Hey look who else popped out of the clown car.
See? You are too stupid to see that you are addressing your own rhetorical questions. Well, that did not surprise me, after all, you scanned Rick Astley for viruses https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158058.msg51588954#msg51588954  I have been completely transparent and all you are doing is drawing more attention to my op with your twisting and moaning.
Thank you for your input. Anything about this: Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him? I did NOT delete my thread.
I already answered your question. Learn to read. Or just keep repeating yourselves, whatever you like. |
|
|
|
What is this - > ?
It is rhetorical question as I can see, don't play dumb. Don't play political games here, you are not smart as you think you are.
TECHARE assumed that FH deleted thread and now they turned they eyes blind about this issue, my question is: Are you going to remove/edit your lie/assumption or not?Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him? I did NOT delete my thread.
Ironically I am curious which global (or admin) decided it was breaking forum rules in order to delete it.
In case TECSHARE does not want to address this because "he missed question", again: Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him? I did NOT delete my thread.
Hey look who else popped out of the clown car. Good to know everyone else gets to tell me the meaning of my own words, but when I tell you the meaning of my own words it is invalid. I asked a question, then a bunch of sad saps suffering from chronic butt pain line up to try to create a circus. I don't need to delete anything. Feel free to see who else you can scrounge up with a score to settle if it makes you all feel better. I have been completely transparent and all you are doing is drawing more attention to my op with your twisting and moaning. You'd figure you people would get the point that this dog piling strategy of yours has the opposite of the intended effect by now, but keep it up, I have enough carrots and saddles for all of you. |
|
|
|
Why didn't I mention he is a Canadian? Why didn't I mention he is a Communist?
What does that have to do with him not deleting the thread? inability to hold a legitimate political debate with me
You're reaching Quicksy's levels of projection. A lot of stuff that you're saying about others seems to be more applicable to yourself. When was the last time you were wrong? Nothing, because it is a reply to the other question "why didn't I state it was his thread?" I tend to not engage in discussion of subjects of which I have little understanding. I know to some people this is a hard concept to grasp, being informed before having an opinion, but I do try. No projection. Nutilduh is an emotionally driven stalker with the inability to argue points based in logic and is largely motivated by lack of emotional control. It is always the same thing, struggling to craft some wrongdoing in other parts of the forum because you can't argue your beliefs like an adult. It is much like yourself, only Nutilduhh just happens to be more far gone. You at least have some understanding of this dynamic by now whereas Nutilduhh doesn't even see the saddle on his back. Keep chasing that carrot. Why didn't I mention he is a Canadian? Why didn't I mention he is a Communist? I don't have responsibilities for your delusional attention seeking interpretations created as a pathetic attempt at retribution for exposing your inability to hold a legitimate political debate with me.
Oh brother.  I asked a question. You made interpretations, now expect me to take responsibility for them. Uh no. It is cute however seeing you struggle to put me on the defensive. Keep scraping that barrel, maybe you'll find something nutilduhhh.
I think we just found everything there is to find. I keep forgetting that you are your own worst enemy. But at the same time I just thought it was stupid that you thought a moderator shouldn't be allowed to delete their own thread, which he didn't do anyway, so, at the very least you should edit your post to remove your high integrity journalistic investigation post about the Missing Flying Hellfish Thread Mystery. Something tells me you won't though. Maybe if you repeat it enough times I will believe it. I never said "a moderator shouldn't be allowed to delete his own threads", again this is just more projection of your own making. After Flying Hellfish flew off the handle the last time I was instructed to post anything I found abusive in the appropriate meta subforum. This is what I am doing. I am so very sorry this is not to your liking. Perhaps some salve to sooth your posterior is in order? |
|
|
|
Next in his mind:
Buying Hong Kong... they need help!
Buying Taiwan... they need help!
Buying Venezuela ... they need help!
Buying Cuba... they need help!
and Buying the WORLD.
That's the Trumpzilla syndrome!
