Developers actually have the right to work anonymously if they don't feel safe/ok revealing their information

 I think  Anonymity would be problem if you don't have effective and morally/legally allowed means to easily trace the persons behind anonymous account if they go rogue(commit serious crime) or try to go rogue. Same as people using pseudonym, and even people using real names but can't be persecuted if they go rogue

Seems the government is putting too much faith in the vaccines, and even willing to borrow to get them. 
Well, I wish things like that (not the harmful or unsafe ones) could be traded for something else like products/services in form of Bartering between Countries and companies. I would have recommended making them free if millions of lives depend on the vaccines, but I don't expect them to be given completely free without hidden/unpleasant conditions or agenda.

I wondered if I have experienced same thing in the past, in order to be able recommend something but I don't remember experiencing such. I'm typically more active in the day time if the condition is right. I could however feel sleepy in the day time if I eat too much foods, if unpleasant loud sound continues to play in the background & make me tired/sleepy, I tend to feel sleepy after working hard for too long etc.
I could stay awake at night to take advantage of the quietness of the night and continue my work or for other reasons like making sure certain entity/people aren't taking advantage of millions of people sleeping at once to cause problems etc.
You probably should note down the factors that contribute to your feeling sleep in the day and energetic at night.

Well, people will eventually be raised from hell and judge according to their deeds while on Earth. I strongly believe that GOD(the CREATOR of Heaven & Earth) will give a judgment that his Children will find excellent and hard to say anything against. GOD is Perfect Judge... HE knows what we don't... HIS knowledge is unlimited... I totally Trust in HIS judgment and don't get bothered about it too much.

There are things I was revealed that will eventually happen to people like your father, (assuming he died in sin).  I wouldn't want to say it so people don't get encouraged by it and continue to do things that will take them to hell atall. Besides, I want be very sure about the revelations before revealing it.
Hell is really a terrible place. Believing in JESUS will save people from it. If you believe in JESUS, you will do what please HIM always because HE is in you and will drive you to do what is right always.

Ofcourse. Saving money for good/selfless cause is what is most important. Better not to pile up too much while ignoring the important problems around you that need to be solved with money.  And Don't be tempted to save for your selfish desires.
Invest the money into something that benefits others  and yourself and be profitable.

The Truth is that false religions are in the hand of  satan, a malevolent entity who controls the Matrix.
 
True Religion draws you close to a CREATOR whose Holiness and Purity is indescribable and won't allow you to do evil. HIS Holy Spirit dwells in truly religious people and helps them do good always. Anyone without the Spirit doesn't belong to the CREATOR and can't do what's right.  What lives in that person is actually darkenness - evil spirit, and he/she belongs to satan.

 It's hard to be evil or live in sin while being in the CREATOR's presence. No evil can stand or survive HIS  absolutely brilliant Presence.  Anyone who is truly religious will be good always.
Satan uses false religions to make the true religion look bad.

 You will know the truly religious ones by the fruits they produce. They will produce good fruits alway. A good tree cannot produce evil fruits. A bad tree cannot produce good fruits. So,you shall know them by their fruits.  it's as simple as that.

A true Nomadic society actually needs to have modular, easy-to-move around, mobile buildings. The buildings would need to be light, easy to build, carry around and assemble.
I think Nomads living in uncertain times need alots of Bitcoin-type decentralization in most aspect of their lives. Don't think I would trust monarchy unless it's led by saints.
Will hopefully go through the youtube videos soon.

I think it could be considered collectible if it served very important purposes, or was very useful/like by its users or community back then. Maybe they couldn't continue the project due to factor beyond their control, or other reasons, then abandoned it? The project would need to be really useful or popular in the past for me to probably consider it a collectible.

 

I think it's better to spend a little bit of your savings, or total amount of money you have on Bitcoin. It's it's important to have extra money reserved for other important things that you need for living a good life.
By the way, I wonder if she sold the taxi and invested all the funds (or part of it) in Bitcoin, or is that trade by barter, or did she abondon her taxi business to invest part of her time and money in Bitcoin investments?

I guess Op is talking about something close to Fractional Reserve banking. He's probably assuming that banks use customers money while they merely add digits/figures that don't reflect the actual money they are holding for customers. Banks could be using part of customers funds for profitable or unprofitable businesses which can be quite risky depending on how well the funds are used and promptly they get paid back with interest.
They probably wouldn't have enough money to pay their customers if they come to withdraw their funds at once.

