The climate scammers overestimated the residence time for CO2 by orders of magnitude in order to give there panic stampede legs, but even they didn't try to go THAT far. Here's real science on residence time for this CO2 trace gas which is much in demand by plants who compete strongly with one another for what little is around...and which are starving for it since we are at historically low levels of atmospheric CO2. It's less than what a lot of plant species had evolved to expect, and many of them have been out-competed and have gone extinct. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8niiyDn2FIUnfortunately, very few 2020 people will be able to follow and understand the above lecture even though it is quite clear. 30 or 40 years ago a lot more people would be able to follow it based on my experiences over this span. 'They' had to destroy the educational system and most likely the ability of peoples brains to work effectively by other means before they could run the climate change scam. And as best I can tell, that they did. Yes, the alarmists don't want to let it be known that man isn't BADDDDDDD. Here's a recent abstract to a study that agrees with your opinion. An atmospheric CO2 residence time is determined from a carbon cycle which assumes that anthropogenic emissions only marginally disturb the preindustrial equilibrium dynamics of source/atmosphere/sink fluxes. This study explores the plausibility of this concept, which results in much shorter atmospheric residence times, 4–5 years, than the magnitude larger outcomes of the usual global carbon cycle models which are adjusted to fit the assumption that anthropogenic emissions are primarily the cause of the observed rise in atmospheric CO2. The continuum concept is consistent with the record of the seasonal photosynthesis swing of atmospheric CO2 which supports a residence time of about 5 years, as also does the bomb C14 decay history. The short residence time suggests that anthropogenic emissions contribute only a fraction of the observed atmospheric rise, and that other sources need be sought.
ChaunceyStarr https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(93)90017-8The economic downturn due to COVID may possibly be used to measure the decrease in CO2 during that period and determine what the actual Co2 reference time is. |
|
|
|
It is crazy how high temperatures rise in summer time in Siberia. I expected they dont go much over 0 degree Celsius, but I was so wrong. Oh and more such changes as permafrost melting will happen on Earth more chances fro viruses like covid-19 we will have. Maybe covid-20 was frozen in permafrost for 1000 years and will get alive and kicking tomorrow. Ready to spread everywhere.
But no permafrost, more bikinis on girls! |
|
|
|
There is a great deal of hydrogen in our atmosphere. |
|
|
|
The whole premise is that we shouldn't be altering the Earth's temperature at all so asking what temperature we want to set it to is a flawed question. We want to let it set itself.
But if you can claim that we have set it to 1 degree higher, then why is it flawed to ask what we should set it to? Really, do you not even know how to answer this question? Because it so, there's no reason anyone should listen to your alarmist propaganda about climate. |
|
|
|
[/quote] It read: "During a deposition given by me in connection with my matrimonial case, I stated that my husband had raped me. "I wish to say that on one occasion during 1989, Mr Trump and I had marital relations in which he behaved very differently toward me than he had during our marriage. "As a woman, I felt violated, as the love and tenderness which he normally exhibited toward me, was absent. I referred to this as a 'rape,' but I do not want my words to be interpreted in a literal or criminal sense. |
|
|
|
Thank you for your input, I concur with your views on Biden, Trump and Clinton but would say your categorisation of are at the lesser end of the spectrum and there are far more apt ways to define that trio.
I really do not think it is far left cultural ideology when a person does not want their personal space or physical privacy invaded by another person without their consent. Not everybody is touchy-feely with other people and not everybody wants to be touched by other people.
Calling it utterly ridiculous lawyering of behaviour for many is an appropriate way to define those people that go around touching other people without consent.
Sure, but the recipient of the inappropriate behavior can respond to that with a "No." She or he doesn't need a promulgated behavior code by a university or institution and doesn't need to be forced to follow that code. It's far left cultural ideology when two people are told that a third party, such as a college, should be intimately involved in their communications regarding what they do or don't do with each other. |
|
|
|
Thank you for your input, I concur with your views on Biden, Trump and Clinton but would say your categorisation of are at the lesser end of the spectrum and there are far more apt ways to define that trio. I really do not think it is far left cultural ideology when a person does not want their personal space or physical privacy invaded by another person without their consent. Not everybody is touchy-feely with other people and not everybody wants to be touched by other people. Calling it utterly ridiculous lawyering of behaviour for many is an appropriate way to define those people that go around touching other people without consent. I think it's fair to say ...Biden is creepy.
