Now, I feel pity for him that he didn't even knew that his concerns have already been settled by the campaign manager. I believe that people here can become too much sensitive sometimes when it comes to the circulation of money and what stops it. I believe he (YOSHIE) should have gone to Hhampuz and asked him about his concerns instead of painting them here if he's actually concerned about it. But still, I've seen many gamblers (not taking those signature guys into consideration) losing a lot more than what is described as minimum withdrawal amount at bspin (seriously, I'm not taking anybody's side but just my opinion) and nobody complained as to why they lost those amounts even after going rekt on those casinos. However, I'd still urge bspin to consider lowering this minimum withdrawal amount a bit as it's costing them a lot of potential customers (gamblers) who are interested to play but fear the possibilities of waiting longer till they reach that minimum to get the funds.

Thanks for this, I never knew they could do this too. I guess Chrome doesn't have a security patch available yet after reading this article: https://superuser.com/questions/1421982/how-can-i-test-punycode-url-will-display-correctly-prior-to-purchase

So yeah, in those terms, I believe Firefox is good. What about other browsers? Are punycode attacks limited to these 2 browsers only? What about Tor browser? I didn't find anything related to this for Tor.

It's not like none of the online wallets have no security, but a few ones are good. And I don't remember where I said this, but it's your awareness and IQ based on which you get scammed or not (except for cases where any hacks take place). But you can also save yourselves from any hacks or malware with a little more "awareness" I talked about. Like for eg.; my experience with Electrum had been the best and will always be because I know whom should I trust here - their official website. There were issues with their wallet with version 3.3.3 or older that when I opened the wallet once, it asked me to download the latest update but it was a malicious attack. It was my choice to close the wallet immediately and not follow the given instructions in that pop up. After that, I just visited the official website, saw the header that said that versions older than 3.3.4 are vulnerable to phishing attacks. You really need to work with awakened eyes here if you're serious about your money. @OP, I guess you got your answer from my end - Electrum.

Ok, I never knew you were concerned about the signature campaign earnings. About the case, they were probably banned due to plagiarism or ban evasion as mentioned in the respective threads and I don't think they should be treated with any leniency here considering any of the deeds committed by them and the amounts that remains after their ban (considering they got paid some %), they should deposit and withdraw the rest because I believe you are not bound to play but you can withdraw immediately even after depositing there.

---

If that's the case, why not such gamblers who've got problems with this, come ahead united and ask for a minimum withdrawal amount reduction? I'm not against your concerns but people should raise their voice so to make the project owners know that they are not happy with what's being provided.

Even our safest browsers like Tor, Firefox, Chrome with integrated security help us to fight with some malicious websites by giving the exact type of warnings like MetaMask gives you but it is all limited to a set of specific conditions like when the website looks malicious and does not have SSL-secured environment available as well as the certificate validation. I believe MetaMask is actually much more trustworthy in these cases but believe me, whether or not you trust these things or decide to stay away, it's you in the end who will be responsible to take actions and your actions will decide your destiny in crypto.

Like for eg.; if MetaMask or even the browser itself stops you from visiting a malicious website (which may install something in your PC without your permission or start auto-mining) but you believe that you will be safe and you want to visit it and you use the "Advanced" feature and permit the browser to release the website and let you go there, then it's not any extension or browser's fault but yours because it was your decision. Take very wise decisions when it comes to using/ storing crypto anywhere. Be safe.

Hey, sorry about that.
I mixed the withdrawal part with the fee, maybe I was in a hurry trying to cross the roads while typing this and committed such a stupid mistake.
I actually meant that they were not intended to be reducing their minimum withdrawal amount and will be keeping it fixed at BTC0.005 for the time being, considering the fact that there is no fee attached to withdrawals.

Isn't 5000.00 µ฿ BTC0.005 if I'm correct?
I don't think this should be a problem considering many players play with some good amount of coins and not to forget that there is no withdrawal fee at the moment. I asked them personally via PM if they've got any plans to reduce the fee, but their response was "no, they are not planning any such thing for now".

Ok, I've got a question here again:

What IF:
- Let's say for eg.; I give Google Photos the permission to receive all my images in my smartphone (and I don't believe it's limited to a specific folder but all the images in my smartphone). Does Google save all the images in its Drive feature and shows through photos? Will my privkeys also be on stake if I use Google drive if I've saved my privkeys in Json format and it gets exposed to Drive which, if hacked, can be in the hands of that hacker with all other data that's saved there?

I could have done that TL;DR thing just the way I snipped your complete post, but you know something? Your posts are darling to me, you're what you are and I love the way you describe things here. And yeah, I never ever meant that like kinda thing for you guys such as LoyceV and you, you guys are the example of what needs to be done and what exactly should be merited, how the standards are set, how the efforts are made and last but not the least, a challenge to yourself that you are only your best friend and your worst enemy too. I've seen many good posts being merited too but those misusing their merit power by giving it to people who just abused in that post or there was nothing but insult there and some more specific things that I didn't like, I believe those merited posts should be considered to come under the category of this like thing because it was their (merit sender's) like or choice to give it to such people for the ugly behavior.

Your achievements are priceless and the cost it takes to become the next DdmrDdmr is beyond hard work, extra efforts to know more and more as well as over efficiency to do what's in your mind (here: post).

They don't care? Uummm aaaa I don't think so. I mean why do you think they don't? Even if the block is empty with just newly generated coins being sent to the pool owner, I believe that maybe their set transaction fee limits could not have been met? Correct me if wrong.
Doesn't this look as an attack towards us who use BTC, to spend more on fees to get involved in those blocks? Can this inflate the fees if all miners unite and commit the same?

