Rich people gamble only to relieve their stress, making gambling as entertainment not as a place to make extra money. Even some rich people who see opportunities in gambling build their own casinos, that way they will get a lot of profit from the casinos they build. And their loyal members of gamblers are usually from people who are poor and hope to get the jackpot overnight, but in the end have to give up with lots of losses. now online casinos have developed rapidly and anyone can do gambling, can not distinguish between the poor and the rich.
Yeah thats true you cant actually the eveluate the correct data but I would like to presume that both parties are multiple in number when it comes to this gambling habit. But rich people something actually feel bored and think to play with their cash and so gamble it all away just to entertainment themselves but even as they do this gamble the winning mentality still roles in their head because no one actually plays gamble with acquiring loss as a first intention. Its the confirmation to the question whether users gamble because they have sufficient funds. They gamble because they have money if not then they toil harder to make money. People who work hard to earn some money don't risk the hard earned money and if they do, it will be very limited. Their money is already intended to their family. However people are always tell themselves to make money work for them, funny its misunderstood that way which the lower class gambles like there is no tomorrow. |
|
|
|
|
There are certainly more lower and middle class gambling to make money than those rich who are only gambling because they with their friends in the casino. For people who are in the lower class, they are in the casino with the objective to make money, if possible find ways to cheat the casino with their strategy. If the rich gamble. its a go big or go home gamble.
In the gambling house nearby, the rich is noticeable because there will be lot o people behind him peeking his cards all the time and watching how much he'd put on the pot.
|
|
|
|
|
Its best if you make it simple and not learn the concept along with BTC. Just read it all in FOREX market trading analysis as they have more tutorials and details of how indicators work.
Not to worry since indicators in forex nor stock market still works the same in crypto market.
Once you established your knowledge in how the economy works and what moves the prices, its when to go buy (long) and when to sell (short) with the help of indicators. And then you can come back to crypto, its all the same the difference in futures trading in crypto is taking a loan from the exchange seem literal.
|
|
|
|
Debt student forgiven seem like a good idea to get votes. This will surely make the people go for Biden but I think he won't be needing this anymore since FEDnow is already live. Sooner, the stimi will do wonders for his win. Its gonna be a wide margin win. It only need on speech and rest of the presidential candidate will not be able to compete him. It's intriguing how USA elections align with Bitcoin halving, but we mustn't allow ourselves to be swayed solely by election promises that often distract people during the campaign period.
A conspiracy theorist will probably come up sort of things because of this coincidental alignment. No it can not be coincident, there is no such thing.  |
|
|
|
As of this point, both camps are yet to discuss that and start their negotiations because it is still too early for them to commence it. Besides, even if we say that Inoue have an advantage in this fight despite being the challenger, we still cannot say that it is a guarantee that he will win and will proceed to the negotiations for the upcoming undisputed fight versus Marlon Tapales.
Exactly, we have yet to see the outcome of this fight as it could still change. There are numerous factors that will be taken into consideration, with money being the main factor. If this fight has the potential to generate a significant amount of revenue and ends up being a close contest, then it is likely that we will witness a rematch. The fact that they rescheduled the fight and included it as part of a mega fight (Spence vs Crawford) indicates that profitability is likely the main reason. This fight becomes even more significant than a main event in the bantamweight division because, despite being an undercard fight, it is part of a mega event that is expected to generate a substantial number of pay-per-view subscriptions and attract a sold-out crowd in the arena. Are you talking about Donaire vs Santiago fight that was moved as part of Spence vs Crawford undercard? Inoue vs Fulton seem to be happening this July 25. But they were also saying this Inoue Fulton fight was moved from May to July was because Inoue rant about WADA random testing which was done twice a week. What was reported though was that Inoue got injured in the training. Anyway as expected Inoue by KO is 1.90 I'm not familiar with the rant that Inoue about the WADA testing, but it is not the first time that I heard from the boxer themselves. Manny Pacquiao too during the height of his run was being testing randomly and he also complains about it. And it lead to the speculation that he is taking juice but it was not proven throughout his career submitting blood samples needed before a fight. Perhaps Inoue might have the same fear of Manny, that is injections and how many blood are being taken every week. Probably, these are just rumors because the official reason why the fight was postponed was that Inoue got injured during practice. However, if this is necessary, then I think they should comply with it to ensure that the fight will happen. It's not a big issue unless a boxer has something to hide. The need of blood samples for WADA testing will not be a thing or needed if the opposing camp is not requesting it, I don't mean to say that Fulton's camp is scared or whatever be the reason is but I know that these tests will only surface if someone will request. Just like during Manny Pacquiao's time, I think he also did that test before he faced Marquez for the third time. Fulton couldn't believe someone so strong with a record more impressive than him. He gets paranoid and requested testing every week. This is an issue already before the fight but once Fulton loses, this is gonna blow up to accuse Inoue. Even that Japanese cake will be an issue sooner to accuse Inoue of sabotaging him. Right now its just discrediting Inoue's career though this WADA testing. You know how that feels when you are accused of something. Its degrading of course Inoue will react in a way. |
|
|
|
Which one do you actually find to be more easier and I believe that futures trading is also capable of giving someone life-changing money but which one do you believe is less risky than the other?
