dont think of it as a 'crash'. because the month average has been $56k anyway

the $64k was a temporary blip. not sustainable.
a $53k-$56k is a normal flow average for the last month. and not something to panic/worry/question

but now we know the market has tested $62k twice in the last 3 months. it shows that its capable of going up in the midterm future. but just not ready yet to go up and stay up

the so called '11%' /20exa is rounded/diluted out over a day. meaning when electricity returned later the day the numbers went up.. but at the exact moments of the power outage the dip was more then 11%


asic miners dont have to be hosted in same location as stratum(pool) servers
a stratum can be in thailand and yet:
25% of asics can be in china, 25%in america 25% in iceland 25% in georgia
and thus a china power outage can cause a 25% dip for a thailand pool. even if the pool is not in china

by looking at which pools suddenly dropped shows which international stratums the northwest china miners connect to.

we should all know by now there is not 'btc' at code level.. the mining reward, transaction, data units were always in satoshi value.
yep thats right you will not find a single btc in the blockchain.nor any transaction. just an enormous amount of satoshis allocated to each utxo
btc is just a GUI / UX basket calculation made for human graphic visualisation . not a code/data fact

so imaging if 12 years ago it was not deemed as 50btc mined block reward.. but on the GUI/UX it was 5,000,000,000sat
and later they developed a basket term of bits 100sat. but never went to the basket of 50btc
so
in 2009: 50,000,000.00 per block
in 2012: 25,000,000.00 per block
in 2016: 12,500,000.00 per block
in 2020: 6,250,000.00 per block

with a 140 year cap of 21 trillion bits(21,000,000,000,000.00)

would people view the network as equally as 'scarce' or would they see the issuance of 50mill 'coins' every 10 minutes as not scarce. and thus not of as equal value

i just want to know other peoples feelings of how much less they would value the network if it wasnt for the user graphic interface calculations

would people in 2009 have deemed
50btc=$0.10c as good value with fee's as low as 0.00000300
or
50,000,000bits=$0.10c as good value with fees as low as 3bits

19th century africa was more tribal and local law. they didnt really have 'state law'

then politics came in. dividing the land based on political notions not tribal sentiment
politicians started selling the land. without tribal consent. disturbing and displacing peoples villages for corporate profit

damming up the rivers to cater to utility companies for cities, left the land dryer with no natural flow for remote tribes.

mostly it was the land grab politically and from global corporations displacing tribes further away from their natural hunting/farming grounds

then the damming of rivers where only the waste the passes beyond the dams

..

ask yourself .. if a village needs to travel 5km a day for water. why did they settle 5km away..
the answer is because they are not allowed to live near the rivers. they were forced out

pastor: my fellow flock.if you pray your life will become richer from god
flock: so then pastor you should pray more and stop asking us for money and ask god instead

it is funny how one side says pray to pay.. and actually means pay to pray

tash defends a retired man that tested a unauthorised vaccine on 60+ people

wait. wasnt tash earlier saying that testing unauthorised things on people was bad..
wait. wasnt tash earlier saying that 21000 test subjects is not enough to 'prove'
wait. wasnt tash earlier saying that 6-9months was not enough to 'prove'
..
so now tash wants to defend a retired guy that tested it without authorisation on 60+ people and call it science

dang tash is flip flopping more then badecker..

and then there is this
'i produced an antigen and then innoculated myself several times intramuscularly'

seems his treatment is not a 1 dose. not a 2 dose not a 3 dose but a several dose treatment
...
so why exactly is tash defending this guy??

so why is a guy that did not seek permission to use humans as guineapigs.. deemed a good guy?

