|
1162
|
Other / Meta / Re: CAN WE HAVE AN ARCHIVE OF QUALITY INFORMATION IN THIS FORUM?
|
on: November 15, 2018, 05:20:28 PM
|
|
That sounds extremely time consuming, and in the end, pretty worthless. You basically want to make a section where "trusted users" copy & paste over "Good posts" from all over the forum...?
I don't think that's a good idea.
Something that might be smarter is to add certain keywords to technical discussion topics/improve how google indexes certain topics (Sometimes bitcointalk.to is indexed higher as bitcointalk.org, how is that possible?), so that people who experience the same issue can google their "error/issue", and find said thread. Just like stackexchange does.
|
|
|
|
|
1163
|
Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Green Trust Rate?
|
on: November 13, 2018, 03:55:50 PM
|
How do I value my trust?
When does he turn green?
The list[1] shows who you trust and who you do not trust. There is a default list of people you trust. This list appears by default for all people in this forum and can be modified by adding or removing people "~username". The people in that list can change your trust as their feedback is reliable. You need two positive trusts and wait for more than 10 months to get a dark green color. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;fullWow, didn't know about 2 monthes O_o What about red one? As far as i understand it, a red trust from a DT2+ member instantly gives a -2 if no prior positive trust from DT2+, i'm pretty sure that multiple red trusts from DT2+ consequentially without any positive trust inbetween triggers some sort of multiplier. -> (-(2x²)=trustscore) =where x = amount of feedback? <- Although i'm pretty sure the formula isn't correct. How it works when you already have positives, i'm not so sure. Usually it'll end up giving a (  ) Which isn't the case for positive trust though. it's +1 for each month, for 10 months. |
|
|
|
|
1164
|
Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Can I trust selly.gg?
|
on: November 13, 2018, 02:01:29 PM
|
Can I trust selly.gg?
I searched in history posts, there are several posts about scammers using selly.gg to scam, but those posts are a half year ago.
Is it better now? Or should I refuse the request to use selly.gg?
There is nothing inherently wrong with using selly.gg, it's just that most/some users behind the links won't deliver their service/good. If you trust the users you're buying from, there shouldn't be any problem using selly.gg, however, in case you don't, it might be better not to, and instead use an escrow. |
|
|
|
|
1165
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Has my transaction been hacked? reward offered
|
on: November 10, 2018, 07:05:33 PM
|
Hello, I have same problem as guy who create topic also my transaction was send to same BTC as his. How can i restore it or it is hacked? I used jaxx wallet on ios never had anything on PC how he was able to stole BTC and ZEC from m account. Lost more than 1500 €  BTC transaction ID 4b7380f0f3a70c5792ef7faaef96e448202eee1d44eb4cb96f7c536a0fc42435 https://imgur.com/a/EyY0I1AThe transaction you linked, has the following output adress; 18NFNXngJKfYUiNCrzibUdAPR7S3WYeuCd The output adress belongs to Cryptonator.com, which seems to be a centralized wallet? If you don't control the private keys for said adress, the best thing you can probably do is contact their support. |
|
|
|
|
1167
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Address mapping to Exchanges
|
on: November 09, 2018, 05:48:04 PM
|
You might be interested in this answer given on Bitcoin.SE, https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/49201What walletexplorer does is called address clustering. When you spend bitcoins, your wallet will take input from several txouts belonging to several addresses depending on amount to be spend. So walletexplorer works on a simple heuristic: If two addresses appear as inputs in any given transaction, they belong to same user More detail about this method can be seen in this paper by Reid and Harrigan ( https://arxiv.org/pdf/1107.4524.pdf). Of course, this method will fail in case of mixers and coinjoin transactions. There are advanced ways to even detect transaction that go through mixers, but I don't think wallet explorer does that To find name of wallets it can scrap forums like bitcointalk, some addresses are tagged publicly in blockchain.info, also it can has bots trade on major exchanges to get their addresses. and the link to the paper which looks quite interesting, although i'm not entirely sure how on-topic it is. |
|
|
|
|
1168
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: All bitcoin addresses with balance
|
on: November 09, 2018, 02:04:39 PM
|
what is software i read it on pc ?
I think you can read it with just about any text editor, (after you unpacked it obviously.)
I just downloaded the sample and opened it up. Am i right in assuming that all balances of the sample are also "truncated". 3D2oetdNuZUqQHPJ......[truncated]......;13866086137914 If not, what are those numbers behind the ; referring to? amount of satoshi stored? |
|
|
|
|
1170
|
Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Has anyone ever bought bitcoin on this site?
|
on: November 02, 2018, 07:18:20 PM
|
|
- They don't use HTTPS.
- They do not accept bech32 adresses.
