Again, so much proofs and factual argumentation. That's for sure, my leftist brain can't handle this! Such an unbiased and logical reasonning is beautiful. You're funny ^^ 10 lines without a single fact, just you explaining how marxism is horrible. Great. Hmm... It's not because you manage to have see anti marxism in 1984 that I haven't read it. While it's clearly not the subject of the book, you whose to project your own ideas on it. But don't worry you do that a lot, not just on books. Curious George is a famous kid's book in USA? Never heard of that but I loved "Oui-Oui" when I was very young  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1OTjCPoVOUJust because you wave your magic comtard wand and pretend I presented no valid logical arguments does not make it a fact. I guess it is just a convenient side effect that you don't have to actually respond to any of those arguments right? I don't know why you are bringing up 1984, but Eric Arthur Blair also wrote a book called "Animal Farm" which was entirely a critique of Communism so, it makes sense some of the same themes would be in 1984. We all know you love Oui-Oui, no need to shout about it from the mountain tops. |
|
|
|
Marxism is not limited to economic theory, but you already know this because you are so informed about the ideology you espouse right? This whole "trans movement" is DIRECTLY out of The Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. Every time I ever talk to actual transexual people they tell me how much they HATE this horse shit because they just want to be left alone and live normal lives like everyone else, but people like you turn them into tools to achieve their own political goals at THEIR expense, because THEY suffer the push back. Psychological problems can be treated. Chemical castration, or EVEN JUST DELAYING puberty results in PERMANENT CHANGES to a child's body which they will NEVER BE ABLE TO CHANGE regardless of what they decide later in life. You talk about male fragility, but how much do you think women would be ABSOLUTELY LOSING THEIR SHIT if this was done to little girls and men just wrote them off as being too fragile? You cite studies about psychological issues and suicide among trans teens, which I don't doubt. The problem however comes with your baseless conclusion that their issues result ONLY from bullying and abuse while TOTALLY IGNORING and even actively hiding the fact that gender dysphoria is often a result of PHYSIOLOGICAL HORMONAL IMBALANCE which can be treated with very high rates of success. Who knew hormonal imbalances can lead to severe psychological issues like depression and suicide right? Meanwhile those that transition show very high rates of suicide and mental problems which you immediately attribute to society victimizing these people because it doesn't serve your political narrative to discuss other alternatives. This is where the Marxism, Critical Theory, and victim culture comes into play. Who is the real monster here? People objecting about the state sponsored mutilation of children, or psychopaths like you lying to these people and preventing them from getting treatment which might actually help them live happy satisfied lives? Ahahahah xD In the mind of TECSHARE: get.eventthathappened
if eventthathappened = obviously good
then praise capitalism and individual freedom
else if eventhathappened = obviously bad
then blame marxism
else ignore Of course, transpeople are just tools of Marxism. You saw right through the lies, we, the Global Marxist Organization, are manipulating LGBT movement in order to bring havoc to the society so we can create a Marxist society from the ashes of capitalism MOUHAHAHAHAHAHAHALet me know when you can find a couple brain cells to rub together to form a logical argument, as opposed to making quick lazy statements that you think make you look clever. |
|
|
|
You know, since I've came to realization that you're just dumb I'm really having fun discussing with you  People like you don't want me in their discussions because I don't let you get away with your easy mindless platitudes and challenge you to provide actual empirical data or logic to support your assertions, which of course you are nearly incapable of.
Marxism is based upon victim status. The proletariat and the oppressed masses which need to create a revolution to overthrow the bourgeoisie yadda yadda.
I don't even have to really talk to you, just putting your own words close together make it funny ^^ Dumb people often think they are smarter than they are, but your logical arguments are so water tight, clearly that is me right? P.S. you aren't having a discussion, you are talking at me not with me. |
|
|
|
Marx himself defined Communism/Socialism as the antithesis which requires the thesis of Capitalism to be created.
