|
I think that if you are starting from scratch is much better to build a website, because it will allow you lean development as there are more tools and you will be able to explore the universe of your market and types of clients more freely. Also, if you look for a standard software, in Android or other platforms, you will not excel in the platform as it will be the same as any other.
|
|
|
|
I think it should be an affiliate program but with more commission. XD,
I may love it very much and I will work for your project to help you promote.
They can surely add an affiliate program as this was too common. Every gambling site do always have this program as this helps promote their brand and in exchange for this, the user will be rewarded or will be given by a commission but it was usually small. I think freebitco is the only site that I know who offers a high commission when it comes to affiliates. We all love high commission rates but the problem is if the owners are feeling the same thing but I guess they aren't. They only want to make sure that they will earn more, more than their users. They can do other forms of promotions but why can't they reduce some of their budgets only to enhance their affiliate programs? Most promotional tools around are anyway obvious. It is said that only 10% of a business is the idea, even it can be more for some really innovative ones, but most time this is true. It is also said that the team is nearly 40% of success, depending on how difficult the task, but there is at leas a 30% that is the execution. That makes a difference in companies, so it is not about affiliate or not or bonus or not, it is about how you implement this into a general strategy. |
|
|
|
NATO (including Finland and Sweden) just reaffirmed their intent to welcome Georgia and Ukraine into the alliance. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_209531.htm
This requires another thread, anyway.
Don't expect a good faith argument from him...he seems especially stubborn and clueless about how the global economy works. Essentially, US money is really only good in the US. Oh, sure, some countries play around with the USDollar. But most of it goes to buying something from the US.
US money is good everywhere. Nearly every country will take it either directly or exchange it to local currency. No other currency in the world comes close to the versatility of the US dollar. It doesn't matter where they buy something from... they all want US dollars as evidenced by the rising exchange rates. You should really travel abroad, maybe to Russia which you're so fond of. Even Russians love US dollar, especially the benjamin variety. All you are doing is confirming the point I made. Are you sure about Georgia? As far as Ukraine is concerned, yes, the request has to be examined and above all NATO must make sure that it can effectively defend any new member from aggression, as it cannot afford to loose reputation in the even it cannot be done. Now, that is not such an easy task when you have a barbaric neighbour throwing trash in your garden. The defensive systems needed go well beyond the rapid intervention force. |
|
|
|
|
Yes, that is part of the program to modernise all those bottle-necks that silently hamper the US economy, such as river crossing, obsolete roads, unfinished infrastructure. At least that is the theory behind the "Biden Plan". In my experience all that optimised allocation tends to end up in a politically motivated allocation that is not very effective. At least it greases the economy.
|
|
|
|
|
Si no garantiza nada que es esto entonce? Son reservas auditadas? Que calidad tiene esta informacion? Yo no me creo que CMC pueda en el futuro verificar realmente las reservas que aducen tener, sobre todo porque hay muchas jurisdicciones implicadas y muchas de ellas bastante opacas. Las reservas tampoco pueden medirse por lo que tengan ciertas direcciones, seria un metodo muy dudoso.
Al final, creo que se puede uno fiar mas o menos de los exchanges que sigan y certifiquen las normativas oficiales y fiarse igual q te fias de un banco auditado (no mucho).
