Also, on the issue of building a windows wallet, so far I've not gotten it done. I apologize, but there are huge demands on my time, and I just haven't gotten it done. I don't use Windows as a general rule, so it's a bit of a struggle.
Thanks for the update. Good to know it's still in the pipeline somewhere. Every time I set a definite goal, shit comes up at work  So I'll just say I'm working on it, and encourage others to do the same. I'm pretty sure it can be done with everything but windows itself being open source. |
|
|
|
Paid, and my thanks to the customer who bought a pretty nice chunk of hash under my referral |
|
|
|
For TEKcoin community.. I think it is now time to act to support the coin!
The way it could be done is to have multipool that will place TEKcoin BUY orders at Cryptsy (or any other exchange) and pay miners in TEK
We need to crowdfund this Multipool! I ask Biomech or Thundertoe to take it in hands ..if not done now it will happen in HYPerStake and mining power will be there...
thank you all people
I don't currently have the necessary skills to build one. I know how to build single coin pools using MPOS and NOMP, and I'm learning coinium-serv, but I have no idea how to sucessfully build or operate a multipool. I could possibly assist somebody taking on such a project, but that's about the extent of it. Also, on the issue of building a windows wallet, so far I've not gotten it done. I apologize, but there are huge demands on my time, and I just haven't gotten it done. I don't use Windows as a general rule, so it's a bit of a struggle. |
|
|
|
Hey All, I just read (lots, but not all  ) this thread after David hinted me to check this coin. I would love to opt to that HyperLoan thing, for me it will be great to know better the coin. Currently i just own 100 HYPs that presstab tipped me on IRC: I entered there to try to solve my problem with the wallet, someone tipped me 1 HYP, and presstab solved my problem... So i tipped presstab 1 HYP. After the overall laughs i learned he is the dev and he throw at me 100 HYPs ;-) Thats my story of how i entered in the community haha My nick on irc is Top8, which is registered. Ive been around some time, and im known from the Blackcoin and NXT communities. David also knows me a little from Mintcoin and now on the Crypto Kingdom game from XMR that he and rpietila are doing. In terms of securing that loan, well, im pretty public if someone checks the NXT forum, as i have my details there as im member of jl777 TEAM and when i have some time im helping the guys at NXTInspect. Anyways, David and Risto have more than 1 BTC worth of XMRs from me into that game so if i vanish with those HYPs and run to Barbados, he has my public consent to change those Crypto Kingdom gold into XMR, that into HYP, and make some (epic) rain in the IRC channel Thats it! The loan idea is amazing, can make some newcomers hook to the train. I propose even to split it: As i have learned, a 4000 or 5000 stake is better to... well, stake, so if you guys can send 2x 5000 to two ppl it will double the output wanted result, and probably minimize risks. In my case i receive one of those batches i compromise to automatically buy another 5K so i can dual stack and enter in this Hypsteria you are apparently all Enough chat. Thanks for reading! Welcome! I think you got a pretty good idea there, and a well thought out post. This is one of the best coin communities out there, very little newbie bashing and folks willing to help. I've been in on it since launch, though I'm pretty far down the rich list Pres and David are good guys and dedicated devs. It's my second favorite coin, and probably the most profitable that I hold, at least in the short term. |
|
|
|
HYPlionnaire, part deux - Hundred for hundredFellow hypsters, I salute you. To celebrate my accession to the rank of HYPlionaire, I will give 10k HYP away. "Hundred for hundred". The rules are as follow: 100 claimed address on the top 1000 will receive 100 HYP. I will start from the bottom so that it will benefit more the ones with less HYP. I will maintain a list of tipped addresses. I will check the list regularly so you can still claim your address now and get the HYP. To claim your address: In the wallet, File/Sign Message, enter your HYP address in first field, name as you want it to appear in second, click Sign Message, paste the three field to the claim page ( hyp.cryptocoinexplorer.com/claim). To check if your address is claimed: hyp.cryptocoinexplorer.com/richHave HYP, have fun! Well, that was a pleasant surprise! Thanks, David! |
|
|
|
Hi there everyone i am currently trying to make a nomp pool for luckycoin. but it keeps saying that my p2p magic value is wrong.
i found the value for the network to be in main.cpp
after pchmessage[4] 0xfb 0xc0 0xb6 0xdb
taking out all of the 0x's = fbc0b6db
anything im doing wrong?
