Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 12:08:52 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 [99] 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 ... 330 »
1961  Economy / Economics / Re: After Budgeting, How Do I Deal With Unexcepted Expenses? on: January 23, 2023, 04:39:12 AM
  • Build an emergency fund: save money and set it aside for unexpected expenses, this really helps when the needs occur

This is all you need. There is nothing more to explain. With an emergency fund of 3 to 6 months of expenses is how you cope with unexpected expenses. It is a basic, initial, personal finance step that is widely known and works. [/list]
1962  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: When was your last Royal Fush? on: January 23, 2023, 04:11:40 AM
I know that feeling, I have got some of those crazy hands too, my last one was a 99, on the table there were 2-5-6, then the next card was 9, I go all in with my 999 and the other guy shows 66. At this point there was only 1 card that could make me lose, and that was the last 6. Well, it happen, the last card was a 6 giving him a poker and I lose that one. I was mad, the odds were 99% on my side and I lost that one.

I'm not even surprised by hands like that anymore. Even if it is an improbable event, it ends up happening. The improbability simply refers to the long-term frequency, they are not things that happen every day, but they do happen. I play less now, but I spent a few years playing around half a million hands a year, and things like that I saw relatively often. At that time I remember seeing a flopped flush practically every day, the probability of which is 0.842%.
1963  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I managed to invite 1 of my friends to invest in bitcoin on: January 23, 2023, 04:02:35 AM
I'm starting to see a pattern here. There was a time when I kept seeing threads in the B&H section prasing Bitcointalk and/or the merit system. They were obviously an attempt at merit fishing. For a while now I keep seeing threads on Bitcoin discussion like this one, although some are genuine, with photos, but this one looks to me like a blatant attempt at merit fishing.

I find it strange if he immediately buys it right then and there ...

Without being able to verify it, I wouldn't be surprised if he had invented it.
1964  Economy / Reputation / Re: A theory, DT in/exclusion and eventually the DT network on: January 22, 2023, 02:18:45 PM
I understand your reaction as by theory you are one of them.

My reaction? What reaction? I have said that I will not take exclusions personally.
1965  Economy / Reputation / Re: I received this private message (possible screenshot manipulation). on: January 22, 2023, 02:14:04 PM
-snip

Thank you for the detailed analysis. With this presentation I can trust you. Another thing: is it normal for the name to appear in the private message in the text? It does not appear in my Telegram. In a group yes, but not in PM.

EDIT 2: Regarding the username that was deleted from the Telegram images, nothing can be evaluated. A faint "n" could be an "a", an "m", a "b" or a "p".

And what is encircled in yellow? It is clearly seen that it does not have the same shape.

Edit: What I'm thinking here, if we see that the capture is correct once the two things I asked about are clarified, is that surely a possibility I was giving off as minimal is what actually happened: that a customer of Royse777 did indeed tell him that I had sent him a PM, when I did not.

I think I'm going to pass on what I'm told in PMs, although I thank the two people who sent them to me for doing so, and that I'm going to come by the reputation section less to de-escalate.
1966  Economy / Reputation / Re: A theory, DT in/exclusion and eventually the DT network on: January 22, 2023, 10:52:07 AM
Well, let it be clear that it was not me who sent you the PM. I was going to answer you in the other self-moderated thread, but I wasn't sure if you don't want answers there.

I already said that I am not going to take exclusions etc. personally at all. I'm going to keep doing things the way I think I should, and if people exclude me it will have a positive aspect: less drama.

For the rest of what you say, I don't know specifically who you are referring to. Why don't you explain the names? To avoid drama? Surely they already know that you are referring to them and you will not avoid the drama.
1967  Economy / Reputation / Re: Re: My ignore list and my feedbacks and is Poker Player acceptable? on: January 22, 2023, 10:44:04 AM
Let us try to cut off all this dramas here, because if this should be continue many people will also emulate these and starts, having haters as well. So all this disagreement have gotten to the point where everyone will let go. Poker has said that he never contacted Rose client, so let us forget about it and make peace between the bridges. This place is internet and it's very hard before we can know each other here, and knowing each other here the possibility is high. So let us have it in mind.

That's not the point now. This is not just a drama between two people that don't like each other. The point now is if Royse777 fabricated the evidence to base the accusation that opens this thread, as I was told by PM by a Legendary member of the forum and as I after reviewing the screenshots also believe it was a gross manipulation of the screenshots.

I received this private message (Royse777's screenshot manipulation).
1968  Economy / Reputation / Re: Injustice while Tagging on: January 22, 2023, 07:45:04 AM
Well, well. Another mess Royse777 is in, why is it that I'm not surprised.

