I believe there's a rule on the forum that anyone who sends you unnecessary, unsolicited PMs without your consent and/or expectation and if reported to admins, can get banned for doing so?  

I really don't want to have a headache while watching my incoming messages being filled by unwanted messages out there that has nothing but highly non-sensical stuff in it.

This shows that since the old campaign ban, you still didn't learn quite a lot while showing up with the same type of campaign once again. I've got a few things to ask:

- You've been on this forum for so long (considering that your campaign had been running here for years), weren't you aware of the spam your campaign did spread?

- Why didn't you learn about so many highly reputed campaign managers here even before your campaign began for the first time? And even if not, why not this time? The forum needs not to be blamed but you for being lazy by not doing research you needed to make your campaign a successful experience for both you and the participants.

- Due to you not being active, do you even know that Yobit's campaign has got enough negative responses and not just limited to that, but even red tags for those who decide to participate in your campaign?

Profile of Vadi2323

Lately, I've been getting attacked again by one of the most mentally-challenged people who don't give a fuck to their deeds and start pushing and provoking us in a debate we don't even want to have with them. This guy accused me pf signature spamming which I didn't do, but what he did should really be considered as unethical in terms of sending merits and especially sending PMs to me with all his bullshit arguments I'm not even worried to know about.

One by one all his PMs, out of which I replied over 2 just so to make this Russian pig believe that I don't just post for money. But then, he just started insulting from the first message he sent me and believes he'd get respect from me? A middle finger in his ass in the name of respect.






Heck, he doesn't even know about his own responsibilities and now trying to provoke me to get into an unnecessary discussion by continuous bullshit over PM. Can this attack be stopped or do I need to take steps from my end? I guess the guy's gone mad over me as I'm the victim for all his bullshit today and he wanted to eat up my brain. 

I believe Yobit is addicted to spam and are also trying to drive people crazy for money with their new campaign on their own forum where they'll be paying pennies for just 30 posts (max) per day and they expect their users not to spam, else they'll get banned. Well-watchable circus going over there.

Source of the quote above = https://cryptotalk.org/topic/21-get-paid-for-every-post/?tab=comments#comment-214

One strange thing is that, I've seen many people hopping from Bitcointalk over there making accounts with the same username they've got here. Maybe they don't love their privacy nor their accounts, because if they've used the same password they used at Bitcointalk, I guess their BCT account is at stake now as I'd never trust a forum (cryptotalk) from those who appreciate spam. I'm not sure if the accounts made with Bitcointalk names over cryptotalk are of those using Bitcointalk with those usernames here, however!  

I've got something to share here:

BTCUSD Weekly



BTCUSD Monthly



Watching both the charts very carefully, I can conclude that this beast is probably following the older pattern and may form a triangle very soon that could be a deciding factor for the long run of BTC in a single direction (could be up, could be down). But all I can say here is that, OP's prediction of $6800 is valid and possess some weight in it because if it is actually following the older pattern, then I see an extra possible downturn as well as sideways incoming. However, it can't go much down because the previous high (~$20k) was much more higher compared to the lower high we saw this year (~$14k) which lowers down the possibilities of a free fall.

Why not simply go to Profile -> Look and Layout Preferences -> Check the box that says "Don't show users' signatures." -> Change Profile ?
It's the best way and that your eyes won't feel butthurt (fuck I couldn't stop laughing my ass off while writing this) and you'll feel much more better. Get well soon, Vadi2323.

Now, let's get straight to the point.
On a serious note, just think what the fuck are you doing.
Ok, about the signatures, no I don't ever post to make a buck and you know what? Check my post history and yours and you'll see (and even feel) the difference. Pointing fingers immediately over people who've got signatures just because you've got nothing else to blame upon has become a common practice here nowadays and I don't really give a fuck to that anymore. Go watch your face in front of a mirror, ask yourself was it all unintended what you did or it was done intentionally? Merit source doesn't mean you need to find some person, go behind him through his posts, stalk him for just a day or two and send all your sMerits to them, you know nothing about the given authority to you. Wait wait, what about your actions on defending Livecoin?

---

I truly believe he knows his job and he does it way better than you - distribution of merits to the right people and posts. You didn't respond to my query - do you always do it like that? If yes, I don't think you deserve to be a merit source any further. I don't know about reporting our posts for signature spam or whatever but I'll surely report you to admins and ask them why the hell should people like you be given such authority when you don't even understand how to follow it?

---

Lolz, as to my expectations, this ass-licking pageant clown PMed me with all the bullshit he could spit out off his mouth. Please use Google translate to understand if you don't get the meaning behind his words. He thinks I'm a signature whore! Now you tell me, what do you think Vadi2323?