To buy and sell some thing is by its nature a voluntary transaction. The USA would only buy Greenland if at least Denmark agreed to the terms. Obviously none of those other nations would agree to be bought at any price, even if they had enough value to be purchased to begin with. Impressive visual with the Trumpzilla and all though, too bad your argument is hollow. |
|
|
|
Are you going to admit that you are mistaken about FH deleting his own thread or...
What is this - > ?Its a question mark in big red font. So just out of curiosity, why have you refused to acknowledge this information? As usual the fucking trolls make an assumption and state it as fact. I did NOT delete my thread. Although having a locked censorship thread doesn't allow me to actually correct the stunned cunt!
Ironically I am curious which global (or admin) decided it was breaking forum rules in order to delete it. Hopefully whoever it was will see this and chime in for me.
I'm genuinely curious as to what your thinking is. I am just making sure you understand the meaning of a question mark considering it was included in your quote of mine. I presented a question, not a statement. Do you propose the fact that I posed this question was mistaken? Uh, what? I didn't add the question mark, it was part of your original post. This has nothing to do with FH not being the one who deleted his thread as you claim. Even after it was pointed out to you that the answer to your "question" was "no", you still wrote this: Just because you are allowed to do it doesn't mean it does not reflect poorly on you.
He never did it to begin with, so obviously there is zero chance of it reflecting poorly on him. You also avoided my other question: why didn't you mention he was the one who opened the thread? You make garbage insinuations and then try to evade responsibility for them with dodge-and-parry techniques, which is why nobody takes you seriously. Well I mean that and ridiculing people for locking their threads when you do the same thing. And, let's be honest, basically doing everything under the sun that you accuse others of doing. Why didn't I mention he is a Canadian? Why didn't I mention he is a Communist? I don't have responsibilities for your delusional attention seeking interpretations created as a pathetic attempt at retribution for exposing your inability to hold a legitimate political debate with me. I asked a question. You made interpretations, now expect me to take responsibility for them. Uh no. It is cute however seeing you struggle to put me on the defensive. Keep scraping that barrel, maybe you'll find something nutilduhhh. |
|
|
|
Are you going to admit that you are mistaken about FH deleting his own thread or...
What is this - > ?Its a question mark in big red font. So just out of curiosity, why have you refused to acknowledge this information? As usual the fucking trolls make an assumption and state it as fact. I did NOT delete my thread. Although having a locked censorship thread doesn't allow me to actually correct the stunned cunt!
Ironically I am curious which global (or admin) decided it was breaking forum rules in order to delete it. Hopefully whoever it was will see this and chime in for me.
I'm genuinely curious as to what your thinking is. I am just making sure you understand the meaning of a question mark considering it was included in your quote of mine. I presented a question, not a statement. Do you propose the fact that I posed this question was mistaken? |
|
|
|
Maybe he's growing up.
Do you people get the impression when you collect a bunch of stupid together in a group it makes you any smarter?
Oh well, kudos to The Pharmacist for giving you the benefit of the doubt, even if in vain. Are you going to admit that you are mistaken about FH deleting his own thread or... What is this - > ? |
|
|
|
What exactly is the issue?
To some people lying would be an issue but not to you apparently  Gotta love a thin-skinned megatroll snowflaking into a muddy puddle. Oh no, don't call me names. You appropriated "our word" snowflake! I am double shook! This entire thread is just a collection of people incapable of engaging in logical debate desperately seeking attention via other means. Do you people get the impression when you collect a bunch of stupid together in a group it makes you any smarter? Learn to have a logic based discussion, then maybe you won't need to scrape the bottom of the barrel for shit like this in a pathetic attempt at retribution for logging abuse of authority by your staff buddy. |
|
|
|
I have already explained myself and said everything that needed to be said in my op. This is just another sad cry for attention from nutilduhh.