OP, first tell you this is in the wrong place, it should be in the Reputation section, you can move the thread yourself, but I will report it to be moved.

Now My question is if Mr crank has been tagged then why Royse77 not or
If Royse77 has not been tagged then why Mr crank has been tagged?

I will analyze the case better after this but in general, Royse777 is a person who has been on the forum for a long time and with his signature campaigns has handed out a lot of money, and still continues to do so. Red tagging him, usually closes the doors to work with him, so people are more reluctant. Plus he has a group of friends on the forum who believe in him no matter what.
1969  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: When was your last Royal Fush? on: January 22, 2023, 05:33:08 AM
I have played several million hands of poker already. I speak from memory but I would say between 3 and 4 million hands. So I've run into several royal flushes, sometimes I had it and sometimes my opponent had it. In some cases they had it  when I had ace high color.

Apart from that I have also seen extremely improbable events, like having a poker on the flop and ending up losing on the river versus top poker or straight flush.
1970  Economy / Reputation / Re: My ignore list and my feedbacks and is Poker Player acceptable? on: January 22, 2023, 05:19:50 AM
And maybe, just maybe there's a small possibility that a third party is stirring the pot in the hopes to keep the drama alive. 

From my point of view, I see it so small that I consider it less than 1%, and as I know, obviously, that I have not contacted any of his clients, it is clear to me that he has manipulated the evidence, what I did not think is that he would be so stupid as to publish the screenshot with evidence of manipulation and that is why I did not even review it, apart from the fact that I know nothing about screenshot analysis.

Obviously you don't have to agree with me but I have clear answers.

But I do have answers to these questions:  Do I believe Royse fabricated the screenshots? 

I do believe it, as explained above.

Do I believe the claim that Poker Player communicated with the potential client?

It's not that I believe it, it's just that I know I haven't communicated with any of his clients.

Do I believe believe the "client" was real and not just a time-wasting bully? 

Tiny possibility in my opinion, as said above.


1971  Economy / Reputation / Re: I received this private message (Royse777's screenshot manipulation). on: January 22, 2023, 04:52:16 AM
Are you really this much ignorant or you are acting dumb?

Hey Royse777. At least I see you have some character, but since I see you cornered I'm not going to insult you.

Let me ask how do you know the second one (the one on the text) is what? It could be their brand name or their nick name or anything else. The name on my bio is with emoji characters when I tell someone my name for example, then do I use it with the emoji characters? You are throwing possible everything that you can in the dark hoping to hit something to the target. How shameful and disrespectful even for the people who think you are still genuine.

I remind you that these are the appreciations of a person of great reputation in the forum with which I agree.

I repeat them:

1. The drop in chat bubbles, that neither in our Telegram nor searching the Internet we have been able to see and you say they are normal in your Telegram.

2. The name.

To what I said about it I will add another thing: in my Telegram conversations in PM I do not see the name in the text, only at the top. Surely it is due to my ignorance in Telegram but it would be necessary to see why a name appears in the text.

And what you say about emoji characters does not make sense because the endings of the names are not emoji characters, they are letters of the alphabet, one looks like an o clearly, the other could be an m or n.

If we had our previous trust system then your account would be give red by now by many. It's understandable that it's now only in used for trading feedback. Stop all these shameful acts you are on.

Surely, but you know what happens? The income I receive from the forum is a very small part of my total income, and for a long time now I have been spending less than I earn, I have an emergency fund and I invest, reinvest and reinvest. On top of that, I have four sources of income.

So if by doing my duty, which is to expose scammers when they scam and liars when they tell lies about me, I would be red tagged and not be able to participate in signature campaigns, the impact on my financial life would be very small.

Anyway, continuing with you is just nonsense but how stupid I am that this will be my 2nd response to your BS. You are free to do whatever you want to do. In the future from this very moment, you and me will have no discussion. You can push me your best to response but Royse777 will never answer you.

It does not cost anything to be a better human. Best wish to you, have a good journey.

You have manipulated the screenshots and are retreating in the hope that, again, since you have a lot of people who believe in you no matter what, this will come to nothing but.

1) You have not resolved reasonable doubts about the manipulation.

2) You have not provided the many other proofs you say you had about my PMing your clients, which in this very thread you have talked about in plural.
1972  Economy / Reputation / Re: I received this private message (Royse777's screenshot manipulation). on: January 21, 2023, 03:06:55 PM
Could it be Telegram is just not very accurate with it's chat bubbles? The exact size could depend on anything.

I don't know, just in case I searched on the Internet and I can't see any chat bubbles like Royse's

Can you explain what this means? I see a name on top, and a name in the chat. I can't say it's very clear.

