That non vertical photo makes me sad

[Nothing to see here guys, this thread is trash and neither party makes sense.]

No, no it does not. See two cases in my trust ratings, BFL paying people to leave 300 negative (most of which were by BFL staff xD), and another from one guy on here with 18 accounts. Neither sets are deleted.

Antpool is a different pool. If you're new to mining and just want to test things then the bigger the pool the better as its typically more stable and there is less variance in the earnings. Its not to do with it being a Cube.

For the record, I couldn't get so much as an email out of them.

You've entered it into the "IP" box, you need to enter that into the "pool addresses" boxes. I have no idea why that would stop your computer accessing your router or internet though. If you're coming from fresh everything the only things you need to change on the Cube's configuration page are [remove all quotation marks]:

Gateway to "192.168.1.253"
Primary to "192.168.1.253"
Pool addresses to "192.168.1.102,192.168.1.102" - assumes your computer's IP has remained at .102 after you reset everything. It probably has.
miner user:pass to "Gstaylo_Cube:1,Gstaylo_Cube:1" - assumes you sign up to Antpool with the username Gstaylo, change as required.

Sign up for antpool https://account.bitmain.com/sign_up


Instructions for the next step, which is the "mining proxy". You need to download the mining proxy, extract it to its own folder in program files and then create a .bat file on the desktop containing the pool settings in the white box.

Taken from the instructions:
"Cubes use the extinct getwork protocol and so we need to use a stratum proxy. Download the proxy and open the file. (this file https://mining.bitcoin.cz/media/download/mining_proxy.exe)"

"create a .bat file in notepad (save as .bat). Move the stratum proxy (mining_proxy.exe) to the file location below and put the following text inside for your
choice of pool [antpool]."

"cd C:\Program Files (x86)\Proxy
mining_proxy.exe -o stratum.antpool.com -p 3333" [remove the quotation marks]

You then should, *should* be mining.

I think the question everyone has been asking is, why are you advocating for PoW changes that delete your own company?

Your gateway IP and primary DNS needs to be that of your router (192.168.1.253). I don't see that you've set up a proxy, but when you do the pool address on the Cube should be 192.168.1.2,192.168.1.2

I think you need to go through the instructions in the OP of this thread again.

It was actually Spondoolies that decided to kill themselves with the price war, however Bitmain was happy to match with their significantly lower costs.

Riser cables, riser cables everywhere.

I would take a guess that Bitfury's chip will probably compete against a new chip from Bitmain, I mean we're already 6 months into this generation and they don't usually last that long.

I think there are two separate things being discussed in here. Paid to Post (PtP), and Paid to Opinion (PtO). I see no problem with PtP as long as they conform to the forum's rules and are constructive and useful, while PtO should be considered as alt'ing.

The extreme advantage is if someone posts something controversial (ie an attack), and then uses 5 of their PtP accounts to join in. It wouldn't be allowed if it was one guy with 6 accounts so it shouldn't be allowed if its 1 guy paying for 5+1 accounts. In either scenario, enforcement is near enough impossible though, so I'm not sure where that leaves this discussion.

Is that really any better?

High end GPUs (still costing the same as a CPU) run it 5x quicker and that amount is forever going to diverge. So again its not 1 CPU 1 vote, its 1 CPU and back to the 6 GPUs on ribbon risers and 31 votes. Then you have the problems that RAM isn't an infallible resource - PCI-E based SSDs are getting closer and closer to RAM but with 100x the capacity. I am aware even commercial 4x PCI-E SSDs have 250-500x higher latency than core RAM but what could we do if that was the actual objective? It won't take long for a Spondoolies-Tech V2 to work out a Cuckoo42 ASIC.

Edit:
Seems like you're more concerned with getting the previous pages of discussion buried, I don't think you believe what you're posting. Are the investors calling?

If Classic is adopted then we continue pouring the petrol over everything else we hold dear. Forks are dumb as hell.

Is ~110GH the expected nominal in the reference design?

Yeah, status page won't load during a cgminer-y error most of the time.

Or just copy paste your trust list somewhere else, and put in DefaultTrust for 2 levels temporarily.

am I?

We'll be on the 14/16nm hype train with 20TH @ 1300-1600W soon enough.

Give us a screenshot of the configuration page, the one before the status page. Red LED just means its in an idle / fault mode.