Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 08:04:10 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 ... 352 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitmain's Released Antminer S9, World's First 16nm Miner Ready to Order  (Read 530805 times)
Kolbas
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 342
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 06, 2016, 02:05:16 AM
 #281

I personally could care less if it mines on -ck and/or Kano's software and pools or not.  Speaking of bastards, I think both of them are egotistical bastards.  I would rather mine on Antpool or any other pool than support the software of those 2 guys.  They are condescending and downright rude 98% of the time.

I am all over the new Antminer S9 and if it pisses -ck and Kano off then even better.
1715285050
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715285050

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715285050
Reply with quote  #2

1715285050
Report to moderator
1715285050
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715285050

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715285050
Reply with quote  #2

1715285050
Report to moderator
"You Asked For Change, We Gave You Coins" -- casascius
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715285050
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715285050

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715285050
Reply with quote  #2

1715285050
Report to moderator
1715285050
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715285050

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715285050
Reply with quote  #2

1715285050
Report to moderator
sidehack
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1848

Curmudgeonly hardware guy


View Profile
June 06, 2016, 02:10:55 AM
 #282

I've got about 40 S7 from various batches in hosting, so if I end up with any of them would save shipping cost. I'm working on a trade for a bunch of S5 but if I come up short I'll let you know.

I also will never mine on Antpool.

Cool, quiet and up to 1TH pod miner, on sale now!
Currently in development - 200+GH USB stick; 6TH volt-adjustable S1/3/5 upgrade kit
Server PSU interface boards and cables. USB and small-scale miners. Hardware hosting, advice and odd-jobs. Supporting the home miner community since 2013 - http://www.gekkoscience.com
scyth3
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 251


View Profile
June 06, 2016, 02:16:38 AM
 #283

I personally could care less if it mines on -ck and/or Kano's software and pools or not.  Speaking of bastards, I think both of them are egotistical bastards.  I would rather mine on Antpool or any other pool than support the software of those 2 guys.  They are condescending and downright rude 98% of the time.

I am all over the new Antminer S9 and if it pisses -ck and Kano off then even better.

Meanwhile using CGMiner in your S9, lol.
elokk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 723
Merit: 519


View Profile
June 06, 2016, 02:51:09 AM
 #284

I personally could care less if it mines on -ck and/or Kano's software and pools or not.  Speaking of bastards, I think both of them are egotistical bastards.  I would rather mine on Antpool or any other pool than support the software of those 2 guys.  They are condescending and downright rude 98% of the time.

I am all over the new Antminer S9 and if it pisses -ck and Kano off then even better.

They may be egotistical bastards but I will always support their work and will only mine on pools running ckpool. These guys an an asset to the community, we cannot say so much about antpool.

t.me/bitcoinasic
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7863


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
June 06, 2016, 03:16:47 AM
 #285

I personally could care less if it mines on -ck and/or Kano's software and pools or not.  Speaking of bastards, I think both of them are egotistical bastards.  I would rather mine on Antpool or any other pool than support the software of those 2 guys.  They are condescending and downright rude 98% of the time.

I am all over the new Antminer S9 and if it pisses -ck and Kano off then even better.



    
Based on the returns at the kano.is pool it looks to me like he practices honesty above manners.  I would like both  but in mining I prefer an honest impolite at times person over a dishonest polite person.

one thing is 100% sure about bitmaintech they do not practice honesty when it comes to software.

As they refuse to honor international laws about using software. BTW deep pockets and proper political connections may one they really hurt them on this.


They still sell good gear.  Which I purchased from them last week.



▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
sidehack
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1848

Curmudgeonly hardware guy


View Profile
June 06, 2016, 03:25:51 AM
 #286

Yep. Honest and polite is the best way to go, but if you have to pick one always pick honesty.

Cool, quiet and up to 1TH pod miner, on sale now!
Currently in development - 200+GH USB stick; 6TH volt-adjustable S1/3/5 upgrade kit
Server PSU interface boards and cables. USB and small-scale miners. Hardware hosting, advice and odd-jobs. Supporting the home miner community since 2013 - http://www.gekkoscience.com
chiguireitor
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 872
Merit: 1010


Coins, Games & Miners


View Profile WWW
June 06, 2016, 03:27:38 AM
 #287

CK - my question was mostly rhetorical. I know all the business reasons why people deal with China. I also know (and for the most part represent) all the reasons why some people refuse to deal with China.
That I understood, however that doesn't stop people asking the questions so every so often an old bastard like me has to spell it out as clearly as possible.

Nothing wrong with that. As old bastard in training, I respect the point.

[laughing]... so, where is the demarcation line between OB in training vs OB?
I am firmly in the OB category already, regardless.

The demarcation line is called male balding pattern: you have it? you're OB, you don't? trainee.

philipma1957
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7863


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
June 06, 2016, 03:58:43 AM
Last edit: June 06, 2016, 12:24:16 PM by philipma1957
 #288

I personally could care less if it mines on -ck and/or Kano's software and pools or not.  Speaking of bastards, I think both of them are egotistical bastards.

For what it's worth, I've found ck to be a decent and helpful guy. Maybe a bit short sometimes, but not anywhere close to being a bellend like Kano.

