It is pretty clear he only cares about profits. James, via Nike wants to exploit the Chinese market to sell shoes. Nike can produce shoes for next to nothing via slave labor, and even though average per capita income is much lower in China, everyone needs shoes, and as such, they can sell shoes in China for a 'low' price, and still earn a lot of money.
Nike doesn't face any real consequences for pissing off Americans, and as such, they have no problem doing so, while pandering to the Chinese government.
I mean there is two sides of this which I think a good amount of us forget. His entire career has been listening to what other people say and do in order to make more and more money in his career. He has had a coachs who instructs him what to do He had a general managers who instructs him what to do His agent is someone who consults him on what he think is best to do His financial manager is someone who consults him on what he thinks is best to do. His PR team is a group who consults him on what they think is best to do. This wasn't something that Lebron decided by himself. He consulted with those around him, the professionals, and they told him to do this. |
|
|
|
Ah. So you're now going to resort to personal attacks on my field of study and myself in order to push your false claim.
The Fed is probably one of the most scrutinized agencies in the US and they are under audit from themselves, from the GAO, and from third party auditors.
But I'm going to entertain your line of thinking for a moment. What do you think is going to be found in 'full audit of the fed'? What do you think they're hiding?
If 'audit the fed' means that you want Congress/ The President to have more control over the fed -- then okay, that's at least something that has a lot more substance then 'audit the fed' I didn't make a personal attack. I said you should be embarrassed to be so uninformed. That is an observation of your lack of knowledge on a subject that is directly within your field of study, and rightly should be a source of shame. It is not an attack on your character. As I already explained the time for the fed audit to be useful has long since passed, but the fact is they are putting the USA into massive amounts of debt by propping up other nations/banks/currencies, that is one major thing that would be exposed. I am not even advocating for an audit, I am simply pointing out it is really not happening and the fraud happening in the darkness is of globally historic proportions. What do you mean the time for the Fed to be useful has passed? The fed ensures that we have stable financial markets. It's already audited and it's not about honesty. It's about throwing red meat to Fed conspiracy theorists on the far right and far left.
Why should a branch of government that runs up debt and couldn't pass a budget for years be allowed to politicize and/or control the money supply? That's a recipe for disaster. The statement from their most recent meeting is available. So are the minutes. The Fed holds a press conference after every meeting.
Full transcripts of their past meetings are available.
Their balance sheet is available. Their audited financial statements are available.
Their short-term projections of economic variables are available.
Their statement on medium-term strategy is available.
Their statement on longer-term strategy is available.
Even some of their internal forecasting models are available.
The Fed chair meets with Congress twice per year and Fed officials provide official remarks from time to time. Senior Fed officials openly discuss policy options in speeches.
Virtually none of that information was public just twenty years ago.
What else do you desire? "As I already explained the time for the fed audit to be useful has long since passed" Common man, you are literally changing my words now. Ah my bad. Honest mistake -- read that wrong. But the rest of what I put below stands. |
|
|
|
I'm not going to go through your activity to determine if you're a good poster most of the time.
If you think i am a spammer, you should had checked my post history and evaluate it based on my activity. If you just mean that am not a good poster, may be you're right but your judgement is based on one single post !! So just you think i have to be banned from the campaign because i post something you saw that it is not in "pretty high level of real discussion". Do i really deserve this in your opinion? As English is not my first language, you may conclude that am not a very good english poster, but i think my level is not that bad and i invite manager to check my posts since i joined the cryptotalk campaign. ... and you post some spam bullshit about you being unable to understand whats being said but it looks cool.
Yes it looks cool, i invite you to watch it. The video is in unknown language for me so i just asked if someone can help explain it and if the topic is in his appropriate board. What's wrong with this? BTW, my post is the first in that topic. In my personal view, that amounts to you spamming for the sake of gaining a couple bucks.
All my respect to all your personal view, but don't you think it's not fair to judge someone by "spammer" and "shitposter" only based on that personal view for a one single post? What about someone has personal view that you reported my post in the wrong thread in Services board, then post it again here with an explanation that you were wrong, all these is a try from you to increase the number of your posts as you are also in a sig campaign. Do you think his judgement in his personal view is acceptable by reason without checking your post history and quality as well? Cool. You've increased in your merits since joining. Great. That doesn't mean anything in regards to quality of posting.