The second instance where the name is deleted supposedly from the chat bubble, it doesn't look like it's even with the rest of the text. If we add the drop at the corners of the bubbles, it gives the impression that something has been moved or edited, not simply erased.

Why does the sender need you to do his dirty work? If someone has something to say, he should do it!

In part I agree, and I have not promised to keep the secret, I've been simply asked for. If it were the case, I could say who he is, but as I said he is Legendary, positive trust, a established member of the community.

Here is another invention of Royse777, to say that I create alts to send me PMs, LOL, if he insists by that way I will try to convince the one who sent me the PM to be himself who says he sent it to me or authorize me to say it.

In any case, I don't think I'm going to do it without explicit agreement with that person if I'm not forced to because when Royse777 presented the garbage screenshot that at least doesn't prove anything, nobody questioned it and everyone considered it good, but on the other hand, when I published mine of my outbox I was told that it didn't prove anything. So, why am I going to publish it?

I find it difficult to take your arguments serious if you talk like this.

You are partly right, and since you are partly right, I will henceforth try to spare me the insults, but the part you are not right about is that the truth is what it is, regardless of the fact that you use some insults in several paragraphs.

For the rest, in the chat bubbles I see an inconsistency in the screenshots of Royse777, in some of them there is that drop and in others there is not. Neither in my Telegram nor in what I have been able to see on the Internet there is such a drop, let alone a drop in some chat bubbles and not in others.

On the other hand, the name supposedly deleted does not match with the rest of the text, it seems slightly elevated.

And finally, since Royse777 has deigned to respond, I ask him to publish the other evidence he said he had, such as that screen recording, which I have repeatedly asked him to publish.

Edit, I was leaving the forum, and when I took a last look at the image I saw another proof that it is a gross manipulation. The end of the name at the top does not match the end of the name in the text part:

1973  Economy / Reputation / Re: I received this private message (screenshot manipulation). on: January 21, 2023, 07:03:11 AM
Can you ask the same guy to examine these images too?
https://imgur.com/a/TeA5vAG

I don't trust your images. Well, I don't trust anything you say. In my Telegram they don't look like that. I'll wait to see what others say.

And by the way, you don't say anything about the unevenness in the name of the one who supposedly sends you a PM via Telegram?

Please stop creating alt accounts and sending messages to yourself.

Sure. The guy who has PMd me is a well known Legendary member. The other guy is lower ranked but far from newbie. Of course I'm not going to waste my time with alts to send me PMs.

Please stop sending messages to my clients or potential clients.
Please stop doing everything to frame me.

Fucking liar.

1974  Economy / Economics / Re: Biden administration announces move to fight 'organic fraud' on: January 21, 2023, 05:56:50 AM
This coincides with what an agronomist told me. According to what he told me in his final year work, he was dedicated to analyze organic fields and saw as a result that a not insignificant percentage (I do not remember exactly because he told me some time ago) did not meet the standards to be qualified as organic.

In many cases it was not so much because they actively used chemicals that were not allowed, but because the surrounding non-organic crops did use them and these ended up contaminating the organic ones. Or in the case of GMOs, if you have an organic crop but there is a GMO three kilometers away you can't avoid cross-pollination.

Eventually, 100% organic farming will become impossible.
1975  Economy / Reputation / Re: My ignore list and my feedbacks and is Poker Player acceptable? on: January 21, 2023, 05:30:30 AM
That sounds familiar, a certain Donator does the same to me, for years now. Once every few months, he posts some shit about me (preferrably when it's completely off-topic). Most people see right through it anyway, but once in a while, I respond with facts. That quiets him down for months again. Either way, I love having him on ignore. See my personal text Wink

I see a contradiction here. If you have him on ignore, how come you respond to him with facts?  Wink Well, that's just what I was talking about.
1976  Economy / Reputation / I received this private message (possible screenshot manipulation). on: January 21, 2023, 05:24:18 AM
Quote
Hi Poker Player,

I examined the screenshots that Royse presented as proof against you here. It appears that the evidence may have been tampered with and possibly fabricated.

Here is a clip of his screenshot: https://i.imgur.com/8NV2cSY.png

When I zoomed in on the image enough, I noticed a 1 px offset from the bottom edge of the chat bubble. It shouldn't be there if the screenshot is genuine. Also, he obscured the name of the supposed client in several instances, however, it is clear from the visible text that the name does not match. I think this proves that he manipulated the screenshot in some editing program, and copied and pasted the text to make his false arguments against you. Maybe make this public and ask for the community's opinion?

I know nothing about his motive for creating fake evidence to discredit you. However, given his behavior in recent events, nothing would surprise me. I hope this information can help you in refuting his false claims, but I would appreciate it if you would leave my name out of it because I don't want to argue with that drama queen anymore.