And then there is Luke-Jr which is another level of crazy bastard altogether.


Yeah ck then Kano then Luke

Sort of 2  then 4 then 16

Shitty iPad does not do squared and cubed correctly .

I don't use Luke much at all.

I use ck and Kano quite a bit.


Also remember they are high quality programmers and every good programmer I have ever know was just a bit off center.  

Or maybe I am just a bit jelly of,the ability to be a high quality programmer as I do not have that skill set.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
kilo17
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1001

aka "whocares"


View Profile
June 06, 2016, 04:08:45 AM
 #289

I personally could care less if it mines on -ck and/or Kano's software and pools or not.  Speaking of bastards, I think both of them are egotistical bastards.

For what it's worth, I've found ck to be a decent and helpful guy. Maybe a bit short sometimes, but not anywhere close to being a bellend like Kano.

And then there is Luke-Jr which is another level of crazy bastard altogether.


Yeah ck then Kano then Luke

Sort of 2  then 4 then 16

Shitty iPad does not do squared and cubed correctly .

I don't use Luke much at all.

I use ck and Kano quite a bit.


Also remember they are high quality programmers and every good programmer I have ever know was just a bit off center.   

Or maybe I am just a bit jelly of,the ability to be a high quality programmer as I do. Or,have that skill set.

I would personally pick Luke Jr, as I have done in the past and will do so on future projects.  He is an honest and polite individual in my eyes.  I have mined on Kano.is since the beginning (when I am mining Bitcoin), and have respect for them, just not to the level I respect Luke Jr.

Bitcoin Will Only Succeed If The Community That Supports It Gets Support - Support Home Miners & Mining
Finksy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1003



View Profile
June 06, 2016, 05:56:57 AM
 #290

Can someone opine whether two S9 would be able to run on one 2880w PSU?
Thanks

no  unless you downclock to 13th.


but this is a complete and absolute guess.

2x S9's @ 1375W DC each will draw 2750W, which would be 95.5% load on PSU.  They should hold up just fine at stock clock unless ambient temp is very high.


IBM 2880W PSU Packages: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=966135 IBM 4K PSU Breakout Boards & Packages: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1308296 
Server PSU-powered GPU rig solutions! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1864539  Wallet address: 1GWQYCv22cAikgTgT1zFuAmsJ9fFqq9TXf 
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
June 06, 2016, 06:36:32 AM
 #291

CK - my question was mostly rhetorical. I know all the business reasons why people deal with China. I also know (and for the most part represent) all the reasons why some people refuse to deal with China.
That I understood, however that doesn't stop people asking the questions so every so often an old bastard like me has to spell it out as clearly as possible.

Nothing wrong with that. As old bastard in training, I respect the point.

[laughing]... so, where is the demarcation line between OB in training vs OB?
I am firmly in the OB category already, regardless.

The demarcation line is called male balding pattern: you have it? you're OB, you don't? trainee.

 My grandpa still had a full head of hair in his 90s. Some of us are lucky and don't GET "male balding pattern" to a significant degree if at all.


I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7863


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
June 06, 2016, 12:26:30 PM
 #292

Also remember they are high quality programmers and every good programmer I have ever know was just a bit off center.  
Or maybe I am just a bit jelly of,the ability to be a high quality programmer as I do. Or,have that skill set.

There is a huge difference between being a massive bellend and a bit off center.

The bellends don't make it very far in the "real world" - You either learn to play nice with your team and co-workers, or your career is likely to be short at any publicly traded company.

Most, if not all of the brilliant engineers I know, do indeed have their own idiosyncrasies, but they aren't bellends. The people like Kano wouldn't last long on any team I've ever worked with, and people like Luke-Jr wouldn't make it to an interview stage after doing a background check on him. ck seems more like the people I've dealt with in my time - someone that may have a bad day here and there, but doesn't generally go around making life miserable for his team.

Sorry for the derail. Should probably get back on topic about how Bitmain likes to ignore the license and refuse to release cgminer updates, while exploiting the code for monetary gain.

Or is the topic how many of these will we buy?  I liquidated a lot of gear looking to order a third and or fourth.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
Longsnowsm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 517


View Profile
June 06, 2016, 01:17:52 PM
 #293

After plugging in the numbers into a calculator, and trying to factor in halving I am having a hard time figuring out how to ROI with the S9.  Maybe I am over estimating the impact of halving into the equation.  I even adjusted the BTC valuations up to $1000 USD and then factored the halving into the picture and still no ROI in a year.  So maybe I am doing this wrong.  Thoughts on ROI on the S9 and the impacts of halving?

Correction to my estimate:  Looks like the calculator says that if BTC is $1000 that you could see ROI in 8 months based on the effective TH drop by half.
alienesb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 06, 2016, 01:42:05 PM
 #294

After plugging in the numbers into a calculator, and trying to factor in halving I am having a hard time figuring out how to ROI with the S9.  Maybe I am over estimating the impact of halving into the equation.  I even adjusted the BTC valuations up to $1000 USD and then factored the halving into the picture and still no ROI in a year.  So maybe I am doing this wrong.  Thoughts on ROI on the S9 and the impacts of halving?