So you don't care about my activity, and you don't care about checking my post history, and you don't also care about my merit activity, but you can judge my post quality according to one post. Thanks God that you are not the manager for this campaign. I've reported it here, and to board moderators. Thanks.
You're welcome. Suggestion: if you think one of my post is far from your standards, please don't hesitate to report it to Mods as they always can make the right judgement. If you find more posts, it will be nice from you to report about it here. Ah. Got it. I didn't expect you to be someone who wasn't just spamming all around the boards. So for that accusation I apologize. I must say that a good deal of what I said came from the fact that we had a large amount of people from this campaign spamming random BS in the P&S board so I apoligize on taking it out on you and not looking into your information properly. I think the second poster annoyed me a lot more then you. So I apologize again. Happy posting. |
|
|
|
[snip]
Seems normal to make statements like this one. Nike has a lot of profits from the products that are produced in the Chinese soil so they need to keep the bonds between US and China strong. And in order to do so, athletes like Lebron James is a great tool. Normal? Yes. Would Nike have dropped Lebron (Not even sure if they can) if he had actual made a public statement condeming the Chinese government and saying that he supports the protests that are pro democracy -- Probably not. Think about that for a second. Do you actually think that Nike would risk dropping Lebron james for the growth of the shoes market in China? No. Because they would lose the American market if it came out that they forced LEBRON JAMES THE KING OF BASKETBALL (and shoe sales) into going against innocent protesters in HK. The United States only has a population of 327 million. China's latest recorded population is 1.327 billion. That's more than 4 times the population of the United States. More people = more feet = more sales. The reason most companies focus on China is based on this fact only. The potential of earning a lot of money. If everyone gave you 1 USD in the US, that would be 327 million. If everyone gave you Yuan worth 1 USD in China, that would be 1327 million (1.32 billion) dollars. It's huge. Especially for a shoe company which everyone, in the end, has to buy. The amount of people in China means nothing. Income levels and disposable income is what truly matters. Lets compare that. Per Capita GDP China - $9,771 Per Capita GDP USA - $62,641 (Esimtates by the World Bank btw - http://statisticstimes.com/economy/united-states-vs-china-economy.php) So yes, while the Chinese market is much larger in regards to total population it doesn't come close to the amount of income and then disposable income. Going into a place like China isn't always easy as well -- there are already other Chinese companies present that are propped up by the Chinese gov. What in gods name are you talking about regarding 1 Yuan and USD btw? Explain that a tad. its cute that you think gdp per capita represents income levels but you're going to be really upset when you find out that most of the income goes to a small percentage of people. There are way more "middle class" people in China who have consumer income to buy small products Nike makes than there are in the US. Theres around 400 million in China which is more than the entire US population. Bezos isn't going to buy as much nike products as millions of Chinese people with the same amount of money. Would you like the median per capita income? (If you didn't know, this is more resilient to outliers) USA - $31,786 China - $4805 By the way, their are outliers in the US and in China. Got it now? |
|
|
|
ResponseIt's amazing what i just have watched in that, i would suggest everybody to enjoy it. The man in the video uses a strange language, i hope someone translate the content of his speech and another one to explain all those appearing lights. Thanks OP for sharing, i just doubt if this really belongs to 'politics and society' board.
Like come on. This isn't anything of substance and it's just spamming for the sake of spamming. Hopefully this is cleaned up. The topic where i wrote that post was in politics board. There is a nice video in the topic where a record for a mission lunch to space in an unknwn language for me, and i think it's legit to write what you saw spam. I have some other few posts in that board you may also check them, please re-check my activity and post history. I also have an increased record of merit since i joined the campaign. You may find it shitpost and report it here (did you report it to moderators?) just because am wearing cryptotalk signature, but you can't limit my acivity in the forum based only on the signature i wear. I had never said that I was attempting your ability to post on the boar.d I'm not going to go through your activity to determine if you're a good poster most of the time. I really couldn't care less. But when you come into a board that TRIES to keep a pretty high level of real discussion (stressing the world try here) and you post some spam bullshit about you being unable to understand whats being said but it looks cool. In my personal view, that amounts to you spamming for the sake of gaining a couple bucks. Cool. You've increased in your merits since joining. Great. That doesn't mean anything in regards to quality of posting. I've reported it here, and to board moderators. Thanks. |
|
|
|
I've been told that I may have posted my original post in the wrong spot. Here's the new post, hopefully this reaches Yahoo without me having to pm him. I'd like to report two of your members for really low quality posting and spam on the board here. Here's the quotes below: OPI'm not sure if it's the same as the "falcon 9 rocket" SpaceX lunched back 2017 but I just want to share this amazing footage I found. enjoyIt's amazing what i just have watched in that, i would suggest everybody to enjoy it. The man in the video uses a strange language, i hope someone translate the content of his speech and another one to explain all those appearing lights. Thanks OP for sharing, i just doubt if this really belongs to 'politics and society' board.
