|
Ok, synced and matching the blockchain. No problems at all, didn't even have to restart it. Nice job!
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Ii am new here(with this particularly coin) .And it seems to me like a really nice coin with some future, want to get at least 10-20k . I have already buy some. And now i am trying to mine on multipool (chunky.. algo: x11).
But X11 on multipool doesnt work for me(CGminer is waiting for work from multipool and nothing happens). I am sure i set up my PC in the right way.
Can somebody help?
Thanks.(sorry for my bad english)
contact chunky directly. They'll work with you. I don't know enough about setting up x11, to be honest. |
|
|
|
|
*sigh*
This shit is why I gave up months ago.
AMT, you NEED to not respond in kind to insults, or you will NEVER turn your rep around. This is friendly advice, believe it or not. It's a mistake you keep making. Customers can be as unreasonable as they are capable of, and you MUST NOT EVER respond in kind. It's a shitty deal, but it's the way life is.
I am glad that you've found an avenue to make your clients whole. That's all I ever hoped for after things went south. Please take the opportunity to hit reset as best you can. I frankly would highly recommend selling your company, cutting your losses and letting someone who's rep has not been tarnished start it over. It would probably work best for all involved.
That being said, this is not unrecoverable. If you make NO promises until you have equipment in hand, and do NOT take pre orders, and then follow through a bit better than you DO promise, you'll come back and look good.
|
|
|
|
I have a question. I'm on 1.0.3, compiled just a few minutes ago, and I do not see the nitesend stuff. Running under ubuntu 14.04. Did I do something wrong, or am I just missing something obvious?
good question - not easy to anwser from the distance - while the new wallet is syncing fine and have NO issue except with the block 86400 - you should prefer to download the wallet then rather take the compiled one the new one works didn't see a link for a linux wallet. I'll wait till nite is back and ask him what I should do  I'm still resyncing, but all seems well at the moment. I'm not personally all that concerned with the anonymity features, I just wanted to know. |
|
|
|
|
I have a question. I'm on 1.0.3, compiled just a few minutes ago, and I do not see the nitesend stuff. Running under ubuntu 14.04. Did I do something wrong, or am I just missing something obvious?
|
|
|
|
Ok, compiled without error, fired it up and I was on the wrong chain. That'll teach me to miss a mandatory upgrade  Luckily it cost me nothing, I didn't have anything immediately in stake. Resyncing now. |
|
|
|
I should post up some more pics I will at some point. |
|
|
|
There is a bug which prevents block number 86400 being found.. but after it is found, also current wallet works fine. There is a fix on the github, however this update is not necessary to all, we only need some wallets to update to find the first block and get the chain moving. So all volunteers, please update. https://github.com/MsCollec/sync if that was up five minutes ago, I'm compiling it now. Sorry, I was one of the stragglers. Thought I had updated, but I hadn't. Dumb oversight. Do I need to delete the blockchain and resync? No need to delete & resync. just compile and run. ok. It's taking it's sweet time, but it's compiling |
|
|
|
There is a bug which prevents block number 86400 being found.. but after it is found, also current wallet works fine. There is a fix on the github, however this update is not necessary to all, we only need some wallets to update to find the first block and get the chain moving. So all volunteers, please update. https://github.com/MsCollec/sync if that was up five minutes ago, I'm compiling it now. Sorry, I was one of the stragglers. Thought I had updated, but I hadn't. Dumb oversight. Do I need to delete the blockchain and resync? |
|
|
|
do this new Version harm me ? will my pc explode ? questions - nothing like questions ...
staking or not staking thats the question
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of children not thinking of what they have here
im just a poor Boy with no luck at all
LOL. Shakespear and Queen all in one go. Good show! |
|
|
|
I dont think cryptsy is a scam at all, just needs a little attention brought to it.
but they were informed and this dont interest them at all ?!?! but we will see - if they dont react the second and third time - we HAVE TO CALL them a scam They're fixing it. I have that direct from some of the staff. They apparently had a misunderstanding as to how rare the coin actually is. I believe the fee has already been fixed, and they are determining what minimum withdrawal will be. I recommended .01. 0.01 is still way too high! 0.0000000001 is the actual fee they have to pay 0.0000000002 is the fee of bittrex this is like million times higher.. its ok, its the same as bittrex great, did not check myself yet, but i saw the suggestion made to cryptsy, which was way too high (compared to other coins and exchanges) I'm glad they have listened to our tickets and e-mails! I think you misunderstood me. I recommended .01 as minimum withdrawal, not the tx fee. I believe, if I recall correctly, that the gentleman I spoke with had it set at like .00000002 for the tx fee. At any rate, they fixed it quickly when it was brought to their attention. And yes, it helps to know people |
|
|
|
When will be the next revision of prices?
Bitcoin Difficulty: 18,736,441,558 Estimated Next Difficulty: 19,558,016,424 (+4.38%) Adjust time: After 1727 Blocks, About 12.2 days source: bitcoinwisdom.com |
|
|
|
what would it take to throw in some pow to help get this moving? the sooner the better. Or is it possible to change nodes altogether in a new wallet version to disconnect all the old versions?