Because it is more difficult to analyse the market than a game, I find gambling to be simpler. However, futures trading might be more profitable than gambling if you have a solid understanding of it. I think it only depends on the person. There are some who can adapt easily but it will first depend on their interest if which one they will go. Some don't waste time in gambling for some reasons but they just head straight in futures trading. So, it was futures trading is the one that is profitable for some while for the other it was gambling, specifically sports betting and other skill-based games. There might be people who will say that gambling is better because it provides entertainment other than the profit potential but they forget the fact that once you love what you are doing, it won't still make you stressed out or you can also be happy about it. Personally, I find it less risky to bet on casinos because I can skip some games if I find it risky while if you are in BTC/USDT finding your way to make it in futures trading. It is hard to predict, the sideways movement today is just liquidating traders wherever the market goes. Generally, there is no easy job. No easy money at all. You'd still gonna have to work it out and either gambling or trading, you can lose money. |
|
|
|
|
Fathers really do that? Unless you really have made them mad after you become a kingpin in your town. But fathers don't do that even if you gamble.
All the years of perseverance is paying off so why do you need an inheritance. Let your father give it all to your brothers, they might need more than you. You tell your father he doesn't need to give something to you. All you need is just both of them to continue a good relationship. You don't have to hate each other or despise each other because of your gambling.
|
|
|
|
Dana be like  Dana would be like that if Ngannou lures more fighters from UFC into boxing or have a fight against Jake Paul  UFC has faces a curse of "being the best". Now everyone wants to bite them. I think that we wont be seeing Ngannou much in mma or boxing fights after this fight against Fury. I believe that people who used to be poor get access to tons of money, they get spoiled really quick. That is a proven fact. Imho Ngannou gonna get his millions and be more a promotional tool for PFL or sits in his chair (he has a position there) and just manage promotion. Seem to be the very nature of man. When eventually they made a ton of money they become a burden to a lot of people. Looking at Conor now, he spends here and there and he seems high all the time and recently he knock out someone in a bar. Ngannou could over time turn into something if he won't get to learn the wisdom. He is humble though, we just don't know how long he will be that way. But they come from a very humble beginning though. Sure he had seen what money can do to people. Cheers to Francis, hope he KOs Fury. Wanna see his life story tbh. I think they talk about his life in a movie |
|
|
|
|
You're the luckiest if you win a jackpot while only depositing the tiniest amount. Still, it's accustomed to providing KYC so long as you are withdrawing a huge amount assuming the casino didn't accuse you of something.
It's why it's recommended to just play at the most well-known casino. If it's not so well known, the casino will snap after learning you deposit BTC worth $10 and you won $10K. You're in an uphill battle and will beg to allow you to withdraw your funds while the casino accuses you of violating their TOS.
