Bitcoin Forum
July 05, 2024, 03:43:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 [144] 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 ... 220 »
2861  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The overlooked existential threat of centralization on: June 11, 2015, 08:53:33 PM
It's true that we are having less nodes, and that's why nodes are incentivated and there is also dedicated hardware for nodes... But what makes you think that bigger blocks means less nodes? The only thing that would make us have less nodes is simply people feeling like shutting down theirs. There isn't really a reason to have less nodes...
2862  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 17-year-old Bitcoiner faces prison for tweeting about... You guessed it! Bitcoin on: June 11, 2015, 08:50:10 PM
He was obviously going to get in trouble, as everything is monitored nowadays and funding criminals is obviously not a good thing to do.

They took advantage of the fact that the boy mentioned Bitcoin to make it look worse for the misinformed general public. Another piece of news that makes people think that Bitcoin is only used for criminal activities and that fiat is the only salvation after baby Jesus Roll Eyes
2863  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: On a scale of 1 to 10, How Excited (!!!) Are You About BTC and the... on: June 10, 2015, 10:06:02 PM
Definitely a 8, or maybe 9. Really excited about what's next for Bitcoin, especially with the latest talk about block size...
2864  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: What's going on here on: June 10, 2015, 06:08:09 PM
It's just someone spamming correct horse battery staple with loads of transactions. He's either saying that we need bigger blocks or that bigger blocks will allow lots of spam Grin Either way, nothing special going on, it can be safely disregarded...

EDIT: what's concerning me more is why the hell did the address change its name?
2865  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: An alternative to spamming the Blockchain on: June 10, 2015, 06:06:55 PM
Although this a pretty interesting idea, I think it would definitely cause chaos in the production network in just a few blocks after adapting the change...

Is it worth it for merchants and people sending transactions to have this experiment going when we have almost full blocks happening? It would definitely be interesting to hear devs/experts about this.
2866  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Thailand and Bitcoin - Rising Power? on: June 09, 2015, 09:59:54 PM
It's apparently quite a bit used. A quick search reveals localbitcoins action, a Bitcoin ATM somewhere and some restaurant accepting it.

A few months ago a cafe in Thailand appeared on reddit, offering Bitcoin payment option. If Bitcoin is illegal there... laws aren't working quite well Grin
2867  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Epicenter Bitcoin interview - Mike Hearn on: June 09, 2015, 08:46:56 PM
To get real testing data, they probably had some kind of testnet. They probably even have several testnets for different blocksizes. It's obviously just me speculating, but I don't see how could they test this and present this solution (and numbers backing it up) without having some testnet for, well... testing.

I haven't seen this kind of tests. Mike Hearn was complaining that we have no idea what will happen when the backlog of the transactions will keep growing. I know that we have the testnet, but was this 1MB limit actually tested over there? I don't think so. Where is the blockchain that we can break as many times as we wish?

I don't have a clue. But I remember reading articles on Gavin's blog where he showed advantages and disadvantages of the 20MB blocks. Blog posts like this one http://gavinandresen.ninja/why-increasing-the-max-block-size-is-urgent that I thought were based on testing and real numbers...
2868  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Epicenter Bitcoin interview - Mike Hearn on: June 09, 2015, 07:33:27 PM
This is what I've posted on Reddit:
Quote
I have a couple of questions after listening to this episode. Mike was saying that we don't know what will happen when the backlog will keep growing.

Why don't we have some sort of "Staging" blockchain where we can test stuff happening? Why don't we have a live laboratory for these kind of tests? Are we only using math to predict stuff? ELI5!

To get real testing data, they probably had some kind of testnet. They probably even have several testnets for different blocksizes. It's obviously just me speculating, but I don't see how could they test this and present this solution (and numbers backing it up) without having some testnet for, well... testing.
2869  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: Has the Darkwallet project stopped? on: June 09, 2015, 02:57:49 PM
Their absence has been discussed around here a few weeks ago. As far as I could gather there is a mix of lack of interest and short funding for the project... which probably led to a lack of motivation.