Trump is or has been a bit sexually aggressive.
Clinton's a rapist that got off.
FYI I don't agree with the far left cultural imperative that a man should ask and get approval for each touch or step forward in a sexual situation. Utterly ridiculous lawyering of behavior. |
|
|
|
The UK is not "the world". No one wants to set the Earth to a temperature because we all know Earth's temperature is not static. We just want to let the temperature fluctuate the way it would naturally without all of the additional carbon dioxide.
Also, even if you ignore all of the climate change stuff, you should still be alarmed about our carbon emissions collapsing the global economy via ocean acidification.
We can have a vibrant global economy with net emissions at zero but we cannot have a vibrant global economy if we realize the consequences of unchecked carbon emissions.
But you guys do conjure up "global temperatures". Because you say things like "The Earth is 1 degree warmer than ...." Now, when I ask what temperature you'd set the planet to, suddenly you can't or won't answer. Look, we all know you want to steal or rob all you can from those despicable capitalists. What's wrong with asking "How Much?" Even when I gas up my 6 mile per gallon truck, I'm concerned with the price of gas. |
|
|
|
I don't know how anyone can vote for Biden, (and that does not mean Trump is good or better than him) but poor man Biden can't even make a simple sentence, and he does have some strange affection for underage girls, as do many from elite. Just one of video compilations: https://youtu.be/V4PLSPvJ9BYHe sure looks creepy leaning over and holding girls like dolls. Dirty old man. Biden denies the allegation but is refusing to open his archives at the University of Delaware where a copy of Reade’s sexual harassment complaint might be filed. Pretty much like admission. Neither Biden's creepy actions or Trump's history with women is going to affect the election results at all. |
|
|
|
well if you truly want to stick with the fallacy of carbon being so active.....
It's the vibration of the C=O bonds in CO2 that absorbs frequencies in a couple niches of the spectrum that is the actual science behind the sputtering about carbon that these agitators go on about. Sure, they don't know what they are talking about, but you can do better. |
|
|
|
Temperatures in like 1870 or before the industrial revolution are more like what "should be".
im sorry. but 1800-1900 england had the london thames frost fairs (river froze over) and ireland had the potato blight so forgive me for saying this but england had good harvests during the middle ages and then in the 18-19th century of smoggy london industry .. it got colder.... I find it a bit curious that people and organizations that claim to have science backing them, who want to take control of carbon emissions away from the populations, cannot clearly and simply tell us what temperature they would set the Earth to, if they were given that power. How are we to know they are not just some Marxist con artists that just want the power? |
|
|
|
...
We've got maybe half a year while 'capital flight' will continue to be a thing. The replacement monetary system will be global, unified, and encompassing. Dealing with the problem of 'capital flight' will be one of the major selling points that 'they' will use to justify it's implementation.