I'm not a coder, but I have been looking into this from my own angles. Code wise, it's probably not that difficult, but it IS a hard fork. Everyone would need to have the wallet that contains the change. The harder question is how to implement it, and what I've suggested to edn247 is that y'all implement it with a zero reward, with a cpu miner active in the wallet. (it's already there, you just have to add setgenerate true in console or add generate =1 in your .conf) after which the wallets will be mining, solving blocks, and getting things moving. This is, in my opinion, is the softest way to do it because it does two positive things. It gets the block chain moving, and it takes away any incentive to attack the coin for profit, as the only profit in the POW would be from transactions. Everyone is likely to have their wallets open for staking anyway, so it's not an egregious burden on the users. I'm not currently involved in this coin, I'm just friendly with edn247. So if the above is not workable for whatever reason, just think of what you paid for it My two satoshis. EDIT: Typos we would need another wallet update to be able to mine in the wallet right now right? that sounds like a great idea... is our problem that there just isn't enough wallets staking right now? I have some waiting to stake lol but with the blockchain moving so slowly it'll take a bit for the coins to mature  thanks to everyone working on this coin, hopefully we can get it moving and give it good push on twitter before before bittrex drops it Yeah, you would, because POS is hardcoded to end. That code would need to be changed and the block reward adjusted. If I understand correctly, we're talking maybe 5 lines of code that need altering, but those five lines mean that everyone who wishes to go forward would need the new client. As far as making it happen, you just need to add a line to your .conf file, or edn247 could add in a mining module to the wallet. The command is already supported. Setgenerate in console, and gen or generate in the rpc commands. |
|
|
|
Can i mine this with an ASIC? What algo is she?
her shirt says NEW, there's a lot more new scrypts then sha256, so she's probably a scrypt  Algo is Deoxyribonucleic acid x 47 pairs. Impossible to counterfeit |
|
|
|
what would it take to throw in some pow to help get this moving? the sooner the better. Or is it possible to change nodes altogether in a new wallet version to disconnect all the old versions?
I'm not a coder, but I have been looking into this from my own angles. Code wise, it's probably not that difficult, but it IS a hard fork. Everyone would need to have the wallet that contains the change. The harder question is how to implement it, and what I've suggested to edn247 is that y'all implement it with a zero reward, with a cpu miner active in the wallet. (it's already there, you just have to add setgenerate true in console or add generate =1 in your .conf) after which the wallets will be mining, solving blocks, and getting things moving. This is, in my opinion, is the softest way to do it because it does two positive things. It gets the block chain moving, and it takes away any incentive to attack the coin for profit, as the only profit in the POW would be from transactions. Everyone is likely to have their wallets open for staking anyway, so it's not an egregious burden on the users. I'm not currently involved in this coin, I'm just friendly with edn247. So if the above is not workable for whatever reason, just think of what you paid for it My two satoshis. EDIT: Typos |
|
|
|
BA=asshole ignorant scammers
I thought it meant Bad Attitude... |
|
|
|
PAID!
while i was typing i missed second and had to re do it... i knew it was u I typed it in as soon as electrum flagged a deposit I figured it was 50/50 whether I beat you My daughter was going nuts, too. I figured I'd lost |
|
|
|
There's a new one every two weeks. It's as regular as clockwork.
This has been done to death. If you believe them a scam, so be it. I've done my due dilligence, and as far as I am able to tell, they are not a scam at all. It is somewhat troubling that they don't choose to reveal themselves more fully, but it did cause them trouble in the past. I think they will eventually be public, but right now they want their privacy. They've never done me wrong, and they have long since been profitable for me.
You know we get a txt from our supreme ponzi-fighting czar that directs us here to post ever two weeks, to the minute! There are time where I'm not sure who to blame, the ill-informed consumer who pays them $17 for 10 Gh/s thinking they've won the bitcoin lottery and start planning their early retirement not realizing that it may take 200+ days to get the $17 back or pbmining who just looks the other way and cites the bitcoin difficulty factor for those that may never achieve a return on the investment. With difficulty rising at the rate that it has been I would seriously doubt that the PB contracts will every ROI. How long should roi be on pb? 7 days, if you buy on sunday. see my sig. This is a financial matter. You make yourself look incredibly stupid misusing financial terms in a financial discussion. |
|
|
|
Are you kidding? These guys have fucked customers every direction and in every hole. You think that if the thread was just left to a paid shill like you that more people wouldn't have been ripped off? They delete every negative post now as it is, so keep on trolling with your lips pressed on that scammer ass.
it's obvious opieum cups the balls too. i have never come across a more delusional character than this kid. he is a text book case of Stockholm syndrome. I think I made my feelings on the whole debacle clear a couple months back. If anyone on this forum can be accused of being a paid shill, or at least compensated, it's me. They sent me a miner, without solicitation, and it worked. I so reported. From that point forward, they engaged in a clusterfuck of epic proportions, which I did not want to be associated with. I walked away, but continued to watch. In the whole debacle, I saw like maybe four people being constructive (as opposed to either straight trolling or straight ass kissing) Opiem2, ISHAWHIM both come to mind. You, I thought, had a quite legitimate grievance and were entirely justified in your lawsuit. But attacking people for trying to make lemonade out of a basket of rotten lemons is a bit low. Oh, for the record, half my miner died. I believe I posted it in the original thread, though it might be here. According to Martin at TechnoBit, it was because of the restrictive case. So if any of you got the original bitfury based miners, keep that in mind. In the open air, the remaining board works great. That after this shitstorm they are trying to make it right is actually kind of cool. Good luck to all involved. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
