Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 05:33:39 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 ... 179 »
1441  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: I was hacked. Can we follow the money? on: August 17, 2018, 08:19:08 PM
Sorry that you've gone through this, but this is the nature of crypto currency. It's both a positive and a negative; transactions are final and immutable. In instances like this, however, there is no type of fraud protection or insurance. I hope you learned your lesson: ALWAYS USE 2FA.

Your best attempt is to alert the exchange and to let them know that this is happening. I highly doubt, however, that they will take any action regarding this. I tried a quick search to see if I could find the exchange that these addresses belong to, but to no avail Sad

The first address that you posted was also used as a payout address in a bitcoin-doubling ponzi, so the scammer is also an idiot, FYI. lol

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:XbmW0pmCxgoJ:double-bitcoin.top/support/disclaimer/double-bitcoin/double-bitcoin/support/feed/feed/our-company-and-team/index.html+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=bz

To add onto this, the adress where your money trail "ends" is where it actually begins.

The second adress 1JuNT9DjmQxXbXjCc67yCf41X6TeajVFbr is used as some kind of intermediary to Binance.

If that adress (1JuN) is held by an individual, it is KYC verified on Binance for sure. (36BTC+ transactions into binance), which makes me think that this is also some kind of exchange/wallet (unfortunately), but i have no clue which one.


1JuNT9DjmQxXbXjCc67yCf41X6TeajVFbr -> 1NDyJtNTjmwk5xPNhjgAMu4HDHigtobu1s (Binance adress) (>Source for this is matbea.net).
https://matbea.net/btc/tx/fba98532efbbbf6a9f79a5c13813ce8c05b48d6ae1bda50520844e864c9401cc

If you could provide the send adress that was used to receive the bitcoins on 1JuNT9DjmQxXbXjCc67yCf41X6TeajVFbr, i could check if your coins actually went through binance.
1442  Other / Meta / Re: banned Nafis1997 on: August 17, 2018, 04:31:40 PM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4852987.0
you plagiarized. Literally someone commented on your post saying it


Yup, almost all of his posts are plagiarized.

Here is another one,

A federal court judge in California has blocked a move that sought to dismiss a class action lawsuit alleging that the initial coin offering (ICO) conducted by the Tezos Foundation violated securities laws in the U.S.

The decision came Tuesday, as District Judge Richard Seeborg denied the motion filed by the Tezos Foundation and the cryptocurrency's founding couple Arthur and Kathleen Brietman, as well as their U.S.-based company Dynamic Ledger Solutions (DLS).

As previously reported, the Tezos Foundation and DLS were facing four class action lawsuits following their ICO that raised $232 million in 2017 and was later accused of selling unregistered securities to investors in the U.S.

Based on the docket report of one case, dubbed "In Re Tezos Securities Litigations," the class action lawsuits have now been consolidated into one with a lead plaintiff named Arman Anvari.

According to the judge's order, the Brietmans argued in the motion that the ICO was administrated by the Tezos Foundation which is based in Switzerland and, as such, the couple and DLS should not be held liable.

However, the judge said the involvement of DLS "in establishing and aiding the Tezos Foundation rendered the two entities deeply intertwined, if not functionally interchangeable, throughout the ICO process."

The defendants also argued as part of the motion for dismissal that the lawsuits were trying to use U.S. securities laws to govern an ICO for which "critical aspects of the sale occurred outside of the United States."

The judge responded in the order that the realities of the ICO transactions "belie" such a conclusion, arguing:

"Anvari participated in the transaction from this country (the U.S). He did so by using an interactive website that was: (a) hosted on a server in Arizona and; (b) run primarily by Arthur Breitman in California. He presumably learned about the ICO and participated in response to marketing that almost exclusively targeted United States residents."

Separately, the court granted the motion and dismissed cryptocurrency brokerage firm Bitcoin Suisse as a defendant, saying that "in any event, Bitcoin Suisse does not appear to be a key player in this action."


you can thank merit)

Copied from https://www.coindesk.com/tezos-ico-class-action-looms-after-motion-to-dismiss-denied/

Also, you're merit begging extremely hard. I'm not sure if that's bannable but it sure as hell isn't endorsed.

I see you're already posting in other sections under this account, which means you're breaking the rules against ban evasion.

25. Ban evasion (using or creating accounts while one of your accounts is banned) is not allowed.[e]

I doubt that it'll take long before this account is banned aswell.
1443  Economy / Services / Re: SELLSSH.NET - HIDE YOUR IP - $15/month on: August 17, 2018, 12:15:14 PM
The code of hideman is.public?
How.can trust? I mean backdoor or other bad stuffs

In this world, trust is rare and important

Explane why,if exe is closed source, we trust in you
The source code will be open and shared for everyone.  
I will update it on GitHub next week, as there are some critical updates on the server.