"What we have to deal with here is a communist society, not as it has developed on its own foundations, but on the contrary, just as it emerges from capitalist society: which is thus in every respect still stamped with the birthmarks of the old society from whose womb it emerges." -Karl MarxI hope that by just putting your own contradictions next to eachother without me adding anything you might see that the problem is you I know you sound really clever in your own mind, but that's not what everyone else sees. If you need more documentation on Marx's use of the Hegelian Dialectic as the basis for his theories I am happy to provide it. Furthermore one of those is my statement, and one is a quote from Karl Marx, so even IF the two quotes were exclusive (they are not) it still would not be "my own contradiction" because one is a statement made by another person. Get a treadmill fat man, your mind is flabby and out of shape. |
|
|
|
You conveniently skipped over the part where he tried to flee and they chased him before he turned to defend himself. If some one is physically attacking some one they have a right to defend themselves, yes. I am glad you don't care to visit, we are already have too many brain dead commies born and raised here thanks.
You mean the part where they "pursued him" without harming him in any way? Oh I'm very sorry I skipped this part. It changes everything. So if you follow me I have the right to cut your hand? Great justice idea you have. You're crazy. Completely crazy. The guy haven't been attacked stop saying that, they haven't hit him, they have merely... Annoyed him. Attack means use of physical aggression, here they did nothing more but... Harassed him. It happens every day at every bar you go. You don't defend yourself from "being chased". The guy insulted them then they harass him, if you want to legalize the use of deadly weapon here, you're going to get a crazy city. Crazy asshole. What is some one on the street who was just assaulted by one or more people he does not know and then chased supposed to assume, that they just wanted to have a little chat with him? He was assaulted, he tried to get away from the assailant(s), they chased him. Self defense is perfectly justified. He was in fact physically assaulted, hitting someones head to knock of his hat is assault, this is where the criminal activity began. This is an illegal form of physical aggression unless you are insinuating they yelled loud enough to make his hat fly off. I have no problem with him being charged with having the sword, but by no means should he be charged for defending himself from assault. |
|
|
|
The above practice is analogous to the government refusing to impose modest regulations on the actions of an oligopoly, which results in the oligopoly imposing many restrictions on what citizens can and cannot do, and acting unfairly in the process. It is nearly impossible to rid the oligopoly of its power, due in large part to high barriers to entry. While on the other hand, if the government were to impose modest regulations unfairly, voters could vote the government out of power.
It's not like that at all. What you're proposing would put all decisions into the hands of one individual - theymos, and that doesn't seem to be something he wants. Nor is he elected in any way so if the community doesn't like his decisions - SOL. On the other hand, the current system is based on voting and the community has a lot of influence on how DT is formed. Perhaps you'd have more success if you actually exposed the "massive regulation by a select few who are accountable to no one" using facts and not some cockamamie theories. Simple math shows that this mythical group would need more than "few" of the ~80 DT1 members to have any sort of control. I would refer you to this thread. There are many people who agree lauda should not be on DT (if you don't believe me, look at the below list of the 1st 75 people who have excluded lauda), and the person behind the thread did not come anywhere close to achieving its stated goal despite stacking the deck in its favor by using 5 alts to boost its goal. Despite being involved in an extortion scheme, and multiple other controversies, he has successfully excluded everyone that has left him negative trust. The same is true for others with high trust scores who selectively scam people. Notice how almost everyone who excludes Lauda is also excluded from the default trust list? I am sure this is just a coincidence... |
|
|
|
These aren't issues exclusively for the left, but they are however FAR more prevalent on the left, as for example Marxism utilizes them directly as tools to fuel its growth.
