Username : NeuroticFish
BTC addy : bc1qeuvhugrlu8g34e8wl3s8dtm2k8mjf0khvqxmaf

Thank you!

52 NeuroticFish

Thank you!

Scuze, sunt pe telefon și mi-e mai greu să pun citate ca lumea...
La mine în VirtualBox pe Win10, unde am Utopia instalat, din Edge, merge acel link. Apare un pop-up și de acolo pot deschide în Utopia. Chiar și linkul meu inițial deschide acel canal...

Legat de câștigător.. altundeva am nevoie de noroc, știi si tu ...

Așa că aici hai să ai tu baftă, așa nu o să fie nicio discuție 

Wow. Multumesc!

Am pus acum o explicatie - ca editarea postarilor nu este permisa - nu stiu daca va fi luata in considerare.
Cred ca acele linkuri nu merg prea bine daca sunt la un raspuns in care este citata postarea la care se raspunde.
Am pus si un nou link, dar na, depinde de manager si nu m-ar mira sa ma ignore, ca nu-i treaba lui sa intre prea adanc in acel ecosistem.

Just an update on my original post, since I'm not allowed to edit it:
The link I've put into the initial post seems to not work and the reason might be that it was a response that also quotes a previous message.
Since I had a longer conversation there, I'll put another link of mine from that same conversation, I really hope it's not a huge problem:
https://utopia.im/d53b4431fd604e2f0261792444797aa4?tid=3776237130527961274
The original link was meant to be from my first message in there, 8 minutes before this (second) link.

Far too many think that they can mine with free electricity. Just the electricity is actually not for free. Most of them are probably at work. Some also in their rented places.
I remember there were even nuclear scientists caught mining bitcoin at work, many years ago. I thought that by now people got smarter, but no, I see they're just greedier.

I've already admitted I was wrong, one post above yours.
xandry has shown a clearer picture/context I didn't know. And in that new light I already said that indeed nuke may indeed be the right direction.
So... should I remove my posts from this topic? It would make some answers useless, but if it would make you feel better, I'll do that.

LE: I've removed most of them; if anybody wants to find them, he can, easily. Next time I'll be more careful in sharing you ideas.

Now you know the drill.
I'll add that you don't necessarily need to consolidate all the inputs, you can just select some in the same way when you want to pay for something... and make sure the sum is big enough and you didn't use too many inputs; of course, on the long run you'll need to get the number of inputs down to a more bearable number. Good luck!


With Ledger Nano S? (Maybe the Ledger is the issue? Loong ago it was not slow for me neither.)

Well, there are people fond of gold, people who want to use gold-equivalent coins. Many see it as a store of value, some even more than bitcoin. I won't debate whether they're right or wrong.
At some point in the past I was advertising one such stable coin and... they were charging their users for that storage (!), it was part of the business model.

But, yes, we're on the same page: the logistics of reimbursing in case such a coin/business collapses may be pretty complicated (as you said, liquidity...)


If they don't store the gold, they have to pay to those storing and guarding it.
And the profit? May come from various operational fees they take, may come (sooner or later) from playing with fractional reserve, .. I've never heard of anybody who's issuing money to be (or stay) poor 

It is slow for me too when I have many inputs, but not that slow. However, for 10-15 inputs it took me too more than a minute (yeah, it cannot really compare with your 10 minutes for 2 inputs).
The problem is that each such transaction you make is on-chain, hence it costs you transaction fees, so it would be advisable to try to get more inputs together.

PS. Be careful to not pay too big fee either (but I'd advise not the smallest either, i.e. at very least 1.1 sat/vByte)

Yes.
First of all, I'd make sure you work with BTC and not mBTC (Tools->Preferences->Base unit).

Basically you pick an address of yours that's empty and has no transactions (View->Show Addresses, pick one with tx = 0 copy the address to clipboard).
Also View->Show Coins, go to coins tab and select some of them (maybe some 50 at once, but make sure the amount is not too small on them ie ignore those with less than 0.0000055 BTC, if you have such inputs; you can sort the inputs by amount). So, with Ctrl-click you select some inputs, then right-click and press Spend. Only those inputs will be used in the next transaction.
You had an address in clipboard, now go to Send tab and send the max amount to this address (CTRL-V). The max amount will be only from those selected inputs.

Repeat this a couple of times with the smaller inputs until you get much shorter list of inputs. But not too small inputs.
That 50 I've said .. you'll adjust depending on how long the operation takes and whether it fails.
Also, if the transaction fee is way too big (even at 1 sat/vByte), then you may want to do the operation again with a different set of inputs, by skipping more of the smaller ones.