That was an important question to answer. Please add the github link in your OP if that's possible.

So for 15$ we have access to ~20k rotating IP's? How did you get your hands on those? Did you crack them?

If not, are these residential IP's or IP's from datacenters? Where exactly do they come from?
1444  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Implementing a bitcoin payment system on: August 17, 2018, 11:18:32 AM

Is there anyway to make sure that a transaction, with which someone will pay us a certain amount, will really be successfully validated and processed before it's actually inside a certain block?
Since the txs can hang in the mempool for quite some time, it's not really an option to wait till it's included in a block for real.


No. You really shouldn't try to process a transaction that has 0 confirmations.

An experienced bitcoin user (Or anyone that isn't using a webwallet really) could doublespend the transaction, in which case your system would receive nothing but does "process/credit" the transaction.

Read more about doublespending and how it exactly works here, https://coinsutra.com/bitcoin-double-spending/

~It makes me wonder though, what service are you creating where you can't wait for 1+ confirmations?
1445  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Is BITCLUB NETWORK LEGIT?THEIR OFFERS DON'T SOUND REALISTIC on: August 16, 2018, 10:09:34 PM

Its looks like ponzi, but idk why they have their own pool https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/pool/bitclubnetwork.
It's likely because they actually use funds deposited to their site to invest in miners, but don't return significant amounts of earnings to their customers. Just because a cloudmining company claims to own hashrate doesn't mean they're legitimate.

They currently have a 2.6% hashrate, according to https://www.blockchain.com/pools so in this case i doubt that they're merely a "cloud mining" scam. Still, i find them quite phishy too, mostly because i don't understand their business model.

They let people invest in their hardware and pay them out accordingly, + they pay users for reffering more users, right? That definitely sounds sketchy, and like every cloud mining scam ever created, but, as others have said, they have been in business for a very long time, and they actually mine blocks.

This one might not be an outright scam, but it's still doubtable if you'll ever get ROI with them.

1446  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Just need a help! on: August 16, 2018, 04:55:24 PM
I can tell you the quickest and most effective way, but this may be a violation of the rules, you may be able to get what you want through a transaction!

This is a fast way to ruin your account & reputation. Not only will you probably receive red trust, but if the trading is provable, i'm pretty sure your account can get permanently banned aswell.

As others have mentioned, there are several threads where Newbs can go to essentially "beg" for merits.

The best thing you can do in my opinion is to simply be helpful and informative towards other users. But please, don't start making these useless guides like many others do in the beginners & help section about a topic that is widely covered online.
1447  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Delete one or more Block on: August 16, 2018, 02:32:05 PM
Is it possible in Blockchain to remove one or more block from the networks?

Yes, if two miners find a block at the same time, this could cause a network split. one of these blocks is going to be orphaned, ( the one that is the slowest to have the next block build ontop of it usually).

The block that will be orphaned could have been seen as "valid/confirmed" by a number of services, but is now "deleted" (or rather not included in) from the main chain, with all the transactions that it confirmed.

See https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/5859/what-are-orphaned-and-stale-blocks for more information on orphaned blocks.
1448  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns [Last update: 13-Aug-2018] on: August 16, 2018, 11:55:31 AM
the YOLOdice campaign is marked with the red *

are they paying the campaign weekly?

It sure says so on their campaign ANN thread,
Quote
10. The week cycle ends on Sundays 23:59:99(9) UTC, payments will be issued within 2 days.

Your balance *should* go in your yolodice account, according to them.


I don't really know why they're marked red, but what i do know is that they have a campaign manager who is evading bans & merit trading. I'd personally also stay away from this campaign.

See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=667927 < The account of the yolodice campaign manager.
1449  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum sucessful but crashes and doesnt show import.. on: August 15, 2018, 09:49:07 PM
Hi, so im wondering what can i do here so that electrum wont crash. I import keys which i have and it does so and says successful, but then throws out a error and crashes.... However prior to that it shows the balances as non verified and then when i open up the client after the crash it doesnt show what i just imported... The format is right and all im just wondering why is it not saving it when it said successful...

would earlier versions perhaps allow this if im hitting some kind of max limit on import? Any tips or suggestions would be appreciated

is there a size limit on dat creation? Seems i cannot have more than 97K? ..

What error exactly are you getting, and how much keys are you trying to import (Although i don't think that really matters here)?

