The past week there is a tree out in the alley blowing these white seeds at me, I have no clue what kind of tree it is, but I been eating them and I think they taste great and no one even knows about this food source, it is making millions of these white flower seeds.
... do you know what they are? I saw a squirrel eating them so I figured they be safe I ate them for over a week now. I think I am going to grow these on my farm. They taste great and the tree (there is 3 of this tree around here and they are massive) is making millions of them. Sad the farmer has to ask wtf this tree is lol. There is a seed in the middle of each flower. It would be easier to identify from the tree, though those seed pods do look familiar.They are Elm seeds. Yes they are apparently edible. |
|
|
|
altcoins? woodcollector? emotional outbursts and incomplete truth in the red trust department? gosh that guy really has made good progress since those heady days.
...
aww it was just getting interesting, but you're right of course.
I can tell by his one post here roach is far more intelligent than any of you posting here. Thanks for proving to me keeping you excluded is the right choice. You can't handle anyone disagreeing with you without making it into a personal attack. BTW, anyone who knows those users, knows them to be mentally ill, a fake charity con man, a thief, a sock puppet shill account, and a mobbing trust abuser in that order. Remind me, when did this become a thread about me? Oh right, when you ran out of logical arguments to defend your flag abuse. Good to point out r0ach as an highly intelligent person, I can also see that with his approach towards BTC, we can all see how smart he is, selling at 3-digit etc He also always use his intelligence to FUD BTC continuously at the WO-thread what works fine as well cause everybody believes every worth of him  Then again recently V8 is proven wrong by HM on actual happening sh*t and he deal with it as a gentlemen as he always does.... I truly can't say much wrong about V8 and have co-posted with him for 2 years or something, as he also helped me out when I was a very very fresh newbie on the thread... So TEC imo you're wrong here with your assumptions towards other members.... I also don't know you very very well and i'm not gonna argue over what I think know from you cause thats still not enough, but its strange to me that you can't agree a soft-warning-FLAG is an appropriate FLAG for r0ach.... maybe as with the FLAG someone could at a neutral feedback in his trust with read careful as he might post outrageous stuff and always try to talk bad over BTC while his assumptions are not proven or grounded by anything... Just because he didn't maximize his profits with crypto doesn't make him dumb. He has a point, have you considered he maybe sold his coin as a principled stance? Because the trust system is not for punishing ideas you don't agree with. Period. "Last of the V8s alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with realr0ach is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions." |
|
|
|
To be fair, look how young those ducks are, we should at least give them a good life, not kill them in there teens, those ducks are not full grown yet.
That is like me picking cherries when they are still green.
are you kidding thats nothing, chicken males are being killed seconds after they have seen the light of life, we are doing in mass scale just that what in medieval times and in nature today happened trillions and more times as well I know it sucks, we must destroy to live, and if we don`t consume we destroy ourselves. I am not sure why it is this way but there must be a reason. Whether it is plant, fish or animal it is still life. The trees feel cold in the winter, I am sure they can feel. They drip sap to cure some wounds, get diseases. I know plants feel just as much as that cow or chicken. So there is no way around it other than greed. The greed to consume and take life from one and put into yourself. I have thought to myself many times if I should just stop eating. I don`t think that is the answer. I think the answer is to create more than I destroy. I think that is how you win the game of life. There is one thing we can eat, that does not kill, unfertilized eggs. We need to give chickens and ducks a way better life. If you don't like it there are 2 primary things you can do to change it. You can either stop eating meat, or you can raise your own animals, give them the life they deserve, and not pawn off the task of killing the animal to 3rd parties for profit. IMO, treating animals respectfully is important, but most people who are concerned about this topic I find overly fetishize it to the point of self traumatization. |
|
|
|
|
That's a cute little neutral rating you left for me. I find the people that most often reference the Dunning-Kruger effect ironically end up fitting the description far better than those they are attempting to characterize using it. Thanks for once again proving you don't know what the trust system is for and demonstrating how incapable you are of handling criticism.
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed certain users are trying to use locked topics and local rules to exclude certain users from arguing for or against certain flags in their flag threads. I assume some time in the future we will have a flag thread child board to keep them all together in one area, at that time could perhaps self moderation and locking topics be disabled there?
I also believe that the local rules excluding certain users from flag threads are antithetical to their very purpose of them being a venue for users to argue for or against certain flag accusations. Can you please clarify publicly if you will not be enforcing local rules excluding certain users from posting in flag threads? Thank you.
|
|
|
|
altcoins? woodcollector? emotional outbursts and incomplete truth in the red trust department? gosh that guy really has made good progress since those heady days.
...
aww it was just getting interesting, but you're right of course.
I can tell by his one post here roach is far more intelligent than any of you posting here. Thanks for proving to me keeping you excluded is the right choice. You can't handle anyone disagreeing with you without making it into a personal attack. BTW, anyone who knows those users, knows them to be mentally ill, a fake charity con man, a thief, a sock puppet shill account, and a mobbing trust abuser in that order. Remind me, when did this become a thread about me? Oh right, when you ran out of logical arguments to defend your flag abuse. |
|
|
|
Both systems are capable of abuse. Only one of them is a failed model in its own right.