Nano S has no BT, but with the right cable or adapter I do use mine with smartphone now and then.
However, that's not relevant for now. Electrum for desktop may do the job better imho.

Bun, dar un fel de backup este necesar, ca telefoanele se pierd, se fura, ... iar daca singura solutie este in cloud, nu imi place, mai ales ca da, este non-custodial, deci daca iti pierzi portofelul si nu ai backup.. s-a dus...
Si daca nici nu e "cel mai functional", imi fac griji - o sa imi dau seama ce nu merge sau nu?

Momentan il las deoparte. Daca ajung sa nu imi placa in mod deosebit nicio alta optiune (cu exceptia WoS), o sa ma intorc si la Breez sa-i mai dau o sansa.

I may be a bit late to the party but, if walletexplorer by chance didn't help then Blockchair has a great filtering capability, see https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transactions
You may be able to filter by the amounts and time for example to narrow down what you need.


PS. If you want to play with local database you may want to look at Bitcoin in SQL, but the online version, sadly, is not too useful (times out too fast hence doesn't return anything useful)

Somehow you seem to come with a lot of topics you could have been researching a little, throw some words and "let's discuss". This is not OK. You should put more effort in this, now you just look desperate for meeting a post quota.

Elon Musk's behavior is known. Many no longer care about his announcements and the effects (many of them short-lived) his actions have on the price.
It's not IRA, it's IRS you wanted to tell about. And I think that SEC also keeps an eye on him.

And Bitcoin price... there are too many things that can affect it (some for longer term, some for shorter term): various announcements (like you said about Musk), various actions (institutional buys/sales), hacks, bankruptcies, new businesses opening, halving, ASIC chips/mining gears releases, war (let's not forget it), pandemic, recession... even the stimulus checks the Americans have received did affect the price.

It's interesting that you are still telling the not-so-relevant story and you don't post the tx id.
However, is the tx confirmed? Or did you manage to double-spend it?

Da, de Eclair am uitat. Multumesc. De Strike nu   (cumva ceva nu ma atrage la el, imi pare rau..).


In caz ca ai intrat si pe taramul LN cu Blue Wallet, tocmai au anuntat ca renunta la nodul lor LND, ar fi bine de citit anuntul postat de cygan acum vreo jumatate de ora.
Si da, am vazut ca are functionalitati interesante acest Blue Wallet, plus ca e open source, de aia am sperat ca o sa il pot folosi (si) pe partea de LN.

Well, the full title of Bitcoin whitepaper Satoshi has written is: Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
It's not an actual motto, but it can be seen as an official phrase (or short definition for Bitcoin)

I recommend you take a look into:
https://learnmeabitcoin.com/technical/txid
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction
These links should explain it better than I'd do (since I'm not that good at the internals).

However, shortly: the first link tells how tx id can be easily obtained from the transaction itself:



I will add that while tx ids seem to not be stored in the actual blockchain, Bitcoin Core does store the tx ids of unspent transactions (UTXO) in chainstate folder (levelDb), read:
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/28168/what-are-the-keys-used-in-the-blockchain-leveldb-ie-what-are-the-keyvalue-pair

---

I am not sure what you mean here.
All the nodes validate transactions and forward them (one node's mempool may be different from another's), hence they can be seen as processors.
The miners are the "ultimate" processors because they add the transactions into blocks.
But none of them would alter a transaction (transaction created and signed by the sender). So.. I am not sure what you mean.

Well, at least in theory, the driver should charge the car before it gets under a limit (20% maybe?) and normally don't go over 90% (because after that it's very slow).
And, if the drivers are not assholes keeping the charging stations busy (I think that Tesla has fixed that by charging them heftily for the extra time) one will easily find a place to charge his car.


Indeed, even with tricks like charging only from 20% to 90%, charging still takes a lot of time, more than for combustion cars. That's one reason why something new needs invented.


One of my points was the better storage for electricity is needed. This would most probably means that such charging stations will have their own special, big capacity batteries (yet to be invented). The charging would go from there (to not overload the grid) and in case of blackouts they can still use their battery for powering their own business. Of course, if the blackout lasts too long.. nothing can help, you're right on that.

You don't seem to have much of idea on what are your chances for find the seed, right?
If only a small number of words are missing, OK, you can do it. But without no other info you will most probably not find anything useful during your lifetime (and I'm being overly generous on this).

So I recommend you read much-much more before offering this kind of services, which, at this stage, are dangerously close to what we call... scam.


I also recommend people don't give money or sensitive information to this "service".
If one has lost some words of his seed, ask around publicly for advises and may recover it. If one lost his seed completely.. bad luck.
Goind blindly for this kind of services can only get more money lost or even the initial coins stolen.