Yes, you are correct that they have consistently stated delivery would be 2 weeks after they get the chips.  That is great and I trust they will, but if that is all they can give us, I find it hard to believe that anyone (customers) finds that acceptable.  Do you?  If so, I'm having a hard time swallowing that is all they are going to give us.  I am not trying to be flippant, but could you help me understand why you believe that the frequency and quality of their communications thus far has been acceptable?

I don't think keeping us (customers) informed is asking too much.  TH, let us know what you are working on... if you are not working on anything, let us know... maybe someone here can come up with something for you to work on that will get the situation a small step closer to being beneficial to all.  If nothing else, I think the communication from TH would calm the anxious chatter in the thread and be a welcome distraction from the chip dilemma.

I am not trying to bitch at TH for not getting the chips yet, but I do feel it would be beneficial to all to receive more frequent communication from TH.  I expect it would quiet the noise and let people focus on things besides waiting for the next tidbit of information from TH.  If TH continues with their silence, I expect the thread will continue to speculate, bitch, and work into a full-fledged frenzy.

Demanding does not generally get good results.  Negotiating might though...

Terrahash is in no better position to demand something of YiFu than you are.  Why not take up your demands with YiFu yourself?  I'm certain your demands will be just as effective as everyone else's have been to date.

No.  Of all the risks this isn't one.  Total annual bitcoin revenue is a rounding error for a company like Samsung or Intel.  In theory (and I am not saying it is likely) some years or decades from now when Bitcoin is many magnitudes larger it might attract the interest of a major semiconductor company however by then the Bitcoin ASIC companies who have survived will have years of experience.  A big player would simply buy the company outright to hit the ground running. 

Yes, lead by example! wait.....

If the update next week is "We did the first run, the chips work", then I highly doubt .003 is gonna cut it.

Already looking for a freebie, again, Kano?

(I am reading up on KNC. Impressive developments so far. Nothing to complain about as of yet.)

It will go slowly over the weekend.

It would have been if at least they would have contacted you.

lol? you maybe forgot about almost million avalon chips, bitfury and other players in this game.)

http://www.ccihosting.com

The payment processing location and server location are not the same thing.


This can be easily enabled when there is enough volume.

Well considering they booked with the fab, whenever that was, they would have been given an estimate of when to expect the chips, and then following such assured statement been at the mercy of the fab. KnC then plays a waiting game, whilst ensuring all else runs smoothly. Once they have the chips in hand they have to build a prototype, test, and then manufacture the products. All they've said is they are on track, so I'd imagine it means what they have said it to mean; September.

Just how unrealistic could that be? Klee what's the beef?

Ironically, I received that same image via PM yesterday from another user.

But that's not why I came here to post. As you all know, I've been busy sticking it up BFL's ass. To date, I've had no reason to check what's happening in Camp KnC. I do have one request though: If at any time KnC refuses to honor refunds, would somebody be so kind as to PM me and let me know?

Later, all.

Bruno Kucinskas

Just how realistic is that seeing it's nearly september already?

The exchange holds the fiat. The merchant/user fees as well as other financial details will be posted when finalized.

The servers will be located in Panama and as posted in the earlier thread, all payment processing is through third party processors.

This fit KNCminner