there is a way to export benchmark results to multiple profit profiles? copying it manually is a pain ...
Good point - It's noted. |
|
|
|
|
Awesome Miner version 6.2.5
Integration
- CoinToMine update interval changed from 15 to 5 minutes when an API key is used
Mining softare
- BMiner 15.2
- TT-Miner 2.1.14
- SrbMiner 1.8
- NBMiner 21.0
- XMRig 2.14 for AMD and nVidia
- XMRig 2.14.1 for CPU
|
|
|
|
Awesome Miner version 6.2.4
ASIC mining
- Diagnostics improved to support older Antminers
GPU mining
- Added algorithm CryptoNight HeavyX for XCash mining
- Generic Miners improved with command line variables for pool related parameters
User interface
- User defined actions can be accessed from the context menu in the Miners tab
Mining softare
- BMiner 15.1
- TT-Miner 2.1.3
Corrections
- Correction to detection of AMD cards for GPU monitoring
maybe the TT-Miner version should be 2.1.13 ? seems that the 2.1.14 is already out: https://tradeproject.de/download/Miner/TT-Miner.zipThanks for finding the typo - it was supposed to say 2.1.13. The latest TT-Miner version will be included in a release planned for today. |
|
|
|
Thanks - this one will be part of a new Awesome Miner release planned for today. |
|
|
|
Hello.
Error in the coin, you need algo Equihash (192_7)
Now
Algorithm EquihashZero
Pool Profit Factor 1
Coin VDL
Is this a coin that is reported as Equihash 192_7 by the coin statistics providers, but that's incorrect and should be EquihashZero? Awesome Miner can override the algorithm for a coin via the Options dialog, Statistics Providers section, where the setting Override coin algorithm can be used to specify that a specific coin should be using another algorithm. |
|
|
|
Awesome Miner version 6.2.4
ASIC mining
- Diagnostics improved to support older Antminers
GPU mining
- Added algorithm CryptoNight HeavyX for XCash mining
- Generic Miners improved with command line variables for pool related parameters
User interface
- User defined actions can be accessed from the context menu in the Miners tab
Mining softare
- BMiner 15.1
- TT-Miner 2.1.3
Corrections
- Correction to detection of AMD cards for GPU monitoring
NICE!!! Patrike can i add or delete a specifie tag to a specifie miner via api? I use the api to stop and start the miners for zilliqa mining. It works very good without any errors, but i want to add a tag for the moment of zilliqa mining and want to delete it when the main miner starts.
If needed i can make a description for other guys for mining Zilliqa with Aweseomeminer.
Is this for the HTTP API? You can use this API to add and remove tags for a miner. See the section "Tags": https://support.awesomeminer.com/support/solutions/articles/35000085916-awesome-miner-http-apiSorry i am new in API  I use curl and this command line in a cmd file to start and stop the miner: curl -i -d POST http://192.168.2.113:17790/api/miners/2?action=startI saw the tags section in your FAQ, but i donīt understand how i set only a tag to one of my miners. As i understand your FAQ it will add the tag to every miner. Ok i try a little bit. Thanks for the details. If you already have your tags defined in the system, you can use the Tags API (/api/tags) to get a mapping between tag name and tag ID. When you know the tag ID you want to modify on a miner, you can do like this with the API for "Managed Miners". It works in a similar way for External Miners as well. 1) Get the properties for a specific Managed Miner: GET http://mypc:17790/api/managedminers/{id}2) Modify the tagList property of the response body 3) Save the new properties for the Managed Miner, where you put the updated JSON data in request body: POST http://mypc:17790/api/managedminers/{id} |
|
|
|
|
Awesome Miner version 6.2.4
ASIC mining
- Diagnostics improved to support older Antminers
GPU mining
- Added algorithm CryptoNight HeavyX for XCash mining
- Generic Miners improved with command line variables for pool related parameters
User interface
- User defined actions can be accessed from the context menu in the Miners tab
Mining softare
- BMiner 15.1
- TT-Miner 2.1.3
Corrections
- Correction to detection of AMD cards for GPU monitoring
|
|
|
|
With double click you open the Mineral properties. If you want do access the miner via browser with awesome miner, make a rule with manuel activation. Then you can access via the actions button.
