Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 03:18:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 [71] 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 ... 179 »
1401  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Understanding Bitcoin Fork on: September 01, 2018, 01:24:10 PM
What exactly is a fork when it comes to bitcoin? Will other coins also Fork? Will Bitcoin continue to Fork later on down the line?
-snip-

This is a very clear answer! But it raises the following question: who are those developers (location, how many, etc.)? Who pays them? From your answer it seems like they can award coins by their will.

They can, and there are several forks who basically pre-mined their own fork to then sell those coins for a profit. Pretty shady if you ask me.

One of the larger forks that did this was Bitcoin Gold.
They explained it themselves here, https://bitcoingold.org/premine-endowment/

Quote
Our premine accumulation of 100,000 coins was about 0.6% of the total number of outstanding coins (which was about 16.6 million Bitcoin Gold coins after the premine), so it’s a tiny fraction – and is even tinier compared to true pre-mines. The rest of the Bitcoin Gold (BTG) coins are in the hands of whoever held the corresponding Bitcoin wallets before the fork – which includes many thousands of individuals and organizations all around the world.

I believe that there also was another fork that credited themselves with all coins that satoshi is said to have mined, but i can't remember which one that was from the top of my head.
1402  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: BTC Buffet captcha login error on: September 01, 2018, 12:19:48 PM
If you're referring to this site btcbuffet.com, I don't know if they have any representative or support here, why don't you try to contact them via their contact page? They're the only one who can help you anyway. And seriously its cloud mining/ponzi site lmao. If you can't login probably there's a high chance that they are running now.

Their contact page also has a captcha that isn't working. Contacting their support is ironically impossible.

I already tried to contact them. But there is the same problem with the captcha. I only know, that it is a very young provider. Maybe they have to fight with technical issues. I will try to login again later. I asked here, because I found no news on google search. But thank you for your fast reply.

I think it is more plausible that they simply exit scammed their "investors" as it is obviously a ponzi scheme.

The site looks like a copy of https://adbtc.com, but they added a nice MLM flavour to it, essentially making it a ponzi scheme. A lot of google search results that turn up when googling this domain call it "legit", but i sincerely doubt that when you have a catchphrase of "The Magic will happen" and no explanation where you pay the refferal earnings from.

If i may ask, how much did you invest into this site?
1403  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: mistake request adress on: September 01, 2018, 10:34:13 AM
Hi adolfinwolf
i thanks from you for your answer
this is my transaction url
https://blockchain.info/tx/8efdc04d51d8c67c56cbc7f0e2acc8de58237f33f5ff5f010a578e96243c86aa
transaction confirmed
but the bitcoin not recieve in my wallet
i have a question
how to understand a adrees belong to my wallet or no ?
please help me
thanks very much


The transaction link you provided really is pretty useless w/out more information.

This is what walletexplorer.com returns, https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/378d7e436d0d228d

It seems that some of your coins have ended up here? https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0003f70860fa7922 Which looks like some kind of exchange.
Quote
i have a question
how to understand a adrees belong to my wallet or no ?

Generally speaking an adress belongs to you/your wallet when you have the corresponding private keys for it.
What wallet are you using? Most non-web wallets will show you whether or not an adress belongs to you (Bitcoin core, electrum) with some simple commands.

I'm 80% sure that this is another case of "Bitcoin Generator Scams" that usually appears on faucets and malicious sites.
-snip-

Yep, i'm pretty sure he got scammed one way or another.
1404  Other / Meta / Re: haw upload GIF on bitcointalk? on: September 01, 2018, 09:25:54 AM
I think this is impossible. not 100% sure though....


https://gph.is/1g7unR9

It's not impossible, but you can't do it as a newbie without the copper membership.  (This is done to prevent abuse. You also can't post normal images as a newbie.)
There should be no issue for Jr members to do so though..

If you still feel the need to have access to posting images/gifs as a newbie, read more about the copper membership here, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2385104.msg24371150#msg24371150 which grants you these abilities among some other stuff.
1405  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: mistake request adress on: September 01, 2018, 08:47:11 AM
Hi users bit talk
i buy 0.005 bitcoins from selling site
i ween 0.5 bitcoins from bitcoin.org and i must paid fee of transaction for give cash rize
so bitcoins are sent to it .and big mistake ....
i given the adress of bitcoin  that provides by bitcoin.org
please help me
how i can telling with bitcoin.org support?
thnks

Let me break this down in some clearer english;

You bought 0.005 BTC from a site such as coinbase. -- Right?

