ABitNut, I am requesting on StonerStanley's behalf that you please remove your negative rating for him. He has taken the first conciliatory step towards mutual restoration, and your original rating seems somewhat baseless.
I retract my previous request for resolution for this user. He is too dumb and rude for his own good. You guys can have this one, he has it all under control. |
|
|
|
Your value system is completely arbitrary. It is based on nothing but your wants.
If you kept the values the same you would not have to lower anything.
From your posts, I see you don't give a shit about animals, (some) humans included.
BTW, I said nothing that is anti-human. You are really fucked up in your twisted, 1st century way of thinking.
It is exactly that way of thinking that leads morons like you to genocides. If you think one type of animal is more valuable than the other, what will stop you from assigning different values to different types of humans, based on race, ethnicity, gender, etc.?
Your classification is arbitrary. Mine is just based on science (biology). My value system is based in simple logic which you clearly have trouble grasping. Please do regale me with my alleged crimes against animal kind. You think you are progressive, but you are actually regressive and anti-human. You are so completely assured of your superiority, so completely engulfed in narcissism that you are blind to the fact you are advocating for standards that will leave humans treated as farm animals. Now saying humans are more important than animals is the same as being racist or sexist? Just being contrarian is not being advanced. You aren't evolved, you are an insane degenerate masturbating your ego with your favorite hubris lube, the blood of free humans. Read what I said. Life value should not be assigned based on its utility or one's whim. I repeat, all life is equally important. You are so wrapped in your superiority as a species that you are forgetting where we fit in the bigger scheme of things. Animals (humans included) kill other animals to survive. In addition, humans kill other animals (humans included) for other arbitrary reasons, for fun, as a sport, sacrifice, to make a point, because they read instructions in some old book, etc. You are assigning values based on utility. Humans are more valuable than horses, horses are more valuable than pigs, pigs are more important than squirrels or ants, etc. Following your logic, you will say that life of an educated, white, Protestant, male American is more than the life of an uneducated, poor, non-English speaking, old, female migrant from Honduras; or that males are more important than women or vice versa. I can only imagine where your way of thinking can lead you. You are so wrapped around your culturally driven superiority as a human being that you do not understand what I am saying. Give it a few decades, you will eventually get it. PS. Problem is you think you are not an animal. I did read what you said. Now you try. All life should be treated with respect. All life is not equally important. Is a rapist mass murderer's life equal to that of an innocent child? You see how quick your moronic statement breaks down? The reality of the real world, not just the fantasy land you live in, is that choices have to be made some times. If choices have to be made, then humans are superior to and more important than animals. BTW, I love that you repeated the accusation of this being related to racist ideology as if by not making myself equal to a cow I am down a path to Nazism. You are blind deaf and dumb (the stupid kind not the mute kind). Also the projection and mirroring of comments I just said to you, back to me as if you thought it up is a nice touch too. In a few decades? I am probably old enough to be your daddy little boy. |
|
|
|
Timelord2067: "TECSHARE has made a very thinly veiled threat to stalk me unless I remove my *neutral* trust/feedback post (last paragraph and his "PS") in this now archived post:
Should be negative, not neutral. :/ Cool story insane canukistani stalker. Didn't you literally just get done lecturing me about ethics? |
|
|
|
and again... Timelord2067: "TECSHARE has made a very thinly veiled threat to stalk me unless I remove my *neutral* trust/feedback post (last paragraph and his "PS") in this now archived post: https://web.archive.org/web/20190908033629/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5181723.msg52379325 " Yes, everyone knows threats are often proceeded by "please". Hey cupcake, you are the one who suggested I was responsible for guiding you. You literally suggested I should have been monitoring you. Can you make up your mind what you want or do you just spew words meaninglessly? Have a discussion with me like an adult in the thread instead of shitting up my trust page with your spazz out little boy. |
|
|
|
Your value system is completely arbitrary. It is based on nothing but your wants.
If you kept the values the same you would not have to lower anything.
From your posts, I see you don't give a shit about animals, (some) humans included.
BTW, I said nothing that is anti-human. You are really fucked up in your twisted, 1st century way of thinking.
It is exactly that way of thinking that leads morons like you to genocides. If you think one type of animal is more valuable than the other, what will stop you from assigning different values to different types of humans, based on race, ethnicity, gender, etc.?