Ah of course. Your numerous proofs really made a point. Look at all those proofs showing leftists are more likely to be affected by mental problems and diseases. It's clearly not based only on your bias. This logic and those facts are really revealing thank you TECSHARE. Brought to you by the guy who says psychology is barely science
Funny how he can at one time call you "way over your head" for this statement and in a second time explain us how dumb we are to believe psychology can be called a science... When you actually take time to read him it's a bit sad, he can say A then non-A in two consecutive posts, still calling you a dumbass leftist for not understanding something as simple. ....I am absolutely bias against the left, that however doesn't mean I am wrong.
Big words hurt small Left brain. why hurt small tender left brain? Hmm... Big words are unlikely to hurt anyone who took the time to read das kapital considering how insanely difficult it is to read. But I guess you have the best words that's for sure! http://www.washingtonpost.com/video/trump-i-have-the-best-words/2017/04/05/53a9ae4a-19fd-11e7-8598-9a99da559f9e_video.htmlMarxism is based upon victim status. The proletariat and the oppressed masses which need to create a revolution to overthrow the bourgeoisie yadda yadda. It is a collectivized form of malignant narcissism. It is a simple formula. Either find or create victims, point at a target group and condition them to believe that target group is responsible for their victim status, justify victimizing them in the name of equality, create more victims as a result, rinse and repeat. As I clarified in the quote, Marxism is based upon victim culture, and it is their modus operandi to use the mentally ill in addition to exacerbating their symptoms to serve their political goals at their expense. That is how Marxism is so great at spreading, it acts like a virus. It takes weak and or mentally ill people, teaches them that group XYZ is responsible for their victim status, and further subjects them to more suffering, which they can then use to further blame their target group. People on the left are unwilling to sit down and have a discussion because they know deep down at some subconscious level that their arguments can not withstand scrutiny, so they need to censor and shut down any criticism by deeming it "politically incorrect" or "hate speech". Political correctness was literally created from Communist ideology and used to justify censoring, isolating, attacking, imprisoning, and then later rounding up and killing political dissidents. The left literally uses mental illness as fuel for their goals. BTW, stop lying about the books you have read, you have already been busted being full of shit about this a couple times. With the level of "debate" you offer here I doubt you have read anything more dense than Curious George At The May Day Parade.  |
|
|
|
EVEN JUST DELAYING puberty results in PERMANENT CHANGES to a child's body which they will NEVER BE ABLE TO CHANGE regardless of what they decide later in life.
Probably, but it may still be the best option for minimizing harm/risk. If the child strongly, actively wants sex reassignment even after people try to reason them out of it, I don't think that it'd be right to outright prohibit them from pursuing it, and delaying puberty is a way to give them time to mentally mature and consider it before anything too irreversible happens. (This particular case is different because the child's desire is in dispute.) You cite studies about psychological issues and suicide among trans teens, which I don't doubt. The problem however comes with your baseless conclusion that their issues result ONLY from bullying and abuse while TOTALLY IGNORING and even actively hiding the fact that gender dysphoria is often a result of PHYSIOLOGICAL HORMONAL IMBALANCE which can be treated with very high rates of success. Who knew hormonal imbalances can lead to severe psychological issues like depression and suicide right? Meanwhile those that transition show very high rates of suicide and mental problems which you immediately attribute to society victimizing these people because it doesn't serve your political narrative.