They'll probably be back soon anyways, or someone will take it from where they left Smiley
2870  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Let's be prudent I advocate 50MB blocks on: June 09, 2015, 02:55:52 PM
There aren't only benefits about having big blocks... And huge blocks aren't the definitive solution Smiley
2871  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Epicenter Bitcoin interview - Mike Hearn on: June 09, 2015, 12:10:43 PM
I don't think Gavin looses credibility, as he started an important discussing that will basically "make it or break it" for Bitcoin. We need this size increase... Probably everyone would postpone that if it wasn't him. And this is why there are several people on the core dev group: so that at least one person thinks differently and advances some proposals. If someone goes in with a proposal, there are other people to correct it, and make things even better... Smiley
2872  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Epicenter Bitcoin interview - Mike Hearn on: June 09, 2015, 10:23:36 AM
https://epicenterbitcoin.com/podcast/082/

From 51:02 onwards... Now we're talking! They're finally stepping up and applying the change on Bitcoin XT. And then we vote Smiley

Quite a nice interview with some information... Also good for those around the forum that still have questions or doubts about making a change in Bitcoin
2873  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Blockchain redownload after crash on: June 09, 2015, 12:11:26 AM
I am running Windows 10, since it's beta I get some crashes eventually (I'd say once every two days).
Thank you for the suggestion, coincidentally I thought of doing that after my last reboot. Hope it works out good.

I created this thread to make people aware of this problem, not for me, but for people who want to run nodes and might find this annoying. Nodes are always welcomed. This resync takes nearly 12 hours on my fast computer.

Crashes are rare on stable and fine tuned systems... Probably a good idea to switch OS if you want to run a node without any problems Smiley
2874  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What Are The Financial Elite Saying About Bitcoin? on: June 08, 2015, 09:30:05 PM
To sum up the article, there are 3 kinds of "financial elite" regarding Bitcoin:
They embrace it
They say it might be good, but don't really care
They say they don't like it, but are secretly pouring money into it Grin
2875  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Electronics for bitcoins? Feedback :) on: June 08, 2015, 08:36:29 PM
Apparently this has launched... Any feedback about them?
2876  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2015-06-08]Bitcoinist - SaruTobi Drops Bitcoin as In-Game Currency on: June 08, 2015, 04:08:04 PM
I don't know how people expected to earn that amount of Bitcoins in a game Grin I remember having something like 500 game-coins when I used to play... Obviously either the dev got really rich in an instant or they were just game coins Smiley Anyways, if there were people confusing things, I'm glad it all got sorted out.

I think the big news here is the breadwallet integration! What a nice touch. I'm going to test it ASAP Smiley
2877  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: How are wallets like XAPO earning money? on: June 08, 2015, 04:02:44 PM
Besides their Vault option and the card fees, they also allow to buy Bitcoins and certainly charge something for such service... They probably even mine Bitcoin Wink
2878  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: So I guess people are using bitcoins for takeaway on: June 08, 2015, 04:01:02 PM
This seems like a very amazing service... I wonder if they have plans to expand further in Europe.

As for complaining about not having Bitcoin as payment method, so far I haven't been well received when I complained, but I'm confident things will change very soon.
2879  Economy / Gambling / Re: Do you know BitPlutos? BitCoins and Binary Options anonymous! on: June 08, 2015, 03:57:56 PM
Wrong section. You'd be better off on Service Announcements, maybe Smiley https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=84.0
2880  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Are loans with interest possible with Bitcoin? Such as with scripts? on: June 08, 2015, 10:04:02 AM
They are possible, and they are done in this forum, on the Lending section Smiley

Through the blockchain it isn't possible... And I don't really see that as a useful addition to Bitcoin, honestly
Pages: « 1 ... 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 [144] 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 ... 220 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!