I understand the frustration that is coming from OP's part, but I think this bonus that their friends are getting is simply to boost the confidence of these people to bet on the site, and since OP is clearly a high-roller, the company didn't feel the need to give him any more bonuses which I still think is absurd. I do think a lot of bookmakers and casinos as of late have been very complacent in giving their most loyal customers a fair and just treatment, after all, what's a couple hundred dollars gonna do against their millions of dollars in funding? So why are they withholding from providing appropriate rewards to people. I think the phone call is more than enough evidence that they really just don't want to give him the rewards or bonus at all. "We wouldn't give you any bonus because our system finds that you are actually winning against the casino". That is just absurd, he is obviously a die-hard customer of them, I don't see why they can't give him the bonus they give out to one-time bettors on their site.

With how Biden is acting lately, the trust of the common people to him are slowly diminishing. He's showing signs of dementia too, which is not a good thing to say the least and certainly not something that you would want for your president. Trump, despite how asinine his last few months in the term, is slowly gaining traction once again within the MAGA community so I do think Trump is gonna win over Biden this time, should Biden run for presidency again. There's Sanders, which I think will have a fighting chance as well, but I don't really see him winning against Trump when he already lost if I'm not mistaken around 2 or 3 elections against him.

As the cornerstone of this betting strategy lies within the notion that most superfans tend to be uninformed and are therefore betting only for the sake of supporting their teams, I think this will work. Especially for national games wherein little to no amount of research between players and teams are involved, thus ensuring that indeed little to no reliable information is being passed around amongst these fans. However, I don't see this working internationally, for sports that involve multiple countries pitting against each other like the World Cup, because the teams are made up of the best players, and there's no singular crowd that really defines who's the veteran and who's the underdog team.

As far as I know, minimum deposit and withdrawals are parameters set by the gambling house to ensure that what they are dealing with is human, and is not a hacker who tries to make profit out of their house. Now in the case of whether these limits connote something on the side of the gambler, or in this case a would-be-gambler, then it highly depends on the outlook of that person. There's no singular answer to whether they'd think the house is forcing them to gamble more, or the house is making them gamble regardless of whatever amount they have, coz at the end of the day if they want to gamble they will gamble, and frankly enough if you are on a tight budget that you can only afford to gamble 10 bucks or less I would highly suggest you don't waste it on gambling.

Everything comes down to having a plan and being disciplined enough to follow through with said plan. As long as you have a concrete plan that you will be willing to follow, there's no way losing money over gambling is gonna get to you. Personally, I employ a three-loss-three-wins plan. Whenever I get as much as three wins in one sitting, I call it a day even if I still feel lucky. Same goes with losses, this way, I make sure I don't get addicted and that my funds are kept in check, in such that they don't dry up in one sitting. I suggest you try that plan out too if you're still lost with what to employ, or maybe think of a plan that really resonates with you.

I think any method in which bitcoin is used as a means to transact is a good enough way to promote its usage to the general public. Although I think it would suffice if steps on how to create bitcoin wallets as well as funding them to let the ones who are not that savvy with bitcoin know. Cause in my opinion it would only cater towards those who already have bitcoin in their pockets. I think a huge signage or a poster on your store where you let people know you accept bitcoin payments could be good too. This is good. that actually makes sense. Exactly, discounts on bitcoin payments could work too so people are urged to use bitcoin as a payment option, and a good way to entice those who are not using bitcoin as well. Pair this with a good infographic on how to create bitcoin wallets as well as how to fund them, and your target demographic is set!

Agreed. I noticed it too for quite some time and that mentality is pretty common and easily instilled amongst the newbies. Somehow the pros and the veterans aren't so much indoctrinated by said notion. Then again for me it's all a matter of capacity really. If you think you can still carry on holding coins despite the bear market, then by all means hold them til the bull market comes around. But if you greatly depend on the value of those coins you own then I highly suggest you pull out some, or maybe even all of it if ever. After all the not losing is still winning, and in this case we have to mitigate the losses you incur which will only be possible if you pull your coins out at an opportune time.

You're seeing a side hustle wrongly. For me, if you'd have to learn skills extensively to the point that it almost takes as much time as going for your regular 9-5, it's not a side hustle anymore, it's a second job, which could cause you to lose employment of both. For you to have a side hustle you must know what your skills are, or at least what your hobbies are. Then find a way to profit from it. I myself, have been a writer for 2 years now, starting from what otherwise would seem to be just a regular hobby I do to pass off time. Ultimately, my point is that your side hustle must not take too much time and effort as your regular job, that way you can still focus on both without losing your social life in the process, or your employment.

First and foremost, congrats on you and your friend's budding venture. Now on the topic of advices. I would highly suggest you don't sell bitcoin to your attendees as "the end-all-be-all" coin like most bitcoin seminars I have attended to. It paints the wrong impression and pulls in the wrong type of people into the industry. You must focus on how bitcoin could make everything better starting from technology, as well as other things, and ultimately, provide them with takeaways so the lessons they have learned through your seminar lingers. Offer them something like a reward or whatnot for learning cryptocurrencies, that way learning is incentivized and ensured.

