|
You all should just start a LAARPing club and leave the rest of the forum out of your compulsive needs for control and jockeying for position.
|
|
|
|
1- Yes. At least submachine guns and military style weapons. Of course.
2- Dude... You can't bring a semitruck and run over kids inside a school building... You're going off a silly tangent to prove your illogical point.
3- I live in the US mate. Been shooting to a firing ring before and I've been offered all sorts of guns on my way out.
4- Sure let's make all students take weapons to school so they can defend themselves! Now is when you bring up the whole "let's arm teachers" argument, right?
5- Lol... Been hearing Eurabia for the past 35 years mate. How old are you? 18? I'm sure you're all into CoD and Fortnite but the real world is different son.
6- I don't even know what to respond. You want to keep your second amendment even at the expense of people's lives. You go buddy.
1. "Submachine guns" are already highly regulated in the USA, way to show your complete ignorance on this topic. Tell me, what is a "military style weapon" one that is black and looks scary to you? 2. Can you bring gasoline or explosives into a school? Why is it required that it happens inside a building to be a valid point? You just unilaterally declaring it an invalid point doesn't make it so. 3. Well then you are exceptionally willfully ignorant aren't you? You sound all American to me "mate". You certainly aren't some entitled twat who came here from another country, enjoy this nation, then expect to be able to dictate to the native citizens what their laws should be now are you "mate"? BTW, What in the FUCK is a "firing ring". You sure have all the lingo down. 4. No one is talking about compulsory weapon ownership or carry. Many teachers are former police and military and should have the ability to be armed at school if they choose to. 5. Well shit you have been hearing about it! Fuck well I guess we can just ignore the millions of illegal migrants that flooded into Europe from Africa and the Middle East over the past few recent years huh! Shit it is a cliche! That is proof enough! Europe is a joke and is no example of self defense "mate". 6. I don't even know what to respond. You make yourself feel safer by forcibly disarming people so they can't defend themselves in their own homes at the expense of their lives. You go "mate". |
|
|
|
the West promotes tolerance in their society only and spreading hate and war in other regions of world. You are exploiting Africans from years and using their resources and when they raise their voice against you people you call them intolerant and same is happening in different oil rich countries. What about venezuela North Korea, kim jong is extremist ?
"The West" is not protected from criticism. "The West" does not wag their finger at you telling you that you are Westophobic when you criticize its flaws. "The West" doesn't throw people off of roof tops for being gay, or stone women for being unfaithful. "The West" does not seek to kill people who abandon its Western values. "The West" is not a religion. I assume you are Arab based on your name, excuse me if I am wrong there, but as an Arab you have some cantaloupe sized balls talking to a Westernerer about exploiting Africans. Do you have any knowledge of the ancient (and modern) slave trade run by Islam out of Africa? Every crime you point at the West for Islam has 3 more skeletons in its own closet it is trying to hide. Perhaps instead of pointing your finger out and making excuses you should start looking inward, because the excuses and "whataboutisms" aren't enough any more. because the West is not a religion, or a belief have no followers. And islam is a religion with over a billion followers and you stereotype all because of few that’s why we hate this freedom of speech and stops world from criticising islam Now you are just going full circle and just repeating yourself. All other religions are free to be criticized. Islam doesn't get a special pass to be free of criticism, and it has plenty to criticize about it. Stop pointing at outsiders and fix YOUR culture. Or just sit back and pretend you are superior to everyone on Earth and see how that works out for all of you. Don't be surprised then when the West rejects Muslims as a whole regardless of how much of a "minority" of "individuals" are to blame. You demand tolerance of the West but Islam is one of the most intolerant supremacist ideologies on Earth. |
|
|
|