If you're not using the peer to peer setting, the magic number can be removed. If you are, don't know what to tell you. I only use NOMP as a stratum, as I think the website sucks in all dimensions from visual to function. |
|
|
|
did Mullick tell you that ? i find it odd you would have found that out defaced. thanks for the info though.. it may be hard for them to prove anything on Cryptsy i think. and the other guy / service i never heard of.. edit: in case some guys don't know the OP here has been good buddies with mods on Cryptsy going back at least mid-last year. i was on a pool defaced ran for example that had me and Mullick on it for example. and yeah he did a great job running the pool  edit2: By the way.. you misspelled "Truth" in your topic title, it's actually spelled F U D Seriously, you never heard of Trendon Shavers and you're supposedly this big crusader in the bitcoin world? FFS, man, he made headlines in the mainstream. Wow, dude, you gotta come up for air once in a while. |
|
|
|
|
I'm fairly sure the dev you're talking to would have already told you this, but you'll need to fork the github to one that you control, so that you have all the relevant keys and access.
|
|
|
|
Personally, I wouldn't want to see automatic coin control added.
[...]
Honestly though, consider not adding automatic coin control - you'll take away what I see as a big part of HYP's addictiveness. I think it is GREAT IDEA!!! I also support this idea. I do not believe barrier to entry is a good thing for a coin that want to be popular. Automatic coin control will probably leave room for fine-tuning any way, the same cars have manual transmission or even sport mode, whilst other have automatic transmission. Then, who's right on cars? Everyone is. Different audiences and preventing one audience to access the coin is not my vision for HyperStake. Not everyone wants to be addicted - I am, and I'm fine with it but other people just want it to work well, without this feeling of losing money because they don't understand coin cointrol. Plus, I tend to think there would be a bit less day-traders if coin controlling was not only automatic, but even encouraged with a potential stake displayed right in the wallet's main window, an "executive summary" ('you have X HYP at the moment - in around 20 days, you should have Y HYP if you leave your wallet open most of the time"). I absolutely agree that automatic control is a good idea to foster adoption. I'd go so far as to say that it should be the default, at least in the QT client, but there should be an option to disable it and/or parts of it for people like me (and apparently you) who have to be under the hood. My wife can't drive a stick, so our car has an automatic. I deal. I'd prefer a stick, and someday I'll have my own sports car that has a six speed manual transmission, twin turbos, nitrous... and a bunch of other stuff of questionable legality But for every passionate driver there are hundreds of people who look at their car the same as their toaster. They drive the industry, while people like me push the edges of it. It's likely the same with coin control. |
|
|
|
Hello HYPmasters!
REGARDING STAKING-
When you are sorting coins into 4k blocks (recommended size?), are you supposed to keep putting them into the same address?
Or the address doesn't matter - STAKING WISE?
PRIVACY-WISE-
I always thought u are supposed to make new addresses for every incoming transaction-- for privacy reasons?
REGARDING SECURITY
And whenever u spend from an address u are supposed to empty & discard it-- for security reasons?
Thanks!
