Flat Earth

[BADecker]

After staring at the lights on ceiling "scientists" decide Newton was wrong and Einstein is a clown. How long before they realize the lights in sky are only small bits of plasma a few thousand miles away?


Newton’s Law Of Gravity Was Wrong, Claim Scientists; Target Einstein’s ‘General Relativity’ Next



The world knew the famous law of gravity when an apple fell on Isaac Newton’s head, prompting him to form the earliest theory of universal gravitation. The 17th-century gravitational law is a landmark in physics and has held true up until now. The theory of universal gravity has been dismissed in the study of black holes. Scientists conducted research on a star called ‘S0-2’ which is at its closest to black hole Sagittarius A* (abbreviated to Sgr A*) that lies at the centre of the Milky Way 26,000 light-years away from the Earth. The study put the law of universal gravitation to test and it did not hold true. Not in relation to the black hole at least.

As per new findings, scientists are now placing their bets on Einstein’s theory of general relativity. Albert Einstein and Isaac Newton’s discoveries are pillars of modern physics but, the black hole has put both theories by the legendary physicists to test. The black hole study found that the intermingling of space and time near Sagittarius A* doesn’t comply with Newton’s law. According to professor Andrea Ghez of the University of California, Los Angeles Einstein’s theory, however, found fresh evidence.

“Newton had the best description of gravity for a long time but it started to fray around the edges. And Einstein provided a more complete theory. Today we are seeing Einstein’s theories starting to fray around the edges,”

Observations of light from S0-2 prove Einstein’s 1915 theory that describes the law of gravity and the relation to other forces. It proves that what we perceive as gravity is the curvature of space and time. S0-2 has a mass that’s 10 times larger than the sun. It orbits around the black hole in an ellipse taking 16 years for an orbit. Studies found that the star's light escaped the black hole’s gravitaional pull. The black hole’s mass is 4 million times more than the sun’s.

Researchers studied the particles of light that travelled from the S0-2 to the Earth. Einstein had predicted that light finds it harder to resist the black hole’s gravitational pull, expending more photons to escape it. But, scientists think it won’t take long to disprove the long-standing theory as well.

“We can absolutely rule out Newton’s law of gravity. Our observations are consistent with Einstein’s general theory of relativity. However, his theory is definitely showing vulnerability. It cannot fully explain gravity inside a black hole, and at some point, we will need to move beyond Einstein’s theory to a more comprehensive theory of gravity that explains what a black hole is.”

Black holes are extraordinarily dense and have gravitational fields so strong that light and matter cannot escape. This is why Einstein’s theory cannot fully explain the way gravity works in and around the black hole. Scientists will soon have to find a much more comprehensive theory that can be applied to the study of black holes. Ghez thinks Einstein is right but, the theory can fall apart too.

The research on S0-2 is co-led by Andrea Ghez is titled ‘Relativistic redshift of the star S0-2 orbiting the Galactic centre supermassive black hole’. The science journal is considered to be the most detailed study on the black hole.

-- https://in.mashable.com/science/5270/newtons-law-of-gravity-was-wrong-claim-scientists-target-einsteins-general-relativity-next

Yep. The laws of physics that make gravity work are tricky. It has been known for a long time that gravity is a fundamental force that ties into the whole universe. Once they understand everything about the universe, they will have the correct law of gravity, as well.

[notbatman]

Gravity is the Elmer's glue that holds all the lies together.

[BADecker]

Gravity is the Elmer's glue that holds all the lies together.

Gravity kept them from floating off the moon. Do you think they used Elmer's in any of their equipment?

[notbatman]

^^^ Copious amounts on the LEM.

[Cryptotourist]

@Cryptotourist,

https://i.imgur.com/AB8LVTI.jpg

(A) I have an IQ of 60 so I can't distinguish reality from fantasy movies and TV.

(B) I'm a sack of shit who knows space is fake and I'm going to gaslight notbatman with CGI images from NASA; gotta keep that $50 million USD a day in taxpayer money rollin' in ya know.

Choose one.

Batty, my man!

Gosh, difficult question, emmmm, I'll go with (A).
If not, then I'll go with (C).  

Other than that, forget NASA, buy a telescope ffs.
Oh & thanks for the morning giggles.

[notbatman]

^^^ How will getting a telescope to stare at the lights on the ceiling prove the Earth is a globe, your IQ really is ~60 isn't it? If I'm gonna blow $$$ on optics I'll get a P1000 and rub the flat Earth in your face all day long!

BTW, why do you collectivist cock smokers all have to make excessive use of emoji's with all of your shill/shit posts?

[BADecker]

^^^ Copious amounts on the LEM.

You realize, don't you, that Elmer's makes all kinds of glue. However, proof? Witnesses? So far you have mostly hearsay that contradicts common understanding.

[Cryptotourist]

^^^ How will getting a telescope to stare at the lights on the ceiling prove the Earth is a globe, your IQ really is ~60 isn't it? If I'm gonna blow $$$ on optics I'll get a P1000 and rub the flat Earth in your face all day long!

BTW, why do you collectivist cock smokers all have to make excessive use of emoji's with all of your shill/shit posts?

I'm sorry for the excessive emoji's batty, it's only part of laughing myself into tears with the utter crap that you post.
You are whole different level retard/dumb. A category by yourself. No point in arguing about that.

