This is not important so maybe that's the reason why I did not know about this. What people are speculating is the Amazon will begin accepting BTC or ETH as a payment method, I think this is a bigger news if this will be happen. Until now I'm still not losing my hope of this happening although knowing it's just a speculation, people would never speculate if there's no possibility.
Bitcoin might be the first one to be accepted on Amazon. However, I don't think bitcoin is the best one, because bitcoin network got congested sometime. No one knows when the BTC network will be logged, but no one want to wait for hours or days to pay their fees on Amazon. It's ridiculous, definitely. Therefore, I strongly believe that other coins, ETH, LTC, DASH, or even Dogecoin might be the better ones. Fast transaction speed will be the most important thing to consider to add payment gates on Amazon.
|
|
|
To recap: - Listing on Binance is good, if it will actually occur. - However, it is not essential thing for Dogecoin. - Without Binance, years since the start of Dogecoin, the coin has still been one of the most favorite coins in crypto. - Without Binance, Dogecoin has still got massive demands that shown via its daily volume in total. - Without Binance, Dogecoin has been globally accepted.
|
|
|
I signed my message yesterday and thought of it a little bit. After all day long, I thought that it might be better (not sure about that, it is just my opinion) for forum users to sign their messages with at least four essential indicators of their accounts: (1) Account name; (2) Bitcoin address; (3) Registered email for specific account.(4) Date on which they sign message. People tend to forget to sign message in which registered email included. I suggest others should do that next time they sign message. For instance: -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is <your account name> from bitcointalk.org, id = <your id in the forum>, my email is <your register email>, and today is <the day on which you sign message> I would like to sign a message to as a proof of ownership for later use -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- <Your BTC address> <Your signature> -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
|
|
Specifically dedicated the position on the above corner at the right of the forum for a slogan, in which describe mission and vision of Bitcointalk forum. Why not? A ANN topic might be un-necessary, but a slogan is good, I think. Something like this:
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is tranthidung from bitcointalk.org, id = 1292764, and today is 13/02/2019 I would like to sign a message to as a proof of ownership for later use -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- bc1qkjrr4u80fpyk59nlrlmzyfxfe37smauherfvfr IH1qTYuhaPsE450w+hYwzvlTXr3cemXc1t+6YG8x7j5fXh2mlUGxcmfJHQ5rjRNADAOuqPwTbSEa7W++Yklhq9s= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Sorry, maybe I do something wrong. Please quote and verify, again.
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is tranthidung from bitcointalk.org, id = 1292764, and today is 13/02/2019 I would like to sign a message to as a proof of ownership for later use -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- bc1qkjrr4u80fpyk59nlrlmzyfxfe37smauherfvfr IAqfGrEGkV7vm5WcIEMf2IytdFL/BE1/CLI+2v6ojuKyEGK/dLWM+VKZH6G2CWrZAChPCDNceeOxTZluueo0PSU= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Please quote and verify my message. Thank you all.
|
|
|
The OP raised a big question for the forum. In fact, as LoyceV pinpointed out in previous post, theymos mentioned about it in 2017. However, it is un-official statement on the forum's mission.
I suggest theymos to create a new topic, that specifically desribe forum's mission, then pin it in Meta board. Such a pin topic on forum's mission will make lot of sense for new comers.
|
|
|
Yes I agree, it now gives smaller guys a chance to stake and earn a share of the pie instead of just masternode holders and before people mining. Staking has always been a great way to earn some coins even with a small outlay. I can see GTM being a lot bigger in the next 6 months and by then staking can be very profitable.
Staking integration on Gentarium network, somehow and at somewhat extent will help to spread hashes out to small hands of stakers. It is helpful to maintain to core value of crypto, keeping the network as decentralized as possible. Staking also help to reduce potential unexpected side-effects on global environment. Why? Stakers can use VPS and masternode hosting services or staking pools to stake their coins and earn rewards. They don't need to have and operate mining rigs, that requires huge supply of electricty and potentially contribute significant green house gases.
|
|
|
Even when there is no problem with Bitcoin's or Ethereum's network (without network's congestions, I meant), I tend to use Dogecoin for my cross-exchange movements. I have never experienced network congestion with Dogecoin. I am not sure that over its long history, Dogecoin has experienced congestions or not. Someone who have more time in the crypto, can confirm that. I used Dogecoin for transfers between exchanges when the network Etherium was a big the cost of gas and problems with the network because Cryptokitties. In this regard, the Dogecoin is very profitable.
2 to 4 times per year. However, it seems right for most of altcoins, not only Dogecoin. LOL. But as an asset Dogecoin interesting - one or two times a year it pump up.
|
|
|
Bullish market does not mean that everyone can take advantage of its common upwards trend and get profits for their invesments. Even in bullish market, where most of coins rising, investors can easily got losses if they made wrong decision. Buy at lows, sell at highs, investors can only get profits by applying the rule. Unfortunately, sometimes, impatient investors got dramatical losses that partially caused by their impatience.
|
|
|
Congratulations, Cryptotourist got promotion to be a Full Member!
|
|
|
Someone would have to make archives of all topics of projects. It's big manual work, who are going to do that? We would need some volunters who will actively watch announcement board and make archive when new thread was published. I don't know, maybe there are some ways to make this work automated.
