19) +2.31 to +2.63%  NeuroticFish

...although I would not be surprised if it jumps again much more, maybe as much as last time though

Indeed, quite a peculiar post. It wants to be somewhat reassuring for its users/customers, but by not denying the hack.. everybody can understand whatever they want, even the worse case scenario.
Since I do have the seeds of negativity in my thinking, I will for now assume they did get hacked and didn't want neither to openly admit it (to avoid panic, especially as you said, it's not that a big amount), nor to deny it so they don't get caught lying.

Username: NeuroticFish
BTC address: bc1q8sw4e4ms07jsjjmdu6y6tq3tjgezappycruhmy

Thank you

Ma bucur foarte mult! Le-ai meritat si cred (din experienta proprie) ca si aveai nevoie de acea deconectare.


Am retinut si am pus Creta pe lista de destinatii de neratat. Mersi!


Problema cea mai mare nu este dimensiunea premiului, ci faptul ca nu este in Bitcoin (bineinteles, fiind asa mic nu prea putea fi in Bitcoin). Asemenea concursuri in general nu sunt permise (sau cel putin un in zonele unde ne uitam noi). Si da, deja a fost sters.


Thank you all for the generosity and for the opportunity.


Asta este o idee foarte inteligenta. Multumim 1miau.

Prediction 2: $31,011.34
bech32 address: bc1q8sw4e4ms07jsjjmdu6y6tq3tjgezappycruhmy

The bitcoins are not in the wallets, the wallets only hold the keys. The bitcoins "are" on the blockchain and copies of it are in a lot of computers all over the world.
The amounts of fiat in the bank accounts are written into databases which for most banks I expect to be backed up securely too.

In both cases people relying on the technology will have to wait patiently until the internet is restored, the things continue from where they left (especially bitcoin) and they get access to their money again.

The fact you compare one forum with a decentralized network like Bitcoin tells that pretty much want this pointless discussion that was started many times before.
An attack like you're saying would come from an intelligent race from outer space. And if so, each and everybody will have more urgent issues than their money.

I've also done today a test mix (with Tor browser). And apart of the fact the mixed coins have arrived almost too fast after my sent ones (less than one hour), all was OK.
I've also noticed this message and I wanted to say about it, but I see there are already two reports

Sadly this is true. Unless he has some very well hidden overly strong backing, he has not much of a chance.


It would be nice, but I think that the number of Americans who would actually vote for him because of his stance on crypto is not that significant.
Plus, as it was said before, he seems to be oblivious to the fact that he will not be able to push his agenda by himself.

Somebody who knows what he's doing and has bought at 69k (although I'd say that the one who knew what they're doing have bought much cheaper) has either sold when the price started showing a downturn (55k) and maybe bought back when the price started showing some recovery (~20k?), either will wait much longer than just 69k and some change.

But 100k si a psychological target and I expect quite some (even much older holders) will sell around then, creating a temporary sell pressure.
But a good keyword here is temporary. Compared to the whole length of the bull run, the 100k "pause" might not even become that much visible.

Me too 


From what I've seen on websites, yes. Just afaik there's more to read about SeedSigner, for example I think that it doesn't work with Electrum (it may do with Sparrow) and you have to generate the seed separately yourself.

Actually I had a situation last summer, I had only the phone with me abroad and I needed to use my Ledger on a let's say unexpected setup and after trying the two Android wallets that I knew they support Ledger HW and they both gave error, I had no other choice than to use LL. Maybe I'll recheck the steps of what I've done and I'll write it detailed some day.
The point is that LL can be needed in other cases too, as wallet, and in the light of that seed recovery crap, ... it's somewhat unsettling.


I strongly agree with both statements from here 

If I've looked it up correctly, this was a really nice one

54 NeuroticFish

Please & thank you

Superb! Sper ca te distrezi la maxim.
Grecia este frumoasa si nu e prea scumpa; e destinatia preferata de familia mea pentru cel putin o saptamana din vara. In Creta nu am fost, in majoritatea cazurilor ne-am limitat la distante (fata de Ro) cat de cat rezonabile de parcurs cu masina.


Legat de concursuri... m-am laudat prea devreme cu timpul liber si nu eram prea departe sa ratez un SinBad.
Am pus acum tot, ca de obicei. Bafta!

Imho it's about how much you would usually spend at once, because you want to have such tx with one input. If you have big enough inputs to choose from, you are fine.
On the other hand, you can consolidate anyway to be on the safe side, to avoid getting too easy small inputs later as change from the 100$ inputs when you spend 95$ of them. (and you spend before they become 500$)
I hope I was clear enough, not sure now how to say it better.

Prediction 1: $31,219.37
bech32 address: bc1q8sw4e4ms07jsjjmdu6y6tq3tjgezappycruhmy

Thank you, Sinbad!

This forum needs to be somewhat optimized for major search engines to get new people in here and maybe ninjastic.space needs to be better linked/advertised to the existing users can use a proper search. That's all we need. The tool you try to promote doesn't seem to bring anything really new or useful into the equation.

Trecând peste faptul că cacajeton probabil că nu se minează, neavând blockchain propriu, eu zic că cel mai probabil niciun cacacoin nu aduce profit (dacă ai noroc chior este listat la vreun exchange).
Câteva altcoins - nu multe - pot fi minate probabil pe profit, dar mare atenție la consum (cu ce minezi) și prețul pe kWh.
Dar, sa revenim: dacă cumperi bitcoin nu înseamnă că l-ai minat. Sper că e clar


Comisioanele alea o să fie tot ce vor primi atunci minerii și ar trebui să valoreze cam mult dacă va trebui să le acopere consumul și ceva profit.
Dar da, e prea departe în viitor. Ideea era doar că ce zicea el (că din 2140 nu se mai poate mina) e greșit.

Și cum OP oricum nu ar fi minat bitcoin, partea asta nu contează deloc.

I am not sure if OP actually talks about Bitcoin, since his post is filled with altcoins and altcoin related tools.
Now, the fact that wallets may need to become easier it was discussed a good number of times, just search.
However, that's not necessarily Bitcoin devs' problem, one can use whatever bitcoin wallet he wants or even make himself one. Even more, while we can give advises, it's not really OK to complain about free software.
I think that a more constructive approach would be to make or fund a wallet that's much more user friendly. But I've never seen anybody trying to go in that direction.

I don't know if it's an unfortunate choice of words or you're using it wrong, but one doesn't subscribe to a wallet. A wallet is just a tool one installs and uses.
If you, by chance, make an account at a website telling you that it's a wallet, that's actually a service holding a wallet for which you usually don't hold the keys. And you may know the saying "not your keys, not your coins".

Also a newbie may play with very small amounts or it may go big, since bitcoin price may grow fast. And if one has a couple thousands invested he may want to make sure he uses a safe wallet. Not a difficult one, not a sophisticated one, but surely a safe one. And that requires a little bit of knowledge.