You then "won" 0.5BTC from "bitcoin.org" and you have to pay a fee to claim your prize -- Right?

You then send the 0.005 BTC to the adress specified by the user who told you you had won 0.5BTC, as a fee to claim the 0.5BTC -- Correct?

This sounds to me like you got phished/scammed. https://bitcoin.org/ doesn't give away bitcoin. If you have already sent the bitcoin (0.005BTC) to an adress you don't own, it is presumably lost. Chances of recovering it are almost nihil.

Also, bitcoin.org in itself isn't a wallet. I can't really wrap my head around how you got on such a site in the first place. Mind PMing me the exact domain so i can take a look?
1406  Economy / Services / Re: [FULL] ChipMixer Signature Campaign | 0.00075 BTC/post on: August 31, 2018, 09:24:08 PM
Can I joine?
Username: johan11
Post Count: 446
BTC Address: 16PVdM1yRrMda7YQHogmMM2RZkSFyUvZ5X

I will wear the signature once accepted. Thanks


Code:
BTC Address ([u]must be SegWit[/u]):

BTC Address: 16PVdM1yRrMda7YQHogmMM2RZkSFyUvZ5X
Roll Eyes

Besides that, your last 100 posts have been in the altcoin section, which is a board that Chipmixer does not pay for. I doubt you'll get in.
1407  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: [AUG 2018] Fees are low, use this opportunity to Consolidate your small inputs! on: August 31, 2018, 07:05:19 PM
-
Why it won't last forever  Cry ? 40 sat/byte that would be 0.6$/per transaction if I'm correct...Are we going to see transactions that cost 10$-50$ and barely gets confirmed again like last year  Undecided?

Because in the future the interest in bitcoin will either rise/fall, causing less/more transactions ( as there is a bigger userbase/(Or smaller, but obviously most of us don't think so.)) While the transaction capacity stays the same. = resulting in higher fees.
Quote
40 sat/byte that would be 0.6$/per transaction if I'm correct

The correlation between the sat/b and $ value of the transaction fee is entirely dependent on how "big" your transaction is.

Quote
Are we going to see transactions that cost 10$-50$ and barely gets confirmed again like last year

If bitcoin is going to become more widely adopted, and doesn't take "counter measures" against that (LN), then yes, there is a huge possibility fees will shoot through the roof again. Especially since the most bitcoin users have some sort of one-up mentality regarding fees, causing them to spiral extremely quickly.


More demand and the same "supply"(=transaction capacitity.)
1408  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Faucets profitable? on: August 30, 2018, 05:38:50 PM
Yes as a faucet owner faucet are still profitable but profits are low compare to 2017 but as a faucet worker faucets are nowadays not profitable that are time consuming and their payout is very low so I would suggest everyone who wants to earn through faucets never waste your time in that you can use those time in bounties this is just my suggestion.

What's your faucet? I'm quite curious.

What i've gleaned from this is that it can only really be profitable (and not that much) if you have a faucet website.

Whether or not faucets are profitable from a user perspective really boils down to how much your time is worth.


It may be profitable in Venezuela......since they only make a few usd per month because of hyperinflation.  For everyone else though, no its not worth it in the slightest.
Agree, this was viable business in years before. Still such new faucet can contribute to community in some cases like in very poor countries or people that want to just "test" bitcoin and see how it works.
Maybe you will be able to get great advertisements (for great $ to you). It only depend on your selling skills Smiley


I doubt that this "depends" on your selling skills, but rather how much convertable traffic you're getting and what your site looks and functions like. Just saying.

How to own them, are there any sources to learn about faucets like how popular you are?

Well, google should be your first step; https://www.google.com/search?q=how+to+create+a+faucet

There's dozens and dozens of guides and free templates out there that you'll be able to use. A complete newbie to programming could make one.

As to the metrics, most adnetworks either ask you for your google analytics, or your alexa ranking.

I'm a little bit out of date on the current meta, but i'm pretty sure faucethub.io is still pretty popular, you can see their most "popular" faucets here -> https://faucethub.io/faucets/BTC
1409  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Would there be a market/interest for such a service? on: August 30, 2018, 04:02:37 PM
I will definitely look further into this, and research a bit more on current regulations, as it is rather vague for me atm.

