|
Muh, mixers are just stupid. Its only good for criminal use. No decent user needs that at all. U might need to trace back all ur coin txs in case...
|
|
|
|
 Is this bad?  Not as bad as this: Less and less BSV nodes, and they're paying to be hosted: https://twitter.com/melikmanukyan/status/115778596501796454940% of the nodes are hosted by DigitalOcean LLC. Wiki: DigitalOcean, Inc. is an American cloud infrastructure provider headquartered in New York City with data centers worldwide. DigitalOcean provides developers cloud services that help to deploy and scale applications that run simultaneously on multiple computers. As of January 2018, DigitalOcean was the third-largest hosting company in the world in terms of web-facing computers. 2 node hosters represent barely under 50% of nodes (total nodes). IF (I don't have the info) these two hosters have 100% upgraded to the current build (for 2GB blocks), it means that they control the network, because around 350 nodes have updated to 2GB per blocks client. Lol, this shit ain't sustainable!  If it wouldn t be Sustainable it wouldn t attract all the Risk sensitive businesses and it could be attacked already all the Time. Instead this and other Forums and News sites are full of fear and fud Posts... Funny. Why attack something while they're doing a perfect job destroying themselves? Sure. We will know a lot more in 6Months (or 18 when LN is ready? Lol) |
|
|
|
Of course he doesn't like it. Banks are afraid of the appearance of something like that, so they whisper to Trump that the existing system may collapse, which he certainly does not like
You have a very wild imagination, when I was new I thought bitcoin was a threat to the bank but when I saw the progress about bank adopting to crypto or bank using the blockchain system, I realize they appreciate it and whether bank or crypto, the government's job is to regulate the market. I don't think it's that wild. In fact, I'd say there's no imagination involved at all. Corporate lobbying is a huge issue in the US. Those with the money pull the strings and the puppets in office dance to keep the campaign donations flowing. The damage caused by being able to buy influence in this fashion should never be underestimated. Contrary to what the headlines might tell you, banks are not adopting crypto, they're co-opting it. There's a difference. Crypto is something that gives autonomy and self-determination to individuals. It puts you directly in control of your own wealth. Banks are not going to offer you that because it conflicts with their business model. Whatever it is they're building, I can assure you it's not designed to empower you in the way that a real cryptocurrency does. Mostly correct. But I d rephrase a bit to: Big banks with power/ money to Can do such lobbying are against bitcoin/ Crypto Adoption. But they also getting many strong arguments against it for free since there are strong facts to be debunked checkin the say "Top 3" Btc: dropped the legal relevant signatures i.o. to go more Dark/ Anno Mode for Users (LN and coinjoin ... more aml / kyc check unfriendly moves are not helpful to get any decent industry on bord). All to make ml and illegal use easier! ETH: illegal ICO (had to go to Switzerland...) and Platform for many illegal ICO... XRP: biggest illegal Security token on the planet ... So it is just too easy to get Goldman and Apple / eben FB to collude against Real open Crypto |
|
|
|
|
The Value over hard cash and all other online Payment Services is that user are protected by not sending their private data with the tx but having the digital signature proving the action and ownership legally. Sad that old btc changed that. So the Real Value is only coming from the original design and the onChain Security...
|
|
|
|
Is this bad? Not as bad as this: Less and less BSV nodes, and they're paying to be hosted: https://twitter.com/melikmanukyan/status/115778596501796454940% of the nodes are hosted by DigitalOcean LLC. Wiki: DigitalOcean, Inc. is an American cloud infrastructure provider headquartered in New York City with data centers worldwide. DigitalOcean provides developers cloud services that help to deploy and scale applications that run simultaneously on multiple computers. As of January 2018, DigitalOcean was the third-largest hosting company in the world in terms of web-facing computers. 2 node hosters represent barely under 50% of nodes (total nodes). IF (I don't have the info) these two hosters have 100% upgraded to the current build (for 2GB blocks), it means that they control the network, because around 350 nodes have updated to 2GB per blocks client. Lol, this shit ain't sustainable! If it wouldn t be Sustainable it wouldn t attract all the Risk sensitive businesses and it could be attacked already all the Time. Instead this and other Forums and News sites are full of fear and fud Posts... Funny. |
|
|
|
A small thread was posted on Twitter about the latest hearing: 1/ Thread
Kleiman | Wright
United States Court House
West Palm Beach
Aug, 5 2019
2/ Witness #1 - Steve Shadders, CTO of NChain
Full-time employee of Chain for about 15 months.