Lockdown or not this is concerning news from China, as one of the superpowers in this planet right now it's a surprise they are experiencing such severe economic struggles. Although in retrospect, this is no surprise considering that along with the lockdowns, they are also experiencing massive issues with their housing market caused by their biggest real estate tycoon defaulting on loans he took to make residential buildings AFAIK. We just need to sit back and observe if whether these issues will be solved when everyone from China start going back to their offices.

I doubt many new-age Indians as well as legislators will take heed of what he said, especially now that more and more people are being more accepting of bitcoin's existence and by adjacent, cryptocurrencies. That being said, since he's on a position of power it is still possible that he could make take some measure to realize this dream of his, however India being a democratic state, they'd have to speak with the people ultimately which as of now considering how my Indian friends think of it, is gonna be futile.

Short answer: We don't know

As it stands today, bitcoin may have recovered a fair bit of its valuation from last year's collapse, sitting at a snug 20-21k just around yesterday. Although this may change in the coming days for the better or for worse. All in all, we can't really tell if bitcoin is going to drop to one lint a piece or if it's going to reach its ATH. We can only predict. 20k may seem reasonable now but without proper reason for it to be valuated, it's going to drop real soon anyway. As of now no good news has come around for bitcoin's value to soar up so best we stay put and updated.

Paper wallets can easily be destroyed, lost, and be mistaken for regular paper with a bunch of codes on it. I literally lost a couple hundred dollars worth of bitcoin from using paper wallets because I forgot to take my wallet out when I went to do my laundry. Hardware wallets do not have this problem because of their relative bulk and the fact that some of them are made of weapons-grade metal alloy. I still think of using paper wallet every now and then because after all it is much more convenient and cheap, you literally only have to tear a piece of paper or maybe print stuff out and you're good to go. At the end of the day it is all a subject of preference, and I guess I can vouch for everyone when we say that hardware wallets are just objectively better in every way.

I've seen that in my country, before Axie the common games our people play with, besides the common sports like basketball and chess, are cockfights and online chinese poker. They bet on these games like their life depended on it and well, most of them lost a couple hundred dollars in the processs. When Axie Infinity came along, there goes everyone's money, suddenly everyone's glued to their phones and computers playing this hit game and earning in the process. I do think there will be some sort of competition between gambling and play to earn should the latter be perfected or at least be improved upon, but that is a big if, and with how people look at crypto following the collapse and multiple scandals, it may take some time before people gain confidence in playing P2E games again.

Everything that has level 1 access security will be vulnerable to quantum computers in the future. Social networking sites, and anything that requires 1 step verification like for instance, cryptocurrency wallets will be at risk of breach and compromise. But think of it this way, surely, when the future comes around and quantum computers become publicly available, there will be measures taken by the IT sector of our future to alleviate and maybe even prevent such attacks. They may even do so before commercially opening the use of quantum computers in the future because let's face it, everyone knows this is going to be a problem. themselves included. So there's no way they wouldn't figure stuff out before implementing such powerful tool.

This is a postulate and a common sense at this point but as common sense is, it's not really that common. Anyways, it's always important to keep a calm and collected attitude whenever you're trading as slight changes in mood and emotions may render you falling into your own heuristics and biases which itself is not good. So just like you said, don't celebrate, and most of all don't let it get to you as well when bitcoin goes down in value. After all the cryptocurrency is cyclical in nature and there will come a time in the foreseeable future when it will bounce back and reach another ATH like always. I think this suggestion is the most important thing you can impart to newbies as a seasoned crypto trader.

Mans literally just stated what seems to be the most probable cause for bitcoin's rise in value last night. But as you have said, a price recovery is already due within this year, just so happened that it coincided with Miss Universe and Miss El Salvador's costume showcase, although honestly speaking the price rise could also be attributed to the showcase, as it literally promoted bitcoin in one of the most prestigious beauty pageant in the world. Then again I really do think it's just bitcoin riding the same trend in valuation as with other stores of value rather than a measly showcase in a pageant.

These aren't ponzi schemes at all, as they are literally scamming people out of their own money. Most probably they promise some sort of already existing crypto like bitcoin for instance, in exchange for real life pesos but when things start rolling they don't give the people their due crypto, because they don't have it in them. These people most likely have connections and possible ponds to fish in which would be very integral as these are the literal things that empower such scammers. Once the authorities get a hold of this list, they won't have control anymore.

Not so fast my friend. The halving which is a guaranteed bull for bitcoin wouldn't happen until sometime next year. Don't get me wrong, I would love to have a bull run as soon as possible as much as the next guy but insinuating one would happen now, especially with multiple scandals coming in and out of the industry is a little too ambitious if not nigh impossible. The bear market is pretty much far from over and i don't want to be the bearer of bad news but may stick around for a little while, unless something happens sometime around June. Then again bitcoin never failed to surprise me so something may just come around. If so I'd come back to this post and congratulate you.

I doubt they'd take Jordan Clarkson out of the team, he's a great player and an integral part of the Utah Jazz, performance-wise he's always been a decent guard and had always secured rebounds for the team. So there's a high possibility that with his enthusiasm to stay with the team, and his great performance, that Utah Jazz retains him and replace somebody else with a more potent player. But for now, as you have said, there's still no news regarding Jordan Clarkson's future with the Jazz so we can only speculate about his team placement until such news arrive.