he he
withdraw:
TekCoin BghpfgumTT8zrSEMLf4LwHi6PQAvBNLuJj 178.32437732 TEK Yes 2014-12-03 00:01:04 Processed TrxID: 1f68c822163d13bcd30b20a5074e3a4e105d980ddcf22c69cf3b0de81ce70443 @ 2014-12-03 02:42:06
.....
All of those cryptsy withdrawls are in the blockchain, Arsenay. You can check the blockchain explorer. I suggest building and running the newest version. If upgrading your gui build environment is not possible, try running a headless tekcoind instead. with such approaches tomorrow and console application will not work. Arsenay, you can have multiple versions of QT on your linux install. QT5 will still compile QT4 if you use the command line qmake-qt4 instead of just qmake. You don't have to recompile everything or symlink dependencies or any of that. Assuming you're running a debian variant, at least. I'm not familiar with the non Debian versions, I run ubuntu. However, I do primarily run daemons, they're less resource intensive and do all the same things, just no pretty pictures.
|
|
|
no joke, I freaked out for the better part of a day... it was horrible.
I cheated. I asked Presstab
|
|
|
...and I'll probably end up mining there at some point I sent a small amount, cuz that's all I can afford right now. If we haven't made it by next monday, I'll have a bit more. TXID 68273a2bdf8d2bb69a7030ca80c3070e74663196c8f05c7c3e1bae52946e045c Gotta support my favorite coin, even if it's just a token amount.
|
|
|
Is someone stealing the BTC or am I crazy?
89ba7ee8d4212ebfcdbc7daa7a1f8af5ab82747c39d5055951ba399ab4c4f358 2014-12-02 03:32:24 1GvPX4BLZSkaWJXtp5o3QjYqPUQuJr6J1d 187xjBhrCEzxPc2HUBT5HaqZcoKVwn6Kra 0.13312714 BTC 17WEnpYgZhJUcSwjnWGAn5CzDjJWHXfnAA 0.00120494 BTC
The multipool BTC address shows the BTC being sent to a different address? I re-clicked the above link to see if my contribution was received and it shows no balance in the fund any more. I hope this is not true, or I may have been scammed? Just does not look right to me.
looks like the bits are just from the mobile wallet i tried to use, i should have checked it was synched, i dunno, its all still there in coinbase wallet, i just double checked. Yes , 1st send by thundertoe , 2nd sent by Dennislevy . After 3rd transfer I dun know whose . Thunder might have use his Coinbase wallet for something and it took the newest coin from his wallet which was the multipool fund . I believe he (thundertoe)will make the new address for multipool funds which is not link to his current wallet. No scam just a minor misunderstanding . I ran an escrow using Coinbase wallet a while back, and ran into this. Scared the piss out of me and the guy I was holding the bag for. It's not a thing. Coinbase is constantly moving BTC in and out of cold storage as their needs call for it. They have a pretty complex system and a custom wallet. If it still shows up correctly on the Coinbase holder's account, it's all good. But it's a bit frightening, too. Since then, when I do an escrow, I do it with a clean wallet on my own system, which gets copied to a flash drive and turned off until the funds are released. That way, there's no jumping about in a block explorer and no frights. That being said, no worries. It'll work out.
|
|
|
Hi everyone, Currently I'm trying to build the latest wallet on Ubuntu 14.04 64bit. Seems to build cleanly with no errors, however no HyperStake-qt executable appears as expected. I have met all dependencies and have built wallets up to this point. Anyone help would be appreciated. Thanks.
Im not laughing at you, I am laughing with you... cause this got me too... Check the 'Release' folder Glad to see I'm not alone on this Took me a minute to find it too.
|
|
|
vegas and Trololoh, you're both usually better than this.
I worked with Noise23 just before the latest TRK release as a guinea pig, he taught me some things about coding that I didn't know, and was a stand up guy. I think English is not his first language, so things may not come out as they should. Also, why shouldn't it be fun?