The address doesn't matter. You can do all manipulations with new addresses if you like and if you care about security, but it is not necessary. But there is one underwater stone you should know about if you don't want to lose your coins. It is the keypool size. You can read more about it here. Regarding splitting blocks - it is best to send to the same address in your wallet, because once I lost about 1000 coins when I had done a lot of splitting after buying large amounts and then my wallet crashed so I had to go back to my 2 week old backup - which did not have all the random addresses that I had been using by not configuring the "change address" and so I lost everything that I had split after the 100 addresses in my backup were exhausted. I lost about 0.1 BTC that time. So since then I know to configure the "custom change address" to my own wallet address and to not eat up all the random addresses in my wallet, so my backup stays current for a much longer period. It does not matter for the staking itself if the blocks are in the same or all different addresses, unless you want to prove the balance of your wallet, there are some coins where your entire balance determines how much rewards you get, so then you better keep everything in the same address. Privacy of incoming transactions: If you don't want the money to be traceable to you then it is a good thing to use a new receive address for different people sending money to you. Also for yourself it can be easier to keep track of who is paying you. Note that if you are splitting *those* inputs then you should re-configure your custom change address to that one or you are still sending your coins to your original address, which will make it traceable to your original address again. The fact that all coins and addresses are administrated in the publicly accessible blockchain has benefits (trustless money transfer) but also drawbacks (traceability). To most of us that is not a problem but it depends on what you use your money for, if you need to shield it. Since addresses are typically not published unless you are either dealing with someone or publishing it (like in a sig of a post like this) the privacy is normally not a concern. Security of outgoing transmissions: There is no point in emptying an address once you have sent from it, since nobody can use the balance of that address without the private key that is only available in your wallet.dat. *if* your computer was hacked and your wallet.dat file was stolen *then* it is a good idea to transfer all funds to a new wallet and discard the old, but any other time there is no point. The transfers out of the old address can be viewed on the block chain, so the new address is know just like the old where it was sent from and even if you sent to someone you do not trust, they cannot do anything with the knowledge about the address from where it was sent, since they do not hold the key. Hope this clarifies the working of the wallet. Overall, good writeup. However, on your first paragraph, you're incorrect. The correct answer would be "If you don't do it the following way, make regular backups of wallet.dat". I'd also add that if you do NOT use a custom change address, make a backup, then add "keypool=1000" to the .conf file, and then after stopping the daemon or client and resynching, make another backup. This will put a very large amount of keys in the backup. And it harms nothing. Only caveat I can think of with that is to not do it on a Raspberry Pi as it will make wallet.dat quite a bit bigger. Given that they're just strings of text, I don't even know if that would be an issue. |
|
|
|
so just curious, whats their formula cause I saw a huge difference in payout.
Payout is based on a standard calculator, sans variance. Usually when it changes sharply, we've hit another difficulty change. |
|
|
|
At least there is pictures. I have most of the miner units that are shown  Will you PLEASE refrain for quoting one decimal meter of photos that just were shown in the preceding post only to make a pointless comment of 15 words below? Thanks so much.  Back to the topic, after 212 pages of posts.... PB keeps on delivering. FWIW. Glad it wasn't just me. Would've taken about the same amount of time to <snip> the quote as it did to type his comment. And agreed. |
|
|
|
Couple of noob questions that I couldn't find the answers to.
In coin control I should be looking at list mode and not tree mode. Correct?
In list mode each group of coins has an age, and a weight. I'm assuming that's the stake age and the current staking weight. So higher is better for both numbers.
Also that the weight is really somehow calculated with the age and number of coins.
OK, I thought the MAX stake age was 30 days. I have a measly 20 coins by there lonesome that are 33.122 days old. There weight is 486.
I just received a bunch of coins and got them in one group of a little over 4K coins. And the rest of my coins (about 1K) are scattered into several smaller piles. Some of these are 16 - 25 days old.
What is the average time for a 4K block to stake?
Thanks for any help.
Pretty damn good questions for a noob You got it right on coin control. List mode shows each block, tree mode shows each address. I never use tree, don't even see it's purpose, but that's me. Max stake maturity is thirty days. After that it gains no further weight, but will keep trying to stake and should eventually do it. I have staked ONE coin. Took bloody forever, but I wanted to see if it worked. It went way past the gain. I've no idea if there even is an average time, I've yet to have blocks bigger than 2K. After my next two stake, I'll be combining into 4K and watching, but it's pretty variable. All of us have ideas and opinions on what the ideal size is, but bigger blocks are more likely to stake early in the maturity period. Not guaranteed. The worry is if they are too big, you throw away some potential as the max subsidy is 1000 coins. So basically, we're trying to find the sweet spot where you hit real close to that without going over in the shortest time. It's like chess in hyperspace Best of luck, welcome to the community, and if you find good answers, please share! |
|
|
|
Have last 400 stake that say created but not accepted , or something like that 0 of 6 confirms in hours
whats that stuff
Just an orphan. You and somebody else submitted the same block at about the same time. They won. It just reverts to staking, nothing lost. It happens a lot with all POS coins. |
|
|
|
I get the following error from NOMP: rpc error with daemon instance 0 when submitting block with submitblock {"code":-22,"message":"Block decode failed"} I get the following error in debug.log: ThreadRPCServer method=submitblock ******* exception encountered ******* ./tekcoind[0x133084] ./tekcoind[0x29224] ./tekcoind[0x2cce0] ./tekcoind[0xfa5c0] ./tekcoind[0xf3704] ./tekcoind[0xc3d18] ./tekcoind[0xc6d78] ./tekcoind[0x134f30] /usr/lib/libboost_thread.so.1.50.0(+0xe528)[0xb6ecb528] Why?  ?? Have any of the pools been able to mine this? A technical dude I know wanted to mine TEK for fun and said he couldn't get it to work either. NOMP fights with TEK. Also PPC. use the Crypto-expert version of stratum-mining instead, it works. Coinium-serv may work as well. I haven't tested it yet. |
|
|
|
Can someone explain me what does manual/automatic coin control mean?