|
|
|
|
They may be famous outside the crypto community but to most Bitcoiners, they are unknown. As much as we want to bet on boxing bouts, there are just uninteresting exhibition fights like the ones promoted by this Kingpyn. @YuginKadoya posted this in the other thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5370631.msg62532811#msg62532811The Logans really influenced a lot of YouTubers to also try boxing but this one looks like a reality TV. Thanks for sharing it here and surely enough nobody really wants to engage with a discussion about it maybe because it is consist of influencers and not actual boxers but I posted it there to make people aware that there is some event that is going to happen but consist of non-boxers and just YouTubers, influencers, Onlyfan girls, and anything under the sun and they have provided an event that is surely out of the ordinary, for sure no one really are discussing this kind of things and I really don't see this profitable if there are no sponsors but I think they have, and I surely don't know any deeper information why they are doing this kind of things but still I really though this was interesting so I have posted it there, It seems you are right because there's no users who quoted the last post you made but maybe there are some of them noticed and read it and maybe they start to research more of it? Like me for example, it's my first time hearing the keyword so I search for more info and see that it was the same as boxing but if people already embraced boxing and other variations related to it like MMA then why not this one? You're right, some fighters are a OnlyFans star. She even did flash her boobs after a win but it was censored. Well, what can we expect from her? It was the nature of her career so things like that are already expected to happen. Maybe this sport was profitable as there might be betting site who offer a market for this? Their main point on why they are doing it is prolly to give people an entertainment. Flashing her boobs! Dang, I gotta see that. I bet that's what the fans paid for so it's definitely not fair to censor it. It's not surprising lots of people come but looks like they are not in an arena, people are just sitting in a lawn chairs. If this Kingpin promotion gonna do this regularly, they gonna make a lot of onlyfans celebrities join. King Kenny seems to have boxing skills, he's got head movement but also showboating. They should invite Jake Logan as it can attract more ticket buyers. |
|
|
|
I have a question for your consideration about crypto casinos and Sportsbooks:
When individuals engage in BTC casinos, they may encounter a message indicating that the games are not available in their country.
The solution to this issue is fairly straightforward. However, do casinos take this into consideration?
The reason I ask is because there are some Sportsbook or crypto casinos that have offered to advertise on my website. However, the majority of our readers have limited knowledge about this. They understand how to enable a VPN and how to send and receive BTC, but that's the extent of their knowledge, with exceptions on both ends of the spectrum. I am hesitant to advertise for casinos if it could potentially lead our readers into problematic situations.
Of course, it's impossible to completely eliminate the risk of "trouble". However, I hope my point is clear?
Thank you so much.
Those are not in his article though. There are a lot more regular people has to know about crypto than gambling actually. It will be easier for them to shift to gambling when they already learn how to use wallets and understand blockchain. They can even wait til there will be new developments like the metaverse which can also make gambling a hell of an experience. But I can't believe I opened that link. 5th is You gamble with mBTC, not BTC lol what does that mean? |
|
|
|
Ngannou just confirmed that he will go back to fight in MMA and there's already a date probably February or March it's going to be a PFL debut and no name still comes out, so Nagnnou will have a busy schedule this year and onwards and there's also a clause that if ever he wins there will be a rematch but it's unclear if there is a rematch if Fury wins, so he promised that he will do everything to get that rematch and that means he'll be earning more from the rematch.
There will be no rematch as Fury will also be facing other title challengers after this. They criticize him for "running away" from real threats when he signed up for this bout but that's not how I saw it. I thought both camps were working on a Ngannou's PFL timeline and they'll probably not have another chance if Fury is to fight the likes of Usyk. Fury couldn't turn down the opportunity since fighting with Francis is an easy peasy win and the money is also satisfying for him. But as Ngannou said, the boxing community was confused as to why a nobody who didn't fall in line to Fury got the next fight. Usyk should have been the next but Ngannou comes in kicking everyone's butt out the line. His gimmick works better after all Ngannou is a sensation as people like crossover fights. There's a pool of HW in PFL that Ngannou can fight, however, they don't excite if matched against Ngannou. This is gonna be harder to promote unless they invite Jones. Dana be like |
|
|
|
|
Don't consider it like it prevented you from winning big. In fact, you aim big, it's just that you bet on the wrong team. If you won, it would have been bigger than that $200 you regretted.
There is always next time and maybe some sports tips may work.
I did have some regrets about Sportsbet as well, especially in the MMA sports. Wrong analysis most of the time. This is what happens when a bettor is uninformed about the ones they put their money on.
