No, that is your interpretation plus a little bit of blatant lying, not facts. A number of complaints were filled and dismissed in all states. Even if you do not believe in all the proof, the content of the depositions, the own members of the RP saying that they wanted nothing to do with it, at least you should consider the level of organisation that would be required to change the vote across several states. It is impossible to do that without leaks and people knowing and leaving real evidence behind.

It is about time that you guys accept that Trump was a terrible president. He was not up to the task of leading a country, probably he is not even up to the task of leading a country club. People died because of his attitude, diplomacy was severely hurt because of his - I cannot call it anything but stupidity. US has lost stance in the world and left it worse that it was before him.

If the RP cannot come up with someone better than Trump or Bush Junior or the likes of them, there is something very wrong in the party.

Saying so over and over does not make it true - just more boring. All evidence, even declarations before congress by their own team and near family point to someone simply trying to take power by force. The US is probably the only place where this guy does not end in prison for a long time.

Even if someone accepts that somehow there was any short of cheating (which is nearly impossible at the scale that would have been needed), the "solution" of assaulting the Capitol is not a solution at all. Attacking physically the chosen representatives of the people is a Coup regardless of any circumstance. In most countries it gets you life in prison, in some a firing squad.

It is false logic ("Ukraine made itself stronger, thus they were not going to comply" False, Ukraine had all reasons to get stronger since the RF had shown clear intent of using violence to achieve its objectives).

The Minsk agreements are pretty much an unconditional surrender and a treaty that is imposed like that does only hold while the balance of power holds. There have been many comments already on who broke what in the agreements. Adolf Putin is not neutral to this.

These are the rules for all female in Muslims extremist regimes, you do not need to travel to 1914. Even in moderate regimes, the rules are implemented effectively to fully control the life of women, except that they are actually more stringent than the ones you have published.

The free world is at risk of going back to those ridiculous rules as there are many fundamentalists, including Christian fundamentalist that would be happy to have that set of demands of women.


You should not confuse the Christian mythology with reality. Please, go to a qualified person for your treatment if you are also hearing voices.  And NO, your priest is not a qualified person for that.


Women have had jobs since the beginning of time - a completely different thing is getting paid for said jobs. Women in 1914 had a limited choice of works - very very limited - factories, teaching, nannies, secretaries,... And they could only keep working if married with permission with the husband.

Women who dyed their hair, went with random guys, etc... were pretty much excluded from social circles as that was considered immoral. Obviously a teacher cannot, even nowadays, show an unsocial behaviour in private life - except that now none of that would be unsocial.

All that you are "discovering" by reading the rules is well known history, there is no need to re-analyse the wheel.

You are implying that there is not freedom of expression already or that is somehow inadequately limited. This is pretty much how the narrative of the Trumpublican party is now. Elon has mixed politics and business certainly, declared several times in lines dangerously close to justifying a coup, so this is not me.

Permanently banning Trump from Twitter is based on the conditions of use. Basically calling for an assault on the location of a governing body when they were choosing the next President. A ban from Twitter has rarely been more deserved.

He stands with Ukrainian civilians, which is perfectly all right. Not every RF citizen is evil - in fact most of them just want to live their lives in peace and prosper like anyone else in the world. The problem is the army and the chief psychos, along with the senile Putin. I reckon that RF population should seriously consider doing something about their government, but in a country with an 11% military spending that may be quite a challenge.

I would not say we are out of the books. There are some doubts on which direction each world area is heading - it can be stagflation, it can be sustained inflation or it can be back to low growth and low inflation. Potentially, it could even get to mid growth low inflation.

All these scenarios are possible, but my take now is that there should be more taxes and this being used to reduce debt, that is quite in general for the western developed worls.

And probably some Russian? I mean, sound like an obstacle to many.

BTW not a "handful" of countries sell citizenships... US, Australia, Canada, UK, Spain, Italy... all have golden visa. I am not going to research, but with around a million USD you can probably be welcome anywhere. And the funny news is that the money does not always have to be yours: think Entrepreneurs visa, just for raising half a mill or so.

Anyway, the point is true and we are still waiting for news of BA Decker's application for RF citizenship and be.open's frontline pictures.

I would like to know the details of the investigation. I am glad Germany keeps a vigilant eye on guys like this, but ideology (communism, nazism, capitalism, fascism,...) is not a crime in itself. Contacting with Putin technically is not either. I am interested in knowing the plans they had, how serious they were about it and the extent of the illegalities themselves. The number of people implied or supportive in the rage of the 20 thousand is something I would also like to have honest confirmation of it.

