I believe this is how most block explorers get it (the relay IP of a new transaction that is:) (Not sure if it's still up to date either.)

Basically: the relayed_by stat is pretty darn useless.

---

I'm not sure if ZMQ actually gives info regarding IP adresses. https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/40755 says only notifications for blocks/tx's.

and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/zmq.md

Might very well be wrong though.

Let me guess: You found some wallet.dat's online where the owner said there's X BTC stored on them, and now you're wondering if there's some easy way to crack them?

Looking at your post history:
I'm sorry to tell you, but there is no such thing as a "master cracker" that can generate either billions of passwords or private keys. (At least not efficiently.)

Since to crack an unknown wallet.dat, you'll need an "infinite" word list to be 100% certain of cracking it. Trying to crack multiple unknown wallet.dat's simultaneously will take infinityx^(?)2 time. As the password could be anything.

So i guess you could potentially make a program that tries passwords (and variations of it) on multiple wallet.dat's, but it will just be a waste of time and computing power. (If we're assuming the password is atleast a couple characters long. (Which seems likely to me.))

---

The closest to something that you can use if you forgot your password of a wallet.dat is that which ETFbitcoin described. Even then, you'll either need to provide your own word lists, or a general idea of the password.

Lol. If that's actually the case then that's just borderline scamming from bittrex. A comma or a dot? seriously? I know them and Poloniex were scammy, but were they that money hungry?

Having an account registered under the name of "Snus Sweden" before KYC was really a thing or required really does not constitute identity forging later on when KYC is required. That'd really be a reach.

OP, after you verified your account and got your money out, ask them to delete your KYC data. I've read that especially if you're from europe (EU), they probably will have to adhere your request (due to GPDR (?)).
Not that i'd verify the account for 150$ in the first place, because really, Bittrex and Poloniex are untrustworthy in my book.

Not on the forum, but i think that on their website they might have refreshed the signature page and send out a message to users/and or bumped it to their front page. (Don't quote me on this though since i only heard this from other users, can't confirm it myself.)

Also their page is still up. https://yobit.net/en/signature/details/ I mean the least they could do is add an update or 404 it. This just adds to the confusion.

But hey it's yobit afterall. I do agree, users should do their own due diligence.

---

This.

The entire concept of KYC in crypto is completely ridiculous when there are billion dollar banks and EMIs who don't even have access to goverment databases, (as far as i'm aware. I think equifax is the exception here.)

Yet, i should be eager to share my passport and thus very identifying information that could be misused in dozens of different ways to a *shitty* crypto startup, (for which if things go south, no one will take real responsibility.) which probably hired some junior CS student to check them, for a payment that is way less than a second-hand car.



Worse yet, analyzing their traffic it doesn't look like it hurt them that much. https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/shapeshift.io - https://www.similarweb.com/website/shapeshift.io

If we let KYC become salonfähig for companies, instead of boycotting those who implement it, they'll probably all start implementing it. Looks like that's already happening/happend.

I’m pretty sure that would be very hard to tell with just the adress alone.

You’ll probably need more information. (Bitcoinmarket database or a former employee?)

In his original thread i only see a reference to paypal though. I doubt they accepted CC, but i could also very well be wrong.  
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=20.msg1014#msg1014

You mean where they are stored/who owns them? Again, probably impossible to tell. Only the site operators could possibly link someone to a withdraw adress. (Either via their paypal, or their card(?) which by the way, would’ve been trivially easy to fake back in 2010. I doubt KYC was actually even required for such small amounts.)

Might be outdated. I haven't used Bitstamp, but i'd be surprised if they didn't let you withdraw to bech32 adresses by now.

Edit: actually, as per May, they didnt seem to support it either: https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum-docs/issues/92
Not sure if that's already changed.

Because the bech32 implementation makes use of all the advantages Segwit has to offer, whereas nested segwit (3.. adresses) doesn't.
I'm assuming that's why they called the former "Native" because it's a more "complete" implementation.

Basically: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/74792, and if you're interested as to why bech32 adresses are cheaper; https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/78934

ed: This site seems to give a good alternative overview of services that support segwit next to the wiki. https://segwit.support/ (Wtf Binance!)

First post.  

Gone for months then out of the blue comes back to post this.  

---

Looks like you got your answer. 1 minute after the other. (Which seems kind of redundant if you ask me..)

From what i can tell: either they're asking users from their telegram to ask random questions to bump the thread, or they obviously hired someone to do so.
This neither inspires confidence in their service for me personally.

I don't think there even is a fallacy or paradox to describe what you just said.
(If there is, i'm just in general curious to know if anyone knows what fallacy resembles the "You can't critique me unless you're involved/have used my service"-esque, so let me know..)

