Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[el_rlee]

Good job for v1.1.  The Linux version is a bit faster than my optimized silentarmy kernel... for now.  :-)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1671021.0

Exactly what I experienced.

With claymore I'm getting 32H/s with my 380X's - with amd gpu pro drivers. The nerdralph-silentarmy miner makes around 27 or so...

Does anybody know a way to squeeze a little more out of my cards? Would using the recommended driver make more hashes? Thanks!

[CoolnQuiet]

The version 1.1 beta reports the total speed as H/s instead of Sol/s like version 1.0. However, actually it is Sol/s not H/s since when I check my speed on my nicehash page it says so. Then, there is a typo needs to be fixed. As everybody involved in Zcash knows that 1 H/s equals 2 Sol/s.  

[blimeyfool]

Claymore - you are CRAZY man!!! 38sol/s from old r7 370\2G!!!! I'm confused! GREAT!

Hi - Relative newbie here, but I've got a beginning rig up running with the same card (Sapphire if it matters, Win10 with 16.9.2 drivers).   I've been reading as many threads as I can keep up with, but I still have a couple of questions.  I'm getting about 33 H/s according to the miner.  How does H/s relate to sol/s?  Have you done any tuning?  I'm not sure if I'm up to modding the bios in this card, but if there are any memory/temp settings in config.txt that you can share, it would be most appreciated!  Thanks in advance for sharing as well as all of the fantastic information on the boards and in the community!!

[Claymore]

The new 1.1 gives me 100% rejected shares on suprnova havent tested any other pools but since i dont need any of the features of 1.1 and i like suprnova.

May be wrong credentials in your command line or config.txt? For such issues I need to see the log file.

The version 1.1 beta reports the total speed as H/s instead of Sol/s like version 1.0. However, actually it is Sol/s not H/s since when I check my speed on my nicehash page it says so. Then, there is a typo needs to be fixed. As everybody involved in Zcash knows that 1 H/s equals 2 Sol/s.  

Both v1.0 and v1.1 report speed in H/s. Miner does not send any hashrate info to pool. Your pool may calculate speed in Sol/s, but it is not related to the miner. Again: all versions of the miner show speed in H/s.

[Hotmetal]

Linux v1.1 binary: So many DevFee failures, timeouts etc..

DevFee: ZEC: Authorization failed
: {"id":2,"result":false,"error":[0,"Failed",null]}
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:02:02 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (257 ms)!
GPU0 t=43C fan=56%, GPU1 t=40C fan=56%, GPU2 t=42C fan=56%, GPU3 t=39C fan=56%, GPU4 t=40C fan=56%, GPU5 t=41C fan=56%
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:02:08 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (250 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:02:13 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:02:14 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (15 ms)!
ZEC: Share accepted (249 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:02:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (259 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:02:24 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (266 ms)!
GPU0 t=43C fan=56%, GPU1 t=40C fan=56%, GPU2 t=42C fan=56%, GPU3 t=39C fan=56%, GPU4 t=40C fan=56%, GPU5 t=41C fan=56%
DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'equihash.eu.nicehash.com' <37.58.117.214> port 3357
DevFee: ZEC: Authorization failed
: {"id":2,"result":false,"error":[0,"Failed",null]}
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:02:38 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (256 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:02:42 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (244 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:03:02 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5)
ZEC: Share accepted (248 ms)!
GPU0 t=43C fan=56%, GPU1 t=40C fan=56%, GPU2 t=42C fan=56%, GPU3 t=38C fan=56%, GPU4 t=40C fan=56%, GPU5 t=41C fan=56%
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:03:10 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
ZEC: Share accepted (247 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:03:10 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (242 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'equihash.eu.nicehash.com' <5.153.50.217> port 3357
GPU0 t=43C fan=56%, GPU1 t=41C fan=56%, GPU2 t=41C fan=56%, GPU3 t=39C fan=56%, GPU4 t=40C fan=56%, GPU5 t=41C fan=56%
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:03:46 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:03:46 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:03:46 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (149 ms)!
ZEC: Share accepted (272 ms)!
ZEC: Share accepted (352 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:03:55 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (251 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:03:56 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (245 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:03:57 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5)
ZEC: Share accepted (239 ms)!
GPU0 t=43C fan=56%, GPU1 t=41C fan=56%, GPU2 t=42C fan=56%, GPU3 t=38C fan=56%, GPU4 t=40C fan=56%, GPU5 t=41C fan=56%
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:04:08 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (244 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'equihash.eu.nicehash.com' <5.153.50.217> port 3357
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:04:20 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (250 ms)!
GPU0 t=43C fan=56%, GPU1 t=40C fan=56%, GPU2 t=42C fan=56%, GPU3 t=39C fan=56%, GPU4 t=40C fan=56%, GPU5 t=41C fan=56%
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:04:39 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (264 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:04:47 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (246 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:04:50 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (244 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:04:54 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (255 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:04:58 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (243 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'equihash.eu.nicehash.com' <5.153.50.217> port 3357
GPU0 t=43C fan=56%, GPU1 t=40C fan=56%, GPU2 t=41C fan=56%, GPU3 t=38C fan=56%, GPU4 t=40C fan=56%, GPU5 t=41C fan=56%
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:05:09 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (245 ms)!
ZEC: 11/05/16-21:05:15 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (264 ms)!
DevFee: ZEC: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...