Like come on. This isn't anything of substance and it's just spamming for the sake of spamming. Hopefully this is cleaned up. |
|
|
|
[snip]
Seems normal to make statements like this one. Nike has a lot of profits from the products that are produced in the Chinese soil so they need to keep the bonds between US and China strong. And in order to do so, athletes like Lebron James is a great tool. Normal? Yes. Would Nike have dropped Lebron (Not even sure if they can) if he had actual made a public statement condeming the Chinese government and saying that he supports the protests that are pro democracy -- Probably not. Think about that for a second. Do you actually think that Nike would risk dropping Lebron james for the growth of the shoes market in China? No. Because they would lose the American market if it came out that they forced LEBRON JAMES THE KING OF BASKETBALL (and shoe sales) into going against innocent protesters in HK. The United States only has a population of 327 million. China's latest recorded population is 1.327 billion. That's more than 4 times the population of the United States. More people = more feet = more sales. The reason most companies focus on China is based on this fact only. The potential of earning a lot of money. If everyone gave you 1 USD in the US, that would be 327 million. If everyone gave you Yuan worth 1 USD in China, that would be 1327 million (1.32 billion) dollars. It's huge. Especially for a shoe company which everyone, in the end, has to buy. The amount of people in China means nothing. Income levels and disposable income is what truly matters. Lets compare that. Per Capita GDP China - $9,771 Per Capita GDP USA - $62,641 (Esimtates by the World Bank btw - http://statisticstimes.com/economy/united-states-vs-china-economy.php) So yes, while the Chinese market is much larger in regards to total population it doesn't come close to the amount of income and then disposable income. Going into a place like China isn't always easy as well -- there are already other Chinese companies present that are propped up by the Chinese gov. What in gods name are you talking about regarding 1 Yuan and USD btw? Explain that a tad. |
|
|
|
|
Hey Loyce.
Any chance I'd be able to get this done for myself? Nothing urgent or anything like that, just curious.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
I'd like to report two of your members for really low quality posting and spam on the board here. Here's the quotes below: OPI'm not sure if it's the same as the "falcon 9 rocket" SpaceX lunched back 2017 but I just want to share this amazing footage I found. enjoyIt's amazing what i just have watched in that, i would suggest everybody to enjoy it. The man in the video uses a strange language, i hope someone translate the content of his speech and another one to explain all those appearing lights. Thanks OP for sharing, i just doubt if this really belongs to 'politics and society' board.
Like come on. This isn't anything of substance and it's just spamming for the sake of spamming. Hopefully this is cleaned up. |
|
|
|
|
Can you guys please stop spamming all of this garbage here.
You're just posting more and more for your sig camp and to be honest your campaign probably has the lowest standards for entry. Going to be reporting this post and you two to your camp.
|
|
|
|
Holy lord.
I'm just going to explain this in very basic terms.
China is imprisoning people in their country due to the fact that they don't support the Chinese government. That's a problem. That's not something we do in this country.
In the United States people are put in jail for breaking the law, law that is created by politicians and public officials that are elected by the people.
China literally imprisons and kills people in their own country for not agreeing with their government. This doesn't happen in America. Look at all the protests we let happen in this country because we were built off of the rights to protest, right to free speech, etc.
There's no way in gods name you can compare the incarceration in the US to incarcerating opponents of the government in China.
While yes, the NBA doesn't have the ability to directly change China -- they're allowed to comment on what goes on in China just like anyone else in the US can (and will continue to) and they don't have to be accept being silenced by China.