Your classification is arbitrary. Mine is just based on science (biology). My value system is based in simple logic which you clearly have trouble grasping. Please do regale me with my alleged crimes against animal kind. You think you are progressive, but you are actually regressive and anti-human. You are so completely assured of your superiority, so completely engulfed in narcissism that you are blind to the fact you are advocating for standards that will leave humans treated as farm animals. Now saying humans are more important than animals is the same as being racist or sexist? Just being contrarian is not being advanced. You aren't evolved, you are an insane degenerate masturbating your ego with your favorite hubris lube, the blood of free humans. |
|
|
|
This guy is unstable. He needs psychiatric treatment for his depression. Blaming a judge, WTF? The judge was not near the baby. The baby died because of his previous health condition. Police found no fault. The guy needs to be locked up as he is in danger of harming himself and others. The judge looks at the evidence not some hearsay by an estranged husband or wife. This is a tragic story, but you have to look at it without taking sides. It is what it is. Baby died. Move on, there is nothing you can do to bring him back. Move on, meet another woman, make another baby. And where did you get your psychiatric certification to be able to diagnose this man remotely with nearly no information and having never even seen him in person? The judge is 100% undeniably at fault for violating his rights to free speech and redress of grievances. This part is not up for debate. He is not required to be correct in his assertions in order for this to be a violation of his rights, though I think there is a good chance he is. The police as well as the court system have a well established bias against men towards women ESPECIALLY in domestic and family court related matters as well as many other areas. If you want to go over the stats I would be glad to demolish any opposition to this point. You are nothing but an establishment parrot repeating the status quo with no critical examination of the situation. Your solution to this situation is to avoid conflict at all cost by simply imprisoning a father that just lost his child, because he is a man, and who gives a fuck what he thinks or feels right? Throw him in a cage, women are strong, independent, and blameless, and if you question this off to the gulags with you! It was reported that he suffered from depression after his son died. It is understandable. It can happen to anyone. Google it. The guy is delusional blaming the judge. The judge was not near the kid. Talk about not thinking straight! If you want to blame someone, blame the mother, not the judge! Fuck, some people are so stupid to think the guy was justified on taking it on the judge. BTW, he will be jailed because he broke the condition of his bond. The law is the law. He fucked up. It does not matter that he lost his son, father or mother. Ignorance of the law is not a defense. You are just making shit up to avoid confronting your own cognitive dissonance from the situation. You have ZERO evidence he is unstable or a danger to others. This is just a pathetic excuse to wipe out a free man so you don't have to address the difficult implications of the situation. Why was a bond placed on him to begin with? Oh right for criticizing the judge. What law did he break? The judge WAY overstepped her authority arresting him for this in the first instance let alone a second time. This is 100% tyrannical behavior and is in no way justifiable. You are probably one of those people who thinks it is a valid charge to arrest some one for resisting arrest. I read about his story (depression) here: https://usareally.com/4090-a-father-who-has-lost-his-son-will-end-up-in-jail-due-to-criticism-of-the-judiciary-judge-spits-on-first-amendmentAnyway, this guy is a little boy who cannot handle his emotions. He has psychological issues, that is for sure. What was his 'game plan'? To scare the judge? Well, it worked. LOL. There is zero information there supporting your assertion of psychological issues. Even if there was, since when do men lose their freedom for having depression? What the fuck is wrong with you, you are advocating essentially for the gulag system of the USSR where anyone who seeks redress from government is imprisoned for "psychological issues". He made no threats. Criticism is not a threat. Neither is listing her publicly available official contact information. |
|
|
|
Why don't you counter negative feedback then? Or exclude user from your trust list again?
Because. Any more questions grand inquisitor? No, your Honer. Just being curious, that's all. Carry on with this case. Interesting, I like the sarcastic projection as if I am the one attempting to arrogantly assert my authority over you, so you can save face from getting called out over your obvious senseless trifling bullshit. If you are gonna make a dig, at least be creative enough to have an original one, don't just mirror what I say as if it was a clever retort. |
|
|
|
We as a society will not respect the rights of animals because we don't recognize human rights properly yet.
