Username: Poker Player
BTC SegWit Address: bc1qydrz3ukd7gl6ek8xvpvgpchnmrqgqhvg4g32y0

I suppose that now that the signature campaign has been launched on the forum this thread should be revitalized in some way, especially considering what is said in the OP:


In theory, this should avoid money laundering accusations, such as those charged against Chip Mixer.

Isn't there an Ann thread on the forum, icopress?

Can you quote that message please?

I guess you must not be too worried about the consequences at this point, right? Seeing as you are one of those participating in the highest paying campaign atm, which is also a mixer.

As far as I can see most of the responses are along the same lines as well. I believe the same. It's one thing if there was a regulation or law banning mixers. If there were, I think there could be consequences for knowingly advertising an illegal service . But I understand that there is no such regulation, what there is is suspicion by the authorities that they are used for money laundering and lack of cooperation in response to requests. So, it's a different story.

Lol. No, I'm not obsessed with you. Just like I'm not obsessed as to contact your clients via Telegram (or bother searching for contact details).

Just yesterday I logged in the forum after a while and saw that I had received some PMs asking me if I was ok. I also had a pending thing with BitcoinGirl.Club.

I simply started a new project that takes up my time. If you add to that the fact that I don't wear a paid signature, it's normal that I focus more on the new project. In this time I have occasionally browsed the forum without logging in, and for example, I know what happened with Chip Mixer, but I didn't even look at this section.


I think that if you are not going to be very active in the forum it is better to delete your trust list because you will not be reviewing the feedbacks and trust lists of others to decide whether to include or exclude them from yours.

On the other hand Royse777 is the one who manages more campaigns and is increasing his reputation.

Although deep down I still have some distrust in him, after being away for a while I think that, if a client really told him that I had contacted him (as it seems to be but I can't verify with certainty), I can better understand his attitude. Then, I remembered when I started calling him a crybaby and things escalated and got out of hand. I also thought that being away from the forum, you never know if in the end you will leave it and never come back here. So, I also don't want to leave a negative feedback, which was influenced at the time by an emotional escalation coming maybe from a misunderstanding.

In the end, Royse777's reputation is in his hands more than ever. If he gets into just one more mess on the forum, he is going to be massively red tagged and that will be the end of it. But if he continues to run campaigns well and stay out of trouble he will have a great reputation.

Interesting. I've always been drawn to what's going on in Nigeria, I guess because of the large Nigerian community on the forum, but I didn't know in detail what had happened with the implementation of CBDCs there.


This point seems essential to me. The same thing will happen in the rest of the world. They are not going to be satisfied with the fact that many people are willingly giving up using cash to pay with their cell phones, they want to make it more difficult to accelerate the disappearance of cash. That's why they are putting limits on cash payments and there are fewer and fewer ATMs.


I think you are wrong. Most people will use them because they have the governments approval and that's it. Plus as I just said, they are going to make it more and more difficult to access cash, which coupled with people willingly not using it will push people to CBDCs.

The insults you better save them, because to begin with when your friend said that I contacted his client I wasn't thinking about a betcoin type company or one of those big ones that publish their data. There are new casinos that advertise in the gambling section and simply create a thread with a newbie account, without even buying a copper membership.

How would you contact this client via Telegram?

NAKAMOTO ROULETTE launched today


Either you didn't read what I said correctly or you are deliberately misrepresenting it. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and think that you didn't read what I said correctly. You can quote me if you still think you are right.

Probably if someone has two alts that he has not made explicit, and applies to the same campaign without the intention of cheating, but trying to see if he can get one accepted, the best course of action would be to send a PM to the manager before the acceptances are made public, as my friend  has pointed out above.

That's just a big pile of bullshit. Do you think Negreanu and Phil Ivey play for fun? The person who plays poker to win takes it as a job, mainly mental, based on a mixture of probability calculation and intuition.

Playing for fun is done by recreational players or fish, who lose in the long run, but obviously have winning sessions, otherwise they would not play.

