|
The one that you can use without having your funds stolen, it's pretty simple. You're going to want to avoid any KYC regulations on any exchanges to, I mean that's if you don't want to have your identity stolen (in case of a breach on their servers)
I'd go ahead and use Binance if I were you. It's a perfect exchange with management that works with their users.
|
|
|
|
|
Meh.
I don't think anything like this makes sense when you're thinking about how easy it easy to use this now. If we're going to have to wait years for the LN to actually be bug-free and coming to fruition then it's not going to be worth the time wasted. Bikes are already here, people use their credit cards (or cash) at kiosks to get the bikes. Why do we need Bitcoin for this sort of thing?
Makes no sense to me, and this isn't going to increase adoption. We've just introduced an alternative that isn't going to get used.
|
|
|
|
|
Btctalk name: squatz1
Rank: Hero
Current post count: 2393
BTC address: 3GnE6T3XmNQGdudYR83wbgpmtLN6RUZPos
Wear appropriate signature: Will change to when / if accepted.
Wear Personal Text: Will change to when / if accepted.
Wear avatar: Will change to when / if accepted.
Without a doubt interested to join the campaign, I've been a part of multiple other campaigns during my time here at bitcointalk and I without a doubt will want to be a vital part of this campaign.
|
|
|
|
I have this thing called empathy, so I tend to put myself in someone else's shoes...
If I was living in some shit-hole country, where US economic policy and/or bombs have devastated my home land... I would think, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em", and walk my ass to the US with the rest of the caravan
What I don't understand is people who think they are entitled to live in a country, but others are not
Nobody says that. Anyone can apply for the immigration visa and immigrate to the US legally. EXACTLY, You're not entitled to live anywhere besides where you have citizenship. I just don't understand how some people can defend illegals who are completetly trying to bypass the immigration system. That's a complete and utter slap in the face to people who have came to countries legally. He wants to stop the Caravan because that's the law of the land, it's crazy thinking that a President can't do this sort of thing. I don't get it. |
|
|
|
So what should happen to a baby born in the US to an American citizen father and a non American citizen mother? Sounds like a pretty unique circumstance that could be interpreted by the courts if they were to go back to the original definition, or at least the definition that the author was trying to get across, as was stated before! Good question though. |
|
|
|
Hm. The 14th Amendment, Section 1 begins:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside…
Sen. Jacob Howard was the author of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause. On the floor of the U.S. Senate in 1866, Sen. Howard clarified the meaning of the Citizenship Clause:
This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. The meaning was not as it is being interpreted as of right now. This is being abused for the 'anchor babies' as Jeb Bush once said! |
|
|
|
Very interesting... When I think of the "center-left globalists" who seemed overwhelmingly powerful in Obama's era, I think primarily of Merkel, Obama, Soros, Hillary Clinton, David Cameron, and Trudeau, who are mostly gone or waning. That faction is still very much around, but they seem a lot weaker, and fading.
It makes me a bit uncomfortable, since while I don't like that faction at all, I also don't like the nationalists who seem to be picking up steam. I do very much hope that the EU crashes and burns, though, since the EU is a totally anti-freedom institution run by a small handful of people who want to engineer society to their whims, and having many small independent states tends to provide more total freedom than fewer large ones.
I don't follow German politics much; how do things look there? Will there be any actual change from the status quo? It looks like the Green Party is gaining, but that sounds like a group that would want to just tweak things around the edges, not make major changes.
While this may not be fully correct, I do think that this is a reaction of the policies that were created under the Merkel (and her coalitions) government. Some people feel that the ones that they most align with is with these far right groups (which are crazily picking up steam in Germany of all places. I don't think we're going to see much real change though, as Germany is typically pretty leftist in all of its polices and these groups show no ability to form a government among people that are just right shifting when it comes to policy. Probably no real change, just a little closer to the middle from a pretty far left leaning political electorate to begin with. Not a fan of the EU as well, seems like a pretty horrid system if you're a member state. At least in the sense of giving up your ability to have control over economic legislation (and other things, as we've seen the EU delving into as of current) |
|
|
|
Crazy to see, after being at the helm for about 16 years Angela Merkel is going to be stepping down from her position in her own party and then will not be seeking the role of chancellor in the next election. Not surprising to say the least, after the recent election her coalition government is most likely going to dissolve as the other side has hinted they're going to do. Right (or even far right) leaning parites have seen massive gains as the open borders movement from Angela Merkel is being frowned upon by her voters. Check out the article here - https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-46020745 - This is going to be a fun chat. |
|
|
|
|
Meh, all of the news media companies have an agenda and have an agenda. It's not something that is only present within one company, or a specific multiple companies, but it's not something that is like that. Each company has their own agenda.
Fox has a right leaning shift.
CNN is left leaning.
Breitbart is VERY FAR RIGHT LEANING.
Occupy Democrats is VERY FAR LEFT LEANING.
This goes on and on.
|
|
|
|
I would say the United States will win again. Brainpower of the all the people (capitalism) will win over the brainpower of a few people (communism).