I haven't heard that sort of a timetable for the authoritarian control freaks to try for a global monetary system. Got any more info on that? |
|
|
|
I would not call Biden who looks likes a creepy old man leaning over and sniffing the hair of a woman trivial, nor would I call trivial Biden putting his hand on the thigh of a woman or using his fingers to rape another or pulling a woman towards him using force by grabbing the back of her head and forcing her to rub noses with him. In comparison to the allegations made against Trump these might be considered minor or trivial but in all seriousness sexual assault or misconduct (sexual or otherwise) is serious, one allegation is not the lesser of two for the victims and should not be for the law either. Clinton was obsessed with Lewinsky but had many other allegations against him: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_sexual_assault_and_misconduct_allegationsBiden seems to be obsessed or touchy feely with anybody that walks in a skirt and has a pulse. Trump (allegedly) never went for women who were in their latter years but had a specific type he was obsessed with. You know, those are 90% trivialities. if not 100%. Biden is obviously no Bill Clinton. I think it's fair to say ... Biden is creepy. Trump is or has been a bit sexually aggressive. Clinton's a rapist that got off. FYI I don't agree with the far left cultural imperative that a man should ask and get approval for each touch or step forward in a sexual situation. Utterly ridiculous lawyering of behavior. |
|
|
|
when you look at news of 'climate change is drying up ganges river'
but then when you google ganges river drying up without the words climate change attached
you start reading about the dams put in from 1970. then the ground water pumps. and then the cycle of reactions
its a worthy read when you start to look for other causes and stop just trying to find carbon links
Here is an area of agreement we likely have, there is a terribly unscientific tendency to blame every single climatic event on "climate change." Causes unlearning of basic facts. |
|
|
|
Anybody can be a bit deranged. Even scientists. How ridiculous, searching for life on other planets! We really need to be looking for intelligence on Earth, right?  so you prefer that one day you wake up and run into this guy:  we need to know what's on other planets, maybe there are more beneficial things on other planets. The best way to be protected Is if we know what is on other planets. we have already seen how our weapons are capable of creating catastrophic destruction, now imagine if there are aliens with technology superior to ours? would you wake up and become a slave to this big-headed guy in this photo  I will take his ray gun away. I want it. You can't have it. Well I might let you borrow it. |
|
|
|
...
But first of all we need a common understanding of extraterrestrial life, is it just some microbial life? Or something more advanced like us humans? Venus is such a hot planet which would make it very hard for anything to exist. It don't think we will find life on any planet around planet. Maybe in the past but not now anymore.
Many of the essential activities of life as we know it, such as the formation of DNA and passage of things through cell walls, are based on a liquid water medium. Really they are based on a narrow range of temperatures. To find life at say 700F even microbes, would be truly fascinating as it would be a study of something completely, utterly alien. |
|
|
|
...Note: in the "House decides" scenario, the House votes weirdly, and Republicans would currently have it, though this could change, since it's the incoming House/Senate.) With such a strong Court majority, it makes it much more difficult for Biden to steal the election if he loses, which he otherwise might've been able to do with Roberts' help.... If the House decided the POTUS, each state would get one vote, and the Republicans would simply pick Trump. In the case of an undecided POTUS because of squabbles over mailed in ballots, the situation would be bizarro. Because a high percentage of people vote party lines and all those fake mail in ballots would be that way, the undetermined or contested candidates would not be just POTUS but all on the ballot. |
|
|
|
Is that like the Dems and their crusade against the2nd Amendment? Because that has brought firearm sales to all time highs. Might the Don do the Same for crypto? |
|
|
|
I only just learned about Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death this morning. I wish peace for her family, and all those who are mourning in their time of sorrow.
Although I've frequently found myself at ideological odds with her votes on the supreme court, I can't help be proud when reflecting on her career. As an American conservative who believes that all men and women are naturally granted certain inalienable rights, as equals, I consider her a champion of civil rights, and women's influence on politics. Her contributions should be celebrated by all Americans, regardless of their political leanings. As should her amazing, accomplished, and distinguished life.
Rest in peace, RBG. You served America with a true heart, and the whole world is better off for it.
I agree 100% and call for a moment of silence, and then a quick decision on a strict constitutionalist replacement. |
|
|
|
Temperatures in like 1870 or before the industrial revolution are more like what "should be". Temperatures now are ~1 degree warmer which is a problem. Another degree of warming will create much more serious problems and 3 degrees would begin to be catastrophic for a lot of people. 4 degrees would be catastrophic for billions of people and reality challenge the global political/societal structure.  Shall we reset to the conditions of 1814? That was the date of the last Fair held on a frozen River Thames in London. Wait...1814? It's been getting warmer since then? That can't be due to man's CO2 emissions, in the 19th century... So why is that what "should be?" |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