This is a good point. If someone is experiencing depression due to physiological issues, then this should be treated before doing anything drastic. And non-physiological depression is ~always an internal problem, not an external problem. If someone is utterly depressed about not being the "correct" gender, then this indicates an outlook on life which will probably cause them to be utterly depressed about not having the correct job, or not having the correct amount of money, or being unattractive, etc. Happiness comes primarily from within, not from without. I'm sure that some people are able to calmly examine reality and decide that they'd be better off after sex reassignment, without unrealistically thinking that this will solve all of their problems. And while I don't think that this is a great idea, it's not my decision to make, and in the end I'm happy that human technology can today sort of deliver on this desire. But some people who end up at this point may be desperately chasing happiness via external factors, which never works and in this case is likely to be particularly counterproductive. Why is it children can not buy booze, weed, or tobacco? Why can children not vote, go to war, or consent to sex? These laws exist because society realizes that CHILDREN ARE INCAPABLE OF CONSENTING to things that may have permanent destructive effects on their minds and bodies. Again, puberty blocking drugs HAVE PERMANENT EFFECTS on the body. If they didn't what would even be the point of using them? Furthermore there is absolutely NO WAY to tell if a child actually naturally has these tendencies or if they are being manipulated by an abusive parent, teacher, or social worker who sees them as a useful pawn to push their own ideologies at great permanent expense to the child. If adults choose to transition knowing full well that they have the option of hormonal therapy instead of Marxists trying to claim this therapy is some how bigoted, then I have no problem with this. Unfortunately this whole "trans movement" is nothing more than a political movement which does more to harm transsexuals than to help them, and there simply is NO EXCUSE for doing this to a minor, PERIOD. |
|
|
|
"Marxists are mentally challenged" Marxism necessarily requires victim status to operate, its primary form being mental illness by many other names. The thread which you are referring to included many sources. Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaah I'm very sorry, it seems you confuse sources and a dictionnary. That's sad. Your sources are just defining the mental illness. You're the one claiming that marxists suffer them. You understand the difference? But again here you claim that Marxism requires "victim status to operate" and that without anything else that your opinion. I don't think I've seen you state anything factual here. You bring your opinion, then you yell loudly at anyone criticizing it. That's your way of doing things.
"the 10 planks are enforced everywhere"
Never said that.
Memory problem my dear? I think you will have to admit the world has largely adopted these policies, even if they have a different name for it. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5125094.0That's the reason why people no longer want you in discussions. Not because you have a truth that they don't want to here. But because you're a lying asshole just vomitting his opinion. One of the defining characteristics of insane people is that they usually do not know they are mentally ill, and usually will even resist efforts by others to expose them to these concepts of self understanding. While it may not be obvious to you, these behaviors are obvious to anyone who doesn't dream about fondling Marx's boil covered balls every night. Marxism is based upon victim status. The proletariat and the oppressed masses which need to create a revolution to overthrow the bourgeoisie yadda yadda. It is a collectivized form of malignant narcissism. It is a simple formula. Either find or create victims, point at a target group and condition them to believe that target group is responsible for their victim status, justify victimizing them in the name of equality, create more victims as a result, rinse and repeat. I am looking at my quote there, I don't see "the 10 planks are enforced everywhere" anywhere within it. I did however say the world has already largely adopted most of the policies outlined in the 10 planks of Communism, which is true. I would be happy to debate any of those planks and their current application, specifically in the USA with you, but you felt the need to isolate your reply to the criticism of your precious failure of an ideology to another thread and refuse to address them here. People like you don't want me in their discussions because I don't let you get away with your easy mindless platitudes and challenge you to provide actual empirical data or logic to support your assertions, which of course you are nearly incapable of. I can see how this would be frustrating for you, but frankly I don't give a fuck if you like it. The fact is I regularly get private messages from people telling me they enjoy my contributions here, so I am afraid it is mostly just you and your comtard buddies that are upset by my words. Even if no one liked it I could care less. These are things you and others need to hear for the common good of humanity, and I enjoy the task. |
|
|
|
It appears to be baseless to you, because I know more about your own preferred ideology than you do. "What we have to deal with here is a communist society, not as it has developed on its own foundations, but on the contrary, just as it emerges from capitalist society: which is thus in every respect still stamped with the birthmarks of the old society from whose womb it emerges." -Karl MarxCommunism is based off of the Hegelian dialectic, which is summarized as THESIS + ANTITHESIS = SYNTHESIS, or in this specific example CAPITALISM + SOCIALISM/REVOLUTION = COMMUNISM Maybe you should learn a little bit more about the ideas you advocate for fat man. I don't know what to say. If you consider that this = Communism requires capitalism, there is nothing more to say. Thanks for reminding everyone why censorship is a necessity in a free country Way to skip over the Hegelian Dialectic part, and the fact that Marx himself defined Communism/Socialism as the antithesis which requires the thesis of Capitalism to be created. On second thought the formula is more accurately CAPITALISM + COMMUNISM = GLOBALISM THESIS + ANTITHESIS = SYNTHESIS PROBLEM + REACTION = SOLUTION In reality economic Communism is a failed model, and the only reason it can work is because it is parasitic upon the resources created under Capitalism. As resources get more and more scarce, those in power take more and more of the resources for themselves leaving even less incentive for the average worker to contribute. This continues until the system runs out of other people's money to spend, then it goes full totalitarian dictatorship with work camps and everything because there is no incentive for people to contribute to a black hole of a broken collective economic model as they do not personally benefit from it. |
|
|
|
I do not condone violence, but particularly in this case, the man attempted to first run but was then chased, and then eventually turned to fight off his attackers using a sword. As expected everyone is casting the man defending himself as the perpetrator and the attacker as the "victim". I am sure nothing bad will result of this continuation of denial of reality...