for me religion is just campfire stories to teach morals and laws.
using entertaining stories of magic and mystery to have those stories remembered.
where the ethos ethics and morals of the story are about peace. respect and not harming others

negatives are they people ignore the morals and ethics and use the stories to excuse them when they do harm by taking exerts out that allow them to be forgiven and thus able to do harm without taking responsibility

when a price dips/corrects/crashes.. DO NOT CRY.
instead celebrate.. because its BUY time

buy the dips

to overcome the fear if failure can be easy
ask yourself. will the task you want to do cause your death if you fail
will it cause you to be homeless

if its not life impacting then dont fear it. instead plan it. plan to reduce the risks even further... then
DO IT

if your not going to lose your life or your home. then the risks are not that much. so do it because the benefits can be far greater

self defense is usually universally spoken as "a clear and immediate threat"

if you know someone says 'im gonna kill you". but has no weapon and you know they are not actually going to kill you. then its not a threat. you know there is no intent. so you wont have a good defence

also to use the excuse of 'fake threat' you also need to prove they were the actual people that actually fake threatened

its not straight forward as someone makes a wild-ass empty claim and it absolves you of any responsibility on your side.. yes you have to be responsible too

your best bet is to find who done the bomb threats. create a police crime report about it. if the police cant do anything but the people continue to make their wild-ass fake threats. then inform the police that they are harassing and intimidating

and then. once you got your defence of harassment and intimidation.. then you can defend yourself

in short prep a harassment/intimidation defence not a 'they threatened to bomb but i knew its not a threat'
(harassment is prolonged and occuring multiple times. so make sure its logged that its not a simple 11 time event)

badecker creates a title.. and then says many will cal it fake news. and then quotes an article from a fake news conspiracy site..

yep its fake news
seems badecker only searches half a dozen websites
phoenix. naturalnews and some freeman cultsite bitchube and some random conspiracy influencer

he fears searching the entire internet. he has become too brainwashed into the conspiracy fake news that he doesnt realise what is reality anymore

if badecker has ever seen the planes hauling water to try putting out the fires of california. he would (if he tried) realise to be able to poison a whole sky/cloud would require more then the the thin 'chemtrails'

heck he is so brainwashed that he is using 'chemtrails' when talking about water vapour from normal flights.. and has not even looked into 'cloud seeding'

yep by badecker using the buzzword 'chemtrail' and not the research of 'cloud seeding' just shows how pathetic and brainwashed badecker is.

he would rather believe the lies of conspiracy sites than do actual research where actual cloud seeding was tried. he would rather believe the lies then learn the difference and learn the truth

millions of lives have been saved
out of the millions that have a vaccine only 21 had adverse affects..
you are forgetting the millions saved from the vaccine

whats next.. if 21 people got infections from injury wound sutures you want millions of injury victims to bleed out and die because you want to ban people getting stitches
are you really that insane

are you really going to cry if 21 people died from infection due to stitches.. if the real world knows stitches actually saved millions of people from getting wound infections. and saved millions from death.
is your evidence of 'benefit. going to be when stitches work so well that the normal open wound injury infection rate goes down to just 7.. but the stitch infection rate is 21.. you will announce you want millions of survivors thanks to stitches be banned from having stitches

please tell me your not that insane to ignore the thouasands-millions where the treatment saved lives

so as deputy director before 2013 he was part of the propaganda that bitcoin was darkweb money..
he probably earned a fair bit going to 'security' conferences to spout out that mantra in his official capacity

then after leaving his role and in his unofficial capacity he wants to get paid doing interviews to say that the CIA propaganda was wrong
.... bit late .. but getting paid jumping over a fence he created

its like the SEC guy that invented bitcoin NYLicence. .. and a year later left his role to join a bitcoin corporation to help advise people how to get around the licence or how to get through it quick and cheaply

'these days'???i think you mean before 2020 (21 years ago) the oral polio vaccine was the live-but weakened virus.

this is where its the virus but weakened to not multiply at-all/much. thus allowing your body to fight it faster than it can replicate thus recover fast
but this is where the weakened virus actually did cause cases..

but this was 21 years ago.. so tvbcof is very outdated with "these days"

it just means less coin in active circulation..

bitcoin should do anything about it.
the point of bitcoin is no one can just steal someones coins for any greedy reason of thinking coins need to be redistributed if not moved after 10 years.

no one should dare declare coins dead and remove them from that address

if they are lost then they are lost. that is it.