You really want the value or trustworthiness of what people share on the platform to be rated by the amount they have in their wallets, and how long they have been holding?  By the way, what stops someone from sending sats to any random address with huge amounts of coins and claiming the fund as his/her own just to make his shared information valuable?  Did you solve this problem?

You could simply sell virtual or digital products/services for Bitcoin.
Just find something people find very valuable and sell at prices they can easily afford. I recommend virtual products for easy delivery and to make things easy for you and your customers.
You need to be very trustworthy though. I think you can build good reputation on a reputable escrow/smart-contract system with inbuilt reputation, terms of service, clear information about your products/services, quality guarantee/warranty etc.
This is what i think would work well for now in true crypto space without much problem.

I guess the amounts paid for both past Twitter posts show the Twitter owner is way more popular and  has something that's worth paying for by the people who knows what he is worth.

The Cardano Twitter post made me smile though. The smile is actually more valuable to me.

"Staking tied to Consensus" is what i do not recommend"


I do not recommend certain kinds of Stakings that are tied to Consensus of Decentralized Crypto Networks/Systems. A Truely Decentralized Cryptocurrency needs to be truely  decentralized and safe as much as possible. To achieve true decentralization, it's important that most/all honest network participants/investors run full nodes and take part in full/proper Consensus. Investors must include participants who have something they find very valuable invested in decentralized network. So this includes investors of any economic class (both the rich and the poor). Unfortunately, Certain PoS consensus mechanisms excludes people in certain financial states or certain economic class, with high staking requirements which makes it hard for lots of others important users from taking part in proper network consensus.
We need proper Consensus Mechanism that makes it possible and easy for all/most participants to take part in proper Network  Consensus. And it's important that consensus participants are able to easily run full nodes.
I want to see millions of people able to easily run full nodes and take part in full consensus. This will greatly help in decentralization, especially if it's Merit-based consensus mechanism, rather than that based on high amount of money all network participants won't be able to afford.

It really surprises me how impatient, selfish and inconsiderate some crypto community members  can be. Nothing stops me from making my own system/network with my own community and leave the centralized cyberspace behind, but I avoided that idea in order not to be selfish. Leaving the rest behind from something that should be for the whole True Crypto Community Fans is definitely a selfish thing to do. I shared ideas I strongly believe will protect alot of people from what is coming but some care about themselves, their class/groups alone.

We need truely decentralized systems/networks, not those that are antifragile and can easily be centralized or will easily fall apart in serious crisis. Such systems/networks need to be driven by Consensus Mechanism anyone can easily participate in.
Trustlessness, Permissionlessness, the ease of running full nodes and taking part in full merit-based Consensus are some of the most important ideals that will make a consensus mechanism very decentralized and safe

There is only one Religion. The one which the  Living GOD is served the right way is the True Religion.

True religion is serving your CREATOR in holiness and righteousness. If you are truely Religious , you will be living in constant holiness, which means, you love GOD and people, and you must refuse to let the World corrupt you. And you must believe in JESUS as your Messiah/Savior and Lord.


Anyone who says "I love GOD" or "I'm religious" but hates people is a liar. He/she is practicing False Religion.

I'm not sure if NFT has advanced to that level. I thought about similar thing (not exactly software) few days ago but felt that with the current NFT model i have read about so far,  the unique NFT products could become expensive than they should, it could encourage the copyright/monopoly of useful ideas/products, it would encourage greed, etc. 
However, I think there are people who would just want to have their ideas in form of NFT just to prove they own the idea but will let people to use them freely...wonder how that will work out.

I wrote that 👆last year and it still remains true to this day.
People should never be given the choice to kill or keep their unborn children. Killing unborn child to save your life or for selfish reasons should not be tolerated. Both lives should be saved in difficult situations.

I wonder how this will sound to them if they are told that  "Gambling" firms are helping them to be better people. Maybe they should be asked how they feel about "gambling" firms supporting them.
Doesn't really sound moral to use money from Gambling or businesses that encourage big risk to fund those that need help.
I think it should simply be seen as Lottery (as it's called) or Betting firms.. and hopefully it is well regulated to prevent irresponsible and very risk bettings.

It's also possible that there are people who consider themselves poor because they compare themselves with others.
In typical rural areas, there are lots of "poor" people who are well fed, have real properties etc but once they are exposed to modern riches they feel poor and want to become like the modern people. They sell their lands, goats, cows to rent properties in cities or travel abroad.

Well, I think there are working parts that are unnecessary, or can be done in better and more efficient way without compromising on security of the Bitcoin system. But it's probably going to challenging to "modernize" some part of an old vehicle without modernizing other parts. I think a complete overhaul may be necessary without changing the brand or model.