|
|
|
|
Wrong! Of course, if BADeckerville happened to be a legal lending institution like a bank in the US, then you are right right. I mean, checks are treated as money. All those little pieces of paper on the floor of the stock exchanges are treated as money at some time in their life. The banks have been given legal permission to treat promissory notes as money... in fact, as newly created money. The problem is that they are harming the borrowers when they require them to pay the loan off twice. But since the borrower doesn't realize what is going on, there isn't a whole lot he can say. Search on "Tom Schauf, bank freedom." In addition, the second payoff money is what the US and the wealthy use to direct US funds and armament to Ukraine. So, the common people are supporting the war without even realizing it, or realizing how.  You seem seriously confused about what the fractional system is. You mean you get "fake" money and pay with "real money" or something like that? I would say you need to open a thread in the Economy section. Other than that, opt-out. It is easier than ever to get out of the fractional system and into a real-no-multiplier money with bitcoin and others. Now, believe that if you are actually borrowing rather than lending, is much much worse. I understand how you can be so easily duped by the banking system. Not all banking systems are the same. Just like the US is fighting Russia through the Ukraine. But here is the point that answers it about US and Euro bank loans. When the banker gets the signed loan paperwork from the borrower, he deposits this paperwork in an account, just like it was a check or money order. In the same way that a check or money order is money, the loan paperwork is money as well. Then the banker withdraws the money and gives it to the borrower in the form of cash or a bank check. An even trade. Borrower money to the banker in trade for banker money to the borrower. How do we know this to be true? The bank ledger shows the entries. Loan paperwork money in, and cash or bank check out. The bank and the borrower created new money together. Most borrowers don't know this. That's why they pay the loan off the second time over the next 10 to 30 years. If you don't want to believe it, just say so. But if you are seriously interest, study up on what Tom Schauf has to say, and why he is qualified to say it. The fractional system is simply another system that banks are allowed to use by government to make more money. The families that own the banking system use both methods to get money to help pay for wars that they use to get even more money... like this Ukraine one. This requires another thread, anyway. What you call paperwork is the recognition of a debt, with is accounted as an asset for the bank - because it is. Not exactly like a money order and is not registered in the same accounting concept but I get your point as both are the recognition of someone owing money to the bank. The recognition of a debt is not and cannot be treated a "money" and is not. You can potentially sell it for "money" (cash) or get a credit using it as collateral, but that is it. You cannot create cash with the "paperwork" just like that, only with cash reserves deposited in the Federal Reserve or, in other jurisdictions, in Central Banks AFAIK. On the fractional system, yes, it is a way of creating money, it is well known and a tool for monetary policy (and a grip that the Government has on banks in many jurisdictions). I think this is only vaguely related to Ukraine. |
|
|
|
Let me say it again, If there is zero interest, the borrower is still repaying the loan twice.BADeckerville is an interesting place. So if you loan me 100 BADecker Bucks today that you created out of thin air and offer without interest, and in 1 year I settle the loan by paying you 100 BADecker Bucks, I've actually repaid you twice (at least!), although I only remember paying you back once.... Wrong! Of course, if BADeckerville happened to be a legal lending institution like a bank in the US, then you are right right. I mean, checks are treated as money. All those little pieces of paper on the floor of the stock exchanges are treated as money at some time in their life. The banks have been given legal permission to treat promissory notes as money... in fact, as newly created money. The problem is that they are harming the borrowers when they require them to pay the loan off twice. But since the borrower doesn't realize what is going on, there isn't a whole lot he can say. Search on "Tom Schauf, bank freedom." In addition, the second payoff money is what the US and the wealthy use to direct US funds and armament to Ukraine. So, the common people are supporting the war without even realizing it, or realizing how. You seem seriously confused about what the fractional system is. You mean you get "fake" money and pay with "real money" or something like that? I would say you need to open a thread in the Economy section. Other than that, opt-out. It is easier than ever to get out of the fractional system and into a real-no-multiplier money with bitcoin and others. Now, believe that if you are actually borrowing rather than lending, is much much worse. |
|
|
|
...
[OFF-TOPIC] all of it.
You are aware that interest rates in EU and US have been nearly 0, even negative in some countries?
