It is simply that I received a PM alerting me that mixero could be a scam. I don't have much technical knowledge, therefore I can't give my opinion, what has caught my attention is that he makes the thread self-moderated.


And how would I know the content of the deleted posts? I might know the number of posts, but not the content of the posts.

Making it self-moderated gives rise to arbitrariness, another thing is that no one has written a really critical review and therefore has not been deleted, but the fact that it is self-moderated is a deterrent. I don't think people who have a bad review on mixero would post it there because they know it will be deleted, and the one who sent me the PM is one who could have posted it and didn't do it.

The few times I bet on something other than poker, I prefer the opposite, to have low odds but that if I win, I get a big prize. The strategy that he used in this case, although safe there is always a risk of loss, and to be able to lose so much to win so little does not call my attention. Besides it is more boring. If you win, it's normal, and if you lose, you'll shit your pants.

Talking about acceptable or unacceptable behavior.

Is this acceptable behavior?

[Full] Mixero bitcoin mixer| Review campaign| Application| 0.00175 btc reward

I mean, a self-moderated review campaign doesn't seem very acceptable to me. I understand that Royse777 self-moderates his campaign threads and other threads, but an honest campaign review should not be self-moderated, although as Royse777 is not honest I should not be so surprised.

The next one I have seen is not self-moderated:

[OPEN]🔥COINSLOTTY🔥 Review Campaign – Rewards From $60 to $70🔥

The bad thing is that with over 20k sh*tcoins, it's going to be hard for people to disassociate Bitcoin from the rest in their minds. It's clear to us, but there have been so many shady cases lately. Aside from the fact that on those exchanges, like FTX, Bitcoin is also bought and sold. So popularly people put it all in the same bag. Let's hope that the legislators understand it better and end up defining it as a commodity.

Since this thread is about my feedbacks in general, I will say a few rules.

If you want me to review my negative feedback, you will have to wait at least one year, unless it is a factual error. If in addition to the feedback I have you on my ignore list, convince someone else to ask me for the feeback review because if you yourself post here, I will delete your post. If you are also known forum scum for scamming or something like that, I will delete your post, even if you are not in my ignore list yet.

I will come by the reputation section with a spaced frequency, maybe I will leave days without coming here, but I will keep an eye on it. Mostly to defend myself if some lying, whining scammer comes out telling lies about me. If this doesn't happen, I guess things will calm down.

No, no, I am not going to PM any moderator. Whoever wants to believe me, and whoever doesn't, don't believe me. Time will put everyone in their place.

What is clear is that, answering the thread question, yes, my behavior is more than acceptable because I have not gotten myself into the messes that the lying, cowardly OP has gotten himself into.

Yes, I think you are right. My conscience is clear and I'm going to give this some time because it's clear that a character like Royse777's is a matter of time before he gets into trouble again.

What a jewel, he opens a thread against me with an invention, which he obviously cannot prove.

All these types of events that help to make Bitcoin more visible are positive, let's hope that over time there will be more and more of them.

As for El Salvador, if they have managed to hold on during this bear market, if things go as planned, which would be a rise in price this year and the next to enter the full bull market about a year after the halving, I think the move will have gone well.

Do you have an emergency fund? Investing in Bitcoin, and any type of investment, should be done after you have secured an emergency fund to fall back on when you have unforeseen events. Otherwise, you may be forced to sell in a bear market, at a loss, to pay for those unforeseen events. Better to have an emergency fund and then invest.

Otherwise, the advice you have been given is good.

Yeah but nutildah didn't know about the subject and just in case more people didn't either I made this thread as I was advised.


No, because the fucking whining childish scammer made up a lie to harm my reputation, which he couldn't do even if it were true.

What fuckingliar777 has to do is to prove what he can't prove. Doesn't he say he has a screen recording? Let him show proof that I have sent PMs to his clients.

By the way, does anyone know how I could prove that I have not deleted PMs? Because I have not deleted any.

Sorry yahoo62278. and what does fuckinglier777's screenshot prove?

It is his capture that proves nothing. If you want to accuse me of sending PMs show proof, not a Telegram screenshot that you could have easily sent to yourself.

fuckinglier777, I am waiting for you screen recording.

Can any moderator confirm that I have not deleted any PMs please?

