Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2024, 04:25:28 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 ... 352 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitmain's Released Antminer S9, World's First 16nm Miner Ready to Order  (Read 530815 times)
AriesIV10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006


Mine for a Bit


View Profile WWW
July 02, 2016, 11:21:46 AM
 #1241

Who's buying these so close to halving?

I just made another order yesterday.  You are either in or out in this business; even through the negative speculation.  Many people are holding off is a sign to me to buy!  The early chips like my S7s were/are my most stable configuration with overclocking capability and stable cooling.  I do not overclock all of my miners, some are underclocked, but you have to find the sweet spot for each miner.  There are those that speculate on the basis of the BTC staying the same....I say this is incorrect.  I believe that there will be a dramatic increase over the next six months.  

My 2 cents.

BTC Address (Donations):  3LepZAju88ZRuNVD4cS6Xv5hKyKrjvirkB     Website:  www.MintMining.com
Email: Mining@MintMining.com      Power Supplies: https://bit.ly/2TtvdOR
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4130
Merit: 7907


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
July 02, 2016, 11:27:37 AM
 #1242

this temperature is ok for S9 batch 2 or I need to lower down the frequency or to set fans to manually ?

http://imgur.com/SdSUMEz

Those Temps are acceptable

Nice temps!

this temp is perfect or I need to do something to lower down it ?

Perfection  for s-9 temps is not important.  Good numbers are fine  and your numbers are good.  Don't worry be happy Grin Grin

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
sunny163
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 02, 2016, 11:28:53 AM
 #1243

this temperature is ok for S9 batch 2 or I need to lower down the frequency or to set fans to manually ?

http://imgur.com/SdSUMEz

Those Temps are acceptable

Nice temps!

this temp is perfect or I need to do something to lower down it ?

Perfection  for s-9 temps is not important.  Good numbers are fine  and your numbers are good.  Don't worry be happy Grin Grin

thanks phil
scyth3
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 251


View Profile
July 02, 2016, 02:21:12 PM
 #1244

Who's buying these so close to halving?

The S9 still isn't listed on their Chinese site. Apparently only "Westerners" are.
Swimmer63
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1593
Merit: 1004



View Profile
July 02, 2016, 02:59:04 PM
 #1245



S9 B4 - So far working as advertised.  I am impressed.  One of the few miners from Bitmain that hashes at it's advertised rate out of the box.
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4130
Merit: 7907


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
July 02, 2016, 03:05:46 PM
 #1246

I am running mine at the downclock freq of 525  until it moves to the solar array

looks pretty good.  my ac amps are pretty steady at 5.1  ac volts are 240 = 1224 watts  my psu rates at 92.6%  so 1224 x .926 =  1133 watts dc for 11285 gh or

 just about .1004 watts  per gh rate. at dc level vs .1084 watts per gh   at ac level



i added a correction the hw rate is 0.0001%


https://i.imgur.com/xgxKaRP.png   no % of errors  arrow otherwise same as below


▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
Tupsu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003



View Profile
July 02, 2016, 03:35:10 PM
Last edit: July 03, 2016, 04:39:04 PM by Tupsu
 #1247

Who's buying these so close to halving?

I ordered.
3 for BTC and
 2 for USD  (Total 3867.83 USD)    Today  3926.44 USD  3952.37 USD USD 3986.22 USD  3870.15 USD 3739.91 USD 3723.79
So I can  use my 1300W PSUs.

Total
10x B1 + 1x2/3  S9
1 x B2
2 x B3
     B4
5 x B5
drazah
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 02, 2016, 04:00:08 PM
 #1248

Who's buying these so close to halving?

I picked one up, plan to get more. The halving doesn't scare me.
steve1965!
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 03, 2016, 04:40:40 AM
 #1249

https://s32.postimg.org/q6fgnp0d1/Not_Really.png

Cant post images yet but at least you can click the link and look for yourself.





AriesIV10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006


Mine for a Bit


View Profile WWW
July 03, 2016, 07:42:44 AM
 #1250



Cant post images yet but at least you can click the link and look for yourself.



Very Nice!

BTC Address (Donations):  3LepZAju88ZRuNVD4cS6Xv5hKyKrjvirkB     Website:  www.MintMining.com
Email: Mining@MintMining.com      Power Supplies: https://bit.ly/2TtvdOR
citronick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080


---- winter*juvia -----


View Profile
July 03, 2016, 09:59:46 AM
 #1251



Cant post images yet but at least you can click the link and look for yourself.



Very Nice!

36 blocks?

SHA256 multi-algo pool?