Actually I was genuinely curious as to why you never admitted you were wrong about FH deleting his thread. He didn't delete it, yet you continue to insist that he did. It was just a little bizarre to me. Because TECSHARE isn't interested in what ACTUALLY happened he is ONLY interested in pushing his agenda and playing the victim card. Having a locked thread where only he can complain about a problem isn't the act of someone who wants to discuss and understand an issue but someone who sticks his fingers in his ears and whines so he can't hear anyone else. Nope. That is you to a T. What my post is is a log of your selective enforcement and your inability to separate your personal feelings from your job as a moderator. No discussion is required, and as you see if discussion is desired a thread such as this can be opened. What exactly is the issue? |
|
|
|
BUT nobody else is even allowed to complain about it.
You're allowed to complain all you like, but man....when you keep writing long screeds like this one, don't expect people to even finish reading, much less give you any credibility. Nobody is censoring dissent here. It just happens that your arguments don't garner a lot of support, which is a fact that you keep missing. Funny how when tecshare is dead wrong about something he just ignores it like it never happened.
In his defense, a lot of people do the exact same thing whether they're right or wrong. This is the first thread that he's run away from as far as I can remember. Normally he can't stand not having the last word.
Maybe he's growing up. Hey, he included me on his trust list, which is something I never expected. But I suspect he won't stop being such a hothead. That's apparently in his nature--and the thread isn't locked yet, so there's still time for him to come back and give his retort. I have already explained myself and said everything that needed to be said in my op. This is just another sad cry for attention from nutilduhh. |
|
|
|
^ With all due respect to both of you suchmoon and Lutpin, you guys did wrong when you both changed your feedback to neutral because it's on entirely wrong argument. It should remain to Negative, so I am leaving my rating to this account. In case this thread gets locked then follow this,my reply in main threadI am also a graphic artist. The industry does frown upon what he did, however his explanation of wanting to protect the privacy of his customers makes perfect sense in this forum full of stalkers. He still should have disclosed the samples were not his, but it is not as if he sold the work of others. Move on. |
|
|
|
|
This is a non-issue. Mistakes were made, and admitted to. There were no damages. Corrections were made. Everyone moves on improved. This is unnecessary drama.
|
|
|
|
It is quite arguable that Bernie Sander's policy positions could very easily destroy the economy of the USA. Free healthcare for example, just one of his policy positions could absorb the entirety of all tax collections and then some. Then he has positions such as raising the minimum wage, which again demonstrate complete ignorance of economics and have an overall destructive effect to the economy because it results in employers cutting hours and firing people to make up the difference if not just outright shutting down. There are so many examples of his insane inability to comprehend even basic economic principles.
Healthcare in the US is broken and that is the reason for the high prices, over the long term, medicare for all saves us trillions of dollars. We are supporting useless leeches at the insurance companies that do nothing but take our money, raise prices and try to deny care, this has to end. Raising the minimum wage improves things if anything, large employers such as Walmart would still be extremely profitable even if they paid a minimum of $15 an hour. You can look at places in the US where the minimum wage is raised a lot more than the federal over the years, they are doing as well or better than places that have lower minimum wages. Unemployment doesn't seem to increase with increasing minimum wages either. There are tons of studies that support my point of view. I can't dig them up right now, but you're definitely wrong on this. Here's a video on the topic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-aOmwtYpEwI agree there are a lot of useless leeches benefiting from the bureaucracy, but this is also a well known and inevitable result of any entitlement program. There is plenty of evidence that raises in minimum wage mandates have the opposite of the intended effect. I understand the argument but it is like saying water is good for you then holding you underwater in a filled bathtub thinking it will be extra good for you because there is more water. It is better to let the market decide as much as reasonably possible, and yes that some times includes what should be well defined regulation to preserve workers rights or else we might as well be China. "Survival of the Fittest: The Impact of the Minimum Wage on Firm Exit" https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2951110https://evans.uw.edu/sites/default/files/NBER%20Working%20Paper.pdfhttps://www.fraserinstitute.org/blogs/seattle-s-failed-minimum-wage-experimentP.S. if you are gonna tell me I am wrong back it up, don't just assure me you are right. |
|
|
|
Whatever this man was going to reveal was going to be a bigger shock than doing something so obvious to get rid of his voice.