We're LIGHT YEARS UPON LIGHT YEARS ahead of China when it comes to human rights. I think Russia is light years away from china when it comes to human rights.
Like come on man what the hell?
I'm not drawing an equivalence between what happens in the US, China, or North Korea. Of course you can say one is not as bad as the other or one is much worse but I'm simply pointing out that they are all doing bad things. I'm not even interested in comparing and splitting hairs over which one is worse because I only live in one country and should focus on what my country is doing. You think Chinese prisoners didn't break laws? Even Otto Warmbier broke a law. You clearly understand that laws can be unjust but you only look outward. No one silenced him, they just made the business decision that someone speaking out against the government killing innocent people was not good for business. No one's stopping NBA from commenting on China but they have to accept the consequences of what they say. Colin Kaepernick was banished from the NFL for having an opinion against the Police killing innocent people. When you're saying that the US cant comment on China until they don't incaracerate people for nonviolent crimes you're practically saying that that the two are the same and should both be fixed at the same rate. That's not fair in the least. One is oppressing and killing their own citizens (China) And here we go again, you're going down this path again. When people in America break laws -- these laws are put into place by people that they elected, and they can be repealed by the people by electing new people or signaling support for a different path. This is a democratic system, so when and if you do break the law at least you know the politicians that you've elected put it into place and you have the ability to try to change the laws. In China this isn't the case. The CCP decides on what is going to be law and what isn't going to be law. That's it. No citizen input, no care in the world about what the citizenry say. The Chinese criminal guilty conviction rate is in the realm of 99 percent because of the fact that there is no way to argue against what the CCP thinks. Its their way or no way. By the way-- Colin Kapernick wasn't BANISHED from the NFL. NFL owners had decided that he was too much of a liability to have on a team and he wasn't hired by another after kneeling. That was it. |
|
|
|
Ah. So you're now going to resort to personal attacks on my field of study and myself in order to push your false claim.
The Fed is probably one of the most scrutinized agencies in the US and they are under audit from themselves, from the GAO, and from third party auditors.
But I'm going to entertain your line of thinking for a moment. What do you think is going to be found in 'full audit of the fed'? What do you think they're hiding?
If 'audit the fed' means that you want Congress/ The President to have more control over the fed -- then okay, that's at least something that has a lot more substance then 'audit the fed' I didn't make a personal attack. I said you should be embarrassed to be so uninformed. That is an observation of your lack of knowledge on a subject that is directly within your field of study, and rightly should be a source of shame. It is not an attack on your character. As I already explained the time for the fed audit to be useful has long since passed, but the fact is they are putting the USA into massive amounts of debt by propping up other nations/banks/currencies, that is one major thing that would be exposed. I am not even advocating for an audit, I am simply pointing out it is really not happening and the fraud happening in the darkness is of globally historic proportions. What do you mean the time for the Fed to be useful has passed? The fed ensures that we have stable financial markets. It's already audited and it's not about honesty. It's about throwing red meat to Fed conspiracy theorists on the far right and far left.
Why should a branch of government that runs up debt and couldn't pass a budget for years be allowed to politicize and/or control the money supply? That's a recipe for disaster. The statement from their most recent meeting is available. So are the minutes. The Fed holds a press conference after every meeting.
Full transcripts of their past meetings are available.
Their balance sheet is available. Their audited financial statements are available.
Their short-term projections of economic variables are available.
Their statement on medium-term strategy is available.
Their statement on longer-term strategy is available.
Even some of their internal forecasting models are available.
The Fed chair meets with Congress twice per year and Fed officials provide official remarks from time to time. Senior Fed officials openly discuss policy options in speeches.
Virtually none of that information was public just twenty years ago.
What else do you desire? |
|
|
|
|
In the abortion argument happening up above ^. I do think there is an interesting thing to think about when it comes to the fungibility of money. Think of it like this.
If Planned Parenthood currently has 100 and has to spend $100 on abortions at their facilities then they take this $100 and put it towards that goal.