Correction to my estimate:  Looks like the calculator says that if BTC is $1000 that you could see ROI in 8 months based on the effective TH drop by half.

The potential to ROI is probably better than with the S7 because I doubt we're going to see better chips within the next year. That said, you still might be better off getting a later batch after the halving which is the big elephant in the room.
sidehack
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1848

Curmudgeonly hardware guy


View Profile
June 06, 2016, 01:51:53 PM
 #295

Good point. ASIC efficiency is probably about to plateau for a while. One consideration to add to that is S2 vs S1 - a more chip-dense machine with the same ASIC about half the per-hash power (for the current generation, probably about 0.6J/GH machine-level) will have a higher initial cost but a substantially longer viability. In that way I guess Bitmain has done hackers a favor going with a bucked string topology on later S7 and S9. For a regular joe it's actually worse than unregulated string because you get worse efficiency but if it can be hacked to adjustable voltage that potentially doubles (or more) the miner's effective lifetime.

Cool, quiet and up to 1TH pod miner, on sale now!
Currently in development - 200+GH USB stick; 6TH volt-adjustable S1/3/5 upgrade kit
Server PSU interface boards and cables. USB and small-scale miners. Hardware hosting, advice and odd-jobs. Supporting the home miner community since 2013 - http://www.gekkoscience.com
citronick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080


---- winter*juvia -----


View Profile
June 06, 2016, 02:02:38 PM
 #296

catching up some reading on S9.... Yes, I ordered a unit....

anyways, I never seen such a big congregation of "Legendary" and "Hero Member" all in one place....

I know several senior members from other threads but first time seeing other legends in the forum.....

it's like walking through the hall of fame of mining....

so much to learn from all of your guys.

If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
Finksy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1003



View Profile
June 06, 2016, 02:23:33 PM
Last edit: June 06, 2016, 02:54:01 PM by Finksy
 #297

The way I see it, the price on these won't drop substantially until they have competition.  So the gamble is either to purchase now and reap the higher block reward for ~5 weeks to get a head start, or wait until the competition/halving comes for the price to drop.  I believe these will stay viable for a long time, longer than any generation prior, however the price is still too high. I don't expect more than 20-25% difficulty decrease in the periods following the halving, and still much of that will be eaten up by new hash rate.

Like many others, the B1 S7 left a very bad taste in my mouth, I'll pass and let those desperate enough to have the latest and greatest buy them up.

Being able to under-volt these and the S7's is going to be a lot more common/important than it was for past gens, only because there won't be a new higher-efficiency generation of miner to come out for quite a while.

IBM 2880W PSU Packages: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=966135 IBM 4K PSU Breakout Boards & Packages: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1308296 
Server PSU-powered GPU rig solutions! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1864539  Wallet address: 1GWQYCv22cAikgTgT1zFuAmsJ9fFqq9TXf 
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7863


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
June 06, 2016, 03:25:40 PM
 #298

Good point. ASIC efficiency is probably about to plateau for a while. One consideration to add to that is S2 vs S1 - a more chip-dense machine with the same ASIC about half the per-hash power (for the current generation, probably about 0.6J/GH machine-level) will have a higher initial cost but a substantially longer viability. In that way I guess Bitmain has done hackers a favor going with a bucked string topology on later S7 and S9. For a regular joe it's actually worse than unregulated string because you get worse efficiency but if it can be hacked to adjustable voltage that potentially doubles (or more) the miner's effective lifetime.

ahh an exotic pencil mod for the s-9

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
elrippo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1001


View Profile
June 06, 2016, 03:30:48 PM
 #299

Guys, don´t cut youreself regarding the efficiency of ASIC chips. Please remember were Bitfury and Spondoolies were in 10.2015....
I tend to say that manufacturers of ASIC chips leave the home miner always one GEN behind  Roll Eyes

For Advertisement. PM me to discuss.
sidehack
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1848

Curmudgeonly hardware guy


View Profile
June 06, 2016, 03:38:47 PM
 #300

Spondoolies had simulation results at 0.15J/GH and BitFury was ordering engineering samples for a 0.06-0.15J/GH chip. Given that the BM1384 could run 0.25J/GH but the S5 was clocked at 0.45J/GH and the BM1385 could do 0.18J/GH but the S7 was clocked at about 0.26J/GH; if the S9 chip is clocked at 0.09J/GH we can assume it's probably got about 30% more efficiency hiding in the basement for a bottom clock around 0.06J/GH.

I'd bet that Bitmain and BitFury used all the tricks they'd already learned optimizing designs for 28nm on this 16nm chip. Is there probably room for more improvement? Seems likely. But I doubt we'll see another 30-50% drop in power use like we had with optimizations in previous generations.

Cool, quiet and up to 1TH pod miner, on sale now!
Currently in development - 200+GH USB stick; 6TH volt-adjustable S1/3/5 upgrade kit
Server PSU interface boards and cables. USB and small-scale miners. Hardware hosting, advice and odd-jobs. Supporting the home miner community since 2013 - http://www.gekkoscience.com
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 ... 352 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!