Camera stopped working
Taken off suicide watch or not successfully implementing suicide watch after Epstein nearly died a few days prior due to either a suicidal attempt or an assault.
Multiple broken bones in neck that are more consistent with strangulation.
Paper-sheets don't break bones, even if braided like a boy scout.
Removing cellmate shortly before death
Shrieking (presumably Epstein) and "Breathe Epstein, Breathe!" (presumably his killer) being reportedly heard by inmates.
Only two guards were on duty, both happened to be sleeping during the incident, hadn't performed the scheduled checks on Epstein surrounding the incident and one of the "guards" wasn't even a regular guard.
At what point is Ockham's razor supposed to back up the idea that he was taken out?
When this kind of information is 'leaked' and plastered all over the mainstream news or controlled opposition 'alt' news, someone wants the peeps to follow Ockham's razor to a specific conclusion. It will be a 'safe' conclusion but almost certainly not the 'right' conclusion insofar as it models reality. We see the game board being layed out. The 'crazy conspiracy theorist' side believes Epstein was murdered (because 'Ockham's razor'). The 'normies' side believes the 'other side' are crazy because they believe something other than what the government says happened. It would be fun to be a no-ethics-having psychopath designing these 'fights' because the peeps are so stupid these days. Could get them to believe anything and get them to do almost anything. It really reminds me of pro-wrestling. AKA Hegelian Dialectic, thesis + antithesis = synthesis, or problem + reaction = solution. Everyone eats the shit sandwich, its just a matter of what flavor you want, red or blue. If you don't like those they have a flavor binary for all of us. |
|
|
|
|
This purchase would give the USA considerably more claim and leverage over the newly exposed natural resources in the Arctic. These claims might be hard for Denmark or Greenland to independently negotiate for and defend, however with the backing of the military might of the US, some kind of share agreement might be maximally beneficial for both parties. It will be somewhat of a hard sell to the native population. I know I wouldn't like it if my nation were sold to another, but if it means more domestic resources, infrastructure, jobs, and government benefits they might see past nationalism.
|
|
|
|
Even though we linked Trump 2016 and Brexit (pretty obvious) no one gives a shit.
Pretty awesome that these movements are unregulated. The playbooks are changing.
Can you even explain to me why we should give a shit? |
|
|
|
More "off topic" Smoking gun of what exactly? What is the crime you are alleging here?
Read the damned article kiddo. Or is reading too hard for you? A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted. Is this your best strategy for avoiding any critical discussion of your ideas? |
|
|
|
Please explain in detail what is wrong with the picture I posted.
The picture (which originated on 4chan) is in response to the recent coverage of the mass shootings in America and the response from the main stream media which is basically "America has a serious problem with people walking into crowded areas and shooting as many strangers as possible, as fast as possible. More often than not these are white males. And the one that happened in Texas was probably influenced by Trumps rhetoric. America has a problem with white supremacy, and the Texas shooting is evidence of that." While all gun violence is bad, it's not all the same. A shootout on the streets over a grudge or gang issues is not the same as walking down a crowded street and shooting 37 people in 30 seconds. This picture lumps them all together, showing only the color of their skin without any other information.It's clear the intent is to pass the message that "black people are worse than white people" when it comes to gun violence, which is exactly why the former grand wizard of the KKK quickly posted it on his website and had an entire podcast devoted to the subject. Thanks for exposing yourself as a racist and a hypocrite. The picture is just reality. Your prejudicial projections upon it are not my responsibility, they are yours and yours alone. People like you LOVE trying to make it seem like only white people are shooters and it is some how worse than when black people do it, and anyone who shows a picture of reality is racist. Take your weak ass guilt via association argument and shove it you fucking bigot. Progressives are more racist than any KKK member, they just think their virtue signalling makes up for it. Jesus Christ dude. You need to calm down. I am perfectly calm. Projecting your imaginary emotional states on to me is just a completely transparent attempt to avoid addressing the fact that you got exposed for your own racist bigoted views while you point your fingers at others for the same. You know who else told people to calm down?
HITLERI rest my case. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