If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
AriesIV10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006


Mine for a Bit


View Profile WWW
July 03, 2016, 10:30:56 AM
 #1252



Cant post images yet but at least you can click the link and look for yourself.



Very Nice!

36 blocks?

SHA256 multi-algo pool?

You need to compare CKPool to Nicehash.  You will see that Nicehash is not so Nice on the wallet.  Check out some stats at:  http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/?view=flipcard

BTC Address (Donations):  3LepZAju88ZRuNVD4cS6Xv5hKyKrjvirkB     Website:  www.MintMining.com
Email: Mining@MintMining.com      Power Supplies: https://bit.ly/2TtvdOR
steve1965!
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 03, 2016, 05:14:51 PM
 #1253

https://s32.postimg.org/q6fgnp0d1/Not_Really.png

Cant post images yet but at least you can click the link and look for yourself.



Very Nice!

36 blocks?

SHA256 multi-algo pool?

You need to compare CKPool to Nicehash.  You will see that Nicehash is not so Nice on the wallet.  Check out some stats at:  http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/?view=flipcard

Multi-algo even though I can only mine SHA-256 Coins nicehash is mining alt coins behind my back "FIGURE OF SPEECH" and putting the profit in there pocket.
soyab0007
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 03, 2016, 05:33:33 PM
 #1254

I am planning for 2 x S9 purchase

just having a doubt, few are saying that mining wont be profitable after halving

Is it true?
sidehack
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1849

Curmudgeonly hardware guy


View Profile
July 03, 2016, 05:40:55 PM
 #1255

If there is any mining at all after the halving, the S9 will be the most profitable machine in terms of revenue minus operating cost. Whether that accrued profit will ever exceed initial cost is a different question.

Cool, quiet and up to 1TH pod miner, on sale now!
Currently in development - 200+GH USB stick; 6TH volt-adjustable S1/3/5 upgrade kit
Server PSU interface boards and cables. USB and small-scale miners. Hardware hosting, advice and odd-jobs. Supporting the home miner community since 2013 - http://www.gekkoscience.com
citronick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080


---- winter*juvia -----


View Profile
July 03, 2016, 06:09:56 PM
 #1256



Cant post images yet but at least you can click the link and look for yourself.



Very Nice!

36 blocks?

SHA256 multi-algo pool?

You need to compare CKPool to Nicehash.  You will see that Nicehash is not so Nice on the wallet.  Check out some stats at:  http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/?view=flipcard

Multi-algo even though I can only mine SHA-256 Coins nicehash is mining alt coins behind my back "FIGURE OF SPEECH" and putting the profit in there pocket.


LOL... you might as well point it to zpool.ca:3333 and get real BTCs  Cheesy

If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
Erumara
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100

I mine because math


View Profile
July 03, 2016, 06:30:31 PM
 #1257




Pictured above: Real BTC's  Grin

Always hashing for the community. Oh, and dollars.
QuadrigaCX -Your North American Exchange- https://www.quadrigacx.com/?ref=h0een92jnww3mhxsekv3mqau -Get Verified Today!
drazah
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 04, 2016, 01:42:19 AM
 #1258

I am planning for 2 x S9 purchase

just having a doubt, few are saying that mining wont be profitable after halving

Is it true?

Most profit depends on your expenses. Like your electricity cost? Are you running it in your house, if so its going to be hot and you may need more cooling, etc etc. But I still think its profitable. I just purchased my first S9 and plan to get more soon. The efficiency is there and I am in a good spot for electricity.
sloopy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 501


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=905210.msg


View Profile
July 04, 2016, 03:31:16 AM
 #1259






This is the first S9 purchase I made, which has been stable running on Kano.Is. It has been within hashrate spec, and overall I think everything is as expected. (I have learned what to expect over my many BM purchases so when I say "as expected" I do not mean to infer there are not many things which should be handled differently, I mean it is as expected, and I was fortunate to receive this unit as it is.)

It is a Batch 1, which I had reservations about after the S7 fiasco, but as usual, there were not many choices for "after the halving" gear. That is not what this post is about, so please refrain from debating it being a sound purchase, halving effectiveness, etc.

This, is a Hardware question, which I have seen at least one other person post about but I have not found much in the way of answers.

I have one hash board generating almost all HW errors.
This is the first time bitmain has shown us this on the GUI (to my memory.)
So, one question I wonder is how common it is for one board to cause the majority of the HW errors?

