Or just find one other DT1 member to remove Lauda from their trust list. Since HostFat has done it already, Lauda's DT score is 0. If it goes below that, they are no longer on DT2.

Not everyone spends every living moment on the forum. That and they may not see the evidence that theymos posted as conclusive, or may be waiting for something more solid (such as a signed message) to come up.

Not that this is relevant here, since this thread is about a completely different user.

I don't have the will or the technical knowledge to try and argue this, so I will concede that I may be wrong about it.

---

You got yourself banned by running around to every semi-relevant topic and whining about how Lauda left you a negative trust. Similar to what you are doing now actually.

No. You are banned from the forum forever. Go away.

You didn't listen the first few times, instead making threads moaning about the rules in Meta, there is no reason for you to be let back in.

Yeah, theymos should really get around to making something like that.

Uncensored or not, r/btc (as with every other Bitcoin subreddit it seems) is a hive mind of anti-segwit big blocks. Just like this, for somewhat fair analysis, r/bitcoin is also a hive mind for pro-segwit pro-blockstream.

Telling someone to go to r/btc to find that big blocks are good is like telling someone to go to an alcoholics anonymous meeting to find drinking is bad.

---

Either way this topic has gotten very off it's original track. I don't think that people's opinions of the bitcoin scaling scenario is relevant to whether Lauda was in line leaving their feedback.

0.14BTC

Thought I had that, oh well.

0.12BTC

So not only a waste of a massive premium, but also a massive amount of USD (providing whoever peeled it sold the coins). What a crazy missed opportunity.

---

I'll put that up to 0.11BTC.

I'd personally really like if this went to an auction, not sure about anyone else.

0.02BTC

If people choose not to trust you based on your political beliefs then they are free to do so. They are also free to show this through the trust system on Bitcointalk.

The best way to go about removing it is either ask them nicely, rather than insulting them, or contact the people that put them on DT2 to have them removed. Asking for trust won't help at all.

0.015BTC

IPs can be so easily faked that they are of no relevance when trying to prove whether an account has been compromised. A Bitcoin address and signed message are near impossible to fake (unless the keys are sold/stolen), which is why they are used primarily to prove a previous owner is the same as the current.

0.1BTC

No Time To Explain has been sold. All other games are available.

Not that it particularly matters. If theymos doesn't trust a user then he shouldn't add this user to his trust list, as with any other member of DT1. Similarly, if anyone else on the DT1 list wants a user to be on the DT network, they can add said user to their trust list.

Do you not agree that having a number of users that are vulnerable to be compromised on the DT network is an issue? Do you not agree that a user should not be added to the trust list simply for transacting with another user on DT1?

Reputation is subjective.

If Lauda was complaining that theymos wasn't answering them privately on this issue I would agree with you. However, due to this issue being raised publicly, do you not think that the administrator should at least give a reason for allowing someone to bloat the DT network with users that serve no other purpose than to be potential issues?

Are you usually allowed on the internet without your carer? Should you not tell them before you log on?

0.035BTC

This service will steal any BTC that you deposit to that address, as it was not created using split keys.

You would expect that the admin of the forum to pay at least some attention to the threads posted in the section specifically for forum matters, would you not?

0.013BTC

---

That's more like it.