Having said that, insofar as I am concerned, they are better kept away.

LOL... so funny... you see a conspiracy in anything and consider yourself smart, but it is, like in most cases, it is because you lack basic understanding of how the world works and some basic culture, so for you everything is mysterious and think other know as little as you do.

paxmao - "Pasmao" - colloquial Spanish for "being frozen" or "paralyzed by astonishment". Not "working for China", nor for that matter, for anyone except perhaps the sponsor in my signature if posting is work.

It also happens that "pax" means peace in Latin... just a coincidence.

Please open your own thread and discuss there world hunger, how wrong is the mainstream media, how smart are you for not believing it and your views on entomology and human nutrition.

Regarding Person of the Year, it is not the Nobel Peace price, an Times just chooses someone who has been very influential during the year. Stalin was influential and until the Holodomor and the real production of the USSR was properly understood, he seemed to be working miracles. Putin also seemed to have taken a decision to take the RF to a higher integration with the larger economies...

Aw... normal guys have their 40s crisis and solve it by buying an expensive car... why did he wait to have his personal crisis at 70 and invaded a country instead? Who the f*** knows.

Which it will fail, as underaged women are married to men they barely know at an age in which they should be playing with dolls... Is it not trafficking because it is their own family selling them? Another step in radicalisation, another stupid law getting the world 100 years back. If you want to fight child sex, fight poverty and start changing a culture that reduces women to cattle.

Elon buying Twitter, which banned Trump - quite late if you ask me - for using it to mobilise the radical supporters into marching violently in the Capitol, then saying that "there was information that was hidden from the public" - which points to supporting conspiracies and Trump and his appointed candidates still on the theory of the stolen election...

I mean, just add 2 + 2 and this looks like Trump trying to get elected even if he does not get elected. There is not much from there to saying that he is "entitled to another mandate after because the second was stolen" or anything along those lines...

Too many scalability problems IMO, the blockchain has certain uses but a private casino recording in a blockchain seems like overdoing it. Provably fair is an interesting application, but that is pretty much it. There is not much benefit from having tokens or records, I would even think that some people would rather not have any records of their activity 

The site can be located in a certain region, serverwise, but the company jurisdiction is more important, they would need to make sure that the country has a positive attitude towards gaming but at the same time is going to enforce the rules that make all this be honest. Else, it does not matter if the servers are in the US or in some region in the Pacific, is about the laws.

Yeah, all casinos need two types of players, the "plebs" if you want to call them that way and the "big shots". The first ones will be on the retail end, little bonus, not much attention from the site, etc...  while the big spenders will receive all the attention and get plenty of freebies. But there is not much difference other than the stakes in terms of the games being played I would say,

A few of the words in the title thread are pretty much red flags: Chinesse (not precisely known for giving advantage to others in the deals, nor giving accurate information), an no KYC, which is pretty much banned all over the world. It seems so doubtful that the proof to the contrary of being a scan would need to be also quite extensive. I wonder why are we even trying.

I am not really confident on these, but honestly, I am not really confident in any other token at the moment. There has to be a clear advantage over bitcoin, which means the token should not be linked to it, which is something that is not happening in general. It also has to give a clear advantage in the gaming, as you are always at risk of the site closing, etc...

It seems that air attacks in general are at the moment exceeding the defensive capacity in general. Anti-air is expensive and cannot cover all territory, but just vital points and perhaps cities. Meanwhile, cheap IKEA drones can be cheaply be sent by the hundreds, so even if 80% are lost it does not matter.

Having said that, these attacks are a weapon of destruction, but not really a weapon of conquer. It seems that the RF is trying to force a diplomatic hand rather than real military gains.

BA, if you really want to be taken seriously, you are going to actually provide realistic evidence of the things your say, because it is very trendy to be a conspiracy theorist and it seems to be commonly accepted that anyone out there may know more than the people who actually know about things after studying all their life - but I do not. I am not blind, I do not fail to see the "scheme behind" nor anything like that. It is simply that I have actually bothered to learn about how the world works from proper sources.

Now, if you expect any kind of reasonable discussion, you would need to stop mentioning your imaginary friends (such as "God") or choose to go and talk to them.

BTW, Ukrainians are mostly Orthodox, which actually have a version of the Christian legends much closer to the original ones, kept by the Byzantines. You do not get to teach anything to them regarding Christian mythology.