If the US government gives PP $50 as reimbursements for other things that PP does for the US government, as they are now legal in new states or medicare is now reimbursing or something along those lines. That means that planned parenthood can now do such:
$50 goes to funding Dem candidates
$100 goes to original abortions
This is what is called: fungiibility of money. Hopefully I explained that correctly.
|
|
|
|
That's just not true in the least. This is a conspiracy theory. The fed is already audited at least once per year, typically MULTIPLE times per year. I actually read the bill today finally. All it does is slightly modify the audit that's already done to allow more of the Board's actions to be audited, and compels an audit by the end of 2012. It's really not that exciting. All the 'audit the fed bill' is doing is trying to audit more of what the Fed does, it's not like Ron Paul is saying that the Fed is not being audited right now. As they are, every year. Knowing your field of study, I must say you should be embarrassed to be so uninformed on this topic. You know damned well how much you can hide with only a partial audit. The Federal Reserve is a private bank with zero accountability to the US government. "Conspiracy theory" Yeah who ever heard of bankers trying to take over and control everything through shady accounting and fraud right? It is right up there with Nibiru and reptilians isn't it? Think for a moment how many resources are dedicated to protecting this racket and spend some time reading independent sources about the Federal Reserve. You are wrong. Ah. So you're now going to resort to personal attacks on my field of study and myself in order to push your false claim. The Fed is probably one of the most scrutinized agencies in the US and they are under audit from themselves, from the GAO, and from third party auditors. But I'm going to entertain your line of thinking for a moment. What do you think is going to be found in 'full audit of the fed'? What do you think they're hiding? If 'audit the fed' means that you want Congress/ The President to have more control over the fed -- then okay, that's at least something that has a lot more substance then 'audit the fed' |
|
|
|
Its none of his business what is going on with politics in China. He is American, not Chinese. There are enough problems to worry about in our country before he needs to criticize someone else. Reminds me of Ali's mindset. China censoring people within the US is non of our business... mmkay. Funny, you keep telling me you don't advocate for totalitarian centralized state communism, but here you are defending a nation that has literal gulags holding hundreds of thousands of people. I am not at all defending them. I'm just saying that as americans, its none of our business. I'm defending Lebron and the NBA for not taking basketball away from the Chinese people just because their government is bad. If we have a problem with mass incarceration, we should start right here in the country that has the highest incarceration rate by far. Americans criticizing China for prisons is hypocritical. Lead by example. Its none of his business what is going on with politics in China. He is American, not Chinese. There are enough problems to worry about in our country before he needs to criticize someone else. Reminds me of Ali's mindset.
He is promoting Chinese propaganda...does your response mean that you are okay with putting Muslims in concentration camps? Or with the jailing of political opponents? I am pretty sure you are okay with China silencing those that don’t speak the party line.
It looks like Morey was the target of a state sponsored twitter smear campaign immediately after his initial tweet, with the number of tweets mentioning him spiking after his initial response. The NBA doesn't have power to create change in China. They will simply be banned from China and any influence they did have will be lost. Thats bad for everyone. I have massive problems with concentration camps and all the shady stuff that goes on in China which is why I'd like to start by closing our concentration camps, dark prisons, and reforming our police. Once we clean up our own yard, then I might consider telling other countries how to run their shit. Holy lord. I'm just going to explain this in very basic terms. China is imprisoning people in their country due to the fact that they don't support the Chinese government. That's a problem. That's not something we do in this country. In the United States people are put in jail for breaking the law, law that is created by politicians and public officials that are elected by the people. China literally imprisons and kills people in their own country for not agreeing with their government. This doesn't happen in America. Look at all the protests we let happen in this country because we were built off of the rights to protest, right to free speech, etc. There's no way in gods name you can compare the incarceration in the US to incarcerating opponents of the government in China. While yes, the NBA doesn't have the ability to directly change China -- they're allowed to comment on what goes on in China just like anyone else in the US can (and will continue to) and they don't have to be accept being silenced by China. We're LIGHT YEARS UPON LIGHT YEARS ahead of China when it comes to human rights. I think Russia is light years away from china when it comes to human rights. Like come on man what the hell? |
|
|
|
Cause why donate to someone directly when you can try to leach off the success and brand name of another to get a couple bucks? /S Why in gods fucking name are you doing this OP. You could've at least said something as to the coins usage, maybe if you're going to donate the money to AOC supported candidates around the country in order to promote change. Or that you're going to send the money to charities that promote green energy around the world. But no-- you say this on your site: The funds obtained are freely available to the owner. Pretty much means you're going to use the funds for your own use. Leach. ALSO: If you're going to scam, you couldn't even spend the extra $7ish and get a .com domain. Really? |
|
|
|
Golden State coach, Steve Kerr was asked about the human rights violations in China after he returned from China, and he responded by comparing the Chinese fascism to what happens in the US.