What you express is a simple superstition like any other.

In other words, we convict someone before he commits the crime?

If you refer to the average member as someone who does not care about anything to get money, scumbag-naim027 style, yes, but if he has some brains, if he is good enough to be accepted with both accounts in a campaign, he can join with only one and continue appying with the other to other campaigns and make everything legal, so he avoids a hypothetical future in which it is discovered that he is owner of both accounts and has been cheating, so he loses the possibility of earning money with both.

Assuming that the news is confirmed, as I have searched the internet and I only see as sources the two that you put, which come from newspapers, it seems logical to me and that is what suits us bitcoiners. It suits us because it does not mix Bitcoin with shitcoins, so the message that there are 20-odd thousand shitcoins that are essentially different than Bitcoin has a strong support. Also, it seems logical to me because of the very nature of bitcoin.

Whether he is our guy or not will have to be seen over the years, not just from this statement.

Yes, I asked it seriously, the joke part was the part that said I might get an urge to send PMs. Being so easy, I guess if I had wanted to send PMs I would have had no trouble finding the addresses.


Yes, now that I see it, it is very easy. Think I have Telegram but I don't think I've even exchanged 10 messages through the app. So when I see something related to Telegram, I think don't even notice, but I guess I'll pay more attention from now on.


Are you the troll again? If you want us to believe that the address is yours sign a message, but they are two different things, that the address is yours and the opinion most of us have of you.

Well, man, if we're setting ourselves up for horror movie scenarios, in this and similar threads, it's not bad to have in your head the possibility that someday you could get divorced and she could use it against you. Even if she's your high school sweetheart and you've been with her for 30 years. I think keeping the possibility in your head is pretty rational.

Another thing is the decision you make, that in the end, whether you tell her or not is very respectable and there each one has to weigh arguments and decide.

So, how is he supposed to get the addresses of your past clients to send them PMs via Telegram? I say this because apparently it is believed that  I have done the same thing and I would not know how to get the addresses of your past clients or those of another manager. I'd like to know, lest I get the urge to actually send PMs , lol.

Funny you should say that, when it's clear you're an alt yourself and became famous for similar threads like this one:

Bitlucy withdrawal problem, does this acceptable?

Don't take this the wrong way, eh. I think you are a great asset to the forum, but curious to say the least.

I really don't care what people do with their alts, as long as they don't break the rules.


I beg to differ, although I am not a manager and never will be. But if someone applies with two alts, as long as they don't finally join the campaign with both, I don't think it's wrong. I mean maybe he applies with both because he is not sure if he will be accepted, but let's imagine he is accepted with both alts. If he finally joins with only one he would not be breaking the rules, I understand.

Yes, I was referring to that. I know it's sometimes due to casinos or exchanges consolidating, but it had been curious to me when making transactions recently that among the unconfirmed ones there were a lot with the minimum fee.

I've seen talk about this for a while now, but I don't see the unconfirmed transaction count going up significantly other than at specific times. Except for one spike, the last week has been relatively low, and I've been sending transactions at the minimum fee for a while now and they are confirmed without much delay.


What would be the reason for this? Maybe too many people doing like me?

Yes, that is the classic example, as I have explained in previous posts.

What happens is that on the one hand it is not the only one, and also dividend investing would be an example of an invested capital that gives you passive income, and not a job that gives you directly that income, which is what I want to explore in this thread.

That is, you can work in a job that gives you active income, save part of that active income and invest it to give you passive income.

What I am thinking about now are ways to work directly to get passive income.


I agree only with the first part of what you say, not that there is luck to be had. What you have to have is patience and know what you are doing.


As I said in response to a previous comment, that's only really passive if you're a big landowner and you hire people to do the work for you.


Yes

I didn't quite catch what you were saying until this second time I read it again, so the delayed merit is for that.


AFAIK similar laws exist in most industrialized countries but those kind of laws do not prevent your ex-wife (or your still wife but in the process of divorce) from testifying against you if she willingly wants to.