NVCS is a variable algorithm. It is the basis of ALL Pos coins except (to my knowledge) HYP, PPC (which NVC itself is descended from), and NXT, which is totally new code, not the satoshi client modified. This is not news. Just when it's going to happen might be.
|
|
|
i just used the bootstrap.dat as mentioned in the OP
my prior experience makes me believe that the daemon will not be reachable until it's finished loading ? if this is correct, the first time i tried connecting to it, the daemon reported block 95k not the 140k mentioned in teh OP
i could be completely wrong about how the daemon interacts with the bootstrap though, and it could still be loading from it.
The daemon still has to index the whole damn thing as if it were downloading it. The Bootstrap just makes it happen that much faster than it would if you were downloading and processing a block at a time. It still takes a little while. You see the same effect, though faster, if you have had your client turned off for a while. It takes a bit of time to catch up
|
|
|
Hey Michael I might have to dump my 60K and check out PPC, That might be something you wana watch OWWWW Good job! I dumped my 50k several weeks back at a 33%+ BTC loss, and an even nicer fiat loss. Hee-hee, shamone! You dump. I buy. I stake I'm with you, bro. I love you TEKheads. Going down with the ship. P.S. Having to watch difficulty to figure out when to unlock wallet to stake isn't a feature, it's a failure. So you consider NovaCoin a failure as well? Or frankly any POS coin aside from HYP? I'd like you to justify that, if so. Almost all of them use the NVCS difficulty adjustment. PressTab tried a different approach. I don't think it's superiour, honestly, just different. I like both approaches, and will continue to support several coins. It's likely someone will clone the HyperStake max subsidy scheme, but to my knowledge, at the present moment all POS coins are descendents of peercoin, Novacoin, or NXT.
|
|
|
well that kinda takes the fun out of this screen shot of 182 folks in the main chat... presstab's sample quote: "billotronic loves apple" . . . i just shot meade out of my nose laughing So, you also like honey
|
|
|
@saddambitcoin: If you still need the info and in case you're a Windows user: You might find a Hyperstake.conf file in C:\Users\<yourusername>\AppData\Roaming\HyperStake. If the file does not exist, you can create one (just use notepad or whatever, it's just a text file, but with .conf extension). Then add/create this one entry on Hyperstake.conf: (obviously, change 20 to whatever maximum of connections you want the wallet to have) I would advise you not to have any less than 20 connections. A very small number of connections, is almost certain to earn you a high rate of stake orphanage, as you would be broadcasting your stakes to a 'smaller audience', so to speak. If you're on Linux or what-else-not-Windows, good luck Happy Staking! Thanks. Question: do I have to have my node connected while I wait the 8.8 days for my HYP to mature? No. When it does mature or is about to, make sure you unlock your wallet. Tools>Unlock Wallet for PoS... If you hover over the thing just to the left of the one that tells you how many connections you have it will say "Minting" and give you your weight, network weight and estimated next stake. The estimated stake time doesn't hold much weight To clarify, while their ARE differences in how the wallets interact with the OS's, such as needing the file extension .exe in Windows, vs simply the filename in Linux, but with permissions set to executable, none of these matter for the hyperstake.conf file. The only thing to note between Windows and Linux in this case is that Linux is case sensitive, and Windows is not. The command structure and available commands are all the same. And as to the specific thing that triggered all of this: 97 connections is rather a lot. I'd be impressed to catch that many It harms nothing, unless your system gets overloaded, and as shown above, you can throttle it. For the slightly advanced user, or simply obsessive (me), you can also code it to ONLY connect to certain nodes, by using "connect=<nodeIP>" instead of "addnode=<nodeIP>". As with addnode, you can do this as many times as you wish, one IP per line. The difference is that addnode will still allow the client to connect to any peers it can find, whereas connect will only connect to the defined nodes. It can matter for security in some instances, and it's useful for testing. Probably not relevant to the above gentleman's situation, but there it is
|
|
|
what you said is on previous pages.. i suggest you re-read what you typed out And yes i postulated you were Shakezulu and i had good reason i outlined. foaming at the keys and flinging wild accusations is hardly what I would call good reason. Or reason at all, for that matter. But whatever. Can't talk to a psycho like a normal human being. I do however reiterate: to date, I have not been directly involved in the coding development of ANY coin except Tech (not TEK) where I altered a few lines of code in the .pro file to make it compile under Unbuntu. I did this because I use ubuntu and the .pro file had lines in it that were windows specific, causing it to crash the compile. I was part of Team Earthcoin as a writer (prose, not code) until other obligations made that impossible. Now that you have shown me the writing of shakezulu, I very well might try my hand at developing a coin. Won't be soon, and probably won't be for profit as I'm just trying to learn more about coding. But what the hell. I'm done with this.