---

I can also give you personal feedback on you calling me a child rapist, if you'd like: i did not appreciate that.

You're a simple fool, and so is your "business model" of blackmailing companies.

What would be the difference between that and Press - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=77.0

Or the Wall Observer thread, or the Speculation board - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=57.0

Seems very "niche-y" for a complete sub-board. If you want to read people's stupid TA analyses, there's Crypto twitter, and tradingview.
Not to mention that the subboard will ultimately only be used to promote paid TA and signal trash, and we already have a gambling section.  .

Google: Mixing service bitcoin, and read some articles. You'll get the gist of it.
To get you started: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mixing_service


Unless Smartmixer somehow injects some sort of javascript into an extension or something, no.
If anything, it's far more likely they steal your bitcoins in the mixing process, since it is custodial.

(I'm not saying this is the case with Smartmixer (obviously not...), but this has happend in the past, and is still happening. Torwallet, bitblender, and countless of other small mixers.)

People do care, as you can see a tag is placed on his account marking him as a scammer.

Other than that, there isn't much we can do to pressure "Bitblender" to come back. He's completely anonymous, and by the looks of it, he doesn't have a (guilty) conscience.

So unless Bitblender comes back, no, your funds are lost. Scroll up & you can see that parts of the funds allegedly have already been moved through various exchanges, which makes the chances of him returning them extremely slim imo.
EDIT: it was this thread where a user claims customer funds were moved. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153859.msg51848029#msg51848029

His bitcointalk profile can be found here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=229601 (If you mean lutpin or HHampuz, they definitely can't help you.)

But, as already above mentioned: he hasn't been online in a long time, so your PM will fall on deaf ears most likely.

Possible: yes.
Easy: not so sure.

This service offers SMS notifications, but it'll cost you a bit probably. https://www.cryptotxalert.com/#service
This one is free but looks a bit funky https://cryptocurrencyalerting.com/wallet-watch.html

I haven't tried either of them so i'm not sure if they sell your data etc. Take care.

With "0 transactions", i assume you mean "0 confirmations"?

In which case you'll simply need to wait.

If you really mean there are 0 transactions incoming to your adress on your iphone wallet, either you or the third party wallet you are using hasn't (yet) broadcasted your transaction, but perhaps already deducted the amount from your account. In which case you should probably contact their support.

(As OP pmed me saying that he bought the BTC w/ euros, and not much other details. He did also mention that he has a hash, which makes me think it's just a case of low fees?)

Unless of course you made a back up of your files, which if you use bitcoin core would be your wallet.dat, and if you use electrum/most other wallets, would be the twelve words you've written down.
So even if you lose your "regular" keys, you'll have a spare one.

2 reviews, no track record of the developer, no source code, no name recognition, no product site as far as i'm aware... Yep, you should definitely avoid this.
Their site: https://www.antiersolutions.com/ doesn't even load for me.

Looks like they were yet another *design*? solution site before they did a 180 and became blockchain/bitcoin experts.
- https://web.archive.org/web/20180504135624/https://antiersolutions.com/

Yep. If the user before you used a "weird" exchange where he or someone else traded in stolen funds, or a gambling site, there's a chance, especially if you yourself are using a US exchange such as Poloniex(?), (by the way, how do you use poloniex without submitting your ID?) that they might start asking questions.

If the user who you traded with used Poloniex, he's on the hook, law enforcement will know exactly who he is, and he can always link YOU to the funds. If LE wants to, they can find you(r funds). So i guess if you just want to have a bit more privacy, you could do this, but there's many flaws attached.

Also unverified binance accounts can only do 2BTC a day, so setting up a serious mixing service would be difficult. Not to mention that i don't think this is something binance will necessarily be very appreciative of, (perhaps it is even in breach of their TOS to use accounts solely for onchain transactions? especially if they're from weird sources such as "unregistered" gambling sites et al (Binance ToU 13.0))

+ the fact that it's probably too much of a hassle to set up, do maintenance and cybersecurity on when you look at how many people actually use bitcoin as their payment method on the web shop itself. (Which usually is a fraction of the userbase. (.x%))

Can you also ensure us that cloudflare doesn't log any of our IPS, browser fingerprints, and then shares it with third parties such as, i don't know, the NSA, Google, (?) deanonymizing us completely?
Can you?















Wow. These questions are asked so freaking conveniently, it almost, almost! makes me think they're asked by a sockpuppet controlled by OP.
I can already predict the answers he's going to give to both questions...  

BMF? Black mafia forum?You're kind of contradicting yourself here. Not that it matters though since the message you're trying to send is extremely clear.  

---

edit: Another question OP can conveniently answer  ;