I use shapeshift specifically when I need an emergency conversion from one coin to another. I dont use it when I am trading coins. While trading I would prefer to sell them during the bull run for USDT and then hold the USDT till price of the coins drop and then use that same USDT to buy a bigger amount of the coin.

I have personally used both shapeshift and changelly and I never had any problems with them - even though there is an unresolved scam accusation against changelly here for which they received negative trust.

@AdolfinWolf,
I can suggest a few pointers for your idea:
1. A chart where I can view all trades and possible profit/loss of trading them. Though that seems more like something that a full time exchange would have.
2. A P2P marketplace as well for Fiat<>crypto based exchanges. Something that is lacking on many other platform but risky as well.

1. I have seen charts on other exchanges that kind of function like Shapeshift etc, and i feel like it really is a hit or miss. (eg, litebit.eu's implementation.) If implemented correctly it could indeed be a nice addition.

2. I personally am also missing an exchange where i would be able to simply cash out bitcoin -> paypal, (without using KYC), but i feel like there are probably a lot of AML laws that prohibit this very thing without KYC. So i really doubt that this is possible without the implementation of KYC, but who knows.

The market isn't much saturated to say, but the most popular are now established and with a good marketing done. But in the end, there is always a spot to make a new one. Its success will come from how you market the product what do you give different from the existing ones.

Just posting this two to give an idea how it can be done differently
https://evercoin.com
https://godex.io/

Evercoin.com isn't available yet? (At least not on desktop?)

Godex looks pretty good, except for the fact that they say they take .5% commision, but when you calculate what the actual price of BTC -> ETH is, it becomes obvious that they're adding another ~1-2% to that 0.5%. Am i missing something here?

Code:
You Get (Expected): 24.09929812 ETH
Expected exchange rate: 1 BTC ≈ 24.22743529 ETH
Fee included (0.5%): 0.12813717 ETH


Actual exchange rate as per Coinmarketcap ≈ 24,60085388 ETH

24,60085388 - 24.22743529  / 24.22743529  * 100 ≈ 1.6% ontop of the already existing 0.5% fee.

Seems like most other instant exchanges (Shapeshift) also do this. I guess it's either due to volatility/they want to make some more $. Interesting.
1410  Other / Meta / Re: New feature implementation @theymos on: August 29, 2018, 07:07:43 PM

We really should have an in-house IT team for the forum. Am I asking too much luxury?

Sure, I am also surprised this whole forum run on  "One sys admin".  When everyone in world is outsourcing its technical work and focusing on the core business/functional ideas , I somehow found this forum is on another approach.


...only problem is that he do not explain to us his reasoning or viewpoint.
Being an active admin and the only developer of the forum I can imagine how busy theymos is. Expecting an explanation from him will be a torture to him. I wonder how do he even find times to response in some of the topics.

Makes you wonder what he paid the 4 developers of Skrilage $100.000 a month for, for year(s) straight. https://archive.is/npFQF

It really seems like a lot of potential and money went down the drain here that could instead have been used to fix the current forum.



(Note that i am just an outstander looking in though, so correct me if i'm wrong. It just looks really bad.)

IIRC, Is this the github of epochtalk (Bitcointalk 2.0??), https://github.com/epochtalk/epochtalk/, and if it still is, is this still actively being used? It looks pretty dead..  Embarrassed
1411  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Need to idea for start bitcoin project with 20 BTC! on: August 29, 2018, 05:58:45 PM
hello, I have a project thats completely done and simple to manage and its for sale. https://adb.tc/ could be yours for 1.5 BTC. Lets discuss about the price. if you have questions you can anytime contact me here or at the contact form from adb.tc . also I will soon start a new project where you can also invest. Also I have a 2 Gambling Sites that are currently offline, however, you could buy both for 0.5 BTC and make them online again.

Let me your thoughts know. you would have enough money to start big advertising campaigns/promotion money after buying one of the sites. I really recommend to invest 75% of your 20 BTC in Advertising if you want get the sites popular! Grin

Just a side note -- buying existing projects from throwaway accounts will lead to nothing but you being scammed.  