This is just absolutely ridiculous. The Chinese government has hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of Muslims in concentration camps, it kills political dissenters, uses surveillance against their citizens, and will arrest its citizens if they criticize their government. None of this is remotely comparable to anything that happens in the United States.
I am strongly against advertiser boycotts, however if there was ever an appropriate time to boycott advertisers, now would be the time to boycott advertisers of the NBA.
Aren't these people insane. Right when they're asked a question about AN ACTUAL COMMUNIST COUNTRY THAT KILLS THEIR OWN PEOPLE he resorts to "fuck drumpf" Like what the hell dude. I think Republicans and Democrats are pretty quick to say: Fuck China. They're a horrible country who is only allowed to commit the atrocities that they commit due how intermingled the global world of economics is. We should never look the other way due to this, but that's what politicians have decided to do and it's been fine with the people. |
|
|
|
Many lost their money when Hillary Clinton lost that presidential elections against Trump. Trump was a heavy underdog when it comes to media talks and news. The betting odds look the same as the what the media portrait it is. I wish I did a bet on Trump that time because I felt it was a bit closer than in the news but still an underdog.
Media being bias, misleading and their mind conditioning strategies are actually normal as they are serving what benefits them and their sponsors most. Looking at this video just brings us back into reality and some deep realizations.
You cant truly tell me that 'betting odds' are the thing that you're using to show that people lost money in that election. Tons of people lost money, but the real money that was lost is the same money that is lost every year when 'your candidate' doesn't win. They lose, and all of the promises that they made to you aren't worth anything now. All the money that you spent propping up your candidate isn't going to make you anything cause they cant return the favor now. This happens every year. Yes, maybe the Clintons had a LOT MORE money going to their charity and going to them as a whole -- as they did outraise trump like 2:1 -- but this isn't something new. |
|
|
|
https://berniesanders.com/issues/real-wall-street-reform/As part of Bernie Sanders' Wall Street Reform, it includes auditing the federal reserve. Audit the Federal Reserve and make it a more democratic institution so that it becomes responsive to the needs of ordinary Americans, not just the billionaires on Wall Street.
Isnt the Fed already being audited all the time by different US gov organizations - https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/about_12784.htmThe fed is audited. If you don't like the policies of the Fed and want something to change thats one thing, but making up things that aren't true to further your narrative isn't something that we should do. If we want, give Congress more ability over the decisions of the FED -- or a group elected by the people that isnt congress, etc. That's cute that you believe that, and from the horse's mouth no less. The Federal Reserve is a private bank with zero accountability to the US government. The only oversight the government has, is the president can appoint its chair. The Federal Reserve is easily the biggest slave system in human history. I would suggest reading The Creature from Jekyll Island. https://www.sott.net/article/250592-Audit-of-the-Federal-Reserve-Reveals-16-Trillion-in-Secret-Bailouts"Ron Paul - Bernie Sanders destroyed Audit the Fed Bill at the last minute" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNuHRyip3iAThat's just not true in the least. This is a conspiracy theory. The fed is already audited at least once per year, typically MULTIPLE times per year. I actually read the bill today finally. All it does is slightly modify the audit that's already done to allow more of the Board's actions to be audited, and compels an audit by the end of 2012. It's really not that exciting. All the 'audit the fed bill' is doing is trying to audit more of what the Fed does, it's not like Ron Paul is saying that the Fed is not being audited right now. As they are, every year. |
|
|
|
https://berniesanders.com/issues/real-wall-street-reform/As part of Bernie Sanders' Wall Street Reform, it includes auditing the federal reserve. Audit the Federal Reserve and make it a more democratic institution so that it becomes responsive to the needs of ordinary Americans, not just the billionaires on Wall Street.
Isnt the Fed already being audited all the time by different US gov organizations - https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/about_12784.htmThe fed is audited. If you don't like the policies of the Fed and want something to change thats one thing, but making up things that aren't true to further your narrative isn't something that we should do. If we want, give Congress more ability over the decisions of the FED -- or a group elected by the people that isnt congress, etc. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