|
|
|
I'm also fairly certain that Thundertoe updated the website with the most recent pool list.
|
|
|
Truth is, I would not have pulled my sig if it were not Puppet making the allegations. He's often brutal, but I've never known him to be malicious. I will not purchase more nor promote pbmining further until there is some level of proof of their mining, or if they're doing something else legit to simulate mining, proof of that.
I'm arrogant, Puppet, but I'm willing to listen to reason from some people. You're one of them.
|
|
|
Puppet, you've made your case. I do not believe you correct, but you've cast sufficient doubt that I'll remove the link.
pbmining, I will restore it if you do reveal your operation sufficiently for someone like him to deem it legit.
|
|
|
I have nothing to defend.. i have not made a coin or provided a service of any kind unlike Biomech saying on previous pages he was paid to make experiment coins for kids to flog around here ..that he knew damn well was doomed to failure ! I would love to see if he wants to play dumb about that LOL If you really are that dumb then you should not be writing coin code for anyone buddy.
Further more making up bold face lies about me personally will not make your gay shitty experiment coin worth more. but feel free to keep it up.. it makes you all look like name calling little 5 year olds.. (not adults)
Again, you lie blatantly. I have not said anything of the sort, nor will I. I have to date made no coins. Couldn't if I tried, as of this point, though I must thank you for turning me on to the writings of shakezulu. It has taught me a lot about coding that I didn't know. There are many things one can accuse me of and have them be true. I'll cop to 'em, too. DO NOT accuse me of your fantasies. I've nothing to do with them, and any role I play in them is entirely on you. I resorted to ad hominem against you for amusement. I need not de-construct your arguments, you do that with no assistance.
|
|
|
AMT screwed the pooch. I didn't endorse them You gave them a glowing review of a freebee POS miner that didnt even come close to meeting its published specs (and broke down 2 months later IIRC?) All the while paying customers received diddly squat and no one with a brain would believe the specs and timelines they published. But they were the real deal according to biomech. They've treated me well As did AMT. I quote " They've done well by me". and I have yet to hear of any of their customers not being paid. Which applies to any ponzi, right until when it collapses. It's been long enough that I doubt very much that it would have been sustainable as a ponzi. You cant be that naive. Have you even tried doing the math? My thought from day one is that they are seling half of the hash they purchase, and using that to sustain profitability.
Or maybe you are I have no direct proof one way or the other. So how is that good enough ? Would you endorse or preorder hardware from a company that offers no direct proof of anything ? Indeed you have ZERO proof of their identity. You have ZERO proof they are even mining at all. No pictures. No asic vendor endorsement. No mining address. Your payouts dont come from mining, they come from coin mixers. This has all the credibility of the Nigerian prince that emailed you yesterday. Why dont you put that in your sig? Let me guess, they dont offer referral rewards? Fuck off, Troll. Fair's fair, even if he did attack me. Puppet is not a troll. I think he's mistaken here, but he's always been pretty thoughtful and asked questions that needed asking. That we disagree this time is not a character judgment, it's a disagreement.
|
|
|
Or the worst coin, because he's just a troll. Now come on. That's very insulting. You owe the trolls an apology for the comparison.
|
|
|
Agree. It is just promotion for bitcoin terminals. It doesn't mean the high adoption rate and popularity in there, which will really qualify the city for the title of "bitcoin capital". No difference from our city!
True enough, but it is a positive development for BTC nevertheless.
|
|
|
Hi guys, Now Cryptsy Added to them voting list. Thanks to BitJhon - cryptsy Admin 56 votes here It was moving up pretty good earlier today.
|
|
|
I just saw diff bump with 3, is it time to increase block size when staking?
Ha ha I have the opposite thought. Does this mean I need to decrease block size so that I don't hit the max? That's the question, isn't it? Speed, take the hit and make it up on compounding, or try to get close but not exceed. I'm on the fence so I'm doing both
|
|
|
|