Something like what Vod has traced several forum statistics, such as merit, trust, activity count, postcount, account's security factors (password/ email changed). Of course, a big database for it needed to do this. And, one or several experts with enough skills and knowledge to do this.
|
|
|
Thank you for translate it into Filipino, and already added the version into the OP. However, I am curious why Fillipinos need to have a translation, because the locals there are proficient in English, I guess. I also translated your topic into the FILIPINO version
Yeap, happy to see your motivational words for my topic. I saw how helpful it is to our fellow countrymen especially newcomers/newbie.
|
|
|
The median of intra month merits (with the data contains 13 months, since Jan. 2018 to end of Jan. 2019) is 19597. However, let's take a look at the fluctuations around the median, by looking at the interquartile range of intra-month merits. The interquartile range found is 18047 to 23173. It means that 50 percent of 13 months observed have their total intra-month merits fluctuated in the range from 18047 to 23173 (including the median, at 19597, of course). We tend to only focus on the mean, but the median is a better statistics for centralization, and the interquartile range (IQR) is important, too. IQR help us to have a better overview on the distribution of what we observe.
More details, please visit my topic and my newest intra-month merits analysis there: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5069140.msg49685978#msg49685978
|
|
|
Intra-month merits update:(from 24/01/2018 to 31/01/2019)
ABSTRACT(1) 50% of observed months (13 months in total), have their total intra-month merits above 19597 (the median), whilst 50% of rest months have total intra-month merits below 19597. (2) 50% of observed months have their total intra-month merits range from 18047 to 23173 (the interquartile range). (3) Minimum and maximum of intra-month merits are 15327 (in 2018m12) and 46630 (in 2018m2), respectively.
Converted intra-month merits. list month merit
+-----------------+ | month merit | |-----------------| 1. | 2018m1 41760 | 2. | 2018m2 46630 | 3. | 2018m3 32084 | 4. | 2018m4 23173 | 5. | 2018m5 19597 | |-----------------| 6. | 2018m6 18752 | 7. | 2018m7 18047 | 8. | 2018m8 16317 | 9. | 2018m9 22261 | 10. | 2018m10 18395 | |-----------------| 11. | 2018m11 17370 | 12. | 2018m12 15327 | 13. | 2019m1 22954 | +-----------------+
Time-series plotBasic statistics:. tabstat merit, s(n mean sd p50 p25 p75 min max)
variable | N mean sd p50 p25 p75 min max -------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- merit | 13 24051.31 9956.748 19597 18047 23173 15327 46630 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Mean +/- sd: 24052 +/- 9957 - Median (Interquartile range): 19597 (18047 - 23173). - Min - max: 15327 - 46630 Notes: The 2018m1 (Jan. 2018) is incomplete month.
|
|
|
The long journey takes a lot of time to finish. I believe that some day Ethereum will set its new all time high, but not in coming days, or even till the end of 2019. Ethereum has to rally partially over time, with corrections along its pathway like bumps on the road. Additionally, Ethereum can not reach its new ATH if bitcoin won't rally to around $20.000. Bitcoin is a backbone of crypto world, and Ethereum is a backbone of startup ecosystem, by now, but they have a mutual relationship. $200 is not something to be happy, we deserved to reach that price again after being down more than 10 times. I wouldn't call that high also, I know we are going their and now that we have reach $120 already, I think the roll will continue.
|
|
|
Congratulations, logfiles got promotion to be a Full Member! | Rank | User name | BPIP profile | BPIP Merit RECEIVED | BPIP Merit SEND | Trust | Status | Personal comment about yourself | | ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fa.radikal.ru%2Fa37%2F1809%2F25%2F69030f38e90c.jpg&t=663&c=SiaTiB2EUf1dkw) | logfiles | logfiles | logfiles | logfiles | 0: -0 / +0 | active | Information expected |
|
|
|
Voting for the new reward structure. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FCJzka4C.png&t=663&c=vHRU_DXCxpOoCw) I don't know that what will happen next after the voting on new reward structure of World Crypto Forum coin, but for now, the WCF coin rallied considerably to above 300 satoshis. It has still been too far away to 1000 or 2000 satoshis, but it is a good recovery after teribble falls.
|
|
|
The list of hacked exchanges remind me that I never should store my coins on exchanges. Only send them to exchanges to sell at the right time to take profits. After sell orders filled all, I should (I actually usually do this) withdraw all money to my own wallet. I strongly think that it is much safer approach, even the Binance CEO stated that he suggested to store coins/ money on prestigious exchanges.
|
|
|
|