Either you will never receive the project/code, the project will be half done, or the code/project is so horrible that it's just useless.
Ps PS. Your URL shortener is definitely NOT worth 1.5 BTC That script is used by almost every copy pasta URL shortener, and you have absolutely no traffic!
https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/adb.tc


Also, if you need to invest 75% of your equity into advertising, it is pretty clear to me that you're in an (over) saturated market. With 24 bitcoin you'll probably never be able to get a hold of your competitors. I doubt that it is even worth trying.

Hi

I have 24 BTC, i bought 7 btc about 5 years ago and raise up it with trade and primedice.
I want to start a BTC Project with 20 btc, if do you have an BTC idea project, please tell me.

We can corporate together for do it.
You must have expertise in the field of the project.

Thanks

Simply "co-operating" is just not going to work on  a forum where everyone is anonymous and basically has nothing to lose from scamming you. Personally i wouldn't work/hire (with) anyone that has offered to do so yet based on their word that they'll "Complete X project".
1412  Other / Meta / Re: "Trust" system is shit !!! "Trust me !!!" on: August 28, 2018, 03:25:55 PM
There are definitely flaws in the trust system, but if we had to do deals in order to leave trust, DT members wouldn't be able to tag shady members and those who are trying to scam.

By the way, who scammed you?  I'd be interested in seeing his profile.  I also got scammed by a green-trusted member, but I was asking for it since it was a loan I didn't ask for collateral for, and I kind of blindly assumed his green trust had more weight than it did.  With all the account sales going on, you never know who you're really dealing with or if their trust page means anything.

I disagree that mods should be the ones leaving all the trust--not that it's even an option.  It's been discussed and discarded before.

To be honest I have forgotten his profile as he scammed for even a small amount and I was quite surprised of how he could spoil his trust for such small amount . Do not worry, as far as I remember he was negative tagged later . If mods can verify your ID, or you want to upload your ID like LBTC then you could be tagged with "verified" mark . Your account might get hacked anytime who knows and your positive trust could be misused . The "hack" may even be not real . However, a verified can be contacted in case of "false hack" situation .

Adding KYC to this forum would really destroy purpose/ideology this forum was once build on.

Furthermore, the forum as of right now can barely recover hacked accounts that have signed messages that prove ownership.

I really wouldn't be so sure that this would drastically improve with KYC. I honestly only see downsides. People hacking my/other accounts and misusing their name/doxxing them, extorting them, the forum's database could could get hacked, the list goes on and on.
1413  Other / Meta / Re: "Trust" system is shit !!! "Trust me !!!" on: August 28, 2018, 03:13:10 PM

Few months back I had traded with a positive trust guy and he turned out to be a scammer . Now the question is Does this forum's "trust" system really offers what it seems to ? To be honest I would say that owners of this forum are not doing good job .
I'd agree that the trust system could potentially be abused rather easily. I know instances where people indeed were able to simply buy DT1/DT2 trust for a couple bucks.
(See the email service of TBZ as a prime example of that.)

But, i don't see any other system that could work, and i think that this system is pretty self-evolving, (In the last couple of months, i have yet to see any (imo) unjustified positive feedback.)

Accrding to me , Trust should only be handles by moderator of any particular section .

Totally disagree. Moderators already have a hefty workload, and they shouldn't be the ones to judge, for obvious reasons.

Trust should be strictly limited to trading and the negative rating should only show up when a scam has been done . A warning will be enough rather than shitty negative look which spoils your profile .
Disagree. You want to give ponzi promoters a pass? Or the people that are promoting autobuy links?

The system in most cases becomes rather useless if we have to wait until the ""crime/scam" has already happend.

1414  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: rent power hashing / how???? on: August 28, 2018, 01:12:05 PM
I personally suspect a lot of cloud mining sites/sites where you can rent hash power are used by money launderers to (obviously) launder money.

If so, running a profit wouldn't be a necessity (receiving/generating clean money would).

[I think we are also going to need to have a KYC procedure. I don’t know 100 percent, but I think considering what’s happening, we will one day need to know every customer who is giving us money and getting cryptocurrency from their mining […] to make sure that there is no money laundering involved.
1415  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Question about swapping tokens on: August 26, 2018, 01:01:15 PM
sup bitcointalk. Have a question about swapping. I have situation like this: i've deployed token in ethereum network and for example some people bought it through ICO smart-contract  aaaand for example now i have to swap their tokens - with the same rate, same name, same supply but let's say with different functions in token's contract. Any materials that can help me understand how does i do it?  Huh

You mean something like this?

https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/30996/how-to-receive-swap-tokens-on-a-new-solidity-contract

The scenario here though is that the user needs to swap their tokens manually. Not sure if that's something you want.

