|
Just disable torrent feature... No advantages in using it.
|
|
|
|
You should simply wipe your offline machine and reinstall it with a newer client and take it from there. Then you restore the backup and everything should be safe blockchain.info isn't perfect. Please cross-check you addresses through different explorers, there might be an error with blockchain. As for your second post, you don't need to transfer all our Bitcoins out. If you just transfer some, the rest will go to a change address (which can be made automatically or can be one of your choice). If you change your mind and/or leave funds there after restoring from backup on an online computer you can consider your backup compromised: it has already touched an online computer. Doesn't matter if it's a secure computer. The backup already touched something that can be compromised, so it's not cold storage anymore  |
|
|
|
100% agreed. Just searched to see if there was some way to switch from bits to BTC units. Why not give users a choice? An app that pushes its own beliefs is fine, as long as it only makes it the default but still provides choice to those who disagree. I otherwise love the app, but just don't feel comfortable using it if there is no option to have the value in BTC.
In this particular instance it's better to have a single standard. It's important for the community to move together to bits. People who don't switch hold back adoption. That combined with the fact that adding more configurable options makes the app more confusing is why we haven't done it. The reason BTC is more comfortable is because most others are using it still, so to break that momentum means doing something that's initially less comfortable. People need encouragement, so that's what we're providing by making an app that people love, but requires switching to bits. It's a short term inconvenience for a greater long term benefit. I totally agree with this decision. It is stupid 'talking' and trading in BTC! Bits is so much more logic and easier to understand; and future-proof. I totally love this app, i am a huge fan. Things i would like to see implemented in the app: -iPhone6 and 6+ support -Multi-sig addresses support Thanks for the awesome work voisine. Although I am not a big fan of Bits, and took quite a bit to get used to them, I understand why they're important in adoption. Much more comfortable saying something like 1000 Bits than something like 0.001 BTC. iPhone 6 not supported? How come, does the app appear smaller or something? I'm still on a 5, so not sure. As for multisig, that falls in what voisine has been saying: he wants to keep the app simple. I don't see that being implemented. To finish my post, I think it would be better to focus our discussions on the main topic. There's no need to have two topics with different discussions about the same thing |
|
|
|
Thanks for developing this awesome wallet!
I started using the wallet and it provides the best user experience that i have seen so far in BTC wallets.
As i understand the wallet each time it receives or sends bitcoins creates a new address. Can we use a previous address created by the wallet to receive bitcoins if a new one has created ?
Yes, you can reuse addresses, although that's not recommended. If you receive further payments to "old" addresses, you will still receive the funds, of course. Just wanted to give some feedback for this last update. The notification center widget is just amazing! Pretty handy and works perfectly, thank you. |
|
|
|
|
They said they would eventuall add local trader to iOS builds... Just wait a little longer and use a cheap Android meanwhile if you really need this.
|
|
|
|
Explain me like I'm 5...  |
|
|
|
How are they merging the small outputs from spam attacks?
I tried spending some as mining fees and I couldn't, tried with Bitcoin Core and Armory. You should spend less time on forum and instead of it improve your programming skills  First thing I thought when I didn't manage to dump whatever I could to miner fees Then I realized these guys don't have anything that we don't have too and started reading about it  ... until I just let it go and kept paying high fees for my transactions. bigger blocks. problem "solved".
Well, that's true, bigger blocks will make these things way more expensive. |
|
|
|
|
This was discussed around here a while back. There was even a poll, and mBTC, Bits and other denominations were considered... I think BTC is simply the best, everyone already uses it and it is widely accepted and known. I would also accept the usage of XBT for the same reasons, it's also widely known as referring to Bitcoin. Other than that, I think it's just confusing for new users (although bits is also gaining some traction)
|
|
|
|
Was going to vote BIP 101, but since 2 options are allowed, voted 101 and 100. BIP101 is the best proposal, but it should adopt BIP100 block increase/decrease mechanism and final block size to be perfect. Here's an interesting link I found on the issue. |
|
|
|
|
How are they merging the small outputs from spam attacks? I tried spending some as mining fees and I couldn't, tried with Bitcoin Core and Armory.
|
|
|
|
The mainstream media has so much to talk about bitcoin this week Who the hell is the Bitcoin CEO and what blockchain in particular? Blockchain.info or the block chain ledger? I think OP was just trying to be ironic... Well, he has 307 activity on a Sr Member account, I would hope that he doesn't think Bitcoin has an actual CEO at this point. I think some people here still think Satoshi is the CEO of Bitcoin or something along the lines. I sure hope he doesn't think like that haha He was just referring that when this reaches mainstream media they're going to make a fuss and write terrible things... As for Mark's account, I probably bet it is really him in control. He doesn't really care... He doesn't mind being seen online. |
|
|
|
This is exactly why we need Monero and private blockchains. This is a ridiculous issue to have.
If the coins really moved and it was unknown they did, the market wouldn't have the chance to move down so everyone could buy more coins... Downsides in everything, I guess Still waiting for that statement from blockchain, genuinely curious about what happened. Yeah the problem seems to be persisting and targeting the assumed addresses of Satoshi, which might cause some excitement and whatnot over the folks that are too eager to know who he/she is. I thought it's a pushtx API problem? So it seems, but that's not an official blockchain source... |
|
|
|
This is exactly why we need Monero and private blockchains. This is a ridiculous issue to have.
If the coins really moved and it was unknown they did, the market wouldn't have the chance to move down so everyone could buy more coins... Downsides in everything, I guess Still waiting for that statement from blockchain, genuinely curious about what happened. |
|
|
|
The mainstream media has so much to talk about bitcoin this week Who the hell is the Bitcoin CEO and what blockchain in particular? Blockchain.info or the block chain ledger? I think OP was just trying to be ironic... |
|
|
|
|
Probably just publicity on the blockchain. You can safely ignore.
|
|
|
|
Looks pretty interesting, trades on the blockchain would be simply amazing... But I don't think this is it. Only time will tell, though Watching. |
|
|
|
|
It can't bring peace... But it can definitely help mitigate minor conflicts and doubts about money usage by big companies/governments.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems blockchain is releasing statement later today. Meanwhile they're only connected to 22 nodes. Maybe they're systems crashed and somehow some nodes were relaying fake info and they got those? Or maybe they were "trapped" connecting to nodes relaying fake information? Is this possible?
|
|
|
|
|
Does not show up at blockr.io. How is blockchain wrong? Any bug?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