Someone "assaults" a stranger in the street by knocking off his hat. The "assaulted" person draws a samurai sword and cut the hand of the "assaulter". Seems pretty obvious who's at fault there. Remove the MAGA hat of the balance. If someone is pushing you around, do you have the right to draw a motherfucking sword and cut their hand? If yes your country is very strange and I wouldn't dare visit it. You conveniently skipped over the part where he tried to flee and they chased him before he turned to defend himself. If some one is physically attacking some one they have a right to defend themselves, yes. I am glad you don't care to visit, we are already have too many brain dead commies born and raised here thanks. He "just" flipped his hat off that's assault i guess i don't really know much about the american law, but retaliating with a samurai sword sounds flipping insane
why was he carrying a katana in the first place ?
Again, you conveniently skipped the part where he tried to flee but was chased down before he then decided to fight back. He was probably armed because of the almost daily occurrence of people being physically assaulted and harassed simply because they chose to wear a MAGA hat. Swords are not legal in California as far as I know, but that is besides the point. He was attacked and he defended himself, which other than the fact that he did so with a contraband sword was completely legal. The guy with the sword needs to see some jail time, he was clearly in the wrong.
Even if the side you put forward, which is a false narrative is to be taken as fact, which it shouldn't, if someone knocks another persons hat off, that doesn't justify the use of lethal force, which a cut with a sword definitely is.
The fact is that MAGA hat man, was a dangerous weirdo who probably came in with a sword hidden up his jacket looking for trouble, he was probably yelling homophobic slurs at people and some idiot fell for the trap.
That's how I see it without getting all the facts.
This is a false narrative. I'm glad that the sword guy at least didn't have a gun.
edit: Grammatical correction
As the person being attacked, how do you know all they want to do is knock off his hat? At what point in an assault does it become justifiable to defend yourself? They did chase him down after all. What is some one to expect after being chased down by multiple people, that they only want to talk? He may be a weirdo and may have been shouting homophobic slurs, but HE HAS EVERY RIGHT TO DO SO LEGALLY. Again, the sword was not legal to posses AFAIK by California law, but that is irrelevant. If he is charged with anything it should be for having the sword, not using it to defend himself from an attack. |
|
|
|
This has NOTHING to do with economic theory/marxism but has everything to do with the long term health of the child. I understand the idea of waiting until the child is older to make this permanent decision but by then it may be too late as the social stigma of being trans will already be engrained into the adolescent's mental health. The outlook is not good for a trans teen. Suicide rate his high, etc etc. Harrowing statistics from a study recently published by the American Academy of Pediatrics revealed alarming levels of attempted suicide among transgender youth -- with the highest rates among transgender boys and non-binary youth. The findings emphasize the urgency of building welcoming and safe communities for LGBTQ young people, particularly for transgender youth.