Without increasing my post count, I've edited this post to show ya people how he's trying to provoke us behind the scenes. He's got nothing to prove but to fuck our minds with all his non-sensical comments.

I believe LN is a solution for those believing in the offchain transactions with lesser fee involved, but even after doing it through LN can't resolve the size and scaling just because we are bound to take those transactions online in the future and add that size to our current blockchain, I believe that compression of Blockchain could be the only possible scenario that could help but don't really know how it'd be put in action by the devs if they ever decide to do so because the biggest risk of doing that will be - losing some old (and even new) transactional data possibly if it poses a glitch that could remove a piece of the transaction to reduce the size through compressing it, nothing else comes to my mind as of now.


Well, to what I've seen, these guys always try to dig a well whenever fire takes place so I haven't clearly seen any such development related debates especially through developers (maybe they are doing it behind the curtains) or it is possible that they believe in actions rather than just words.

Why not pay attention to your own self first before pointing fingers over others, Vadi2323?
What was so special to reward Viktor SPB around 50 merits in a period of just 2 days? You've had those merits to be sent to the most deserving candidates but all you did was sent these merits as a special treatment to Viktor SPB while most merits were sent over a single topic? Heck. We guys try to filter out the best ones among the average guys out there, do you always do that Mr. Merit Source? Then I believe that you don't even deserve to be one. Wait wait, is it your account only? Or is it that you did that for some kinda financial gains (maybe a deal cracked between both of you, eh!)?

Please try as mentioned here:
https://bitcoin.org/en/release/v0.18.1#wallet-gui


It is also said in the link provided that "Upgrading directly from 0.7.x and earlier without redownloading the blockchain is not supported." So yeah, that's one kind of an extra step OP needs to take before continuing with the upgrade.

I believe I've never seen any genuine mixers asking you to send your coins to a legacy address but to multisig addresses that start with a '3'. And what made you went through these mixers when you've had Chipmixer that charges you nothing for using their services? Seriously, the amounts that you sent could've been easily mixed up through Chipmixer and it is the one and only mixer whose security couldn't be broken by the best hackers available.

The network clogs and mining pool games of increasing transaction fees are few of the most important topics I'm trying to get a resolution to. Please also try to focus on these things while sharing knowledge about the type of scripts and transactions. Great thread, appreciated. There's been a debate about Bitcoin's block size increment over time to involve more and more transactions, do you believe that's actually a form that can scale it in the long run considering the hyper hefty blockchain size that's technically too high for an average sized hard disk of a PC if people decide to run a node through downloading the whole blockchain?

I believe we're in the middle of institutional traders taking it all in their hands and decide the direction of the markets and maybe the selloff was to make these type of investors get in at lower while also considering a fact that selling it off in leveraged positions make these SHORTS higher gains compared to those who open long leveraged positions. And since you already predicted $7340 past 8100, let us not forget that BTC already went near $7800 on most exchanges in minutes while this dump took place, so I currently believe that the game has already been played, chaos has been nested in the minds of longs where everyone is scared of taking a long position while it is also advisable to stay away from the markets before we see how and where BTC closes its weekend.

@OP, Thanks to the Bakkt launch we're now almost 20% down from where we were a few days before. As to what I saw, more than $45 billion had been wiped out of the markets since its launch and still counting, but it was all a predicted game of big players who were counting on the astonishing dominance of BTC which, when started to pull back, they came to knew that alts are going to take it over for some time and Bitcoin might lose it hard and Bam, it did! This was actually all planned to kill the longs who bought leveraged positions in lieu of Bakkt's launch and what happened, killed their longs so badly liquidating many of those who were over confident over Bakkt. BTC is going to recover, but not so easy this time.

All in all, this looks to me as a lesson learnt. I don't know how many times users such as OP will be suffering from such issues as there's always a new type of scam taking place every single day trying to drag away your money out of your hands. Some people also don't have money to buy that much maybe because they could be from a third world country and/or not too much interested in crypto or have very less (not even $50 worth of BTC or alts) held in their bags for which they don't prefer to go for any hardware wallets.

---

That's true, the sort of security we need to take care of is very high in front of what people believe it is. This platform is new and so, chances of getting hacked and scammed are reaching newer peaks every single day with more and more adoption as it's all about getting exposure of these unknown buddies (those who don't know about anything technical) to these highly professional hackers who know how to get into somebody's wallet and get the coins. When we say we are our own bank by using crypto, we really do understand the level risks it possesses and when we put a step in, it's better to be cautious than hell in order to save our everything that's kept in our PC.


