Until today I had not written any celebration thread nor had I written here for an achievement, but I saw that I have ranked up to Legendary and I thought it was worth commenting here.

It was a good idea of Bitcoingirl.club to concentrate all this kind of posts here.

I guess you mean the opposite: that it's your money and not theirs. Although theoretically it would be like that, it is not, because the money when you deposit it becomes just another accounting entry, which allows them to give credits for x times the amount. There are people who believe that when they deposit their money in the bank, it is as if it were kept in a box in their name, and it is not so.


You mean they don't detect it because it is P2P? I was going to say that I have never used decentralized exchanges but I would say that I have once.

What a genius Biden is. He keeps hindering the extraction of crude oil in the USA, taking it from energy independence to complete dependence on dictatorships, as in this case.

The reason why he prefers Venezuelan oil to US oil is that... Venezuelan oil does not pollute!!!!

I don't know how it had not occurred to me before. They should give him a Nobel Prize or something.

Yeah, well, good old Lightlord told us to stay tuned for that two months ago:


It wasn't the first time, he apparently recovered from his health problems in January and announced that the signature campaigns were coming back.:


At that time he also announced news for his shitcoin that came to nothing:


Call me crazy if you want but I don't trust his claims very much.

That's what I thought. I have read that news and others, and it seems to me that it is far from being legal to tend and have the same status as in El Salvador. If so, an obligation should be imposed on businesses to accept Bitcoin, as happened in El Salvador (with some exception for rural areas), but here it seems to me that it is more a recognition that it is a valid means of payment if the two parties agree, as can be a gift check.

I would like to see that specified temporarily. Surely, crypto interest started to rise over the past year and early this year, but I highly doubt interest will follow an upward path since June or so. Interest follows price and the bear market we are in doesn't seem too flashy to attract those unfamiliar with this world.


Lol, I hadn't thought of this. I don't have a Twitter account and I only go there once in a while, so I didn't know about this. Let's see if that's why, a lot of supposed interest that are actually agitated scam attempts.

I agree and I think that's what most of us on the forum think, whatever you save on your HW or whatever system it is but you control your private keys. This comes to point as just yesterday BlockFi filed for bankruptcy.

What happens is that if you are a gambler or you trade, it is normal that you have a certain amount in the exchange or in the casino. If you play poker, for example, you should have a bankroll, which depending on the modality can be 50 or 100 times what you can lose in a tournament or the maximum in a cash hand. So, if the site turns out to be a scam, you lose what you have as well. It is not feasible to go depositing and withdrawing every time at the minimum because of the fees and the hassle involved.

The odd thing is that the price has not been affected. I imagine that when the problems started and there was a downturn, the market already discounted the possible bankruptcy. Anyway, one more chapter in this sad story. As what does not kill us makes us stronger, let's hope that all these events serve to strengthen the ecosystem.

No, I didn't. As I explained in my previous comment, I softened the feedback but when I write a new one it appears on top.

I just left one that I think will be clearer, deleting the previous, and as a result it appears on top now, just above another positive that had been left recently.

Funny you should say that about wanting the comments to appear on top, because it was funny how when the Casino Critique was launched, positive comments started to appear on top in Royse777's trust, and coincidentally they were from people who knew who was behind the Casino Critique account, as we learned later. If he is so trustworthy, there should have been no problem leaving positive feedback not to Royse777, but to Casino Critique saying that he was Royse777's alt and therefore very trustworthy.

He hasn't been online for a couple of days, and I think that since he hasn't been very successful, we won't be seeing much of him around here.


I've left him a neutral tag, because it's unclear whether he's simply a careless or clueless person, but in any case, by action or omission, he doesn't look like someone I would do business with.

Limit orders only matter if you are going to trade, especially short term, which a hardcore bitcoiner does not do. If you expect Bitcoin to reach $1M at some point in the future, it's not worth it to set up a limit order to try to buy at 16,160 instead of 16,165.40, only to be left without buying because the price goes up and you have to place a new, higher limit order. For that you buy at the price of the market and that's it.

I have just realized that. We are again very close to the lows, and I think that as the situation stands it is more likely that we will pierce it than go up. I just don't see anything significant that is going to push us up, and instead, bad news can pull the price down.