First step: Recognize that humans are animals. Next step: Recognize that human life is not more important than life of any other animal. However, animals eat other animals. So do humans. Even if you eat only plants, you still kill life to eat. This concept that humans and animals are equal is nothing but a backdoor way to lower the standing of humans to that of an animal so that mistreatment of humans is excused. There is no way to give animals equal protection to humans and not do so. This is an anti-humanist viewpoint covered in a thin veneer of cute little furry creatures regardless if you recognize it as such or not. Are you sure? Why do you think human life is more important than the life of other animals? Because we can kill any animal on the planet anytime we want? Is the life of a lion more important than that of a gazelle?We are the most dangerous animal on the planet, not the most important. All life is equally important. Step out of your 'human thinking box'. BTW, humans are a plague. I don't give a shit about any of your relativist bullshit. THE FACT IS that making animals equivalent to humans lowers the value of human life down to that of an animal, and this is anti-human and totalitarian. I don't need any other reasons, that single reason is horrible enough to reject your postmodernist tripe. |
|
|
|
This guy is unstable. He needs psychiatric treatment for his depression. Blaming a judge, WTF? The judge was not near the baby. The baby died because of his previous health condition. Police found no fault. The guy needs to be locked up as he is in danger of harming himself and others. The judge looks at the evidence not some hearsay by an estranged husband or wife. This is a tragic story, but you have to look at it without taking sides. It is what it is. Baby died. Move on, there is nothing you can do to bring him back. Move on, meet another woman, make another baby. And where did you get your psychiatric certification to be able to diagnose this man remotely with nearly no information and having never even seen him in person? The judge is 100% undeniably at fault for violating his rights to free speech and redress of grievances. This part is not up for debate. He is not required to be correct in his assertions in order for this to be a violation of his rights, though I think there is a good chance he is. The police as well as the court system have a well established bias against men towards women ESPECIALLY in domestic and family court related matters as well as many other areas. If you want to go over the stats I would be glad to demolish any opposition to this point. You are nothing but an establishment parrot repeating the status quo with no critical examination of the situation. Your solution to this situation is to avoid conflict at all cost by simply imprisoning a father that just lost his child, because he is a man, and who gives a fuck what he thinks or feels right? Throw him in a cage, women are strong, independent, and blameless, and if you question this off to the gulags with you! It was reported that he suffered from depression after his son died. It is understandable. It can happen to anyone. Google it. The guy is delusional blaming the judge. The judge was not near the kid. Talk about not thinking straight! If you want to blame someone, blame the mother, not the judge! Fuck, some people are so stupid to think the guy was justified on taking it on the judge. BTW, he will be jailed because he broke the condition of his bond. The law is the law. He fucked up. It does not matter that he lost his son, father or mother. Ignorance of the law is not a defense. You are just making shit up to avoid confronting your own cognitive dissonance from the situation. You have ZERO evidence he is unstable or a danger to others. This is just a pathetic excuse to wipe out a free man so you don't have to address the difficult implications of the situation. Why was a bond placed on him to begin with? Oh right for criticizing the judge. What law did he break? The judge WAY overstepped her authority arresting him for this in the first instance let alone a second time. This is 100% tyrannical behavior and is in no way justifiable. You are probably one of those people who thinks it is a valid charge to arrest some one for resisting arrest. |
|
|
|
I haven't ignored anything. It is none of your fucking business. The end.
So why don't you counter it? I did. Negative feedback, I mean. It should be normal to counter negative feedback if you think it has been wrongly placed and/or to exclude user from your trust list if you think they left wrong feedback. Why don't you counter negative feedback then? Or exclude user from your trust list again? Because. Any more questions grand inquisitor? |
|
|
|
This guy is unstable. He needs psychiatric treatment for his depression. Blaming a judge, WTF? The judge was not near the baby. The baby died because of his previous health condition. Police found no fault. The guy needs to be locked up as he is in danger of harming himself and others. The judge looks at the evidence not some hearsay by an estranged husband or wife. This is a tragic story, but you have to look at it without taking sides. It is what it is. Baby died. Move on, there is nothing you can do to bring him back. Move on, meet another woman, make another baby. And where did you get your psychiatric certification to be able to diagnose this man remotely with nearly no information and having never even seen him in person? The judge is 100% undeniably at fault for violating his rights to free speech and redress of grievances. This part is not up for debate. He is not required to be correct in his assertions in order for this to be a violation of his rights, though I think there is a good chance he is. The police as well as the court system have a well established bias against men towards women ESPECIALLY in domestic and family court related matters as well as many other areas. If you want to go over the stats I would be glad to demolish any opposition to this point. You are nothing but an establishment parrot repeating the status quo with no critical examination of the situation. Your solution to this situation is to avoid conflict at all cost by simply imprisoning a father that just lost his child, because he is a man, and who gives a fuck what he thinks or feels right? Throw him in a cage, women are strong, independent, and blameless, and if you question this off to the gulags with you! |
|
|
|
I haven't ignored anything. It is none of your fucking business. The end.
So why don't you counter it? I did. I haven't ignored anything. It is none of your fucking business. The end.
|
|
|
|
No. This concerns me directly and in a public way.
Ok, so it is public then and we should wait for OP to say what was the reason to use new account, reading removed post it looks like they are evading something. I am not sure why you've ignored this fact. I haven't ignored anything. It is none of your fucking business. The end. I will do it wherever the fuck I please
Fine. If you want to abuse trust and throw away all your ethics just to get on DT; that is just your true nature. But fuck off telling people to clean up their lists when you don't do it yourself. Outside of OP's issue with ABitNut, this is exactly the kind of behavior that should be discouraged in the DT system.