Cool thx, I have to learn how to create rules The rules are intended to be a flexible way of automating these kind of tasks. In addition to what sxemini pointed out above, you will also find other examples of rules in the documentation pages. It can be a good source for inspiration: https://support.awesomeminer.com/support/solutions/articles/35000085907-rules-detect-mining-issues-and-automate-tasks |
|
|
|
Patrike can i add or delete a specifie tag to a specifie miner via api? I use the api to stop and start the miners for zilliqa mining. It works very good without any errors, but i want to add a tag for the moment of zilliqa mining and want to delete it when the main miner starts.
If needed i can make a description for other guys for mining Zilliqa with Aweseomeminer.
Is this for the HTTP API? You can use this API to add and remove tags for a miner. See the section "Tags": https://support.awesomeminer.com/support/solutions/articles/35000085916-awesome-miner-http-api |
|
|
|
Thanks for all feedback and suggestions! Awesome Miner can only read CPU temperatures when running as Administrator. The temperatures are however currently only displayed on the System tab, not in in the Miners list, so I agree that there are room for improvements here. The same goes for CPU Power Usage - it's currently only displayed on the System tab but not part of the miner list and not in the profit calculations. Adding the Actions button to the context menu should be possible. lolMiner 0.7 had some compatibility issues with Nicehash for some algorithms that used to work fine with 0.6. For that reason I didn't include it yet. It's a balance between including the latest/greatest and not introducing new issues to those running a previous version. NBMiner 20.0 is already included since a week ago. |
|
|
|
I agree that that usability for the benchmark can be improved and I know other users had similar suggestion in the past.
Speaking of benchmarking, I have a suggestion: In the benchmarking window - would it be possible to select an algo/miner (and pool) and hit a button "Diagnostic". I think this would make it easier to find problems, Often the profit switcher has changed to another algo (or the pool is disabled for no accepted) and it could be a hassle to make sure the diagnostic will start with the correct algo/miner. BTW: Have you considered making benchmarks run in parallel? (on multi-gpu rigs) Like running X16r with 3-4 different miners (exe) simultaneously to get more accurate speed comparison - or just speeding up the benchmarking in total. Good point about the Diagnostics for a specific algorithm - I agree that it would make sense to have. It's noted. The idea of running in parallel is also interesting, but it would require Awesome Miner to understand which GPU's are identical in terms of memory and clock to make it fair. |
|
|
|
Small bug fix, it seems as though the 'add to worker name' tick box is not inherited sometimes from templates. You have to manually go to the miner and change it. It'll even show up as ticked or unticked regardless of what it's actually doing.
In the Properties of a Managed Template, you will find a section called Template settings. On this page you can configure if the template should include "Add to worker name" or not when it's being used. Can you please check how this one is configured for the templates you use? As you can have cases where you don't want the worker name part to change when applying a template, it's configurable per template if the "Add to worker name" checkbox and value of the miner should be modified or not. Yup, this setting sometimes works and doesn't. The template wont apply consistently across all miners. Sometimes toggling the add worker in the template settings fixes it, other time you have to toggle that on the miner itself on and off and then the template works like normal. I'm trying to isolate the scenario. Have you noticed the same behavior for the other two properties in the Template settings of a Managed Template? |
|
|
|
Thahnks for letting me know. Is "Map to system monitoring" enabled on the GPU tab? Are all GPU's listed in this dialog, but the order is changed from the previous version? Yes it's enabled, but when I click on "map to system monitoring" it just displays the first two GPU's out 6. That's all it shows. The previous version listed them all. Here's another attempt at adding a screenshot (for whatever reason, I can't embed photos): Thanks for the information. There was a small change in v6.2.3 to not include AMD GPU's where the system report that the GPU no longer is present in the system - indicating it's a card that has been removed from the system but Windows still keeps an entry for it. It looks like it wasn't possible to detect that in a reliable way so I will revert this change. I will also send you a PM in a short while. |
|
|
|
The latest update messed some GPU monitoring with my Sapphire RX580's. The GPU Name / Clock / Fan / Performance in particular. Also, the Progress for each individual card isn't working, but maybe that's just the nature of Phoenix Miner? The hash rates are correct.
Thahnks for letting me know. Is "Map to system monitoring" enabled on the GPU tab? Are all GPU's listed in this dialog, but the order is changed from the previous version? I was unable to access the screenshot link, so I wasn't able to get a full understanding of the issue. Phoenix Miner doesn't report accepted/rejected shares per GPU, only a total value. |
|
|
|
A suggestion. When choosing the preferred exchange in the currency, only the exchanges of which there is a price could appear in the list.