Is it a warranty item? It is hard enough to get Bitmain to pay attention to warranty claims unless going through Yoshi, and he and I are in talks regarding a different purchase but he couldn't get me one out the door fast enough for me to play with so I ordered direct. I have not spoken with Bitmain about this, as again that would not get me anywhere near the reasonable responses I usually read here and I thank all of you in advance for such. This is one of the reasons I love this community, like a family there are those of us who do not get along, but we can still have intelligent conversations with positive outcomes.

So back on topic, how many of you are seeing this same thing, and what are your thoughts from both a technical and ideological viewpoint?
Should I try swapping the physical position of the board?
Swap complete electrical connections with another board?
What about a warranty pursuit? Sincerely it would come out of my pocket to get anything done reasonably fast because I would really buy it if it is even available. I don't want to be down.

My technical concern is this is a sign of a board which is failing, and I will end up down because of it. I prefer to be proactive.
Maybe I should swap it with one of the batch 2 unit hash boards and downclock it? Hmmm, just talking that point out, I have not downclocked the unit to see if I can reduce those HW errors, maybe that should be the first thing I do?

I think many of us believe Bitmain are finishing up the recent batches with lower grade chips. Maybe I have one which they considered fine due to the overall hash and error rates being within spec? What is the "spec" on HW errors.

How would you approach this with Bitmain?

Thanks again for input.

By the way, this is running on the Finksy / Jabber 2880 bo board with a 2880 PSU without any other hardware connected to this PSU. I originally set it up this way because I always burn in my units on individual power supplies so I know nothing else is a variable. This one has been left this way until I had time to sort through this particular issue.
I plan to move it to a 4k setup from Jabber / Finksy with another S9 once I complete the burn in on that unit.




Transaction fees go to the pools and the pools decide to pay them to the miners. Anything else, including off-chain solutions are stealing and not the way Bitcoin was intended to function.
Make the block size set by the pool. Pool = miners and they get the choice.
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4130
Merit: 7907


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
July 04, 2016, 04:01:37 AM
 #1260






This is the first S9 purchase I made, which has been stable running on Kano.Is. It has been within hashrate spec, and overall I think everything is as expected. (I have learned what to expect over my many BM purchases so when I say "as expected" I do not mean to infer there are not many things which should be handled differently, I mean it is as expected, and I was fortunate to receive this unit as it is.)

It is a Batch 1, which I had reservations about after the S7 fiasco, but as usual, there were not many choices for "after the halving" gear. That is not what this post is about, so please refrain from debating it being a sound purchase, halving effectiveness, etc.

This, is a Hardware question, which I have seen at least one other person post about but I have not found much in the way of answers.

I have one hash board generating almost all HW errors.
This is the first time bitmain has shown us this on the GUI (to my memory.)
So, one question I wonder is how common it is for one board to cause the majority of the HW errors?

Is it a warranty item? It is hard enough to get Bitmain to pay attention to warranty claims unless going through Yoshi, and he and I are in talks regarding a different purchase but he couldn't get me one out the door fast enough for me to play with so I ordered direct. I have not spoken with Bitmain about this, as again that would not get me anywhere near the reasonable responses I usually read here and I thank all of you in advance for such. This is one of the reasons I love this community, like a family there are those of us who do not get along, but we can still have intelligent conversations with positive outcomes.

So back on topic, how many of you are seeing this same thing, and what are your thoughts from both a technical and ideological viewpoint?
Should I try swapping the physical position of the board?
Swap complete electrical connections with another board?
What about a warranty pursuit? Sincerely it would come out of my pocket to get anything done reasonably fast because I would really buy it if it is even available. I don't want to be down.

My technical concern is this is a sign of a board which is failing, and I will end up down because of it. I prefer to be proactive.
Maybe I should swap it with one of the batch 2 unit hash boards and downclock it? Hmmm, just talking that point out, I have not downclocked the unit to see if I can reduce those HW errors, maybe that should be the first thing I do?

I think many of us believe Bitmain are finishing up the recent batches with lower grade chips. Maybe I have one which they considered fine due to the overall hash and error rates being within spec? What is the "spec" on HW errors.

How would you approach this with Bitmain?

Thanks again for input.

By the way, this is running on the Finksy / Jabber 2880 bo board with a 2880 PSU without any other hardware connected to this PSU. I originally set it up this way because I always burn in my units on individual power supplies so I know nothing else is a variable. This one has been left this way until I had time to sort through this particular issue.
I plan to move it to a 4k setup from Jabber / Finksy with another S9 once I complete the burn in on that unit.






Lower the clock to 625 run for a day see what happens.

I have five of these  they all like lower clocks.

My take on that board is it wants a lower clock .

Now it could be the 2880 breakout board is failing and you should measure every  pcie jack.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 ... 352 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!