Theymos has already stated the idiot TECHY has no place near DT. I believe his ultimate goal is to make the forum collapse by making it difficult to do business here. We either do it his way, or we don't get to do it at all. :/ So posting here in public is "throwing away all my ethics?" What? Try harder. Again, you have some fucking nerve to point the finger at anyone about ethics, your abuse spans back years and affects hundreds of users. BTW when did I tell anyone to "clean up their lists?" Again none of these pathetic clown car inhabitants give a fuck about anything other than following me around to try to cause drama. None of this insane rambling is even on topic. Yeah, for the last few weeks he has been putting aside his morals and belief structure to get back on DT. He stopped distrusting everyone and started trusting many others, hoping for retaliatory trust. It was a good example for Theymos to see just how easily idiots can get on DT right now. This is correct. TECSHARE has been trying to get reciprocal inclusions for a few months now. Its finally paid off. The DT1s that he has nothing in common with except for reciprocal inclusions are: WhiteManWhite (Russian local board poster) Kalemder (Turkish local board poster) bobita (Turkish local board poster) Matthias9515 (Turkish local board poster) (left a positive trust for TS on 6/29, was added by TS a month later, during the first week that Matthias was on DT1) mhanbostanci (Turkish local board poster) He's never interacted with these users as they all post exclusively on their local boards (except when they make the exception to visit Meta or Reputation to address trust-related issues). I'm going to assume that he doesn't speak enough Russian or Turkish to understand the ratings left by these users and (for the most part) they don't speak enough English to understand his, and the only reason he included them was to gain enough votes to be back out of the negatives on DT. Without them, he would be back at -4. He also included two other Turkish posters soon after they were added to DT1, PHI1618 and by rallier whom he subsequently dropped (I imagine it was for not getting the reciprocal trust he was hoping for) He's still waiting for Vispilio to reciprocate, probably unaware that he just fell off DT1 for not having the minimum number of inclusions. Outside of OP's issue with ABitNut, this is exactly the kind of behavior that should be discouraged in the DT system. And you know the amount of interaction I have had with these users how? I imagine you rape goats dressed in full drag when you get restless. I guess it must be reality! Also seven in a week? I know counting to 2 is hard for you but please try. None of this is on topic, if you want to discuss it I would be happy to in your own personal butthurt thread for the topic in reputation. I know you are fond of those types of threads, go make another and talk about it till the clowns come home. "outside of the op" is called off topic little girl. This is clearly not about resolving the topic issue, but about the fact that the clown car can't stand that they can't permanently punish me for calling out their collective abuse by working together to keep me off the default trust. I guess you are just becoming irrelevant. I wonder who's fault that is? Clearly it is not a result of your own behavior! |
|
|
|
The difference is I was requested to be involved and am inherently involved. You just choose to impose yourself where no one asked you to be so you can give your pathetic life the feeling of having a minuscule amount of control.
Do it privately then. No. This concerns me directly and in a public way. |
|
|
|
This rating has no substantiation or basis in anything other than the fact that he has more than one account and you SUSPECT based on nothing else he COULD MAYBE have done something worthy of tagging.
It doesn't look so: Vod is an abuser and he's a moderators friend, i already got the experience from them Wink so don't waste your time, like me: make a new account and be careful when you talk because this forum is full of corrupted/idiots mods.
ps: yes this is not my main acc. I will do it wherever the fuck I please
Me too. What was the reason to leave it and use new account? Cool story bro. That is not evidence of anything but suspicion. Having an alt account is not a reason to tag some one alone, and he doesn't owe answers to your interrogation. The difference is I was requested to be involved and am inherently involved. You just choose to impose yourself where no one asked you to be so you can give your pathetic life the feeling of having a minuscule amount of control. |
|
|
|
You claimed he could be evading a ban.
Except cherry picking (I also said "tagged"), as I said, it is my observation, we are talking about trust feedback so it is not moderation issue. Also considering I was directly requested to respond, and the fact that ABitNut is on DT via my inclusion, I am directly involved here. What is your reason for involving yourself other than your own personal entertainment?
Do it privately then.
because i had another account from 2012 which i left to make this one with another name
Which account? What was the reason to leave it and use new account?