For example, if you have only 4 exchanges of a currency, when displaying the list that only the exchanges appear in bold where that currency has a price, and so it would be easier to change from one to another or know if it is only in one or several.
The function is very useful, but right now to know which exchange to use, I have to go to the ANN and investigate what the exchange is in the currency.
You take the data directly from CTM, I think it would not be difficult when you display the list, mark in bold or otherwise the exchanges where that currency is, it would make things much easier.
As always it is a suggestion to make the program more complete and easier to use.
Thanks for the suggustion - I understand your point. |
|
|
|
|
Awesome Miner version 6.2.3
GPU mining
- Native overclocking: Improved detection of AMD cards
- Benchmark can run with a specific pool
- Added algorithm CryptoNightV4, to prepare for Monero fork
Rules
- Each rule can be configurd with a limit on how often the actions can be triggered, to make it easier to prevent too frequent executions of the actions if the trigger conditions are true for a longer period of time
- Minor user interface updates to the Edit Rule dialog
User interface
- Added additional coin images
- Save the horizontal splitter position on the Balance tab when closing the application
Mining software
- CastXMR 1.8.0
- XMRig 2.13
Corrections
- Corrected ASIC device count for Hyperbit BWL21 ASIC miners
- Modified calculation for Aeternity coin
|
|
|
|
Small bug fix, it seems as though the 'add to worker name' tick box is not inherited sometimes from templates. You have to manually go to the miner and change it. It'll even show up as ticked or unticked regardless of what it's actually doing.
In the Properties of a Managed Template, you will find a section called Template settings. On this page you can configure if the template should include "Add to worker name" or not when it's being used. Can you please check how this one is configured for the templates you use? As you can have cases where you don't want the worker name part to change when applying a template, it's configurable per template if the "Add to worker name" checkbox and value of the miner should be modified or not. |
|
|
|
Hello Patrike, I usually suggest new features, today I have a complaint.
The benchmark section has been losing its functions over the months. There are very few Al-Gos that I can benchmark directly. This forces me to create a test pool and select the auto-exchanges and do the manual miner mining test.
Suggestion. If I have all the Autoexchanges activated, but I have them as they do not automatically enter autoprofit unless I choose it. Because the benchmark is not able to use those algos from the auto exchanges? I mean nicehash, zpool, ahaspool, etc ... On Saturday I teach a 3 day course of Awesome miner and it will be tedious to explain to people that the benchmark system is almost useless and that they have to create a pool of test, activate the Auto exchanges and select only one Al-GO and try different miners.
I think the benchmark if it detects that I have activated the auto exchanges, should use those algos. I'm not going to lose money, but I think it would be the logical thing to do, because now the benchmark is almost completely useless, and it's giving me a lot of work to measure the new AL-GOS and find the best miner by hand. This needs to be improved soon, it's my personal opinion.
Thanks in advance.
I agree that that usability for the benchmark can be improved and I know other users had similar suggestion in the past. What I've been planning for is to make it possible to select any pool from a list to be used for the benchmark. At least you would't have to go in and add it to the profit switcher all the time. However, you still need a pool to do the benchmark for most mining software - it's only a few of them that supports offline benchmark without a pool. I'm thinking of two or three selections that could be used to improve the benchmark dialog 1) Benchmark using pools available to the profit switcher (this is the only way you can benchmark today) 2) Benchmark using a specific pool (the user select a pool from a list, it doesn't need to be part of the profit switcher) 3) Maybe also: Benchmark by manually entering pool detils (the user need to enter pool URL, worker name, wallet and so on) Can you please give your view on how you want to tell the benchmark dialog which pool to use? Would #2 above solve most of your scenarios?dialog? Edit: The new version 6.2.3 allows you to select a specific pool to be used for benchmark |
|
|
|
My managed profit miners are going "offline" now and then, this seem to happen when pools fail (seen it on nicehash and zpool so far, with bminer, gminer and z-enemy). Even that the miner is flagged as offline, it is still connected to awesome miner manager and I can just start it again. Is there a way to force the miner to not stop/go to the next pool/algo, or any ideas on how should I troubleshoot this?