Not off-topic at all! Here's why. The Ukraine gifts from the US and Europe are paid for by the people of those countries in a very clever way. So, it's all on-topic regarding the way the people pay Ukraine. Here's how it works. In countries where loans come from the US banking system, or the Euro banking system, the loans aren't really loans. Why not? Because the banks use the promissory notes for the loans as money. Promissory-note/money-in, cash/bank-check/money-out to the so-called borrower. Simply a creation of new money by the borrower and the bank. But only the bank knows it (most of the time). Then when the people or the government pay the loans back over a period of so many years, they are attempting to pay the loan off the second time. The bank keeps the second payoff and sends it to the elites who are trying to run the world. And these folks are seeing to it that Ukraine gets a whole bunch of that money. Right on-topic. Besides, if banks charged negative interest on the loans, they wouldn't be hurt at all. Why not? They were prepaid the money they used to make the loans. They were prepaid this money in the form of the promissory notes. Yet still there is demand for the USD and the EUR worldwide. It would seem that despite the lousy and sometimes irresponsible policies followed by the currency issuers, there is still a dominance. Anyway, it is fine, nearly anyone can opt-out, just buy gold or bitcoin or Picassos and do not hodl USD. Why do you complain? Now, the guy was talking about lending with interest. My point is that it has not been much interest charged in the last couple of decades. |
|
|
|
...
What passes for 'Democracy' in most of the 'developed' countries (and most of the others) is a 'choice' between WEF candidate 1 or WEF candidate 2. Usually the one labeled 'winner' is either 1 or 2 (regardless of the vote count) which is why there are so many of totalitarian technocrat Schwab's 'young global leaders' labeled 'heads of state' these days and you can tell them by their totalitarian footprint on policy when it is dictated by WEF project goals. Particularly since the covaids scamdemic was launched pretty much on the first day of 2020.
Your argument in essence is: since it is not perfect, it is not better. That is false logic. There are a few obvious things you are passing over also: - You do have at least some choice, as opposed to having to live with the guy (like Adolf Putin, forcing people to fight) forever. Even in cases where there are only two candidates, this creates an incentive to no crap over the people excessively. - The candidates in many countries pass primary elections, so you effective have a much wider choice that it looks. - You are probably thinking only US - there are many other countries with representative regimes. Extreme cases like Italy have coalitions of 5 parties and the like, at least 3 new parties - with elected representatives - are new in Spain, the US does have more than two candidates (I still remember Ross Perot), France does have at least 3 relevant parties,... Bottomline, democracies are more fluid than they look. Now, you say that Democracies are not free because they are subject to constrains and influences. Well, that is the same for any government. ...
When anybody, company or artificial entity or the government, borrows money from the US banking system, it is really a creation of new money. The bank considers the promissory note to be money, and treats it that way. So, what borrowing money really is, is a trade of one form of money for another form of money... not a loan at all, although they can legally call it a loan.
What this means is that paying off the loan over the next 10 to 30 years is really giving a gift to the banking system.
...
This simple and enjoyable cartoon, which I watched well before Bitcoin was born, ultimately made me a LOT of money. I tell my friends all the time that if one just takes the time to learn what 'money' actually is these days, it is kind of difficult NOT to be wealthy. Money As Debt - Paul Grignon https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZHMCDYB3xzjT/Equally important, upon learning what money is, decent people will often avoid lending at interest. While the lender may (or may not) end up doing a little worse financially, the debtor will have a huge advantage. Often enough the two parties share a common future. I was watching a speech of some Jewish Rabbi the other day and he claimed that the economic miracle which occurred in pre-WW2 Germany was attributable almost exclusively to the government's policies deprecating usury. I'm not saying the dude is right, and I don't even know if he's a real Rabbi or some neo-nazi playing one or whatever, but it's worth contemplating: https://www.bitchute.com/video/dOhCYij6T7Ai/[OFF-TOPIC] all of it. You are aware that interest rates in EU and US have been nearly 0, even negative in some countries? |
|
|
|