In the meantime, keep watching children die at schools every other week. But then again, we're the ones with our eyes closed lol Answer these questions, please: If we cannot eliminate evil, is there a need for guns? Why are children being killed every other week? How have 85 years worth of gun restrictions helped prevent children from being killed? Are there solutions that don't include holding innocent people responsible for the actions of the guilty? Are there solutions that don't leave innocents susceptible to tyranny? How can blame an inanimate object for your lack of real solutions? BTW: Stop multi-posting. You can reply to two people in one post. 1- Yes, police officers and trained people should carry guns to protect citizens. 2- Because sick people have access to all sorts of guns and submachine rifles. All they need is a driving license to get their hands on them. 3- Mmmmmm... gun restrictions? What gun restrictions are you talking about? 4- Who is holding innocent people responsible for anything? We're talking about confiscating guns to protect these innocent people. 5- This whole tyranny argument worked well in the 17th century mate. There's no need for this anymore. Take a look at Europe. No European country has citizens carrying guns in the street and no one is concerned about their governments going tyrannic on them. Like... come on... 6- How is prohibiting sick people from getting access to guns not a real solution? I'm giving you one REAL solution that works very well in Europe. The only thing you're telling me is "that's not fair what about the innocent people who don't use guns to kill other people". Well, mate, wont you rather give up your gun and have your kid feel safe at school? Plus, to be honest, I'm more concerned with regular citizens being able to acquire military styled weapons. If we could get rid of these I'm sure the amount of public shootings would come down drastically. I can't see someone killing 49 people at a night club with just a hand gun. 1. So you want guys with guns to take guns from people? 2. Sick people have access to semi trucks, gasoline, and explosives too, what is your point? 3. This shows me how ignorant you are of US gun laws and how you are only interested in your own bias. 4. You. Banning guns disarms innocent people, ie taking their right to self defense. 5. Yeah right, everyone knows now all the governments are trustworthy! BTW EUrope? LOL! Europe is a prime example why to KEEP your firearms. Europe is going to be Eurabia in 10 years. Quite a light on the hill you are. 6. Taking peoples rights so that you "feel safe" is not a right you have. Your rights end where another's rights begin. |
|
|
|
Let us say this is the vote. Do you think we should there should be a higher sales tax on items over 4$ 1. Yes 2. No 3. IDGAF (you would not even be voting and be given less of a BIP) https://www.strawpoll.me/18026636Politicians and Professors or anyone for that matter. (could make a video upload to the file sharing that is linked to the Poll and voice their concerns) The people could watch all the data if they wanted to help make up their mind, if they could not make it up their own. My Video: When I go to Mcdonalds and order 2 mcdoubles it cost me $5.30 but if I split it it cost me $4.90 I will only be making the cashier do more work by splitting my bills and ordering 1 at a time so this is pointless. When I go to Timmies and I order 3 large triple triples it cost me $6.05 but if I order 2 then 1 it cost me $5.97, so I would just split them. So the point of the tax is just stupid. I will just split orders and create more of a line for people to wait in. (I watch others view points on it via file sharing) In Addition paying tax to fund projects I have no say in, like giving lawblaws 12 million is not in my interest or funding war machines, I will pass. https://toronto.citynews.ca/2019/04/09/tories-cry-foul-over-12m-to-help-loblaws-buy-energy-efficient-coolers/I rather have a say of where my tax is going, I am the one creating it. I vote 2. That wasn't really a response to me, but kind of one at me talking about a different subject. I am not a fan of our tax system either but I do think some taxes serve a purpose. |
|
|
|
|
I could go on for a long time about what this technology is capable of, but I won't because you wouldn't believe it anyway. All I am going to say is you would be amazed what you can accomplish with the right resonant frequency. Look into interferometrics, directed energy, and scalar technologies. There is a whole ever expanding laundry list of nefarious things you could do with it.
|
|
|
|
Please I'm trying to understand what did Arnold Schwarzenegger do that cause this issue, I mean who Hates Arnold, his a cool guy even kids love him
While I love Arnold the actor, Arnold the man is most likely a rapist and a Nazi. Worst of all he is (at least openly) a leftist. |
|
|
|
|
The general public is easily lead. We don't need baby sitters, but informed and accountable people making decisions. Everyone loves free shit for example, but if we just start handing out free money, eventually our economy would fail. What do you think would be the result of a pure democratic vote for free money for everyone?
Do you ever notice how even the most vapid empty headed freaks have strong opinions about pretty much anything? People love having strong opinions while simultaneously knowing nothing. They call it "paying attention" because it costs focus, time, effort, and consciousness to really understand the world around you and the happenings within it. Most people want to pretend to know, but can't afford to pay attention. What some people call "common sense" is just conformity and operant conditioning at play.