More than half of transgender male teens who participated in the survey reported attempting suicide in their lifetime, while 29.9 percent of transgender female teens said they attempted suicide. Among non-binary youth, 41.8 percent of respondents stated that they had attempted suicide at some point in their lives. Taking care of this now is the best option because on one hand the child is old enough to know she is a girl. Being trans is not just a "phase". We're talking about someone who has likely felt like a girl everyday for as long as she can remember. She isn't old enough to have been physically abused or lost will to live so there is still time left to save her from that trauma. Mothers want whats best for their children. It is fathers who often seek some sort of legacy affirmation through their sons. Male fragility is so rampant that you guys actually think this entire trend is aimed at emasculating you. Marxism is not limited to economic theory, but you already know this because you are so informed about the ideology you espouse right? This whole "trans movement" is DIRECTLY out of The Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. Every time I ever talk to actual transexual people they tell me how much they HATE this horse shit because they just want to be left alone and live normal lives like everyone else, but people like you turn them into tools to achieve their own political goals at THEIR expense, because THEY suffer the push back. Psychological problems can be treated. Chemical castration, or EVEN JUST DELAYING puberty results in PERMANENT CHANGES to a child's body which they will NEVER BE ABLE TO CHANGE regardless of what they decide later in life. You talk about male fragility, but how much do you think women would be ABSOLUTELY LOSING THEIR SHIT if this was done to little girls and men just wrote them off as being too fragile? You cite studies about psychological issues and suicide among trans teens, which I don't doubt. The problem however comes with your baseless conclusion that their issues result ONLY from bullying and abuse while TOTALLY IGNORING and even actively hiding the fact that gender dysphoria is often a result of PHYSIOLOGICAL HORMONAL IMBALANCE which can be treated with very high rates of success. Who knew hormonal imbalances can lead to severe psychological issues like depression and suicide right? Meanwhile those that transition show very high rates of suicide and mental problems which you immediately attribute to society victimizing these people because it doesn't serve your political narrative to discuss other alternatives. This is where the Marxism, Critical Theory, and victim culture comes into play. Who is the real monster here? People objecting about the state sponsored mutilation of children, or psychopaths like you lying to these people and preventing them from getting treatment which might actually help them live happy satisfied lives? |
|
|
|
FYI tecshare calls anything he thinks is bad "communism" and you should read his posts with his definition in mind. genocide=communism transgender=communism climate change=communism atheism=communism etc etc While your opinion is true that just because other Muslims are terrorists doesn't make all Muslims to be terrorists but we can't blame people from the trauma they're experiencing because of what other Muslims are doing. It is like putting one spoiled tomato in a a basket full of good tomatoes spoil them all. It is their Muslim brothers that are destroying the reputations of Muslims in general and causing hatred to the people.
This is absolutely a bigoted double standard. You are allowing a few muslims to destroy the reputation of islam but have not let the christian terrorists destroy the reputation of christianity. In my country, the USA, most terrorists are Christian yet people fear muslims because they are "foreign" and they don't get fair representation in the media. Our media only shows news stories from muslim countries when they are related to war or terror. Our TV shows and movies mostly cast muslims into terror-related roles. This has had a dehumanizing affect on muslims. TV will never tell the truth. I recommend you travel to some muslim countries and you will actually find them to be much more friendly and hospitable than western countries. Travel to Iran, Pakistan, and Indonesia. These are among the largest muslim countries in the world and the friendliest, most hospitable counties I have ever been but mentioning them strikes fear into the heart of most Americans. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWeWxl7ruGEThat's because the Hegelian dialectic, which Communism is based upon, can be applied to literally anything to subvert any goal, group, or cause using overt goals to serve ulterior motives. I know to simple people like you it sounds like I am just saying everything is Communism, but that is because you don't want to critically examine anything I present, so your brain finds easy ways to dismiss any information I put in front of you that challenges your belief system. Regarding the rest of your horse shit, you don't have any evidence to support your assertion that "most terrorists are Christian", this is just some shit simple minded trendy lefties like you like to run around telling each other to justify your own bigotry while you defend an ACTUAL supremacist political ideology in the name of fighting racism. Your lies literally cost people their lives. Nothing to worry though, it was just "neck wounds". Yet, he fails to see socialist and communist ideas in Christianity. The way I see it, Jesus character was the first socialist.