Regarding the exact price, I think that if we go down we will reach the 12 or 13k area.

Fighting it?

If I were in charge, I would apply the saying: "if you can't beat them, join them".

I would suggest the central bank (which is supposedly independent of politics but we all know that in practice it doesn't work that way), that they would go mining like there is no tomorrow for HODL Bitcoin, in the same way that many central banks hold gold reserves.

I don't.


It is not another red tag. I simply changed the red tag and made it lighter, so I don't know what he is complaining about... well yes, the last time he was crying like he is now, he got yahoo62278 to change the feedback from negative to neutral.


Maybe.


Of course not.


Lol

I don't know what he is complaining about. Negative feedback mainly prevents you from joining a signature campaign, and with the decentralized system and the people in DT, campaign managers can let you participate in the campaign if they don't agree with the feedback, as we have seen several times. It can also prevent you from doing deals on the forum, but he has a lot of people with whom he can do deals no matter the feedback.

It doesn't affect him, he can go on with his business, running campaigns. Even the 1xCrap people do business in the forum.

Today when Hhampuz put the campaign I was participating on hold, I even thought of applying to one of Royse777's campaigns like trolling, lol.

I do not trust him because of everything that has happened and I will not repeat it or enter into endless discussions. Now he handles a lot of money in campaigns, well, Madoff also handled a lot of money and there were a lot of people who trusted him.

I am ashamed to have been complicit in the secrecy of who was behind Casino Critique, as potential investors had a right to know, and based on that, make a reasoned decision.

It's funny what you say because there are quite a few on this forum who approve of the censorship that goes on in social media.

I know I have been able to say things on this forum that would have been censored on social media. On Twitter before Musk came in I would have been banned for sure.

Good thing we have someone in charge who respects freedom of speech. Those who don't respect it are usually for opinion contrary to their own, but theirs they don't want censored.

As for the topic of the Russian forum, I don't know Russian either and I'm not going to get involved by using a translator, but I think that everything that is not death threats from one forum member to another or things like that will come to nothing because of the forum policy that we are discussing.

What I do understand that theymos should somehow make sure is that only posts from one side are not censored. That is, see if it is true that pro-Russian or pro-war opinions are not censored and those supporting Ukraine are. I don't know exactly how the situation is on that board, but if the two moderators are from one side, there should be at least one moderator from the other. Or better just one of each.


Having that attitude with someone who is trying to be constructive with what you are commenting on is not going to help you.

See, that's why I was talking to you about mathematics. Recreational players who lose at Poker also complain that it is rigged, when there is nothing rigged, and that's why regular and professional players win money.

Improbable events end up happening, like those you put in the picture, but it is one thing to have in your head that they can happen and another to base your actions on events that have a probability close to 0 of happening, like buying a lot of lottery tickets.

Moreover, following the logic of that image you should have had few tickets and not bought many, right?

By buying a lot of tickets, the probability of winning would still be close to 0, although slightly higher.

Username: Poker Player
BTC SegWit Address: 3J7my4Y92L9VdkLbhDQjAxMFL3zWZgSSyj

What you need are some math classes applied to betting, that's what I see from your thread and what you say here.

At this moment I see on freebitco.in 133 million lottery tickets, constantly growing. Let's say for the sake of simplicity that until tomorrow's lottery there are 150 million tickets. In the most extreme case, if you have bought 100,000 tickets, you have 0.07% of the tickets. What do you expect to get with that?

I was just thinking that it seems to me more typical of primitive times, where it was more understandable that this kind of fights would happen. On the one hand, there were no entertainment options like there are now, and on the other hand, animals were considered as wild beasts without feelings. In addition, societies were generally more violent.

These types of activities have been reduced little by little and I hope that in the future they will disappear completely.

If you get it right you won't have much merit, the merit would have been if you had predicted that in January of this year. Or last year when the price hit $69k. To me, whether we go a little lower now or not is not that relevant. It could happen, especially if we have another exchange going bust or something.

I don't care so much if we've hit low already or can go lower as much as I do seeing overall how this cycle, which is the worst in terms of percentage returns since Bitcoin was created, will end.