Yes, but sorry, exile is useless in democracies, it is only in despotic and tyrannical regimes that may appear. I a participative regime with rule of law you can live in the country and say pretty much anything you like, even become president if you convince enough people. So a "government in exile" is just not necessary, you can be the "wannabe government" equally well in the country. In my view Trump is even anti-government and anti-system and is still there you know. Now, I am aware that there are many caveats on this, but not in the essence. Your writing is a little confusing, but it sounds like we are in agreement that 'Government-in-Exile' is legit for places governed by non-democratic despotic and tyrannical regimes. That describes pretty much most of the West with their sham voting, de-pop shot policies, and climate hoax non-sense. There so happens to be a huge overlap with WEF run countries that I mentioned. ... My hope is that Russia might tentatively entertain such a role as a giant 'Fuck You' to those who are trying to shove them out of global involvement. Even to the point of not letting Russian individuals compete in international tournaments! These petty and infantile leadership decisions are something that I cannot in good conscience support, and even if I could, they are the harbinger of a complete collapse...and it isn't hard to see who is standing by to 'reset' things to their liking when it happens. The RF is shoving itself out of the main dialogue and negotiations groups in the world. Other children do not play with you if you hit them in the nose. You may FUD democracies and call them whatever, but there is no doubt that the current RF Junta does not represent anyone but themselves - there is not even a doubt there. Am I justifying a "government in exile" - not really, I mean, France had a government in exile during WWII, you know, nothing that strange. I am saying that if let people speak and run for offices, you wont get a government in exile. Where is the confusion? But that is not going to happen in the RF is it? Apart, "governments in exile" can be certainly a political tool of foreign countries, so let people choose their leaders and your country will be more resilient to divide an conquer strategies by foreign powers. |
|
|
|
Yes, but sorry, exile is useless in democracies, it is only in despotic and tyrannical regimes that may appear. I a participative regime with rule of law you can live in the country and say pretty much anything you like, even become president if you convince enough people. So a "government in exile" is just not necessary, you can be the "wannabe government" equally well in the country. In my view Trump is even anti-government and anti-system and is still there you know. Now, I am aware that there are many caveats on this, but not in the essence. |
|
|
|
False. Yoshiro Mori has no role in the current Japanese government, this is not, as you are trying to imply, any official position from any current representative of Japan, not to mention Japan itself. Just to make it more clear: He is 85 years old and the last time he held the PM office was 21 years ago. An BTW, just for a character reference an reliability of what he says he was appointed to head the organizing committee for the 2020 Summer Olympics and Paralympics,[7] but he resigned in February 2021 following gaffes made at a committee meeting that were considered to be sexist.[8] On a Sintho culture that values the opinion of the elderly, it may mean something. For the world, nothing. Further more, Japan, at this precise moment, aligns with US decisions mostly (thanks Kim Jong Un). |
|
|
|
...
Kherson Left Bank deserves a 10/10 from what I can see. Civies were given re-settlement options anywhere they wanted to go, anything which was fit to tow was removed, and there were zero losses in the military ranks....
But will never know right? The number of RF young unmotivated (sometimes enslaved) and untrained RF citizens that have been recycled into planting beds for the maniac leadership and madness of a septuagenarian that has maybe 5 or 10 good years left of life is not published. So sure, zero losses *wink *wink. But I can agree with you this time, it is a 10/10... for Ukraine. A practical implementation of the Art of War (the battle is won before it starts, the wise general avoids battle, you must have better intelligence, etc.) to the letter. “Ultimate excellence lies not in winning every battle, but in defeating the enemy without ever fighting.” "“He will win whose army is animated by the same spirit throughout all its ranks.Treat your men as you would your own beloved sons. And they will follow you into the deepest valley." “He will win who has military capacity and is not interfered with by the sovereign." “Know yourself, know your enemy. A hundred battles, a hundred victories.” “All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near" - Sun Tzu This one is specially for you:“To know your Enemy, you must become your Enemy. It is easy to love your friend, but sometimes the hardest lesson to learn is to love your enemy." - Sun Tzu ...
Stuff as usual. Even retreat of Russia is considered as win.
...