[Hotmetal]

Good job for v1.1.  The Linux version is a bit faster than my optimized silentarmy kernel... for now.  :-)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1671021.0

Nay, your version is actually faster than Claymore's on my RX480's

[CoinPro69]

There is a bug with the dev fee. It can't connect...

https://img3.picload.org/image/rdicgwdi/2016-11-05_20-14-43.jpg

[adaseb]

I am still getting 1% rejected shares overall with version 1.1 on Nicehash (to mine BTC pool not ZEC)

[Lafu]

Version 1.1 runs stable no issue again fine nice work claymore  !

[YIz]

Are there any performance improvements planned for the next versions?

[thiagobangu]

Version 1.1 runs stable no issue again fine nice work claymore  !

Will have dual version Claymore ??

[chumurk]

Hello Prompt why rx 470 msi 4gb rate of 33 sol?
how to make 40+ sol?
00:19:47:197   177c   ZEC - Total Speed: 132.721 H/s, Total Shares: 16, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
00:19:47:199   177c   ZEC: GPU0 32.669 H/s, GPU1 34.544 H/s, GPU2 32.995 H/s, GPU3 32.514 H/s
00:19:49:969   11a8   GPU0 t=48C fan=59%, GPU1 t=49C fan=58%, GPU2 t=55C fan=58%, GPU3 t=51C fan=58%

[CoolnQuiet]

There is a bug with the dev fee. It can't connect...

add to the config file as a line again "-allpools 1". Eventhough Claymore says there is no need for nicehash to put this line, actually it seems still needed.

[Prelektro]

Since flypool is stabile enough i didn't set epools file for failover pools but i decided to do that just to guarantee mining nonstop. After that, i get this error in red text at the beginning of miner start : "no address specified - ignore". It seems it's not a problem since i'm mining with no problem whatsoever. I checked my epools.txt, it seems in order but maybe i'm missing something. I'm just curious what creates that error?

[tytanick]

i can confirm that its working faster and for now stable
Also id there will be option with dual mining ?
 I heard that we can add ethereum as second miner and it will be more profit overall.

[DevonMiner]

Since flypool is stabile enough i didn't set epools file for failover pools but i decided to do that just to guarantee mining nonstop. After that, i get this error in red text at the beginning of miner start : "no address specified - ignore". It seems it's not a problem since i'm mining with no problem whatsoever. I checked my epools.txt, it seems in order but maybe i'm missing something. I'm just curious what creates that error?

I've had that a couple of times as well: "no address specified - ignore". I did just that and ignored it ... all is well. My conclusion was it failed to connect to fly pool first time round, and then connected OK when it retried. Version 1.1 stable so far after an hour.

[scavern]

Great job as always Claymore!

Looking forward to future optimized releases 

[Claymore]

Since flypool is stabile enough i didn't set epools file for failover pools but i decided to do that just to guarantee mining nonstop. After that, i get this error in red text at the beginning of miner start : "no address specified - ignore". It seems it's not a problem since i'm mining with no problem whatsoever. I checked my epools.txt, it seems in order but maybe i'm missing something. I'm just curious what creates that error?

Copy default epools.txt and remove all "#" characters from it to enable sample pools in it, do not change anything else, we just want to test. Start miner with default "config.txt", it will write at the beginning "ZEC: 5 pools specified". Four in epools.txt and fifth (main) pool in config.txt. If you see red text about ignoring pool it means that you specified it incorrectly in epools.txt and you need to see sample pools in epools.txt as example and may be read Readme.

[Golku]

Great job claymore!!

Getting 90 sols with rx 480 4gb and rx 470 4gb

[Jinx99]

Claymore ZEC 1.1
4*Sapphire RX 480 Nitro + OC 8 GB
Modded ROM, 1150-1175 GPU clock, 2150-2175 Mem clock