This thread is curious. It starts with off-topic replies that I reported and were not deleted, as usual in this section. Then we have one who what he writes is not off-topic, as it is one of the two topics of the thread, but apologizes for derailing. Another one writing a long rant explaining to airfinex how the trust system works, that he has not understood what the thread is about, that airfinex is not confusing between trust list and trust feedback, he simply questions that the feedback is negative, he sees it as unfair.

Then we have my friend Royse777 with his ego boosted, going cocky, lol.

To top it off, we have this:


Lol. Really? Quote me. I'm sure I didn't say any of that. You probably misunderstood me. Quote me and we'll see.

I am going to give my honest and as rational an opinion as I can about the feedback, which boils down to the fact that I understand that it is incorrect feedback, but not so incorrect as to distrust him.

On the one hand, the arguments that feedback relies on are poor. Basing it on the fact that an unsolicited PM about a new project to raise money from someone who had been in the middle of a scam recently is confidential information is laughable. And the part of "It is believed that..." is even more laughable. Even if I had contacted his client, it would not be enough for a negative feedback, as airfinex says. In fact, it is not consistent why Royse777 has not left a negative feedback to him, who has said that he did contact Sinbad.io and has posted a screenshot to prove it.

The laughable feedback base does not show that there is any trading risk with me, that the only transactions I have made on the forum, has been working for signature campaigns getting paid for it and making donations.

Now, is the feedback so bad as to distrust him? I don't think so. Abstracting from the past and supposing that I had Royse777 on my trust list because I trust his feedbacks I don't think that even if analyzing that feedback I would conclude that it has a poor base, it would lead me to distrust him if I believe that the rest he has left are correct.

You are detracting from the thread.

I've just reported your posts for being off topic, although from previous experiences it seems to me that they will remain unhandled.

This thread is neither about how much Royse777 is talked about, which is what the BitcoinGirl.Club post is about, nor about how to search TryNinja's website.

Do you have anything to say about the two topics of this thread?

I remind you that they are the feedback that Royse777 left me and coinplay campaign.

Instead of simply saying what you think, you could have spent a few seconds to search the internet, and you would have realized that what you think does not match reality.


Source: Overdraft fees and charges are major source of income for banks

That it is the second largest source of revenue, accounting for 30% of revenues is no small feat. There are always exceptions, such as the case of the students you mention, because they know that they either have no income or the income they have is very low, and they prefer to establish a business relationship now, to earn more money from them in the future. It is a long term investment.

If you don't have money to buy a hardware wallet I guess you must not have much money invested in Bitcoin, right? To me you are worrying too much, they are not going to be able to unlock your phone having it as you have it with fingerprint lock. I don't know what you're asking about, but you could also make yourself a paper wallet and transfer the Bitcoin there. The bad thing is that I think in both cases, to do it with 100% guarantee that no one has spied on you online is going to take a lot of work.

If you have a small amount in your mobile, let's say less than $1k, I wouldn't even worry about it.

I also vote for my friend Royse777's as the best, although as it is a kind of job-related topic, maybe it would have been better not to do it because there are people who have felt hurt, but perhaps precisely for that reason it is the one that has caused more impact. TryNinja's one I don't know what was about as I don't have his bot and I hardly use Telegram at all. Theymos' one it seems it was not as interesting as in previous years.

In reality, although banks need deposits in recent years when interest rates were low, they needed them less than ever, because they got the money they wanted from central banks. In reality, although banks need deposits in recent years when interest rates were low, they needed them less than ever, because they got the money they wanted from the central banks, so they gave little or no interest for depositing your money there.


Fractional reserve? Lol.

Why isn’t the Federal Reserve requiring banks to hold depositors’ cash?


Today's economy is like a casino but one of the worst, like 1xCrap.

Lol. I guess it won't be long before they accuse us of being alts. I imagine the other two who opened threads about Royse777 recently must be alts of mine as well. Yes, I confess. I have 143 alts.


The difference is that I didn't.

Can you put a link to the coinplay thread btw?

(Edited to add the following)

I see it is this one:

Coinplay.com | Brand New Crypto Sportsbook & Casino

As far as I can see, apart from the accusation of being related to 1xBit, there are also people in the thread complaining about not getting paid. We would have to discern on a case by case basis as we see many accusations on Scam Accusations that we later find out that the user had broken the rules and such.