Let's toast for RF's victorious retreat of unwanted Crimea then. |
|
|
|
You constantly talk in this thread about the future victories of Ukraine and how clumsily the Russian army is fighting. Apparently, you are very confident in the victory of Ukraine, then I offer you a bet with the following conditions:
- if Ukrainian troops manage to recapture any of these cities before January 1, 2023: Kherson, Mariupol, Melitopol, then I will leave this forum forever.
- if the Ukrainian troops until January 1, 2023 are NOT able to recapture any of these cities: Kherson, Mariupol, Melitopol, then you will leave this forum forever.
If you're not ready for this bet, then maybe you will stop your wishful talking?
вaши cлoвa - пoкиньтe фopyм. XEPCOH- УКPAИHA
If you think about it, Ukraine really hasn't captured anything in a real fight. False, they have fought and driven the RF army out of more than 3000 km2. That was not achieved by "talking the RF Psychos out of them".
Yes, they re-occupied areas that the Russians didn't want...
RF young and unprepared RF soldiers died for those "decoys", "unwanted areas" and "smart tactics". Ask anyone if they think that RF would have not rather kept the main city of a territory they are (illegally) claiming as RF's. Your shit is becoming pathetic. You specifically wanted to bet on Ukraine not being able to do so - curious how fast you change your blabber.
Latest word is that Ukraine themselves are evacuating Kherson after figuring out the hard way which was pretty obvious to every thinking person;
...
Latest word where? In you Secondary School latrines? Give a GPS loc for that, I will pass it to the nearest HIMARS. ...
It's a loser at this point in time and will be as long as Russia can easily destroy anything which moves on the West Bank and will likely do so for quite some time. And, of course, if anyone destroys the dam the whole place is wiped clean as though by the wrath of God.
...
None of that is happening. Your imaginary's friend wrath isn't either. One reason Ukraine might be abandoning Kherson City is that they might be going to have another go at the dam in order to fuck with the water supply to Crimea, but it would be very NaZiocon to keep the population in place at gunpoint just because it's the kind of thing they do. The Russians certainly knew that which is why the resettled the decent elements of the population before pulling out.
None of that is happening, is just the effect of that pill the they sold you after Maths II class. Congrats on your newly purchased account.
I've got a few 10 year old sock-puppet accounts here. ... Bear in mind that you may loose two at the time for double posting, including Legendary and Senior accounts. Me and many people need you here posting - you are greatly helping the Ukrainian cause by posting unbelievable shit. How will this war ever end if Russia will never leave Crimea and Ukraine will never cede Crimea?If Ukraine attempts to retake Crimea will Russia openly declare war on Ukraine and carpet bomb it or simply try to defend it from within which has proved to be a futile tactic against an impressive Ukrainian offensive?Both sides seem to be well matched on the battlefield.Is there anyone here with any military experience who could give some input?
It is not a military issue. If the US wanted Ukraine to take Crimea it would already be done. The problem is political, you have to defend Ukraine without threatening Adolf Putin's regime survival. A decisive quick victory would de-stabilise the RF, like it did with Iraq - but RF's got nukes which makes it much more dangerous. Risks are being carefully measured. |
|
|
|
Gas pipeline explosion near St. Petersburg. Any bets as to whether the Americans, James Bond, or Ukrainian bio-engineered geese did it? Or it could be Russia just being Russia and disintegrating due to its own rot and corruption.  Another gas explosion in Sakhalin, residential building, 9 people dead. The thing about this one is that the building - like 1/3 of Russia, the "super power" threatening other countries with oil and gas blackmail - does not have natural gas piped to it, so residents use propane tanks, which caused the explosion.  Makes one wonder if that whole "Europe is gonna freeze" thing might have been a bit of a projection. It seems that knives cut both ways. Even in the RF once would assume that they do at least take care of the infrastructure that is really critical to their economy. Explosions in buildings... well it happens... but a pipeline is a completely different animal. There are management and technical systems in place in any pipeline to prevent exactly what is shown in the picture and if that is not sabotage (which I would not be surprised if it is), proofs that there are clogs in the arteries - big clogs, in the coronary. |
|
|
|
Most of us have heard about the child soldiers in some conflicts in Africa and even a while ago in Latin America. However I would like to ask you guys if you consider a forced conscript pretty much the same as a slave.