The site also just looks extremely clunky in general. They're using a script which is heavily dated and really does not fit the type of business that they're doing.
(I'm buying a "good" that is worth 500$ in Bitcoin???)
Looks like a scam to me, but even if it's not, it's very amateuristic and i wouldn't send a dime to this site with all the other options that are available.
|
|
|
|
|
1171
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Does Bitcoin Core in prune mode support mining?
|
on: November 02, 2018, 11:56:37 AM
|
|
I'm not so sure.
With only 550 blocks stored, how can/would a pruned node make sure that an input given by user to be signed in a block isn't a double spend? There'd be no way to check that on such a node, right?
(E: Although i think there's probably a mechanism for this, otherwise it wouldn't be able to verify any transactions at all.)
finding a valid nonce would probably be possible on a pruned node, but i could see some problems with the construction of a valid block.
|
|
|
|
|
1172
|
Other / Meta / Re: What about these accounts?
|
on: October 29, 2018, 05:01:58 PM
|
Why are those accounts even posting there? I am giving away 0.01 mBTC To all member's account that signs up and posts their account username. Once you receive your coins try out your luck and maybe you'll win big! Do note there are no restrictions what so ever! So you may withdraw at anytime you wish, and as always check out the referral program on our site. If your referral wins the jackpot, you win a partial amount of it! You get a part of the house edge, so you can watch and EARN! Quick way to make some coins. The giveaway is only for Member+? Or am i missing something?
Anyway, that 777 ANN thread with above giveaway really is just another way to pay for people to bump your thread right? Why is this even allowed? I thought bumping services were forbidden? /(Paying people to bump your posts.) Yet here this thread has been essentially doing that for years. |
|
|
|
|
1173
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: scam
|
on: October 29, 2018, 04:27:50 PM
|
Seeing the front page having the words: "START TO EARN ON CRYPTUAL", I automatically assumed it was a scammy bitcoin "investment" site, but it looks like an exchange. I think it's either a scam, or a crappy new exchange. But yeah, if you're going to call it a scam, give us some info on your experience. Some info: - Creation Date(from whois): 2018-10-23T12:11:43Z
- No ranking via alexa.com
It's a fake gambling site, like many others that we've seen before. They make it look like people are gambling on their roulette, but they really aren't. It's just bots. See for yourself here; https://sidecrypt.info/rouletteIt's funny how their entire front-end is completely ripped off from some exchange. Lmao. |
|
|
|
|
1177
|
Other / Meta / Re: Report about a liar, spammer, flooder? or paid negative by competitors?
|
on: October 28, 2018, 03:01:03 PM
|
Whether or not the feedback is accurate, he has every right to leave it. Unless he extorts you over it, i doubt there is much that the forum moderators will do. Feedback isn't moderated. He has continuous spam and duplication of his messages in a circle. I read that according to the rules of the forum his actions are punished with an permaban. I ask you to help me get out of the situation correctly. I am accused of what I didn't do. View his message history. He writes only in 2-3 threads. It seems that he is paid for his messages. I don't think that criticism of a service = plagiarism ? And if so, simply report the posts?
I have to say, the average posts in both https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5039127.820 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4720775.3580 seem extremely low quality. Whether or not that is the standard in these altcoin sections, or if that constitutes to fake bumping, i don't know, but it looks pretty bad. |
|
|
|
|
1178
|
Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: can't send bitcoins from electrum
|
on: October 27, 2018, 07:22:08 PM
|
the case is that i can't send btc from electrum wallet macOS because of error 'nonetype has no attribute get' i has tried to restore my wallet by secret key via blockchain.info wallet, but it says 'incorrect seed'. When I open electrum i see my btc and state 'connected'. What should I do? Thanks
I think that's because blockchain.info(.com) uses a different derivation method. I'd store your seed somewhere safe, and then try to reinstall Electrum, and then reimport the seed (and thus your wallet), as i suspect something about your electrum.exe has been corrupted somehow.. What Electrum version are you using? AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get' Seems like an error that can be found more frequently in older versions, usually in combination when using a ledger Nano S, looking at github crash reports/bugs. That's not the case here is it? If it is, look at this, https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/3508#issuecomment-351222172 |
|
|
|
|
1179
|
Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] ChipMixer.com - Bitcoin mixer / Bitcoin tumbler - mixing reinvented
|
on: October 27, 2018, 04:54:24 PM
|
Yea it is, has anyone checked the tor one? I’ll do it in a few minutes if my laptop will connect.
I don't think tor (.onion domains) relies on HTTPs certificates, as they're encrypted by default? so that's probably not affected. Guess i'll use the tor version for now. Although; As of August 2016, 13 onion domains are https signed across 7 different organisations via DigiCert.[23] But as far as i understand it, it's rather useless. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
. 