1416  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Thoughts on StartMiner on: August 26, 2018, 10:20:05 AM
Nope, there are a lot of this site if I remember correctly bitminer looks likes this as well, same designs but different color scheme, same profit calculator, same owner probably so how can you trust this site, it will just eat up your funds there so just stay away from them.

Yup. https://bitminer.io looks exactly the same as https://startminer.com, which indeed makes it clear that this is either a template, or owned by the same people.

If you simply google bitminer.io, it becomes pretty clear that they are a scam. There's several threads on the forum about them, see

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1789851.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1580717.0

Startminer.com has the exact same business model as bitminer, which means that they'll stop paying sooner or later, just like bitminer.

(Although it seems like they've already not been paying for a long time/selectively scamming customers, see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1870027.new)
1417  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin Core Multi-wallet HTTP RPC request problem in v16 on: August 25, 2018, 03:01:18 PM
The README.md of https://github.com/aceat64/EasyBitcoin-PHP states the following;


Code:
$bitcoin = new Bitcoin('username','password','localhost','8332');

I don't really understand why you included the /wallet.dat/, changed the '' into "", and put both the IP and port in one syntax. I'm not an expert, but that might be wrong.

Try changing

Code:
$bitcoin = new Bitcoin("userhidden","passhiddden", '127.0.0.1:8332/wallet/wallet1.dat/');

To

Code:
$bitcoin = new Bitcoin('userhidden','passhidden','127.0.0.1','8332');

And see if that changes anything.

1418  Bitcoin / Project Development / Would there be a market/interest for such a service? on: August 25, 2018, 01:04:51 PM
I'm thinking (Or rather fantasizing Roll Eyes) of creating a service where you could exchange bitcoin -> most altcoins & vice versa. Now i know that this market is very saturated, (Shapeshift.io & Changelly.com)

But i think that there is still a place for such a service, where there is more attention to lower fees, more accepted/tradeable coins, and more privacy/anonimity.

I was wondering what the community here thinks about the currently already existing instant exchanges such as Shapeshift & Changelly. If you use them, are you content with them? Are there things you wish that were different about them/are you missing features when using them?

I'm really just testing the waters here, i'd love to hear your opinions.
1419  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Can you put wrong information in Blockchain? on: August 24, 2018, 02:38:28 PM
As I understand, one good analogy to explain Blockchain Technology is to think it just like a document wherein everyone can edit the file real-time and everyone can check the updated file (kindly correct me if my understanding is wrong).

I just want to ask, can someone provide a wrong input in the Blockchain?  What will happen if someone wants to input an error in the blockchain?  What are the counter measures?


Well, there are certain "network" rules. I think you are referring to mining here, right?

If a miner tries to bypass these rules, say he tries to add a transaction in his block that isn't signed correctly, the nodes will simply reject his block, making all of his work invalid.

( Which would cost him a lot of money, hence why it doesn't really happen).

Most of these rules can be found here, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Protocol_rules
1420  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Orphan Blocks on: August 24, 2018, 12:36:19 PM
what are orphan blocks in proof of stake coins? and why they are created any particular reason?

I've read about this a little bit, and from what i can find, they're the exact same as with PoW coins.


It is explained a bit more/better here, https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/8172/what-happens-if-two-miners-mine-the-next-block-at-the-same-time

Yes, it is possible, and you can actually follow "orphaned blocks" here: https://blockchain.info/orphaned-blocks

Bitcoin clients always trust the longest chain, so if two blocks is mined on the same time, it's up to (51% of) the miners to decide which is going to be 'accepted' and which is going to be worthless.

This is one of the reasons why you shouldn't trust only a few confirms, as the confirms could be a orphaned blockchain. After "enough" confirms, everyone will mine on the "correct" blockchain, because any work(mining) on a orphaned blockchain is waste of power (unless your trying to perform a 51% attack).

Note that they're using the POW (bitcoin) perspective here, although that doesn't really matter.

The definition as per blockchain.com,

Detached or Orphaned blocks are valid blocks which are not part of the main chain. They can occur naturally when two miners produce blocks at similar times or they can be caused by an attacker (with enough hashing power) attempting to reverse transactions.
Pages: « 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 [71] 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 ... 179 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!