It is funny to see him draw is half-ass conclusions. He thinks disbelief in the supernatural is somehow related to the economic system,
and if you are on the left of the political spectrum, you are mentally ill.
The guy is a twit. Don't take him too seriously. Sorry, but Christianity is not based on Socialism or Communism regardless of your mental gymnastics to try to shoehorn that one in there. Communism is not only an economic system, but a political ideology as well. Communism seeks to crush all religion because it is antithetical to its goals, this doesn't mean if you are atheist you some how automatically support Communism. Of course you know this, but you desperately need to find a way to take pot shots at anyone who dares question your religion of atheism. Your behavior is indistinguishable from any other form of religious supremacy, but you are far too convinced of your own superiority to notice this. |
|
|
|
I agree I am an asshole, often quite purposely in fact. I never said no one else should use personal attacks against me. It is however important to note my personal attacks almost always include logic based criticism along with them, unlike you fat man. Keep running.
Ahahahahah xD Yeah of course, if you call bland statements based on absolutely nothing such as "the 10 planks are enforced everywhere" "Communisme can't exist without Capitalism" "Marxists are mentally challenged" "logic based criticism" It's just funny how you have a definition of what logic is for you, and another one for what logic is for others. "the 10 planks are enforced everywhere" Never said that. "Communisme can't exist without Capitalism" See reply in the other thread "Marxists are mentally challenged" Marxism necessarily requires victim status to operate, its primary form being mental illness by many other names. The thread which you are referring to included many sources. |
|
|
|
If you want a good laugh on Moglie, look up the "windows tax."
The French government would tax people according to how many windows their house had.
Yeah, you can clearly laugh on me about a 300 years old tax used in France (and in UK and Spain which means it was used in the 3 biggest powerhouses of Europe but let's forget that). The link between this tax and me is obvious. And it is funny. You see Communism REQUIRES Capitalism to operate, but Capitalism does not require Communism to operate, as a result Communism will always appear within Capitalist systems, not independently of them. Of course this makes convenient fodder for simple minded folk to create this weird cognitive defect of binary choice which makes it easier to superficially make it appear their projections make sense.
Ah yes, this proof is mesmarazing. Communism requires capitalism to operate. Of course. Thank you for this logical explanation. I guess that's what you call "all the facts and logical arguments". Maybe, just maybe, that's just a suggestion coming from a mentally inefficient dumb ugly leftist, take 3 seconds to think about what you write? And how it has no factual bases, no proofs, no logical explanation and is a circular logic? But if it hurts your brain don't think too much, just continue to say something as bold and baseless as "Communism REQUIRES Capitalism to operate" without any study, any source, any fact backing such incredible statement and call me an idiot for not being able to deal with all that logic and arguments xD It appears to be baseless to you, because I know more about your own preferred ideology than you do. "What we have to deal with here is a communist society, not as it has developed on its own foundations, but on the contrary, just as it emerges from capitalist society: which is thus in every respect still stamped with the birthmarks of the old society from whose womb it emerges." -Karl MarxCommunism is based off of the Hegelian dialectic, which is summarized as THESIS + ANTITHESIS = SYNTHESIS, or in this specific example CAPITALISM + SOCIALISM/REVOLUTION = COMMUNISM Maybe you should learn a little bit more about the ideas you advocate for fat man. |
|
|
|
Way to prove you aren't suffering from cognitive dissonance Flying Hellfish.