I am asking because the RF is now forcing people to become soldiers under threat of being sent to prison and they are being sent sometimes with just days of training and obsolete and malfunctioning equipment to fight in the war in Ukraine. For me, these soldiers are just slaves. They are not defending their country or trying to save the lives of their loved ones, they are just accepting being sent to kill and die for no good reason.
I know many people do, but then on the other hand i don't live in any of those aggressor countries who attact others without a reason. To me this question is similar to "Do you consider paying taxes as slavery?". I don't because they are for common good. Just like civil service in here that you can choose if military service is against your moral conviction. I consider it as a work national duty and a sign of a working society where we are willing to work for common good. And child soldiers are a whole different issue as they are not developed enough to work as consenting adults. Paying taxes is not the same as killing others (or be killed) - most people will understand that, and I hope you are one of those who can notice there is a big difference between the two. RF conscripts do not enjoy the luxury of choosing Civil Service (please correct me if I am wrong, but it is military or prison). You can argue, and that is very debatable, that you have to defend your country. However Ukraine is a war of aggression and annexation, so there is no point there either. There does not seem to be any "common good" on this case. |
|
|
|
I recently won $1000 with a $1 bet in a slot game and stopped playing right away to not let myself lose my one shot winnings in a few bets. IIRC the name of the slot was Pig megaways (something like that) and I won on my 5th bet, so it was a huge win for me without losing even 2% of my capital.
That's a huge and a lucky win. Do you usually bet $1 for every spins on slot? Or you go smaller than that? Or higher? I'm curious because in my case, I rarely bet $1 for each spin. Though I have one similar experience that I hit around 500x when I did that. I hit big multipliers twice that session with a dollar bet. My last big win has been 10$. I bet with a friend that I would be able to find a supplier for a certain (legal) product that would beat the price he was given from a contractor and I got it right, so I saved him the equivalent of 1000 USD and I won the bet for a value of ... 10 USD. As you can imagine, my friend did not mind much about loosing the bet with me  |
|
|
|
I like this thread about future predictions. I recall there were some token or chains that aimed to create a future predictions markets. I believe one of those was Augur, but they did not demonstrate enough that having a chain would serve the public better than a privately owned site that usually has someone looking after it. What the future may be for bitcoin... always up  |
|
|
|
|
Bottom line, you can find lots of tournaments and do not have to go with the first one. Another matter is if it makes sense to you to go through the hassle of changing your platform, going thorugh the documentation process and the KYC, etc.. just to join a certain tournament. Also, your gameplaying can be different in a certain way because the feeling of the interface may be different.
|
|
|
|
I am not sure if I can call it a "gambling technique", but when I roll dices I usually go for high percentage of chance and low profit, of course.
Perhaps, it is just me, but like to extent the game as much as possible and hopefully accumulate a bit through a good streak. Unfortunately, this has not worked well for me, since the numbers play against me and I end up losing more than I accumulate during those low risk rolls just in a couple bad rolls.
The same in my experience. I did this before because there was a prize for the top wager in dice and it is an amount that would absolutely make you try to bet over and over again. So every competitor's technique was to bet more with low amounts. I tried doing the auto mode for 24 hours with just satoshis at stake but to my surprise the next I lose quite a lot of my capital, like 20% so I just tried to be inside the top 10 rankings with a prize and never did it again the second round. Obviously, that's not how they do it, there must be another technique where the loss is smaller. It is very common to gamify everything, particularly if the platform itself is a gaming one! So be aware that all those tricks will be systematically used by the site owners and the programmers with the help of some strong marketing if they can afford it. Sites that have long history may have perfected the techniques more than sites that are still exploring the behaviour of their clients. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