bitcoin needs to do nothing.. PEOPLE need to actually take care of their assets and prevent forgetton/losing their keys.

although non economic nodes do help decentralise the network. thats all they do
its more about data. not rule change control

it is a supposed safety net to ensure that the economic nodes(ones running bitcoin accepting businesses) dont co-ordinate a change of rules without majority. however we seen this in 2017. they had and succeeded to push the non-economic nodes not wanting the NYA off the network. because having so many nodes allowing to accept standard blocks would have ruined their chances of changing the network rules
yep the economic nodes clubbed together and set their own rulechange ploy as part of the developers need for segwit

the power of non-economic nodes is limited.
not only can the power players (dns seeders, economic nodes and pools) just push others off the network. but also when economic nodes want to change something.. because they are the businesses/exchanges people use. people end up following the economics lead just to stay on the network that will accept their transactions
(no point having a coin if a service cant see it)

and so the economic nodes can end up winning anyway

yes even exchanges can control the path pools go. because pools cant spend their coins if they are not on the same network as the major exchanges/services they want to spend rewards on

user nodes and pools end up being sheep to the main service nodes(exchanges/dns seed)

..
in short. if a normal non-ecomomic node wanted to change the rules.. they would need to get the economic nodes onboard
if the economic nodes wanted to change the rules. they can just change the rules and let everyone upgrade to their ruleset after

non-economic node changes create altcoins
economic node changes create network upgrades

and if you do the maths. the 166exa to 136exa that the differences count as

is only 21%
so atleast you know "china" do not own bitcoin. do not have 50% but at the most 21%


next thing you realise is that these dips are only about the stratums(pool servers) and not the mining rig count themselves

so when a server goes offline in china. it may house multiple countries asics that could not connect to the chinese server

and so the count is actually low than 21%

so can people now chill and realise china 'owns' under 21%

simple math

a coin worth $100 only needs 100 increments of $1 to get to $200
a coin worth $60k needs 60,000 increments of $1 to get to $120k

with a exchange orderbook having these increments. it takes lot of buying pressure to move a higher priced asset(actual increments are sub pennies so its a multiple of the 100-60000 respectively)

also some of the crap coins are pure speculation. they have nothing backing it so they can be more volatile
they are only used for pump and dumps. so have more frequent spikes and dips

i found the same issue when 'penny share' trading. its easier to move a investment that has a share price under $1 than it is to move a investment of $20

also bitcoin has more stable value underlying it. so the dumps dont happen as much. but with that the spikes dont happen as much either.

if a price dumped down buy 50% the correction then is seen as a 50% rise. and then speculative hype can push they by 50% making a 100%

but if a dip only occurs at 10% then the correction and hype(FOMO) would only be seen as 20%

..
the difference between a crap coin and bitcoin. the pump and dump volatility of a altcoin does not have a long term progressive growth.. but bitcoin does progressively grow. price now is much higher then price 2 years ago, which is greater than 2 years before that

dont think of altcoins as a long term asset. just think of them and use and abuse them as quick pump and dumps and return that back to bitcoin for the long term progressive growth

if you got contacted from someone offering you lots of money. but then asks you for money to be able to get this secret special offer.. its a scam

its like the nigerian prince. you get contacted by someone saying that they found you as the distant relative of some prince/successful guy that died and a Will has shown you will get lots of money but you have to pay an admin fee

as for the website gleepin.com
seems you might have had a spelling mistake as 'whois' says its never been registered.. or the scammer just mentioned a random giberish thing and said its a site hoping no one would actually check

deities and gods did not write scripture

humans did.. these humans pretended to be messiah.. messengers. or witnesses..

most of the messages were not 'gods speach' but instead laws and moral rules to keep the population tame and civilised where the rules of kingdoms pretended to have got messages from a being no one has ever seen so that any blame can be pointed to the sky and not at the messenger
even though the messenger is actually the creator of the rules of ancient law

governments do it now. senators make laws by their individual votes.. but when questioning. no single senator can be blamed because the entity 'senate' created the law.