Have you EVER considered that if numerous people say your an asshole who can't debate with anyone as your double standards allow you to use personnal attacks, baseless statements and off topic and unrelated arguments, it might be because it's true and not because the whole world is united against you in a giant Marxist conspiracy? I agree I am an asshole, often quite purposely in fact. I never said no one else should use personal attacks against me. It is however important to note my personal attacks almost always include logic based criticism along with them, unlike you fat man. Keep running. |
|
|
|
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. ...
Plus I don't even understand the hatred for Trump. It has been more than 2 years now, I personally do not live there but people that live there, does anyone feel any difference? I'm sure 95% of people are still living in the same way as before, perhaps a good amount of them in better conditions, I see the statistics and I don't see much wrong, obviously not perfect, Trump does say a lot of shit but overall everything seems totally fine.
Yes, the hatred is a sort of fake, artificial whipped up hatred. People here are better off under Trump. And he has not started any wars.... At this point it is far more than that. It is a form of trauma based mind control that relies on cognitive dissonance and media based fear and hysteria. The people who have been duped by this lie subconsciously know they can not handle the pain and stress of having to not only admit they were fooled, but then having to reorganize their entire belief system to make room for this reality. Instead, feeling they have "gone to far to turn back", they continue on this path of ever increasing collective hysteria, and at a certain point society itself will not accept them back even if they manage to cope with their own internal conflict. They subconsciously know this and get ever more extreme and erratic as their ability to lie to themselves is continually eroded, this in a last ditch panic effort to regain control. Like a cornered rabid animal they will lash out, because they perceive the message itself as being the cause of this discord. Way to prove you aren't suffering from cognitive dissonance Flying Hellfish. |
|
|
|
What have I been saying over and over people? It has become acceptable practice for deranged leftists to attack people for wearing a MAGA hat, and I said it was only a matter of time before there is serious retaliation resulting in bloodshed. How much longer will this kind of behavior be tolerated before some one is shot? What do you think the reaction in retaliation will be after that? I can already hear the cries now "oh but he just knocked off his hat!". The fact is if some one on the street jumps at you and assaults you, you first of all do not know their intent, nor do you know how far they are willing to go with that violent act. Even if they were just knocking his hat off it is STILL ASSAULT, and no one has a right to do this to others regardless of how upset they are. When you are assaulting people on the street, you do not then get to cry about the level of force used. I do not condone violence, but particularly in this case, the man attempted to first run but was then chased, and then eventually turned to fight off his attackers using a sword. As expected everyone is casting the man defending himself as the perpetrator and the attacker as the "victim". I am sure nothing bad will result of this continuation of denial of reality... https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-09/he-was-just-gushing-blood-man-maga-hat-retaliates-against-hat-flipper-using-samurai |
|
|
|
The existence of a competing centralized service is a "watershed event for decentralized social media"? Dlive, like most of this garbage, is a centralized company which has brainlessly shoe-horned "blockchain" into what they're doing. Their infrastructure is centralized, they have rules which among other things prohibit "hate speech", and their lino coin is 100% centralized in both operation and distribution. A proper decentralized social network or streaming site is possible, but it should either not have any blockchain stuff at all, or this should be a sort of side feature. It'd look like Freenet or I2P, not like Bitcoin. You are absolutely right. However if the data itself is in fact immutable on the blockchain (I have no idea) there is nothing stopping people from retrieving it themselves. A lot of these arguments could be validly made for Steemit, but it still is much more resistant to censorship regardless, and there are alternatives to their centralized platform. Their "coin" is very much totally centralized, but seeing as they pay out directly in Bitcoin as well as Paypal, this is still a huge step in the right direction. All of these arguments aside, this is going to introduce millions of new users to blockchain based social media which is still a very big win. |
|
|
|
He might have been Christian. He might be a Buddhist bisexual philatelist circus clown too, that doesn't mean there is any evidence he is one though. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
: -