He is the one who tried to extract CSW’s addresses to present to court.
He’s been given criteria which he used identify the addresses owned by CSW
3/ Criteria:
1. Date Range (Jan, 3 2009 - Aug, 21 2010)
2. Unspent BTC
3. Pay to public key
4. Lack of address re-use
5. Pay to single output
6. Nonce Field ( Value from 0 to 58)
He ended up with 27000 addresses.
4/ Some random stuff I found interesting:
When did you start working on extracting the addresses?
-around beginning of June 2019.
Who paid for your travel to Court Hearing on June, 28 2019?
- NChain, but I believe Craig had too reimburse it since is his own business
5/ We are having a short break and going back to the courtroom.
6/ An expert has been brought by Plaintiff.
Matthew J. Edman, PhD
Dr. Edman is going to testify on alterated metadata of those emails between Kleiman and Wright
7/ His testimony will start after the lunch break (1 pm EST).
Apparently, his report includes words like FRAUD and FRAUDELENT and we spend quite sometime defining those. Getting interesting 💃
8/ Everyone here is either pro-BSV or convinced that Craig Wright is Satoshi. PLEASE SEND HELP!🤣
9/ Craig Wright didn't show up for the hearing today
10/ Side note: Mathew Edman (Plaintiff's Expert) had been a part of Silk Road investigation. #freeross
@Free_Ross
@RealRossU
11/ The expert did a great job explaining complex technical aspects to the judge. It seems like he's been in a court room dozens of times before.
12/ We went through Metadata, internal structure and content, as well as PGPs of those emails between *Kleiman and Wright* that have been altered.
13/ The parties are going to meet on Aug, 26 at 1:30pm to get to the conclusion. I might attend as well.
14/ I DID NOT get arrested or killed by BSV supporters.
P.S. Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi. #faketoshi Muh Seems ya getting quiet a bit now due to learning how BitCoin original Design should work? Oh. Remember the P2P to IP ? But you seem to miss the very last bit. |
|
|
|
Lol What a poor trolly hate 'News' Not worth posting like all the tech success of a boring stable Protocol |
|
|
|
|
Hmm
No substancial fud posted here?
So all Good still?
Nah. Satoshi did not want too many trolls and crime too close by. ...
|
|
|
|
Arthur van Pelt (@MyLegacyKit) posts today that CSW claims to be able and plans to crash BCH and BTC in 2021:  Craig Wright truely is a fucking idiot. Sure. If he destroys ür ponzi Dream. LMAO The capacity for 14,000 people to transact every second (more to come next year) BSV 14000 tps Komodo 10000 tps Xem 4000 tps Eos 3000 tps Xrp 1500 tps BTC 6 tps BSV is the only legitimate crypto currency. February 4th 2020 Block size limit drama will be over, the unfuckening complete. Shitload of patents (near 1000), unlimited blocks on the way and McDonalds interested in utilising BSV, MetaNet, scientific data uploads....... BSV had a single block that could contain all the blocks produced by BTC in AN ENTIRE DAY. Let that sink in for a minute. https://satoshi.io/block-height/593116Are you serious? BSV is same as his creator... And this info you can see on your topic: Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they believe that the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them high-risk.
(Check their trust page to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution. same as creator? What you mean? 1 Mb blocks is the same as 2 Gb blocks, MetaNet is the same as what? Been lazy with homework? https://blog.bitstocks.com/the-rebirth-of-bitcoin-bitcoin-myths-series Another leap forward, 248MB block on Mainnet! Nothing else comes close Before already a 236.67 MB block https://satoshi.io/block-height/593116Whats that 4 days of BTC confirming time? Quick lets find the defibrillator the orange line is flat-lining, red one is pumping nice.  "Bitcoin, an electronic peer to peer cash system". Remember ? Your gigameg wanabee block: less than 2.5M USD of value (2,489,450) Bitcoin blocks: 587487 5,760,800.00 587486 24,705,600.00 587485 21,488,700.00 587484 10,788,500.00 587483 22,153,900.00 587482 73,447,300.00 587481 90,123,300.00 587480 42,493,200.00 587479 8,834,990.00 Biggest block size of these above ? 1,478MB (obviously block 587481) So: - BSV: 2,489,450USD for 248MB. - Bitcoin: 90,123,300USD for 1.478MB. BSV block size is almost 168 times bigger for 36 times less value than Bitcoin  Bitcoin is 6000X more efficient to transfer value / money. Keep your gigameg blocks. You're welcome. Sum up here: BSV block size is almost 168 times bigger for 36 times less value than Bitcoin Bitcoin is 6000X more efficient to transfer value / money. BTW, if I want smart contracts, I go on ETH (or ETC), Vitalik can code a "hello world" whereas fraudtoshi Wright can only copy / paste from Sourceforge. Why than so many full Time Trolls still busy with payed posting? Lol |
|
|
|
Arthur van Pelt (@MyLegacyKit) posts today that CSW claims to be able and plans to crash BCH and BTC in 2021: Craig Wright truely is a fucking idiot. Sure. If he destroys ür ponzi Dream. |
|
|
|
|
So finally Bitcoin Can Scale.
