearly the evidence of competent competition is here and the opinion has shifted. But your surprise remains - did you really think this opportunity for profit wasn't going to get exploited? That isn't a very free-market way of thinking.

Pages: « 1 ... 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 [614] 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 ... 1348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!