comunism is defined to be humanist and pro workers, its symbols hammer and sickle stand that those governments work towards workers interests. capitalism isnt, its simply capitalism, it could be anything, islamic european, american, russian and other capitalism. working towards the interest and social goals of anyone. communism only isn't providing if it is to weak to achieve its interests and is constantly forced to build weapons to defend itself. regards Communism superficially pretends to be humanist, in reality it is one of the least humanist systems to ever exist. The hammer and sickle are ancient symbols. The hammer represents building, creation, and Capitalism. The sickle represents harvest, destruction, and Communism. Communism from its very inception as a political movement was designed as controlled opposition to Capitalism by the banker class. They are rubbing it right in your faces with those symbols on the flag. Communism's job is to pick the bones clean after Capitalism builds a society up so that it can be harvested of resources and prepared as a clean slate to again introduce Capitalism into it for a new cycle. |
|
|
|
snip snap
I can't continue supplying you with this but fine... last time though!  You should use that cream for yourself instead of using flags to sooth what ails you. |
|
|
|
Nice, Last of the V8s from the Popescu cult who pretends to be the ruler and dictator of Bitcoin made a thread about me. Yes, we are all aware virtually nobody on the entire planet speaks in such a delusional, self-felatiating manner as the Popescu cult and it's members, but the fact is you are nobodies with no power over anything, and virtually none of the text material put out by the Popescu cult is even based in objective reality. It's grandiose jibberish from a textbook example of some type of narcissist insane asylum.
But while we're on the subject of objective vs subjective, here's a dose of objective reality for you that you're going to claim is subjective when it's not:
Only idiots support digital currency over physical metals. Why? Because governments can and have been forced to use metals as their unit of account, which acts as a governor on fiscal recklessness and tyranny. Is it even possible to force governments to use Bitcoin at all? No. Since digital shitcoins have no Schelling point, government will simply 'print' up their own digital shitcoin instead to maximize seigniorage fee they extract from their citizens slaves.
Due to digital shitcoins being entirely artificial, Keynesian constructs with no Schelling point, there is no way possible to stop government from doing this. Government cannot just 'print' up a new gold or silver, though. In the end, shilling for completely artificial, Keynesian, digital Ponzi tokens will accomplish absolutely nothing besides giving credence to the cashless society, government tracking and slavery token the state wants to create and impose on you. Casting a vote for any artificial, digital token is simply empowering the state.
Well, shit... I didn't know V8 was part of "the Popescu cult", but now that is out in the open it makes a lot of sense. That retard and his friends have been coming after me for years. Back on exclusion you go V8... |
|
|
|
|
What a bunch of fucking lunatics. They only have themselves to blame. These people should be in jail, or in a padded room. This is not military strategy, this is suicide strategy. The loons out front traumatizing themselves over the dead ducks in their arms is a nice touch too.
|
|
|
|
Could it be that monopoly of big companies isn't a good thing? That capitalism is indeed just dictatorship with more steps?
Yeah, take it from mOgliE, he gets his talking points from Rick & Morty. |
|
|
|
|
Once 5G is deployed, you will have no more privacy. You can be tracked 24/7, 365 with or without any handheld devices. They can not only track you, but literally tell what you have been eating, what drugs you have been taking, even identify you by your DNA, all without even touching you. 5G = the end of privacy anywhere within range of its antennas.
|
|
|
|
There are an infinite number of potential explanations, but lets just start with one. How about a combination of nature and nurture being the cause? Happy now? You were in fact using a false choice fallacy. OH NOES! DON'T REFUSE TO SUBSTANTIATE YOUR ARGUMENT! I don't know how I would cope if you don't bother supporting your own argument! Is this supposed to motivate me some how, you refusing to make your own points? Duuuuuuuuuumb. The conclusion of the studies might be discussed but not the facts described. And the facts described are enough to prove that environment > genetics. This is you making the argument of a conclusion in the nature vs nurture debate, you are just to ignorant to realize what your own arguments consist of. Speaking of reading, you can't even read and understand your own words. Please read the definition of nature vs nurture: "The nature versus nurture debate involves whether human behavior is determined by the environment, either prenatal or during a person's life, or by a person's genes. " It talks about individual behavior. I talk about social and economical status. In other terms, nature vs nurture is about how one acts, I'm talking about what one obtains after his actions. Hence your whole critics is based on an argument I never made. Please think about the difference between the two then come back. Lol, yeah ok... I just didn't get the detailed nuances of your arguments... it is certainly not the case that you made a half baked argument then forgot you made it 3 seconds later, pretended you didn't make it, and are now pretending you are just too deep for me to understand to cover up for your own self contradiction. Nah... BTW the distinction is irrelevant anyway. |
|
|
|
~
Arguing with you reminds of trying to argue with a militant feminist. There's no moving forward, there's no meet in the middle. You've made up your mind already even before you type out what it is you want to type out. It's sad, because sometimes I feel like you bring up valid points but then we turn the corner and you've done a 360 and act very militant. Ugh. That is interesting since I have been a vocal critic of militant feminists as anyone who is active in Politics & Society will attest. I think you are confusing persistence with inflexibility and lack of logic. You might want to consider for a moment as well that this is exactly what it would look like from a perspective of some one who is wrong but refuses to admit it for whatever reason... Hey I'm just giving you my view. I never venture into Politics & Society so I would not know what you post about there. You take it as you will, I wish we could have more productive conversations though, that's all. And I the same. I am sorry you feel this discussion is not productive. I feel as if it is very productive from my view point. I am forcing you to either explain your chain of logic or continue to dance around and find new distractions to avoid doing so. Either way we get to the core of your motivations by either working out the logic or demonstrating that you refuse to. |
|
|
|
~
Arguing with you reminds of trying to argue with a militant feminist. There's no moving forward, there's no meet in the middle. You've made up your mind already even before you type out what it is you want to type out. It's sad, because sometimes I feel like you bring up valid points but then we turn the corner and you've done a 360 and act very militant. Ugh. That is interesting since I have been a vocal critic of militant feminists as anyone who is active in Politics & Society will attest. I think you are confusing persistence with inflexibility and lack of logic. I absolutely am one of the most persistent people you will ever meet, but that does not make me automatically inflexible or illogical. You might want to consider for a moment as well that this is exactly what it would look like from a perspective of some one who is wrong but refuses to admit it for whatever reason... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