I don't understand screenshot analysis, so I would be grateful to those of you who understand the subject better if you could help me with this.

As much as I am the visible face, there are many people who do not trust Royse777, and it is normal that they send me PMs, like another one who warned me that one of the mixers he works with could be a scam.

Just in case he thinks of deleting it, I have saved the images.





I edit to say that I just looked at my Telegram, which I hardly use, and I see that yes, that the fucking liar and crybaby has manipulated the screenshot, which I already knew, but could not prove, and the proof is seen in what is inside the chat bubble. My Telegram messages on that left side are seen in a straight line, and not with the jump that is seen in the screenshot of the fucking liar and crybaby, and as the private message said, there is a drop in name where the name is.

And before anyone says it, I'll say it: yes, I think this deserves a thread on its own to make it clear how manipulative he is. If it remains as a secondary topic in one of the other threads, then many people don't know what's going on.

For those who are not clear on where this comes from:

https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6158/61583381.html

How unfortunate today users like Poker Player who joined not even two and half years ago, thinks they are fine to insult me. Poker Player doesn't stop just insulting me but he is picking up my clients and telling them not to hire me because he thinks I will scam them. Do you think this is acceptable behavior?

https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6158/61584717.html

https://imgur.com/a/XlNrHOV
Let me know if you need a screen recording too. I deliberately removed their name by the way. Since then they never replied me.
1977  Economy / Gambling / Re: What do you appreciate more Desktop or Phone on: January 20, 2023, 04:52:46 AM
Desktop.

As I practically only play poker, I only do it on desktop because it sucks on mobile. I can't multi-table, I can't use Poker Tracker, I can't use mouse. In short, if I were forced to play with the mobile, my profits per hour would be greatly reduced.

Playing poker with a cell phone is usually done by what we call fish or recreational players.
1978  Economy / Economics / Re: Comparing U.S. Federal Spending with Revenue - This is why fiat will fall on: January 20, 2023, 04:48:14 AM
Which solution is the best?
I assume it mostly depends whom one asks to. now I get why the United States needs to borrow so much money and increase their debt ceiling.

The solution that has never failed is a lowering of taxes but, and this is very important, coupled with a lowering of public spending. And let interest rates rise as much as they have to. Letting the private sector compete without putting a thousand obstacles or drowning it with taxes is what makes societies prosper, something that nobody seems to want to remember nowadays.

The problem is that today you have many right-wing politicians who only pay lip service to it and when they get into office they seem to forget what works.
1979  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin increased my mental awareness on: January 20, 2023, 04:24:32 AM
Well, we already have another thread praising bitcoin or bitcointalk, which if I were wrongheaded I would say is an attempt at merit fishing.

1. You must split your coins in 2-3 wallets, to avoid losing all your coins if they are all in one wallet. But then you don't know what types of wallets to use.

Take note that this isn't necessarily the best strategy. While you avoid losing all your coins in one go, it increases the chances of you losing your funds partially.

What do you think it is worse? It's clear to me.

On the other hand, I only see sense in it if you have enough liquidity.  If you have 0.05 Bitcoin I think it's bullshit, and even more if you are going to have it in HW, which is how you should, because you are going to spend 20-30% of your holdings in custody.

Then you would have to take into account other things, for example, you will have physically remote places to hide them, right? I wouldn't see the point of having your holdings distributed in 3 wallets but hidden in the same house, even in 3 different places, because you would have a high risk of being robbed with a 5 wrench attack.
1980  Economy / Reputation / Re: My ignore list and my feedbacks and is Poker Player acceptable? on: January 20, 2023, 04:04:45 AM
Regarding the self-moderated thread, I see that being the reviews in another there is nothing questionable, as Edwardard and LoyceV have commented.

@Royse777: ignore the other guy. Close your topic on him.
@Poker Player: ignore the other guy. Close your topic on him.
We get it, you don't like each other. That's okay. You're not supposed to like everyone on the internet.

No, LoyceV, I will not make that mistake again. I'm not going to put him on ignore again because since he's also a liar if he tells lies about me I won't be able to defend myself. In fact

My stance on the alledged messages: I saw a screenshot that looks like it came from Telegram. It may have actually happened, outside Bitcointalk. We can't know who sent it. So it proves nothing.

things like this have been said in these threads after I defended myself. When he said that I was sending messages to his clients, as if I didn't have better things to do, everyone who commented took it for granted that it was true. I guess I won't need to start quoting here.

So I have realized that this is a mistake I will not make again. It's one thing to put someone on ignore because he's constantly trolling or something, but someone you've had reputation discussions with? Not a chance. I'm going to keep a close eye on him.
Pages: « 1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 [99] 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 ... 330 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!