5
|
Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: To Gamble or To Invest?
|
on: August 28, 2016, 10:47:24 AM
|
Investing is always better. But it's good to keep some saving money too. Which is why I chose to save 10% of my money when the interest went zero. The rest went for investing in both bitcoin and some currencies & stocks. I feel it's a risky investment but to win you need to take risks.
|
|
|
9
|
Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: How to stay away from gambling? suggestions ?
|
on: July 29, 2016, 06:40:05 AM
|
get away from gambling or to give up, or to create a special zone or to withdraw from the cities, but pop e options simple away from the crowds of people already not trying as-that separately and carefully cautious attitude to such places, the electronic version offers already have gambling in "chest," although, live chat and offers a full and valid picture of the rush of gambling, but the electronic version leaves a sense though, educating yourself and culture can somehow "protect" from the horrible vices of gambling, but an elementary sense of proportion, I think not to trigger a strong repulsion, in turn, lead to negative any consequences
|
|
|
12
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains / XBridge / true cross-chain P2P
|
on: November 05, 2014, 09:20:31 AM
|
So Dan does not want to answer a simple question whether he actually is the developer that writes the code for XC.
And considering all the evasion to similar questions earlier there's only one conclusion - the answer is no.
Why the fuck should he answer you? Do you even own any blocknet? If not, then GTFO. Show us a signed wallet signature where you actually own any block and not just trolling and fudding, you friggin DRK troll. You should ask, why doesn't he answer? He's been answering all sorts of questions, but dodging everything regarding whether he actually is the developer. He shouldn't answer specifically to me, instead he should take this opportunity to remove the doubt from the people who might be wondering the same thing, if he cares about his reputation as the best dev in the business whose reviews are widely sought after that is. Do you agree clearing this issue would benefit everyone who holds block? He has answered all these questions many times. Only fudders like you keep asking the same question over and over again. Go and ask your Evan how many coins he has now. Why doesn't he answer?
|
|
|
15
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains / XBridge / true cross-chain P2P
|
on: November 03, 2014, 01:06:00 AM
|
MrBoh and Longandshort are trolls that have spread FUD campaigns against several altcoins such as LXC and XST in the past. Tranglee received word of their plan to discredit the BlockNET and destroy Dan's reputation on October 21st, days before this FUD campaign erupted. Oh god this never ends with these guys. The 3 big 80% coin owners-bagholders of ShadowCash (pookie, trollsroyce and longandshort) overrode their dev's decision to break with trolling and cooperate with other coins by forcing him to remove SDC from the Blocknet. To take it even further they have begun subtle fud trolling of the blocknet. This will become more viceral and obvious as time moves on. It will peak with a website yes website they are building purely for the point of discrediting and fudding the blocknet and its founding coins. Who does that? Make a website replete with fake pastebin quotes, gifs, and other smear items, and fud threads? Wouldn't the resources and effort of this be better off to make zk-snarks work and promote SDC? Seriously these guys must have small penis syndrome. Oh look XST,Fibre, Blocknet has a smaller penis than ours! Mark my words this shit is real and you can quote this thread when they start their full on trolling of Blocknet and it's coins. Same for when the websit goes live. You heard about it here first. Now here is more evidence showing that they conspired to destroy Dan's reputation for their own malicious purposes:https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/GkZ2H9tHThere is no denying that the evidence and facts are public knowledge regarding Dan, XC, and BlockNET... but are you really going to let these trolls, who have a reputation of FUD campaigns, interpret that information for you? It is clear what their objective is. Boh and Longandshort, you're a bunch of deceitful scammers. You disgust me. Those scammers are the reason that the alt coin scene dies off eventually. Total sewage of society.
|
|
|
18
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] Blocknet + Synechist - Have your posts been deleted??
|
on: November 01, 2014, 11:58:40 AM
|
I'm not understanding why there is such a huge FUD campaign on the Blocknet. If you don't like the idea and think it will fail, walk on by and don't invest. To everyone who wants to have a punt at it, let them. I have invested in the blocknet i think its a good idea.
You and all your paid FUDsters have just made this website insufferable in the past few days, its like wading through sewage to find the real information people want to read. Do us a favour and create your own website to conspire on.
Out.
Supernet feel that if Blocknet succeed then they will lose. Mind boggling, but yes they are that dense.
|
|
|
19
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Slander online, get sued
|
on: November 01, 2014, 11:57:07 AM
|
lol, obviously you're not a lawyer Neither am I, although I did take several business and criminal law courses in undergrad. Just trying to clear up some misconceptions for you and others posting on this board who may be worried that what they post here could have legal repercussions. In my non-lawerly opinion, there is about a 0.00000001% chance that something you post on this message board would be considered by any court of law as libel. Just my two satoshi, take it for what you will. If you are not a lawyer, then your advice is worth just as much as mine, 2 satoshi like you said. Let the people that want to play with fire continue their ways. They just can no longer claim ignorance now. lol you're an idiot. Sue me for libel, bitch Look in the mirror you lawyer wannabe. Knowing your rights don't mean you have to be a lawyer to use them.Knowing your rights also doesn't mean you can abuse it.
|
|
|
20
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Slander online, get sued
|
on: November 01, 2014, 11:54:15 AM
|
lol, obviously you're not a lawyer Neither am I, although I did take several business and criminal law courses in undergrad. Just trying to clear up some misconceptions for you and others posting on this board who may be worried that what they post here could have legal repercussions. In my non-lawerly opinion, there is about a 0.00000001% chance that something you post on this message board would be considered by any court of law as libel. Just my two satoshi, take it for what you will. If you are not a lawyer, then your advice is worth just as much as mine, 2 satoshi like you said. Let the people that want to play with fire continue their ways. They just can no longer claim ignorance now. lol you're an idiot. Sue me for libel, bitch Look in the mirror you lawyer wannabe.
|
|
|
|