I mean, I do think this is a pretty tough question when you think about it. It's not as simple as it's being presented as/ I think that there is an argument to be made for the Chinese winning -- as they're going to be able to force their companies to produce certain things. I don't think this is something that is present in the US, as companies have no obligation to listen to the US government and would probably win court battles regarding this sort of thing. If the US military industrial complex took on the task, with payment, and they wanted to do it then the US would win -- if this wasn't the case then the Chinese may be able to win. |
|
|
|
|
Hate speech is a word that is overly used by the media in an attempt to grab more viewers. Yes, some people may actually adhere to whatever standards fit under the umbrella term of 'hate speech' but I do think that definition could be used to paint people are 'racist' or 'misogynistic' or something along those lines.
This is something that has good intentions but could be used for evil. We're going to see this abused in some years, it's going to be a crazy time.
|
|
|
|
I already read this somewhere else. The main reason cited is to protect whales and sea animals from eating those garbage which they cannot digest and which will kill them.
A good step : yes. But it is too limited.
Mediterranean sea or the North Sea or even the Atlantic ocean will always have plastics if someone outside the EU will keep throwing it in the sea even thousands of miles away. Besides, chemicals waste are always trashed in the ocean (without forgetting the greenhouse effect which doesn't exist obviously thanks to the clever and the best potus ever).
I fully support any ban issued against this silent killer and hormones modifiers, BPA iykwim.
Exactly, I would think this is an all or nothing type of legislation. If the rest of the world is going to do it, then so be it I'll support it, but without the rest of the world we're going to have some issues with this legislation working. Yes it's going to work to an extent, but there's only so much that can be done to ensure that there is workable environmental legislation without hurting economies. |
|
|
|
|
Hate to be the guy to ruin all of it, but I do doubt that this sort of thing would ever be possible to occur. Humans are going to form into factions to protect and fight for their own interests, that's just what's going to happen. So even if we were 'decentralized' -- there would still be centralized factions with people supporting them.
Yeah, maybe these would be smaller factions -- but they would form into coalition governments (like we see in parliamentary systems around the world) in order to create government.
I feel this is the shift of people.
|
|
|
|
I don't care who made it/painted it. If it moves me emotionally, it is art. Think of all the science that is moving people emotionally... the design of a car... the shape of an airplane. Is it art? Or is it science?  I do suppose that this is right. If I couldn't tell that the art I purchased / saw / whatever was created by an AI and it moved me emotionally -- then I wouldn't care in the least. I wouldn't want to pay top dollar for a piece by a famous artist and then find out that it was created by an AI from machine learning of a particular artist though. If people understand what I'm getting at. |
|
|
|
|
Crazy to see, never thought that Brazil was going to go from super super super far left to a VERY far right stance.
But -- onto you mentioning Trump being a fascist, that isn't true in the least. Fascism compromises of a system where and I QUOTE "economic system in which the government controls the private entities that own the factors of production. The four factors are entrepreneurship, capital goods, natural resources, and labor. A central planning authority directs company leaders to work in the national interest."
This isn't true, of the United States and it will never be true. We don't have a board of people that are deciding where resources are being used, nor do we have a system where the central government has this much control. Republicans in government usually fight for devolution, or the "the transfer or delegation of power to a lower level, especially by central government to local or regional administration."
So yeah, not a Fascist.
|
|
|
|
Yeah, well we also have like, what 3 times the population, are much more diverse culturally and otherwise, and the little fact that we border a country with some of the highest homicide rates on Earth. I am sure none of those things matter in this equation Wink
Of course not!!!! Increased poverty, a shit ton more people, more illegal immigration problems, gangs, etc. Why would we ever want to factor that into the equation? /s |
|
|
|
Watch how fast they put pressure on them to flip this decision around...
Yeah, this is going to be swift -- both parties are going to get a shit ton of money to reverse this sort of decision with legislation. I do hope that people give their politicans a large outcry to not take money and to vote for the people, but I doubt that's going to happen. Right to Repair is good for people, obvs not good for monopolistic corporations that want to be able to control their products even when you want to repair them. Which is a horrid thing in my view. |
|
|
|
Republicans create domestic terrorists, Democrats create equitable healthcare...
3 officers shot...
Shooter in custody...
Preliminary reports are he had an AR-15 and multiple hand guns. 12 people shot inc 3 officers with 8 casualties. First reports are that 60-100 people could have been inside.
275 mass shootings in the US this year, you fucking retards need to give up your obsession with things that are designed to ONLY kill humans... Americans in general are not smart enough to have assault rifles in the hands of the general public LOL. Oh come on, you again trying to do ALL OF THIS. Republicans don't create domestic terorirsm, and Democrats don't create equitable healthcare. Lets relax with the semantics and actually think for a second. There also hasn't been 275 mass shootings this year, you're using a source that is using a defination of 'mass shooting' that isn't close to what the FBI (or other places) use. Check out this link - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_shootings_in_the_United_States#Differing_sourcesDon't think by what I'm saying that I think that mass shootings are okay, but inflating your numbers to attempt to make a point is horrid enough in and of itself. |
|
|
|
I do not think it will significantly influence blockchain but Brexit definatly will influence GBP/EUR
This right here, we're going to see some sort of movement in the price of bitcoin but it's going to have nothing to do with anything that's going on with Brexit. People don't understand that there is no evidence as of right now showing any correlation between the price of bitcoin and the price of the stock market, or anything along those lines. So no, it will not. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