Even if i take one hour to find it in my mails it won't change anything at the situation Why not? It could. What was the reason to leave it and use new account? That is a cute little semantic game. This rating has no substantiation or basis in anything other than the fact that he has more than one account and you SUSPECT based on nothing else he COULD MAYBE have done something worthy of tagging. I am not cherry picking anything. I will do it wherever the fuck I please, I have a reason to be here. Your only reason for your unsolicited involvement is your obsessive compulsive need to control others. No one owes you any answers. No one asked you to be here. You aren't resolving anything, more so you are purposely attempting to sabotage a resolution to satiate your own desires to lord over others with your insignificant amount of authority. |
|
|
|
because i had another account from 2012 which i left to make this one with another name
Which account? What was the reason to leave it and use new account?
Someone having an alt account is not a valid reason for negative feedback
Irrelevant. This s not the intended use of the trust system. I posted my observation, but why are you repeating what I have said? This is a, matter for moderator if anyone.
Trust is not moderated so it is not for moderator. Also at this point your involvement is unrequested and counterproductive.
So is your involvment in DT. Go spam somewhere else. He doesn't owe you some explanation as if you are some grand inquisitor. You claimed he could be evading a ban. That is 100% a moderation issue. Last I checked people have to vote for you via inclusions to be on the default trust. Also considering I was directly requested to respond, and the fact that ABitNut is on DT via my inclusion, I am directly involved here. What is your reason for involving yourself other than your own personal entertainment? Yeah, for the last few weeks he has been putting aside his morals and belief structure to get back on DT. He stopped distrusting everyone and started trusting many others, hoping for retaliatory trust. It was a good example for Theymos to see just how easily idiots can get on DT right now. ABitNut, I am requesting on StonerStanley's behalf that you please remove your negative rating for him. He has taken the first conciliatory step towards mutual restoration, and your original rating seems somewhat baseless.
@ABiNut, no one will blame you if you tell the hypocrite TECHSHARE to fuck off. He really should look at his abusive feedback before he comments on others. If TECHY threatens to distrust if you don't do as he demands, myself and many others will counter his baseless accusation. So I assume you are now back to your regular pattern of obsessive compulsive stalking now that you have abandoned pretending to ignore me? You have some fucking nerve lecturing anyone about principles, abusive feedback, baseless accusations and threats. These two clowns are a prime example of why there are never any restorative solutions applied around here, because if there is mutually restorative solutions, how can they masturbate over abusing the minuscule amount of authority they have here that they never got to enjoy in real life? I don't have to make demands or accusations. I made a request. That is what people who hold the respect of others do, because that is what engenders respect from others. You should try it some time. Frankly I think you are just upset you have to host a website that shows I am far more trusted than you, and you can't handle it. |
|
|
|
I checked reference link and it points to missing post, however, someone archived it http://web.archive.org/web/20150517200326/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=677224.20 (post #29), StonerStanly posted: Vod is an abuser and he's a moderators friend, i already got the experience from them Wink so don't waste your time, like me: make a new account and be careful when you talk because this forum is full of corrupted/idiots mods.
ps: yes this is not my main acc. Someone having an alt account is not a valid reason for negative feedback, however, I am really surprised that OP said it is not alt account while they clearly said it is. Question is, which main account has been tagged (hm...banned?) and for what reason? Irrelevant. This s not the intended use of the trust system. This is a, matter for moderator if anyone. Also at this point your involvement is unrequested and counterproductive. |
|
|
|
Don't misunderstand me please, it makes no sense when humans kill their fellow humans, especially when it's done unlawfully. I'm very active on my twitter page speaking against the Xenophobia attack, using the hashtags associated with the xenophobia attact to spread my message across. The focus here were Africans hating on each other to the extent of burning ourselves alive, destroying what a fellow hustler, survives on. Generally, we using ourselves as scapegoat instead of focusing the anger lawfully on those who're stealing our resources in the name of rendering humanity services etc is just stupidity [ Africa isn't poor - Africa is being raped]. I'm a civilized individual and I advocate for things to be done in a civilized manner. I would never support them attacking whites unlawfully neither do i support their attack on the blacks. There are right ways for things to be done, they should go do that instead of misdirecting their anger towards those they know their government won't retaliate. This can't be done to the Americans or any Westerns counties immigrants as they'll be hit immediate with sanctions to the extent they'll seized to exist as a country😄. The xenophobia attacts has been ongoing and very active in the last 10years although this time around they went too far. Africa is raping itself. You talk of scapegoats, but you simultaneously speak of your own favorite scapegoat. You know what really separates places like Africa and China from the rest of the modern industrialized world? A sense of common wealth, and high levels of social trust. Without these things, even if all the other world's nations ceased to exist, Africa would still be raping itself. Clean up your own backyard before pointing at the neighbor's. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