For a lot of detail, look at the wiki, but a short overview. Under the "send coins" tab is coin control, which shows you every block you have and how much proof of stake "weight" it has and how many days it's been maturing. As new blocks are generated, this can get pretty chaotic, and you can use coin control to combine or split blocks into more useful/optimal sizes. This is an entirely manual process at present. Presstab and a few others have been looking into automating this process to some degree. Currently, there is no automatic coin control. While I'd likely never use it, I think it's still a good idea, so long as it's an option rather than forced. |
|
|
|
I like the 1% fee for automatic coin control. Perhaps it would be more enticing if it was better than manual coin control (if that's possible?)
Well, they've been making automatic transmissions for over 60 years and they still got nothin' on a manual... I have my doubts. |
|
|
|
How does automatic coin control work?
Personally, I wouldn't want to see automatic coin control added. One of the things that keeps me intrigued about HYP, is the fact I HAVE to keep checking my wallet to ensure that my blocks are staking, then rearranging them to what I believe to be optimised. I could probably say I'm addicted to checking it. Look at it like a garden - if you don't look after it, your flowers will still grow, but not as well, and there'll be some weeds creeping in there too. I don't want blocks under 1k, (weeds), I want nice strong staking blocks (flowers) to shine through and earn me my optimised interest, and at the same time, compound my interest to give me advantage over others who don't take so much care. Now, if you decided to add an automatic coin control feature, then why not benefit the community wallet with it - set aside 1% of the S4C going towards the community wallet. If people aren't willing to optimise the results themselves, let them pay for it. 1% is nothing in the whole scale of things. Honestly though, consider not adding automatic coin control - you'll take away what I see as a big part of HYP's addictiveness. Just my opinion....... I'm divided. I kind of like your idea of the 1% for automatic, so why not make it an option with that price coded into the autocombine controls? I too enjoy manually tweaking it. But I can also see where it would be a major pain in the ass for some people. And I do hope that at some point HYP gets out of the hobby stage. It's already a more successful coin than I think any of us thought it would be. |
|
|
|
... I agree with Tranz's initial picks, though of course I'd add TEK Yeah, it's a personal bias. These were just off the top of my head, quick picks. In reality there would be more, and all thoroughly vetted. I like TEK and thundertoe. I rather see it have a little more solid, cleaner, development work. Lots of issues over there right now. But definite potential. He and I have discussed me taking a more active role in it's development, though so far it's just been talk from both of us  It remains my favorite, followed by HYP and HBN, no particular order on second place TEK was my introduction to high POS, so it kind of sticks with me. |
|
|
|
I found this folder. And now? I have no idea, what I have to do ^^
Thank you for first!
I started yesterday the wallet and it worked, but it stopped again after 7204 blocks. In the debug window is following text since first start today: "Sync version v1.0.0.0 ()
You need to download and use latest wallet 1.1 Sync Wallet 1.1.0 Launch Get your new Sync wallet for Mac, Linux and Windows today: http://syncfund.com/wallets.htmlAnd if your wallet stop syncing - close the wallet, reopen and wait syncing again. But I already sent my buyed coins to the adress in this wallet. Are my coins lost?? Regardless of the flavor of coin, the very first thing you should do is create a back up of your wallet.dat file. Or several of them. The new wallet client will see all of your old stuff. As long as you have the same wallet.dat file, nothing is lost. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