Anyway, OP, it's not consistent for you to repeat these things several times in the thread and still continue to work for him.


Bounty Manager. Royse777 is primarily a campaign manager for campaigns that pay in Bitcoin but he is also or has been a bounty manager.

As some of you know, I'm not so active on the forum lately, and I just found out about the prank. Lol. I have to confess that I found it funny, although I think that making a joke about this is not the most suitable thing to do because there are people who may feel hurt as we are seeing. Not everything goes to make a prank. To give an exaggerated example, I wouldn't think of putting a knife to someone's neck to make a prank.

The topic of Chip Mixer has given a lot to talk about, and about this aspect in particular, there are several conversations scattered throughout the forum. I think it is relevant to bring here a quote from another thread:

Username: Poker Player
BTC SegWit Address: bc1qydrz3ukd7gl6ek8xvpvgpchnmrqgqhvg4g32y0

I suppose that now that the signature campaign has been launched on the forum this thread should be revitalized in some way, especially considering what is said in the OP:


In theory, this should avoid money laundering accusations, such as those charged against Chip Mixer.

Isn't there an Ann thread on the forum, icopress?

Can you quote that message please?

I guess you must not be too worried about the consequences at this point, right? Seeing as you are one of those participating in the highest paying campaign atm, which is also a mixer.

As far as I can see most of the responses are along the same lines as well. I believe the same. It's one thing if there was a regulation or law banning mixers. If there were, I think there could be consequences for knowingly advertising an illegal service . But I understand that there is no such regulation, what there is is suspicion by the authorities that they are used for money laundering and lack of cooperation in response to requests. So, it's a different story.

Lol. No, I'm not obsessed with you. Just like I'm not obsessed as to contact your clients via Telegram (or bother searching for contact details).

Just yesterday I logged in the forum after a while and saw that I had received some PMs asking me if I was ok. I also had a pending thing with BitcoinGirl.Club.

I simply started a new project that takes up my time. If you add to that the fact that I don't wear a paid signature, it's normal that I focus more on the new project. In this time I have occasionally browsed the forum without logging in, and for example, I know what happened with Chip Mixer, but I didn't even look at this section.


I think that if you are not going to be very active in the forum it is better to delete your trust list because you will not be reviewing the feedbacks and trust lists of others to decide whether to include or exclude them from yours.

On the other hand Royse777 is the one who manages more campaigns and is increasing his reputation.

Although deep down I still have some distrust in him, after being away for a while I think that, if a client really told him that I had contacted him (as it seems to be but I can't verify with certainty), I can better understand his attitude. Then, I remembered when I started calling him a crybaby and things escalated and got out of hand. I also thought that being away from the forum, you never know if in the end you will leave it and never come back here. So, I also don't want to leave a negative feedback, which was influenced at the time by an emotional escalation coming maybe from a misunderstanding.

In the end, Royse777's reputation is in his hands more than ever. If he gets into just one more mess on the forum, he is going to be massively red tagged and that will be the end of it. But if he continues to run campaigns well and stay out of trouble he will have a great reputation.

Interesting. I've always been drawn to what's going on in Nigeria, I guess because of the large Nigerian community on the forum, but I didn't know in detail what had happened with the implementation of CBDCs there.


This point seems essential to me. The same thing will happen in the rest of the world. They are not going to be satisfied with the fact that many people are willingly giving up using cash to pay with their cell phones, they want to make it more difficult to accelerate the disappearance of cash. That's why they are putting limits on cash payments and there are fewer and fewer ATMs.


I think you are wrong. Most people will use them because they have the governments approval and that's it. Plus as I just said, they are going to make it more and more difficult to access cash, which coupled with people willingly not using it will push people to CBDCs.

The insults you better save them, because to begin with when your friend said that I contacted his client I wasn't thinking about a betcoin type company or one of those big ones that publish their data. There are new casinos that advertise in the gambling section and simply create a thread with a newbie account, without even buying a copper membership.

How would you contact this client via Telegram?

NAKAMOTO ROULETTE launched today


Either you didn't read what I said correctly or you are deliberately misrepresenting it. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and think that you didn't read what I said correctly. You can quote me if you still think you are right.

Probably if someone has two alts that he has not made explicit, and applies to the same campaign without the intention of cheating, but trying to see if he can get one accepted, the best course of action would be to send a PM to the manager before the acceptances are made public, as my friend  has pointed out above.