While you're speaking about extensions here, I believe there's nothing that can be called as safe and secure when it comes to being useful in case of using and hodling crypto. You should be very careful while using such extensions because some of them need specific permissions and that could also lead to many malicious effects to your coins. Some extensions come with viruses that could lead to data loss where even your privkeys can be compromised. Don't use these things in a PC you generally us to store your coins in.

True, GameArt is selling their services and can do whatever they wish to and bspin should have made this thing clear that there would be restrictions in some parts because GameArt is a service provider whose services are being used by bspin as a vendee here while giving the joy of those games to us, but they should have made it clear in OP itself that the gaming provider has some restricted countries where the games will not be played, it's not the responsibility of GameArt but bspin.

IMHO, Merits to me are clearly nothing, yeah nothing. With that said, it is but something of an important value to me till I saw something and so, I stopped thinking a lot about the same. Again for me, Merits are nothing but a token, a reward that you get when your post is liked by someone on the basis of some part of humor and some part of your knowledge that you present in that post.

Merits are rewards for your brilliance.

To me, it is also a responsibility of a user to get the cycle go on by circulating them continuously while giving / sharing them with the most hilarious and humorous people around.

Merits bring responsibility with that reward to circulate and spread them amongst the best.

Now, why I don't like it and don't think of it too much, anymore!

The reason this Merits thing has become tragic for me is due to the fact that I've seen too many people getting merited for using slangs like (Fuck your mother, fuck you, fuck this, fuck that) kinda bullshit and many more shit that you can't even imagine that "Hey, did this post deserve a merit?" So, after seeing that the system made by theymos is good but people are misusing it in their own way, I stopped caring a lot about this thing. Obviously everyone have their own choices to give it to anyone for anything including all this shit, but then, I don't believe Merits to be a measurement to judge anybody's character, quality of posts or their behavior (like I said, it's kinda "LIKE" feature button for me).

Merits in today's time cannot be used to measure anyone's posting quality but just limited to being used as LIKES.

Trust me, when I said that, I knew it was all about permitting requests but many apps won't work without those permissions being given to them (or at least won't work properly. For eg.; Camera app needs your storage permission to view files and show them to you as well as store newly clicked images in your system only after permitted. This includes all the attributes set here for it to perform all these tasks - Read, Write and Execute. By saying outdated OS, do you point it towards the older versions of Android or anything similar? You meant that Android is also vulnerable to bugs which can help hackers steal our data just because it is old? For latest versions of Android nowadays, we need to spend at least $200 - 300  and more to get them in a smartphone. We don't need sandboxing because at the end of the day, you're sure to give those permissions to an application that needs it to do its job better.

https://cryptocurrencyalerting.com/wallet-watch.html?channel=telegram
This is your best place to get continuous alerts from a service that provides more than just what you need.

As I said before, this thing could revert back to them in a negative way as well. The way Wright was ordered to give 50% of his stake in BTC that he holds, to Kleiman for the fact that Kleiman was totally involved with his true soul in the making of the future of payments - BTC. Satoshi is one and he will never be found nor his Bitcoins, accept the truth and move on (until someone really shows up with a signed message from the privkey/s of Satoshi which won't happen ever). I'm scared about those entities already claimed to be Satoshi because the way Wright was treated, I believe Satoshi would love to work under the hood serving his project and people with much better innovations like Bitcoins. I think he should make something that can help to actually decentralize BTC and bring something like anti-quantum for BTC to be prevented from possible future attacks.

Frankly speaking, we guys are somewhat happier till any rules and regulations are announced in regards to crypto. The three things you spoke about, i.e.;

Trading - is already being done at a very high pace and I guess we (Indians) come in the top 10 traders amongst the list of all those countries where crypto is frequently traded.

Gambling - though being illegal in some parts of India, we're still enjoying this part because of crypto due to the fact that it's all pseudonymous and we can't really be traced that easy as well as we've got various genres of gambling unlocked due to crypto. The only issue we face is about settling it all into fiat and we're good.

Exchanging of products and services - is also being done with full-fledged security of crypto here (not physical but virtual products ATM) as well as services like VPN and domain names available through Indian hosting websites at cheaper rates than what we used to give in fiat. We can also purchase Gift cards of different websites through crypto with cool discounts which gives us more confidence in using cryptocurrencies.

I don't have any issue if the Gov comes ahead with some positivity on crypto, but I believe they're too old to understand what is all this about. For them, crypto is just one thing and that's "PONZI SCHEME".

Slows down, but probably protects you from almost all types of up-to-date viruses that can harm your data and not just crypto either due to your mistake or by some hacker who tries to steal everything by sending continuous attacks to your PC even when you put your AV at switched off mode. And what space are these guys even talking about? It isn't really that big in size (depends on different types of AVs but still NOT THAT BIG, at least not that huge of how much blockchain captures your hard disk space) and all it has in it is the database of all types of updated viruses to save your back from being raped off. Maybe Carlton had some issues in the past or experienced something bad in the present?

We shouldn't use even smartphones if you ask me because it's one of the most vulnerable things to malicious viruses in general and most people don't even have anything like AV installed in their smartphones because either they are not aware or they are too over-smart. Most of the hacks nowadays take place through these Android applications and if such extension is installed in your chrome browser and you've allowed some permissions to your browser, I guess your coins are at stake because this extension will have some sort of code or patch injected in it that'll come with it after installation and it'll fetch all the data from your mobile and send it to hacker. So not only are your coins and privkeys, but your data also isn't so safe if you blindly download anything.

If you're real and ready to conduct a Satoshi test instead of asking for MT 103/72 blocked funds test, I would like you to contact my friend D Man over telegram @lovenatashas as he is one of the most trustworthy people who don't really need any introduction in the field of crypto. He can help you sell your stake without any hassles and may also get involved into it as an escrow if you want to do it likewise.