|
|
|
|
Yup! That might be it, for sure Jack Della Maddalena isn't what we think he could be with Wrestler for sure, or maybe because of his weight cuts for 2 weeks that might affect his cardio, maybe he had a hard time with Bassil Hafez, but for sure a lot is thinking Jack Della Maddalena will surely struggle against Khamzat Chimaev for sure,
Jack Della Maddalena is actually a pretty good UFC fighter even in 17 fights he managed to have 15 wins with 11 TKOs. This fighter based on Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu has succeeded in becoming a fighter who can give fans satisfaction when watching him fight and now he has managed to occupy 13th place in the Welterweight class. But when it comes to fighting Khamzat Chimaev I still doubt that Jack Della Maddalena can win even though he has tried his best, because Khamzat Chimaev is quite a dangerous fighter and often creates wins with his fighting intelligence. He has powerrr in those hands but not sure if he's really as 'good' as where the books want to line him at. What was the price for him last weekend? Around 1.30? That's too much imho. If JDM and his opponent fought under the same conditions three times I think his opponent could win once. And as the match ended in a split decision, JDM should've been lined close to a coin flip. UFC Free Fight: Aspinall vs Spivakhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZopYc-vsxoUFC Free Fight: Tybura vs Hardyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo3bhCZJs-MThe UFC must be giving Aspinall a favor by matching him up with an easy opponent after what happened during his last match. Let's hope the knee is all healed up! I think Aspinall via sub at anything around 2.50 - 3.00 will be value here. Aspinall can not be so confident against Tybura. He may not be as brutal as Blaydes but he's well rounded. Took a year for Aspinal to come back after Blaydes's fight, it's considerably long inactivity due to the knee injury. He may actually lose the fight because that injury causes his knee to be unstable. Lots of interesting matches this weekend though. I'd skip Aspinal but will bet on some. Muniz by submission Stoliarenko by submission Grant by submission Alvarez by Submission |
|
|
|
The government owns the crypto exchange that's cool. Is this the first where an exchange is owned by the government? I can already see where the market will go and what will happen to the existing exchanges today like coinbase seem to be favored by the government as it partners with Blackrock. I guess Coinbase will be officially the crypto exchange for US citizens. Binance will be China? Definitely Anyway, we all have out local exchanges, I guess I will also assume our exchange will be government owned as well. This will be the first that I have heard of. Coinbase is not only the crypto exchange that is existing in United States, there are other ones like Binance.us, Kraken and some other exchanges in United States. Binance headquarter was in China before, but no more there since many years ago. Most countries in the world allows Binance.com to render its products and services to their citizens. Its very good news and inspiring development for Indonesian investors/traders, as well as for overall adoption and growth of crypto industry. Given that Asia is the ls the most populous continent, crypto friendly policies implemented by the governments of the regional countries can play pivotal role for establishing it as widely accepted method of payment and appealing option for long term investment.
I do not see it as a good news, I prefer crypto exchanges to be private, instead of government to be the one in control directly. If Indonesians have alternatives, that is better in my own opinion. From that I have read the US government afaik gives a directive to Binance.us where only US citizens can be their employees. That tells something is pretty much what is happening. To other US exchanges like Kraken, I think it's no problem for them as they are US company. The Indonesian government mandated that all crypto transactions can only be done through this exchange. This is pretty slick because apart that they collect KYC, they can also trace all the wallet addresses linked to whichever coins passes thru this exchange. |
|
|
|
The government owns the crypto exchange that's cool. Is this the first where an exchange is owned by the government? I can already see where the market will go and what will happen to the existing exchanges today like coinbase seem to be favored by the government as it partners with Blackrock. I guess Coinbase will be officially the crypto exchange for US citizens. Binance will be China? Definitely Anyway, we all have out local exchanges, I guess I will also assume our exchange will be government owned as well. |
|
|
|
Robert F. Kennedy Jr has outlined his plan to create a new public debt issuance that will be backed by bitcoin and precious metals. He also said that bitcoin trading will be exempted from capital tax gains under his administration. This will certainly create big headline news hehe. It also appears that Bukele will also find a friendly American government towards El Salvador if papa Robert wins hehehehe. The both of them are bitcoiners. “My plan would be to start very, very small, perhaps 1% of issued T-bills would be backed by hard currency, by gold, silver platinum or bitcoin,” Kennedy said, describing his vision for returning to a hard currency standard in the U.S.
In addition, Kennedy announced his administration “will exempt the conversion of bitcoin to the U.S. dollar from capital gains taxes.”Source https://www.thestreet.com/cryptocurrency/rfk-jr-announces-plan-to-back-dollar-with-bitcoin-end-bitcoin-taxesSeem a game changer to counter the BRICS that are shifting to the gold standard. The polls though don't manifest, Sir Bob isn't winning. If no media is covering RFK Jr, no matter what he can offer. He may just be in the shadows and will still not gonna be the Dem's dog, Michelle Obama might just be if they are indeed taking out Biden in the equation. Trump is taking step by step and getting the speed somehow. But as Democrats get desperate, they are going to arrest Trump for that Jan6. Poor Trump. |
|
|
|
It is quite sad to see even people here, in the bitcointalk forum where you are already in the high tech world for people who are usually young and more developed and smart to be able to do crypto trading, end up showing so much hatred towards them, just look at this topic, and see some people who has shown so much hatred towards them and we can easily say online gambling is much better for them but also for us as well because I wouldn't want to be gambling near a person who is filled with this much hate neither, even if that hate wasn't towards me, it's still hate and I rather stay away from that if possible.