Don't forget to ask him not to save his old Windows.dat (old data) of the previous OS.

@OP, What I didn't get is - when you clicked that suspicious link, wasn't there any Antivirus in your PC that may have stopped or warned you for not visiting there?

Even I've never went through these services except HitBTC that wanted me to do KYC for no freaking reasons and being the shittiest of all exchanges, but I needed to give out my details just to get my money moved.



The best advantage in our hands here - I try to find reliable traders with broader background in the field of trading Bitcoins and trade with them only (directly) rather than transferring my coins to an exchange, waiting for the deposit to confirm, waiting for a trader to buy my coins (and that takes a lot of time because it's all done partially and not in one shot) and finally, the hassle of releasing them, all with the so-called KYC regulations to be abide by as there's "No KYC, No Trading allowed" policy here.


I'm afraid I can't get a debit card to use in my country knowing that the heat to stopping crypto here has taken an enormous form, but all I do for nominal things like buying groceries online to doing recharges and even paying my bills, I simply sell my BTC to the trader, give the bill details and/or number to recharge upon and get it done almost immediately without any issues.


Exchanges are dominating because they've got volumes (whether real or fake) and that's why they've taken over the OTC deals at a higher pace these days. I wouldn't prefer giving my details to any shady exchange (even the most reputed one) just because they won't let me withdraw my money, but would rather prefer going out of the box and remain private (not so safe if the trader turns out bad).

What made you keep all your coins in the same wallet is the first question that strikes my mind badly.

I believe this address was also involved in some HYIP investment activities like BitRegal (and maybe the admin was the guy himself who stole OP's funds)

Whole story below, please search for this address on that page: 12HfRnx47gQnnYn9Q3Zpiuzzv6yzXTKMEJ
https://x-invest.net/forum/thread-bitregal-10-daily-btc-only-13254?pid=184427&mode=linear

I've checked walletexplorer too and it's very strange that it is just a single address and no more addresses are in that wallet which made me believe it couldn't be of an exchange (maybe).

We have lately been seeing a lot of big names dipping their fingers into the sweet profitable sauce through Bitcoin's variations and tasting it nicely these days. Names coming out are some of the highly used apps in terms of daily consumption of data through their customers over these apps:

- Japan's Messaging giant Line launches an in-built crypto exchange for their 80M userbase.

https://www.coindesk.com/line-officially-launches-crypto-exchange-for-80-million-users-in-japan

- Telegram raised $1.7 billion for its TON token development and released code recently as well as Coinbase is considering on adding it to their exchange.

https://www.coindesk.com/telegram-finally-releases-code-for-its-1-7-billion-ton-blockchain

- Japan's Retail Giant, also known as the "Amazon of Japan", Rakuten has officially launched a crypto exchange where they have now allowed spot trading services to their 850M customers.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/japans-retail-giant-rakuten-officially-launches-crypto-exchange/

And many more...

Source:
https://news.bitcoin.com/apps-gone-crypto-popular-apps-are-adding-crypto-capabilities/

Still need anything more to believe that Bitcoin is actually being adopted worldwide and everyone has now started taking advantage of this old-yet-highly addictive global cryptocurrency (asset) already?

Finally, something great is gonna come to us, Bitcoiners.

The US Gov had just been doing the same thing since years and making fool of people on the name of "repo" and many other reasons they put up. They are actually increasing debts on their side and this unnecessary printing of bills without any prior information shows that Bitcoin is actually the best alternative over anything considering that it is only 21 million and the number can never, ever be changed even if Satoshi shows up and interferes because that's how the protocol should work.

They are just purely able to manipulate their people living there and that's what worries me about the situation they will be facing in the very near future. Can't this be called as a way to be funding to save their superiority over other major countries by keeping the value of USD higher against other currencies?

Glad to hear that it didn't screen-bled in your case and yeah, the phone is in Asian region only. However, it didn't have that issue before and it came into effect after installing a custom ROM (that's what I came to hear from that friend who's got F1).


Ported Means? Sorry, but I'm not too technical at least in this case.

@aundroid, Which ROM fits the best and is similar to CarbonOS that I can install in Realme 2 Pro? Please also share a link to it. And do let me know that all these custom ROMs are based on which version of Android?

Hey, yes it was actually told to me by one of my friends who used to install a custom ROM over Poco F1 and then, faced the screen-bleeding problems badly.


I actually referred to the 2nd comment by ETFBitcoin and because I am familiar with CarbonOS, I thought it'd be the best option for this smartphone but don't know if I can actually install it. @ETFBitcoin, can you help out with this if there's a way possible?