The difference is a total absence of privacy with CBDCs, as much as the central banks want to say otherwise, and a greater ease of control on their part, with things like putting an expiration date, or punishing you if you consume meat, do not get vaccinated etc. by seizing a % of your money, making it so that you can only spend it in certain places, etc.

This is all potentially, I think that at first it will not differ much from the card payment, to which we are accustomed and increasingly we do it more willingly.

I have had to remove Royse777 from ignore because in the other thread I have seen fat lies being told about me.

You lie, liar, I have not sent any PM to anyone to tell them not to do business with you, liar. And that screenshot is fucking bullshit.

You want me to post a screenshot of my PMs you whiny fucking lying dishonest crybaby?


Yes, I want it, you fucking liar.

What a coincidence that your scumbag friend naim027 was also supposedly proving that you did not play a major role in Bitlucy with screenshots.

Liar.

There you have it. Let the whole world see what a fucking liar you are.

What? You are insane. Prove that, liar.

I'm not going to have long discussions with you because arguing with you is almost the same as arguing with crybaby777, but what I will not tolerate is your blatant lying.


What? Do you mean crybaby777 is saying that I have been PMing his clients and telling them no to do business with him?


If you weren't so biased, you would know that the changes were started by me softening the negative feedback, followed by your friend crying.


False, you are a liar. For starters the other manager had a completely different attitude from the start. He has an inactive flag due to lack of support and only negative feedback. Nothing to do with your friend.

I'm not going to put you on ignore at the moment to control what lies you tell about me, liar.

Edit after unignoring Royse777 and reading the blatant lie he's told about me:

I will post here the link to my demonstration that it is a lie that I am PMing anyone to tell them not to do business with crybaby777 and I have the content saved. If crybaby777 happens to delete the thread I will post the proof here.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5434476.msg61610794#msg61610794

By the way he got another negative feedback for that blatant lie. On top of that he has the nerve to say that if we wanted a screen recording. Yes, we want a screen recording, yes.

If you don't like my second feedback you can distrust me, ignore me or whatever. I'm not going to change it. This person is not to be trusted and proves it every day.

I was amused by the post, because you don't see them much here, as well as in other forums in bear markets, bitcoin haters and nocoiners come out right away to say that Bitcoin is a scam and is going to go to 0. In this forum I only remember trolldhon, I mean proudhon.

Now we have trollsumda. It occurred to me to look at his/her post history. Is this credible?


No, trollsumda, "crypto" is not going to be banned at this point and even less for the bullshit you say.

Yes, it often takes effort, but instead of striving to earn $25, try to strive to earn $250, and in the longer term, to earn $2,500.

I guess you are very young and/or live in a poor country.

Try to educate yourself, to have a good income and several sources of income. Besides investing long term in Bitcoin, not trading for $25.

As I have already commented in other threads on the subject:

1) Most likely we will end this year positive, but it doesn't have to be very positive, just finishing the year at $20k would be a positive return over last year's close.

2) History does not always have to repeat itself; this year 2023, or 2027, or 2031, etc., there could be circumstances that make that year a negative return. As is often the case in such cases, it would be necessary to rethink the "trend", which is a reconstruction of past events rather than a tool for predicting future events.

I completely agree. I just found out about the case and I just supported the flag. The bad thing is that he hasn't posted much lately on the forum, so the only thing left for people to do is to go to the police.

This is an extreme case that is by no means the norm. Most people play responsibly, although from time to time they may have an odd session in which they end up betting more than expected, but this type of degenerate gamblers need psychological help and the first ones to recognize it are them.

Stay away from this type of people for any economic dealings.

I see more sense in the first part of what you say than in the second. Apart from the red tags he has done repeated plagiarism, which is cause for banning and for which he was effectively banned in the past and he used alts while banned, which is another cause for banning.

On the other hand, if we were to take into account the argument that they can always create alts, no one would ever be banned in the first place, as they can create alts, right?

Some are so dumb that they use the same IP, the same addresses or show other evidence that makes it easy to catch them.


Let's hope so.

I simply believe that we are getting back to normal. Under normal conditions, without so much bullshit leverage cascading and cases like FTX affecting the ecosystem, we would not have gone below $20k at the bottom of the bear market. Now we are back to what would be normal, as sub $20k levels are priced in and in the next few cycles will be seen as a bargain. Take the opportunity to load up now while it is still cheap (this does not affect those of you who do DCA).