On options->Profit switching I have this:
Ignore pools with no accepted shares in minutes: checked 6
Ignore minutes: 50
Ignore pools after too many failed miner restart attemps: checked
Thanks
Is the scenario that once you run into this problem, even after > 6 minutes, Awesome Miner has still not marked the pool as failed and moved on to the next pool? It just keeps running the same mining software that is unable to do its work - while it display "Interface offline"? I usually can't remote to the computers very fast so when I remote to them they are just not doing anything, I can confirm the "Interface offline" only for Equihash 150.5+NiceHash+Gminer CUDA Equihash Miner (it happens more often, I'm not 100% sure about the others). Edit: If I go to right click->view details (even after a few hours) I have several timestamps (as if the mining didn't stop) and when I click the timestamp after the error (i.e. 12 minutes after the error), it shows the message that some pool is being ignored and the button to reset. If I click a more recent timestamp there isn't any ignored pool message. Thanks for the update. The fact that you do see the "Failed" for some pool in the View Details dialog indicates that Awesome Miner did detect this pool failure. The profit switcher will then not use this pool for a while, but the profit switching decision might be made a number of minutes later, depending on how often the profit switcher is configured to run. Right now you have an ignore time of only 50 minutes, so Awesome Miner will start using the pool a while later and this is why you no longer see the "Failed" indicator. If the pool fails again a little later, Awesome Miner will again mark it as failed and ignore it. The idea is that Awesome Miner shouldn't be stuck on a failed pool for many hours or days, but a number of minutes of mining will always be lost before Awesome Miner will consider it to be a failure. For this reason it can be good to ignore the pool for a longer period of time after a failure. If the specific combination for Eq150,5 + Nicehash + Gminer causes these issues frequently, it could be time to consider if this combination should be removed from the profit switcher. Sorry I wasn't clear, the miners stop working until I manually start them, the other day I went to sleep and it failed after 1-2 hours, I received the offline email but it didn't wake me up(that's ok). Another day the same thing happened, I didn't see/check my email until noon, miners were idle for around 11 hours until I started them. I just wanted to know if there was a way to troubleshoot this because it started happening with more than 1 algo/pool/software. It doesn't happen that often but I'd rather it kept mining by itself. When you find the miners in this start, they are showing as "Interface offline" as you pointed out earlier? Not "Service Offline"? And when you look at the miner console window, the mining software is running but do nothing because of pool connection failure? The Offline e-mail you received, was it from the Offline Detection rule? Sorry for asking all these questions, I'm just trying to get as detailed understanding as possible of the scenario. |
|
|
|
My managed profit miners are going "offline" now and then, this seem to happen when pools fail (seen it on nicehash and zpool so far, with bminer, gminer and z-enemy). Even that the miner is flagged as offline, it is still connected to awesome miner manager and I can just start it again. Is there a way to force the miner to not stop/go to the next pool/algo, or any ideas on how should I troubleshoot this?
On options->Profit switching I have this:
Ignore pools with no accepted shares in minutes: checked 6
Ignore minutes: 50
Ignore pools after too many failed miner restart attemps: checked
Thanks
Is the scenario that once you run into this problem, even after > 6 minutes, Awesome Miner has still not marked the pool as failed and moved on to the next pool? It just keeps running the same mining software that is unable to do its work - while it display "Interface offline"? I usually can't remote to the computers very fast so when I remote to them they are just not doing anything, I can confirm the "Interface offline" only for Equihash 150.5+NiceHash+Gminer CUDA Equihash Miner (it happens more often, I'm not 100% sure about the others). Edit: If I go to right click->view details (even after a few hours) I have several timestamps (as if the mining didn't stop) and when I click the timestamp after the error (i.e. 12 minutes after the error), it shows the message that some pool is being ignored and the button to reset. If I click a more recent timestamp there isn't any ignored pool message. Thanks for the update. The fact that you do see the "Failed" for some pool in the View Details dialog indicates that Awesome Miner did detect this pool failure. The profit switcher will then not use this pool for a while, but the profit switching decision might be made a number of minutes later, depending on how often the profit switcher is configured to run. Right now you have an ignore time of only 50 minutes, so Awesome Miner will start using the pool a while later and this is why you no longer see the "Failed" indicator. If the pool fails again a little later, Awesome Miner will again mark it as failed and ignore it. The idea is that Awesome Miner shouldn't be stuck on a failed pool for many hours or days, but a number of minutes of mining will always be lost before Awesome Miner will consider it to be a failure. For this reason it can be good to ignore the pool for a longer period of time after a failure. If the specific combination for Eq150,5 + Nicehash + Gminer causes these issues frequently, it could be time to consider if this combination should be removed from the profit switcher. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