I haven't heard of a "max amount" of keys that you can import with Electrum, so i don't think that that's the problem here.


Quote
is there a size limit on dat creation? Seems i cannot have more than 97K? ..

AFAIK, no? Also, i don't think that wallets created after Electrum 1.9 are .dat files?
1450  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Searching about trading signal on: August 15, 2018, 05:19:21 PM
Hi everyone , i am searching about good trading signal that i can copy and invest , can anyone give me a telegram channel or site that have trading advertice with good yeld , how much i must pay for those info?

There are groups that ask you thousands and thousands of $$ a month for entry.

My advice: Don't join these groups and don't give them a dime. These people act as if they "know" the market, while in reality what they actually know/influence is very, very little. You're usually better off making your own calls, and taking responsibility for them.


Especially if they promise you steady returns. Such a thing is simply not possible with this kind of market.
1451  Other / Meta / Re: Account 'ajochems' hacked/stolen (DT please tag) on: August 15, 2018, 03:54:28 PM
Who the fuck are you ?
Why you fucking offering money for my own acc?
I have own email,i have my btc stacked,what the fuck you are talking about ?
You ask people to give me red feedbacks and you threating me to sold you acc else more red trust.If you are fucking owner or owned this acc, why you fucking came after year to report?
You fucking offer me 200$ for my hero acc. I grind this acc from Jr to Hero , who the fuck are you go check forum rules .
It's clearly written to recover or claim account ,you must signed a message from btc adresss . You fucking cant do anything.
Stop threating me and offering me money for my acc, you fucked my acc with all red trust and offer me 200$.

I don't think anyone here believes that you "grinded" this account from the start.

It's clear that this account switched hands, for anyone interested, take a look/compare the posts before Oktober 7th 2017 and after.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=187501;sa=showPosts;start=620

It went from pretty good and informative posts to absolute 3rd world shit posts. Maybe you should've just taken the money they offered you.

Quote from: ajochems
Don't speak without knowledge of the subject, ... if there is any insider it would be Cryptopia themselves as they required the CSC dev team to deposit 9,7 mln coins or they would delist CSC. We offered to look into replacing the involved users BTC instead of CSC as we do not have any reserve CSC available as CSC does not have a premine. Cryptopia refused that so they are at fault here and i do not react very well to threats! Until now only 1,8 mln coins have been reported missing by users so i wonder where the other 8 mln is??

All malicious transactions are rolled back on the blockchain within acceptable timeframes and could take place because Cryptopia had only 6 confirms on deposits and works only on their own internal DB instead of verifying against the blockchain. The attacker got users BTC and run off. To stop all speculation you can find all transactions below with their rollbacks from a primary CSC seed, ... you can check that in your own debug.log if you run your own full-time online CSC node:

vs

Quote from: ajochems

Good Buddy. If you have bitcoin longer time means, that much profit you have with you for your future.Bitcoin keeping is like saving money in bank which gives interest to your money. In bitcoin also,after some days you will get additional dollars compared to today's price of bitcoin.
1452  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Which is the Best online BTC wallet? on: August 15, 2018, 02:22:04 PM
Bitcoin.com wallet. I use this because its fee is very small.....

It seems like you don't really understand how bitcoin works.. Wallets themselves don't determine the fee you pay for a transaction. The network and ultimately you do.

Their fee being low has absolutely nothing to do with their service/wallet (unless they are consolidating inputs like many faucet sites do, in which case you should avoid them completely, ( since they're in possesion of your private keys.))
1453  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Which is the Best online BTC wallet? on: August 15, 2018, 01:27:01 PM
My choise is Blockchain. Because firstly I use blockchain and then I use coinbase. Coinbase is one of the most popular btc wallet.

You can store your bitcoin in coinbase wallet because it is secured and you can access to it from anywhere

This is where it goes wrong. Coinbase is not a wallet. It's a centralized exchange.

If you have your funds in coinbase, you don't actually own it, since you don't control the private keys. It really destroys the entire purpose of crypto to keep your funds there..

quite good:
  • Copay
  • Ledger Nano
  • TREZOR
  • OPENDIME




3/4 of the wallets you listed are hardware wallets, not online wallets..

If you really want to use an online wallet, use something like blockchain.info, but really, you're missing out on a lot of features/security if you do. As others mentioned, bitcoin core / electrum are much better options.
1454  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] Coingamex | New crypto exchange | Trading contests on: August 15, 2018, 11:44:04 AM

Our mission is to provide the most secure and user-friendly trading platform.  

If that's really your mission then i don't really understand why you chose for 2011 jsCharts.