All the hate and trolling comes from fear bsv is winning all.
Smart contracts are here as well. Script can do it if ppl learn how.
Give it a try
|
|
|
|
The SEC clarified last year that ETH is not a security: William Hinman, director of the division of corporation finance at the SEC, explained at the summit: “Based on my understanding of the present state of ether, the Ethereum network and its decentralized structure, current offers and sales of ether are not securities transactions.” I only accept that once they ve written down that statement. Given out legal doc like a no action letter. Not having such yet after many ppl tried to imply that eth might not be a security ( it is 100% for sure, easy read from ICO and selling purpose definition) is a strong hint that still fights from eth foundation are on. requiring a no-action letter as proof makes no sense. the SEC would only write a no-action letter if it were requested by the ethereum foundation. https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answersnoactionhtm.htmlregulators in the USA don't like to make it easy. the SEC is unlikely to state in a formal document that ether is not a security. the fact that they've publicly stated it's not a security and haven't come after the ETH foundation is pretty strong indication of their position though. personally, i don't see how ethereum fits #2 and #4 of the howey test. but maybe you can enlighten us. Nope. The tactics is simple. They ll wait and what business will earn a bounty for them and charge it later . So no big bank with decent risk dept will pick eth for trading. It is a dad cat. Any bigger move to change protocol by some central dev is the security proof btw |
|
|
|
Only that u are able of running some tech doesn't make u live outside any law.
If u play with financial tech, u will always need to be aware of regulations and non- tech trust.
US still has strongest powers in terms of law enforcement, check what they have done to Liberty Reserve...
More shitty unregulated stuff will get their bills soon imo
What you are pointing out is unfortunately the sad reality, but only concerns centralized services. You and me at home have a choice not to use them, and thus not to be subjected to these shitty regulations. In my case that comes down to paying tax over the small percentage of coins that I use for speculative purposes and need a centralized exchange for, but I don't pay a single penny in tax over my cold wallet holdings. People might consider me being a tax evader based on that, but I consider it theft to be taxed over wealth that isn't being used in any shape or form. I have that choice, businesses don't with how lawmakers know exactly who to target and take offline. Proper trust only comes into any money if there is no flaw no banning since u need many incl the mearchants any industry to adopt it. U cannot really do nichy , grey zone stuff (getting rather dark and illegal very soon) for longer time. Trust is not just inherited cause u tech does fine. |
|
|
|
Like the SEC chairman said on his interview about a year ago, all ICO coins ARE securities and needs to be regulated as such.
Go down the list in coinmarketcap and mark em
ETH, XRP ,... all such are, no rocket Science.
What the SEC chairman said at the time was, "I believe every ICO I’ve seen is a security." It wasn't a blanket statement about the ICO mechanism itself, though he was certainly implying that most ICO tokens are securities. The SEC clarified last year that ETH is not a security: William Hinman, director of the division of corporation finance at the SEC, explained at the summit: “Based on my understanding of the present state of ether, the Ethereum network and its decentralized structure, current offers and sales of ether are not securities transactions.” I only accept that once they ve written down that statement. Given out legal doc like a no action letter. Not having such yet after many ppl tried to imply that eth might not be a security ( it is 100% for sure, easy read from ICO and selling purpose definition) is a strong hint that still fights from eth foundation are on. |
|
|
|
name one instance where decentralized tech has been successfully disrupted by so-called "laws"
you can't. so be quiet
I did. Read again Better: Everybody must do deep own due dilligence BEFORE try out things or get other ppl to do so in financial world. Experimental uninformed approach might fire back shit hefty. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