Human beings have a natural desire to conform which has been evolved from earlier times in our existence where if you were an outcast you likely died because you didn't have any support networks. This has been bred into humanity and it is a cognitive bias that "the elite" exploit more easily than they can a Constitutional Republic with checks and balances designed to check this kind of effect among others. All that will happen is the masses will be convinced of their victory as they will be lead by the nose right down the same path they were being lead anyway, only much faster.
|
|
|
|
Did you know that 50% of the population is of below average intelligence?
How does that even make sense? I think you worded that wrong. Also, I would rather trust 500 monkeys with average intelligence rather than 50 with above average intelligence any day of the week. How do you even measure intelligence? also keep in mind we are talking about people voting on issues for themselves. Are you going by I.Q? amount of knowledge retained? (Joe Rogan might be one of the smartest people then), Pattern recognition (IQ)?, Ability to spell good, Linguistic ? Recalling information? or putting thoughts into new information? forming ideas? How fast they can type? Nature smart? Life smart? Interpersonal people smart? Mathematical? Logical? Ability to persuade people? There is many forms of Intelligence. It actually makes perfect sense. It is just a little phrase that serves as a easy filter for people. it never fails to result in a retarded reply, and I think it serves as a perfect real time demonstration why pure democracy is retarded. |
|
|
|
|
This forum has turned into a group of a bunch of pre-teen girls picking people to gossip about and fuck with one by one. You are all losers.
|
|
|
|
|
Did you know that 50% of the population is of below average intelligence?
|
|
|
|
|
Pure Democracy is over rated. Even if we made a magical infallible decentralized voting system based on blockchain, they would just hack the minds of the masses and lead them where they want them. It would in fact probably make corruption even easier.
|
|
|
|
Still available? Interested
Absolutely. Sorry about the late reply, just noticed it. Please PM me for quickest response. |
|
|
|
|
Looks like you owe the man $100. LoL.
|
|
|
|
.....
....I think there are a few incorrect assumptions with thinking that everyone carrying guns is a good idea, but thats not super relevant. Funny enough, I was going to look up the statistics on the locations of school shootings....
There's a mindset that comes first, before anyone should do concealed carry. Otherwise he becomes a target for punks to take the gun away. The right solution is to eliminate "gun free zones," and make them "zones where you don't know who is carrying but you damn sure know they are there and they are going to shoot you dead." Like "Air Marshalls." They exist, but good luck identifying them. .....
I am ABSOLUTELY in agreement that there is a correlation between over medication of children and incidents. Besides the obvious effect that antidepressants and such have strong side effects on adolescents, its another important indicator. Medication is not a treatment for mental health problems. There are very few cases where someone is just born with a chemical imbalance, and a pill just fixes that. Tossing someone a pill doesn't fix the problem, you need to get to the root of the problem or the pill doesn't do anything. .....
Behavior suppressing pills are obviously behind sudden breakout into psychotic behavior that to a fair degree results in mass shootings. This is not getting the attention it deserves. Exactly. The point is every school will have a handful of these people seconds away to react. It doesn't need to be everyone. Watch a couple would-be school shooters get ended before taking any lives a few times and suddenly it will get a lot less glamorous and a lot more scary in the minds of these deranged individuals. Suddenly it stops happening as much, and when it does less people are hurt because they don't get to go on an unchecked rampage for 30 minutes to an hour. |
|
|
|
|
That is some shit security. I have seen $10 an hour bouncers do better. What is that guy screaming?
|
|
|
|
tin foil ! russian made ! no worries, be thin  . shine... more seriously, I have this multibillion dollars project, how to harvest emf energy and power btc miner? that would force them to li-fi (light-wireless communications) while harvesting their energy... it's still not even quoted... don't worry . ps : no, I don't watch willingly anything glorifying the role of tyrant, jew or not. I am more interested to know who allowed telford, uk to happen . Unfortunately everything you said and more can be accomplished using 5G hardware. There is a reason the US and China are in a cutthroat battle over the world's 5G systems, because it has dual use as a weapons platform. |
|
|
|
didn't work in afghanistan... they must have hard head, or the dod couldn't reach them to make them conform and obey  . thanks for your link. psychotronic warfare using emf to shape brain waves... quite interesting field, good to create obeying and conforming slaves or detect those "deviants"... 5G anyone? Anyone see Kingsman? Do you think they were trying to warn us about something? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