Also, doing a quick penetration test on your site gives several red flags. You're using insecure cookies, and you might have several other issues,

See

Someone who knows what he is doing might be able to do serious harm to your site, and your customers.
1455  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin Core default fees not ok? on: August 14, 2018, 09:49:25 PM
So basicly if i set mintxfee to 2sat per byte i should be ok (it says 1 is enough now) right?
but the default value is 0.00001 (BTC/kB) if i look it up, am i missing something?

It depends on what you want. A 1 sat/b will get you confirmed anywhere between ~1-10 blocks. See https://bitcoinfees.earn.com/ (Albeit this site can be very inaccurate, it usually gives a clear indication)

If you're in a hurry, it might be better to use a slightly higher fee.

Which fee should I use?
The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 12 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top.
For the median transaction size of 225 bytes, this results in a fee of 2,700 satoshis.
1456  Other / Meta / Re: What do you need merits for? on: August 14, 2018, 08:10:23 PM
Uhh, they're needed to rank up? Merits themselves are really not an indicator of how trustworthy someone is. I'd say the Trust system fulfilles that role much better.

Quote
And, consequently, they mean nothing if we got them in a different (undeserved) way. In addition, outside this website, these merits don't mean anything and can not be used at all. So, why do so many users try to get them from the very beginning of their registration, as if this is their main goal on the forum? It seemed to me that merits should be just a tool, not an ultimate purpose.
Because they want to rank up, obviously.
1457  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: i need desginer on: August 14, 2018, 04:48:57 PM
i need desginer so pm me if you interested

A designer for what exactly?

If you want to get serious replies/Pm's you'll need to be more specific, although i assume you are talking about a signature/Avatar designer?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1578821.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4786191.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4705588.0

I found these by just scrolling through the first page. No idea how legit they are, but maybe you could contact them, if this is what you were/are looking for?
1458  Other / Meta / Re: Community generated suggestions to improve the forum (+ eventual voting on them) on: August 14, 2018, 01:29:15 PM
I can't find the thread anymore, but one user suggested to remove to ability of (low-ranked) members to make locked threads in the marketplace section.
I think this would go a long way to prevent the autobuy scams that a lot of Jr/Newbie members are pulling off.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1353400.0

Animated avatars would be a nightmare, If they are introduced, then please provide a method to disable them.

Aren't these already a thing? See bill's profile, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=370611
1459  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Digital advertising- Solution to Ad fraud on: August 14, 2018, 01:15:26 PM
It makes you think that blockchain, If it can be used anywhere, can be injected in such an analytical field like digital advertising?
There are lots of bugs and bots out there to cheat the whole system and make money side by side for the publishers. It can only stop duplicate amount of fraud clicks/impressions, but cannot be that sufficient to remove those bugs or stop bots from looting the advertising media as blockchain is not what you've mentioned it for.

Yeah, Copy-pasting Stedsm's post really makes you think huh.

Any thing can run on blockchain

Just because everything can be run on a blockchain (note: blockchain is just a data structure; a form of arranging data) it does not mean that everything should run on a blockchain.

Many people seem to misunderstand the real purpose of a blockchain. If you just want to add 'blockchain' as a tag for something, you are not making it better in any way.
The problems you are trying to fix can not be fixed by the use of a blockchain.

But.. feel free to outline. How would you fight ad fraud with 'a blockchain' ?

I haven't said that's what I am doing yet, but you can't say it can't be done.
Third party involvement in the negotiating process have left a loophole in the heart of digital advertising sphere.

A proper smart contract to create an enabling environment for digital advertisers and publishers is underway

I almost puked from reading this, seriously. The amount of useless buzzwords without any real meaning behind them is staggering.

What good would a smart contract be when detecting if a page visitor is a bot/real person? I don't see any usecase AT all tbh.

Or am i missing something here? Are you simply looking to cut out the middleman (Which would be google if you use their platform), which is something that i think the brave browser is trying, but this really doesn't have that much to do with "ad-fraud"
1460  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Digital advertising- Solution to Ad fraud on: August 14, 2018, 10:17:27 AM
How to stop Ad fraud and other loopholes created by third party involvement in digital advertising.

To me best solution remains blockchain which is obviously a great innovation.  

What are your suggestions?

Don't use shitty advertising sites to promote your products. TE sites & bot clicks aren't that hard to detect. (See Google advertising et al)


I think blockchain usage here is really far-fetched and i don't exactly see how this would fix the fake traffic, but instead would be just used as a buzzword by a shitty company to do another ICO.

Would you care to explain why you think "blockchain" usage is the great solution? What exactly is that going to fix?
Pages: « 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 ... 179 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!