Flat Earth

[notbatman]

Also watch out for guys making claims they have special inside info from Antarctica, there's giants and their remains everywhere except cleared zones around populated areas. I'm also fairly sure the firmament puts off enough radiation to keep everybody at arms length and there's nothing you can't get from a genuine meteorite fragment anyhow.








The simplest explanation I can give is that it's a miniaturized Heat Pump, it's considerably beyond 100% efficient and it wouldn't surprise me if a shoe-box sized unit could pull 1kW out of the air.

Here's a version with what looks like a 10kW generator motor.




We live in a closed system like a thermos, the energy just keeps cycling it doesn't get "used up".

[BADecker]

^^^ Keep it up. All you are doing is proving that the earth is a globe. How are you doing this? You can't show how many of the FE things work. All you try to do is emphasize stuff that could be applied if the earth were really flat.

[notbatman]

^^^ Modern humans didn't evolve from apes on our flat earth, this is a globe exclusive theory.

The idea of a rotating pressurized system open to a vacuum is a fucking joke; the earth is a flat, motionless enclosed system. Party headquarters clearly has dirt on you or you wouldn't be going along with the globalists and their big lie, amirite?


Meanwhile in California, what's left of it...

[BADecker]

^^^ The point isn't evolution in this thread, the point is flat earth.

Flat earth can easily be proven false by doing the following in many places on the earth. Since you claim the sun is about 3,000 miles in diameter, stand a person directly under the middle of the sun when it is directly overhead. Have him look straight up, so that he sees the mid-point of the sun.

Next, stand a couple of guys 3,000 miles apart, so that a straight line between the two guys passes through the guy in the middle, and so that both of the guys are 1,500 miles from the guy in the middle. When the two guys look straight up, they don't see the edges of the sun as geometry says they should on a flat earth. Rather, they always see the middle of the sun just like the guy in the middle.

This shows that the sun is way larger than the 3,000 miles FE people suggest. In fact, it is so large that it has to be well beyond any possible height that would make it to be inside any possible dome that would cover a flat earth in the way FE people suggest.

Whatever calculations FE people are using to determine that the GE is really a FE, those calculations are missing all kinds of important parts to make them realistic. The earth is a globe (GE). But even if it isn't a globe, it absolutely isn't anything like flat, or anything like FE people suggest it to be.

[notbatman]

^^^




BTW champ I claim now and have argued with you multiple times that, the Sun is directly measured to be 32 nautical miles across.

[FlamingFingers]

Any new photoshopped NASA photos ? keep the thread alive

scientifically it has been proven that the earth is not flat,  with some evidence and not photoshopped photos,  but as usual there will definitely be an objection to it, a flat earth cannot revolve round a sun, that alone should have cleared the doubt of L those doubting that earth is spherical

[BADecker]

^^^

https://i.imgur.com/u3NaJ5V.jpg


BTW champ I claim now and have argued with you multiple times that, the Sun is directly measured to be 32 nautical miles across.


https://i.imgur.com/aykktdS.jpg

Thank you for destroying flat earth for us. It's so much easier when you help us do it.

Simply go to my post here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg52735246#msg52735246, and replace the 3,000 miles with 32 miles. And replace the 1,500 miles with 16 miles, and use transits for accuracy, and whoopie doo! You get the same proof that FE doesn't exist. Except that it is easier to do with your 32 nm.

So, thanks for explaining.

[notbatman]

@FlamingFingers, the earth is motionless; it does not revolve.

[hornetsnest]

I took a measurement of the sun today and it was no more than 1 inch across in diameter if that helps with todays theories 

[Cryptotourist]

@FlamingFingers, the earth is motionless; it does not revolve.

I thought we had that covered, only your brain cells are truly motionless in the entire universe Batty. Brain dead to be exact, but still breathing.
I see it as mere confirmation that the universe is expanding along with your amazing stupidity which seems to also be endless.

I took a measurement of the sun today and it was no more than 1 inch across in diameter if that helps with todays theories  

Ha, try to make a measurement of Batty's brain cell activity - you fucking can't - it's a trap - there isn't any.

[notbatman]

@hornetsnest, 0.53°.



edit:
Alex, I'll take triangles for $500 please!



edit2:
No wait Alex, you don't even need to ask, I've already got it! What is the angular resolution limit of the human eye?

[Cryptotourist]

What is the angular resolution limit of the human eye?

[notbatman]

^^^ If you want to make a claim about what is being observed it helps to understand how vision works. The angular resolution limit of the eye, camera, etc.. making the observation can be and is a factor for some observations.

Assuming 20/20 vision, at distances beyond 1/2 nautical miles a 1 foot object is too small to see; its angular size is smaller than 1 minute and it's not visible. When observing the Sun its angular size appears to be ~0.53°. Knowing that the human eye has an angular resolution limit of 1 minute allows for the calculation of the diameter of the Sun. If perspective and atmospheric refraction are accounted for then ~0.53° equates to a solar diameter of 32 nautical miles (36.8 statute miles or 59.3 kilometres) at a ratio of 1 nautical mile per minute.



Ref:
Yanoff, Myron; Duker, Jay S. (2009). Ophthalmology 3rd Edition. MOSBY Elsevier. p. 54. ISBN 978-0444511416.

[Cryptotourist]

I get dumber every time I read one of your lobotomized epic posts Batty.

- Does the donkey fly?
- Of course it flies, and it's got 2 fucking huge wings Batty.

[odolvlobo]

Knowing that the human eye has an angular resolution limit of 1 minute allows for the calculation of the diameter of the Sun.

I don't understand how the angular resolution of the eye can be a factor in the diameter of the sun. Also, every eye's angular resolution is different and a camera can have a higher resolution than the eye, so, wouldn't that affect the diameter? Sorry if you have explained it already. A summary would suffice.

[Cryptotourist]

A summary would suffice.

From Batty?
Batty has major comprehension problems, he can't get his head straight, let alone write a credible summary of anything.

There:

Assuming 20/20 vision, at distances beyond 1/2 nautical miles a 1 foot object is too small to see; its angular size is smaller than 1 minute and it's not visible.

I mean what kind of idiot misreads this:

The human eye has an angular resolution of about 1 arcminute (0.02 degrees or 0.0003 radians) which enables us to distinguish things that are 30 centimetres apart at a distance of 1 kilometer.

[notbatman]

@Cryptotourist,

Here's a picture, it's flies in the face of a donkey.



If I can't perceive an object then it's not visible, your comprehension of the word 'distinguish' is at fault here not mine.



@odolvlobo,

"...Assuming 20/20 vision..."
"...let pupil diameter be 2.4 mm..." -- https://i.imgur.com/qFO5tSL.jpg

The diameter of the Sun is obviously a fixed value, only the minimum maximum distance you can observe a 1 foot object changes with a change in the resolution limit. It's like measuring a an object with yard stick and a metric pair of calipers, you end up with about the same result it's just that one has a higher resolution.

[Cryptotourist]

If I can't perceive an object then it's not visible, your comprehension of the word 'distinguish' is at fault here not mine.

It is visible, you twat.



Sorry Batty, I can't really argue with a fool (yeah, you).

[notbatman]

The horizon line is everything squished together, the distance to this line if it's not obscured by a narrow band superior mirage changes depending on the angular resolution limit. Atmospheric refraction not withstanding no objects are visible past this line.

[Cryptotourist]

You sound like a fucking genius there Batty, too bad you understand zip shit of the things you write.