[BADecker]

^^^ How will getting a telescope to stare at the lights on the ceiling prove the Earth is a globe, your IQ really is ~60 isn't it? If I'm gonna blow $$$ on optics I'll get a P1000 and rub the flat Earth in your face all day long!

BTW, why do you collectivist cock smokers all have to make excessive use of emoji's with all of your shill/shit posts?

You always bring into the discussion some form of off-the-wall idea that has nothing to do with what we are talking about. The point isn't trying to prove GE by aiming a telescope at some ceiling lights. At least, this isn't your point. Your point is trying to prove FE by aiming a telescope at some ceiling lights. I mean, that's what you are trying to do, right? Prove FE, right?

And then you want to aim a camera at some ceiling lights to rub FE in somebody's face? What does photographing the ceiling of a planetarium have to do with FE? And even if it did, how does photographing something rub something else in somebody's face? I showed you a long time ago that there is nothing flat... not even floor tiles... even floor tiles of a planetarium.

[BADecker]

^^^ How will getting a telescope to stare at the lights on the ceiling prove the Earth is a globe, your IQ really is ~60 isn't it? If I'm gonna blow $$$ on optics I'll get a P1000 and rub the flat Earth in your face all day long!

BTW, why do you collectivist cock smokers all have to make excessive use of emoji's with all of your shill/shit posts?

I'm sorry for the excessive emoji's batty, it's only part of laughing myself into tears with the utter crap that you post.
You are whole different level retard/dumb. A category by yourself. No point in arguing about that.

I know. He's quite the illustrator, what and with all those GE pictures of the earth. I mean, the only reason he doesn't like emojis is, they represent globes, because they are faces, and faces exist on globes. But he doesn't want to talk about this, because then he'd wind up having something else to find some outlandish theory for... outFElandish, that is.

 

[Cryptotourist]

Well, give him the benefit of the doubt, but personally I'm divided between mega dumb or mega troll.
Probably a combination of both in reality.

[notbatman]

@world's biggest tit (BADecker),

   The Earth is proven flat by photographing the Earth not the lights in the sky for dog's sake. If there's a point being made you put effort into finding some way to miss it.



@cryptojew,

  Yeah you just keep beaking off, 'cause the second you try and post something that you think might pass as evidence/proof you'll see nothing but back-hand, fucking bitch. Go on, post more CGI garbage from NASA, maybe some fish-eye lens or ships over the curve!

[Cryptotourist]

@cryptojew,

  Yeah you just keep beaking off, 'cause the second you try and post something that you think might pass as evidence/proof you'll see nothing but back-hand, fucking bitch. Go on, post more CGI garbage from NASA, maybe some fish-eye lens or ships over the curve!

Wrong again there batty.
Be my guest & go through my post history, & if your IQ is around 60, you should figure it out.
If it's lower, well, then Jew it is - for your eyes only - sweetheart.

Back-hand?
Hahahahahha, I see nothing else but sheer stupidity. Impressive stupidity actually.

[BADecker]

@world's biggest tit (BADecker),

   The Earth is proven flat by photographing the Earth not the lights in the sky for dog's sake. If there's a point being made you put effort into finding some way to miss it.

Well, make up your mind. I mean, you said the opposite, here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg52003031#msg52003031.

Btw, check out these images to see that the Earth photos show a globe earth - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=telescopic+view+of+the+ship+going+over+the+horizon&t=h_&ia=images&iax=images&iai=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.boatnerd.com%2Fpictures%2Fimages%2Falgoflip.jpg.

[notbatman]

^^^ Go rope yourself you cunt, I said I'd get a P1000 and rub the flat Earth in your face. How am I going to do that with pictures of stars you sack of shit? Obviously I would take pictures of/on Earth to show that it's flat.

[suchmoon]

mega dumb or mega troll.

Troll for sure. Nobody is that dumb. He's admitted in the past that he got scammed by Black Arrow and because that's also a name of a rocket he's now trolling us by denying everything related to rockets and space and stuff.

[BADecker]

@world's biggest tit (BADecker),

   The Earth is proven flat by photographing the Earth not the lights in the sky for dog's sake. If there's a point being made you put effort into finding some way to miss it.

Well, make up your mind. I mean, you said the opposite, here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg52003031#msg52003031.

Btw, check out these images to see that the Earth photos show a globe earth - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=telescopic+view+of+the+ship+going+over+the+horizon&t=h_&ia=images&iax=images&iai=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.boatnerd.com%2Fpictures%2Fimages%2Falgoflip.jpg.

^^^ Go rope yourself you cunt, I said I'd get a P1000 and rub the flat Earth in your face. How am I going to do that with pictures of stars you sack of shit? Obviously I would take pictures of/on Earth to show that it's flat.

Samuel L Jackson - Bad Motherf*cker

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyoJN9MN-lQ


Having some trouble today, aren't you? 

[notbatman]

^^^ You live on a painting, a CGI rendering, a composite image, you see the world through a fisheye lens. I'm telling you the dog and the man are working together!

[xxkaiwaxx]

Look at photos of the Earth taken from space.

Congratulations you have successfully been MKUltra'ed.

[Astargath]

^^^ You live on a painting, a CGI rendering, a composite image, you see the world through a fisheye lens. I'm telling you the dog and the man are working together!

You once asked for a pic without fisheye lens which i provided and then you changed your mind because you are a liar and forgot about the evidence. You are not looking for the truth.