At the end of the day, they are just normal people just like any of us and I wish them the best of luck on their gambling.
You can't help it, you will find people like this almost everywhere, even online where there is no physical contact or appearance, so people who can see others and their physical appearance somewhere outside like a land-based casino or something will surely show hatred that they have been raised with, I say that because someone who has been raised with love and care tends to have the same feelings for everyone else, but the opposite happens when you have been raised with hatred. A person, regardless of their appearance, status, cast, gender, or anything specific, is allowed or should be allowed to gamble as there is basically no discrimination of any kind in gambling whether it's done online or done in a physical or land-based casino, everyone should be allowed to gamble. The world is not a Barbie world. It's cruel that their dads don't like them being gay. But believe it or not, people vote for gay people and you can see there are gay actors and politicians, they are welcome as much as straights. But if they notice something is not good, take a hint that's the advice to take. Sure, they can gamble in traditional casinos as much as in online casinos. But just be wary. What else do the LGBTQ want that the world hasn't given when they can marry each other already they can even adopt a kid. Are people suppose to be afraid of them? |
|
|
|
This fight has been cancelled. Paulo Costa refused to fight in two less before the fight (Booo!). Now Aliskerov gonna fight Roman Dolidze, whos gonna be on short notice and fought in March against Vettori. For information, Aliskerov has only 1 loss (to Chimaev) in his career and is sort of a Chimaev on minimal settings. Either Costa has money issues with UFC again, or got scared. Because Aliskerov is a perfect counter for Costa (combat sambo + he is from Dagestan ). Allegedly Paulo Costa is hinting (on his twitter) that the reason for his pull-out is that he got contracted to fight Chimaev at UFC 294 in Abu Dhabi (October?) and this would make sense. His fight with Aliskerov was a poor match-up in my opinion. Aliskerov would gain a lot by winning, but from Costa's point of view, it was a high-risk-low-reward move. And from the UFC perspective, Costa is still a well hyped-up fighter, so why waste his earning potential like that? Setting him up against Chimaev makes way more sense money-wise. Btw, anyone ever seen how Costa wrestle or use bjj techniques? Has he proved that he really got that black belt in bjj?
Not really. I can't find even a sparring footage on youtube. Same high risk against Khamzat but at least Abu Dhabi fight will be profitable for Costa. Fans will not look at it that way though, to them Costa is a pullout puss. Khamzat also pullout against Usman reasoning he only wants in the MW which Costa make sense. They did have a heated quarrel before and Costa was very eager to fight Khamzat so they finally agreed. Costa can prove his BJJ blackbelt against Khamzat. Either that Khamzat sniffs his crouch. |
|
|
|
~snip~
There is no other way if one day it is proven that there is no match between personal data and IP because using a VPN you have to let the winning money be lost to be taken over by the casino.
I said about this if you take the risk by using a VPN you will be very sorry if it happens and is detected violating casino rules.
There are still many casinos without having to use a VPN but they always use it just to be able to access their favorite casino. And that's when gamblers who violate the rules will complain about their problems and even submit them on this forum in the hope that friends on this forum will help them. But after careful investigation, it turns out that he was the one who violated the rules of the casino, and he only wanted to damage the reputation of the casino by spreading false stories. There is no other way for him except to let the casino take his money because of his own mistakes. But some casinos allow him to withdraw his deposited money but cannot withdraw his winnings. That is the policy of the casino. We better follow the rules of the casino so that our gambling account is safe from trouble. Withdrawing his winnings seem very considerate but some casino just allow them to withdraw what they deposit. I think we have seen these happen every time there is a scam accusation where the user did something against the TOS. Its often just what was deposited as allowed to be withdrawn. I'm not sure if authorities will find it illegal when casinos have lots of domain to mirror their website so that users from countries where gambling is illegal don't have to use VPN. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
